Scholars Repudiate Official Version of 9/11

Scholars claim government's account violates laws of physics and engineering.

UPDATE: Please vote in this poll "Is This an Impressive Group of People?":

(PRWEB) January 27, 2006 -- An influential group of prominent experts and scholars have joined together alleging that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11. The members of this new non-partisan association, "Scholars for 9/11 Truth" (S9/11T), are convinced their research proves the current administration has been dishonest with the nation about events in New York and Washington, D.C.

These experts contend that books and articles by members and associates have established that the World Trade Center was almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions and that the available relevant evidence casts grave doubt on the official story about the attack on the Pentagon. They believe that the government not only permitted 9/11 to occur but may even have orchestrated these events to facilitate its political agenda.

The society includes U.S. and international faculty and students of history, science, military affairs, psychology, and even philosophy. According to its spokesmen, S9/11T represents a concerted effort to uphold the standards of truth and justice and to strengthen democracy in this nation, which has taken a terrible hit in the aftermath of 9/11, when "everything changed." Its function is to bring scientific rigor to the study of 9/11 phenomena.
The society includes numerous notable professors and scholars, including:

• Morgan Reynolds, Texas A & M Professor Emeritus of Economics, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor for President George W. Bush, and former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis

• Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University, co-chair of S9/11T and the creator of its home page and its forum

• Robert M. Bowman, former Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" Space Defense Program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, a former senior Air Force Colonel with 101 combat missions, who is also a Catholic Archbishop

• Lloyd DeMause, Director of The Institute for Psychohistory, President of the International Psychohistorical Association and Editor of The Journal of Psychohistory

• James H. Fetzer, Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Duluth, author or editor of more than 20 books and co-chair of S9/11T

• Daniele Ganser, Senior Researcher at the Center for Security Studies of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

• Andreas Von Buelow, former assistant German defense minister, director of the German Secret Service, minister for research and technology, and member of Parliament for 25 years

Oh that's so nice, I needed

Oh that's so nice, I needed to read that.

A song for the Scholars!

you can check out there

you can check out there website here:

ill add it tommorrow to the side panel.

DailyKOS has just taken down

DailyKOS has just taken down the poll, so your direct link is unfortunately no longer active.

The results:

Is This an Impressive Group of People?

1. Yes: 51%
2. No: 28%
3. Maybe: 19%

Quite in contrast to the comments which at some points reminded me of FreeperVille. But even the more civilized commenters reveal a pitiful lack of research on their part.

We still have a ton of work ahead of us, patiently starting at square one, over and over and over again ...

This link still works:

Sorry - my assumption about

Sorry - my assumption about the poll being closed may have been false *I* get a "not found" message but it could be that this is their way of ensuring that no-one votes twice. It might still work for you. Check it out for yourselves. :)

Seems this story has