Absolutely. In a related story, Air America's Mike Malloy has had a 9/11 lightbulb go off over his head the size of the Caspian Sea oil reserves. Mike is openly calling the Bush administration the "perpetraitors" of the 9/11 attacks, as of his show on Friday.
http://server4.whiterosesociety.org/content/malloy/MalloyShow-(03-02-2006).mp3

The "painted UN plane" is also covered in the London Guardian:
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,,1700881,00.html

You know what I'd like to see? David Ray Griffin giving lectures at Madison Square Garden. (That's where the "Concert For NY" was held.) Of course, the local radio stations might need to get rid of their pro Iraq war status, for conflict of interest :)

I'll see that "Hmmmmm", and raise you some random "reality" quotes:

"The history of the 20th century should have taught us that it is important to shape circumstances before crises emerge, and to meet threats before they become dire." -- PNAC
http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm

"We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities." -- aide to GW Bush
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html
http://www.deeperwants.com/cul1/homeworlds/articles/withoutadoubt.html

"Look, perception becomes reality, but the facts don't back it up." -- Bush spokesman Dan Bartlett
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/whispers/articles/030929/29whisple...

"We are in a process of absorbing the factors of the situation we're in and shedding the unreality that dominated at the beginning." -- senior bush official
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/13/AR200508...

"Perpetual deception of the citizens by those in power is critical (in [Father of neo-conservatism Leo] Strauss's view) because they need to be led, and they need strong rulers to tell them what's good for them.'
....
"Strauss thinks that a political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat," Drury wrote in her book. "Following Machiavelli, he maintains that if no external threat exists, then one has to be manufactured."
http://www.ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=18038

"It is easy to imagine an infinite number of situations . . . where government officials might quite legitimately have reasons to give false information out." -- Ted Olson (husband of Barbara Olson of Flight 77 repute)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentI...

"All war is based on deception." -- Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Why would Saddam be more likely to fire on a U2 painted in UN colors? If the UN had authorized U2 flights (had they?), wouldn't he be as likely to fire on one of them? If the UN hadn't authorized the fake flight, wouldn't the fake immediately be discovered as the UN would deny it had lost a flight, unless the UN was in on the scam, and said one of its flights had been shot down? U2s fly very high- is it likely Saddam's people could've hit one, or even been able to discern the markings? Why use a U2 to provoke shots, a hard target- why not use a lower-flying aircraft? Unless, as w/ Op Nwoods, the plan was actually to blow it up and claim it was shot down, not wait and see if it actually got fired on- so were they going to switch out a genuine U2 flight? They have those connections in the UN? It's possible a fake quote was leaked for whatever reason, wouldn't be the first time- anyone have good answers to these questions?

@ FrankV: Thx for that overview.

Add the grand chessboard, The Clash of civilisations and the PNAC agenda and you have the complete philosophy of these bastards.

I figure this message supports all 9/11 plane swap theories?!