The burst of light in that so-called "flash frame" (the super-flash of light came and went in one video frame; actually, half-a-frame according to the Naudet DVD) appeared in its first airing (Univision seems to have aired it before any other network in the U.S., at around 12:41 a.m. EDT 9/12) and the DVD on which the videographer relased it. People who saw it before going to bed that night knew that 9/11 was a hoax. Now, the existence of the evidence is not denied, it is just not considered.
It takes a special kind of group of disinformationists to not only get people to ignore the obvious but to get them to help the government suppress it!
When a "911 truth" movement's 'leaders' don't and won't call upon the government to answer the questions that the government obviously does not want asked, that is a recipe for one constipated movement.
______________________________________
911blimp (not verified) on Tue, 01/24/2006 - 11:22am.
hi. wanted to make sure
hi. wanted to make sure y'all saw my freeway blog i did last december.
[img]http://static.flickr.com/42/76281532_6e54dba419_m.jpg[/img]
not sure if images can be posted on here, the link is
http://static.flickr.com/42/76281532_6e54dba419_m.jpg
Residents fight to include
Residents fight to include WTC steel in 9/11 memorial
http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060122/NEWS02...
Looks like some people just want to forget about 9/11 now.
Al... that's great!
Al... that's great!
That's a good freeway sign,
That's a good freeway sign, alright.
Can someone please explain to me how a "Boeing 767" impacting a WTC tower wall could ever make such a phenomenally brief (no more than 15 milliseconds and probably less, maybe much less) brilliant burst of light??? And while you're at it, I'd also like to know why the 9-11 Commission wouldn't address it, and why the 'leaders' of the "911 truth" movement won't address it (or its omission from the 9-11 Commission Report). And why a careful frame-by-frame of the only known video of the opening salvo of 9/11 has also been so assiduously avoided by all commercial television networks and stations? And why NASA, whose cutting-edge video technology has been used to help solve lesser crimes, was never called upon to give us a better look at this evidence?
The burst of light in that so-called "flash frame" (the super-flash of light came and went in one video frame; actually, half-a-frame according to the Naudet DVD) appeared in its first airing (Univision seems to have aired it before any other network in the U.S., at around 12:41 a.m. EDT 9/12) and the DVD on which the videographer relased it. People who saw it before going to bed that night knew that 9/11 was a hoax. Now, the existence of the evidence is not denied, it is just not considered.
It takes a special kind of group of disinformationists to not only get people to ignore the obvious but to get them to help the government suppress it!
When a "911 truth" movement's 'leaders' don't and won't call upon the government to answer the questions that the government obviously does not want asked, that is a recipe for one constipated movement.
______________________________________