Spitzer Gets Heat for Blocking Aide From 9/11 Testimony

Spitzer blocks top aide from 9/11 Congressional testimony

News from The New York Republican State Committee

For more information: Ryan Moses, (518) 462-2601


Spitzer blocks top aide from 9/11 Congressional testimony

ALBANY, NY -- (02/15/2006; 1230)(EIS) -- New York Republican State Chairman Stephen Minarik today demanded Eliot Spitzer explain why he would brazenly prevent one of his closest advisers from providing testimony to a Congressional panel investigating the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

"Mr. Spitzer needs to come clean, and tell us what is more important than the safety and security of New Yorkers" Minarik said. "Government's number one priority is the safety and security of its citizens. Eliot Spitzer should try to help that, not hinder it."

According to today's New York Post, "the House Armed Services Committee had requested testimony of Deputy Attorney General Dietrich Snell - a former top investigator with the 9/11 commission - at a hearing today on 'Able Danger,' the secret Pentagon cyber intelligence program that allegedly turned up the name of Mohammed Atta, the mastermind of the atrocity... Staff members of Able Danger, who will appear under oath for the first time at today's hearing, claim they had Atta's name and photograph on a chart of al Qaeda suspects in 2000 and that they were blocked by Clinton administration lawyers from sharing their information with the FBI." (Latham/Dicker, NYP, 2/15/06)

In addition, Minarik noted that Spitzer's action was the ultimate in hypocrisy. According to the Chairman, he noted that while speaking at a 2004 Democratic National Convention event, Spitzer himself stated: "We have seen in the 9/11 commission report how many errors we made and how many opportunities were missed." (Savage, NY Sun, 7/30/04)

"I wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Spitzer that the 9/11 Commission report documented critical errors made, and prime opportunities missed," Chairman Minarik continued. "However, Mr. Spitzer must have a feeble memory, or is just a horrible hypocrite. How else can anyone explain Mr. Spitzer shielding a top aide, who formerly served as an investigator with the 9/11 commission, from assisting our nation's efforts to improve our security at home and abroad?"

"Politics and personal interests should never interfere with the safety and security of our people," Chairman Minarik concluded. "Unfortunately, Mr. Spitzer's actions and rank hypocrisy are putting all of us needlessly at risk. New Yorkers and all Americans deserve better."

This is one of the wierdest things to try to figure out. Spitzer prevents his aide from testifying about 9/11 during the Able Danger hearings, and he gets grilled by the 'New York Republican State Committee'. Spitzer never did anything with the information sent to him by concerned citizens regarding 9/11 through the justicefor911.org petition, and now he blocks his aide from even testifying about 9/11 to a somewhat tame Able Danger hearing.

The article seems more than just a bit misleading in labeling the Able Danger hearings as 'a Congressional panel investigating the terrorist attacks of 9/11'. The Able Danger hearings are far short form a full investigation into 9/11, and since when do republican committees care about blocking information related to 9/11?

It seems like members of the 9/11 Commission wants nothing to do with the story of Able Danger. What is going on here?

Thanks Erik for the heads up.

seems only reasonable to

seems only reasonable to contact Mr. Minarik about others who refused to testify publicly under oath like bush and cheney, and who else has helped block investigations into 9/11..

you can find his contact information here:

OT This is off topic, but


This is off topic, but wanted to point out the very first review of Jones' Feb 16 seminar


Keep in mind that "news

Keep in mind that "news reporters" are not only embedded in the Iraq military. The MSM (foreign and domestic) is embedded with government operatives at all levels. 99.99% of any MSM "news" story about 9/11 is theater art and is simply meant to entertain the reader and support the government myth. Here are three simple questions you can ask yourself to help keep from being sucked into this mind controlling cesspool.

1.) Is the story about hijackers? There were no hijackers. If the story creates controversy around the subject of hijackers, the embedded news item should be ignored.

2.) How many times and in what media does the news item appear? Do a Google news search on the news item. The more times you see the news item being repeated in the media, the more you should ignore it.

3.) Did I learn any vital information? How did I feel after reading the "news" story? Very little information of any substance will be released in a news story. The job of the news media is to control our emotions not educate us.

Like creating the Mark Bingham (the gay hero) web site on 9/12/01, here is another one of their screw ups:


To AmandaReconwith: Your

To AmandaReconwith:

Your points 2 and 3 are good to keep in mind as GENERAL indications, though to treat them as gospel strikes me as wrong and possibly fanatical.

As for 1), I'm not sure whether or not there were ANY hijackers, and one of my pet theories is that the planes were remote-controlled, thus obviating the absolute need for hijackers.

Never the less, I also definitely believe that Atta was a drug running intelligence asset, and resolving the question of WHY he was treated with kid gloves does 2 things:

1) reminds the public about 911 being overflowing with unresolved questions, many of tem pointing to treason; most of the public has put 911 behind them

2) focusses attention on the high level interference with proper intelligence gathering - a level so high that it doubtless goes all the way to the White House.

I forgot to add: Atta was

I forgot to add: Atta was doubtless the "official patsy", who, I tend to believe (because his father told us he spoke to him on 9/12), survived the hijackings and thus was not a hijacker.

Since the "cell phone" calls from the airliners can be explained as phony using voice simulation technology, we could also explain Atta's call to his father as such, and thus the purpose of such a phony call is to interject more disinfo into the "mix".

In either case, it's inconceivable to me that Atta was not designated the "official ringleader patsy" long before 911.

As such, he needed to be protected from getting busted, and Able Danger revelations are pointing at exactly such an immunity. Thus, I don't think your concerns about Weldon's efforts have any substance, at all.

Hopefully, we will find out for sure, one way or another. Till then, I think we should encourage Weldon (while not getting our hopes up too high - the US government consistently fails to investigate and prosecute political murders in the US, from that of JRK, RFK, MLK, Oklahoma City, to 911)

What do you expect from the

What do you expect from the PET GOAT, ( President Elect Traitor - Gives Official Attack Tales), who made these statements.

“I don’t give a goddamn,” Bush retorted. “I’m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way.”

“Mr. President,” one aide in the meeting said. “There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.”

“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”

I’ve talked to three people present for the meeting that day and they all confirm that the President of the United States called the Constitution “a goddamned piece of paper.”

The PET GOAT has a "long tail!

Yes, Amanda's link (above)

Yes, Amanda's link (above) to the news story about Flight 93 landing in Cleveland is another smoking gun! How can this be explained?

Also, seems Atta & Moussaoui were spaced-out kooks who make fine patsies. Even if/when captured, they couldn't reveal any gov't conspiracy because they're nuts. Gov't bonus - as more people began suggesting "al Qaeda" is trumped-up fantasy, they get Moussaoui to scream, "I am al Qaeda!" at his "trial" as if on cue.



Read my comments in the second article...

Spitzer has long-range

Spitzer has long-range political goals, so he's tits on a bull from now on.

I happen to know that -

I happen to know that - unbeknownst to anyone - while in prison Moussaui legally had his name changed to Alfred Kida.

He tried to tell us, but we didn't listen!!!!