UAE Port Security Deal Spurns Uproar From 9/11 Families

The Bush Administration "Hobnobs" With 9/11 Co-Conspirators - Jon Gold

Recently, the Committee on Foreign Investment approved a $6.8 Billion deal allowing a United Arab Emirates (UAE) based company, Dubai Ports World, to "oversee operations at six U.S. ports". The cities in which those ports sit are Philadelphia, New York, New Jersey, Baltimore, Miami and New Orleans.

The problem with this deal is that the UAE, through banks in Dubai, launders terrorist money. They are also alleged to have links to two of the alleged 9/11 hijackers.

Michael Chertoff came to the defense of the deal by saying, "We make sure there are assurances in place, in general, sufficient to satisfy us that the deal is appropriate from a national security standpoint." Thanks Michael. That sure makes me feel safer. Especially when you take into account how you handled Katrina. Please resign immediately.

Rep. Charles Schummer (D-NY) says the President "should override the agreement and conduct a special investigation into the matter." I agree with him. How could an organization like the UAE, a co-conspirator in the 9/11 attacks, have gotten a deal to oversee our ports?

Security fears over P&O sale - Times Online

However, Lindsey Graham, a Republican Senator, described the Administration’s decision as “unbelievably tone deaf politically”. He added: “Most Americans are scratching their head wondering why this company, from this region, now.”

Hillary Clinton, a New York Senator and front-runner for the next Democratic presidential nomination, is threatening legislation to block the take-over, saying that “our port security is too important to be placed in the hands of foreign governments”.

Charles Schumer, a Democratic Senator, has called on President Bush personally to “override the agreement and conduct a special investigation into the matter”. He was joined at a press conference by family members of September 11 victims, including Peter Gadiel and Bill Doyle, both of whom lost their sons in the attacks.

Mr Gadiel said: “I’m a lifelong Republican and I think the President’s gone insane.” Mr Doyle said: “We’re not securing our country in any way by selling our ports to foreigners.”

If people still seriously think the 'war on terror' is real, or that we are really worried about our security, they should really catch up. Obviously the Bush administration isn't too worried about our ports being attacked, wonder why?

Admittedly, the article I

Admittedly, the article I wrote isn't that great. It was just to get the point across... I write better when I'm "inspired".

only in the new american

only in the new american century could bushco claim that 19 arabs were responsible for a new pearl harbor and then turn around and sell the operations of 6 U.S. ports to an arab company.

My latest update of book on

My latest update of book on 9/11 and US government conspiracies.

Some new original research on demolition techniques, and liberal (but cited) borrowing of others work.

pdf format, about 9 MB, with lots of photos, analysis, and commentary.

Hope you enjoy and more importantly, learn something new.

See torrent details for more information:

http://conspiracycentral.net:6969/stats.html?info_hash=fd100685bf68f4f40...

"How could an organization

"How could an organization like the UAE, a co-conspirator in the 9/11 attacks, have gotten a deal to oversee our ports?"

So Jon Gold knows that the UAE was behind 9/11? This sounds like the Michael Moore 'The Saudis Did It!' position.

activist, i personally think

activist,

i personally think that a number of countries were in on it.. top of the list for me: U.S., Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan.. i dont think was a sole U.S. operation..

So Jon Gold knows that the

So Jon Gold knows that the UAE was behind 9/11? This sounds like the Michael Moore 'The Saudis Did It!' position.

What dz said.

Incidentally... why do you

Incidentally... why do you think I used the phrase, "co-conspirator"?

well, and the point is that

well, and the point is that they try to tell us that boogie men tied with the UAE attacked us on 9/11, then turn around and sell out some of our biggest ports to them.. which is just screaming out that they have no concern, which further invalidates the scare tactics and loss of freedoms and tax dollars to 'protect us'..

"only in the new american

"only in the new american century could bushco claim that 19 arabs were responsible for a new pearl harbor and then turn around and sell the operations of 6 U.S. ports to an arab company."

Likewise, the gov't quietly relaxed restrictions on bringing sharp objects onto planes a few months ago. Utilizing such objects was CRUCIAL to the (supposed) terrorists 9/11 hijackings. So why is it suddenly okay to bring these (supposed) deadly weapons back onto planes again?

And what James Ha said also.

And what James Ha said also.

Another painfully obvious

Another painfully obvious ploy for Bush to show how GOOD they are at security. "We can sell our ports to Arab states, and STILL here's no terrorist attacks? You know why? It's the WIRETAPPING, stupid!"

I love when politicians

I love when politicians promote the fact that we haven't been hit since 9/11.... In order to make the "War On Terror" justified...

We all know the real reason is because our Government's ability to strike its' own people diminishes with each attack. After every attack, more and more people wake up to how our Government works, making it harder for them to attack us.

That's not to say they won't, but it makes them more cautious of doing so. Instead, they have to rely on the fear mongering of the media, and the "Terror Alerts", etc...

9/11 woke A LOT of people up. If there is another "attack", Martial Law will be instituted almost immediately.

That's not to say the next

That's not to say the next attack won't not be the genuine article. Lord knows we've made a lot of REAL enemies over the last 5 years.

Won't be...

Won't be...

The Invisible Hand unbound

The Invisible Hand unbound has returned to its old ways! Freedom-loving supernational corporations will feed and care for you!

"This territory is now under: Martial Law" (music)
http://images.indymedia.org/imc/seattle/media/2003/12/237266.mp3

The Amazing Piloting Skills

The Amazing Piloting Skills of the 9/11 'Hijackers'

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2006/210206impossibility.htm

The reason I used Abu Dhabi

The reason I used Abu Dhabi airport in my script for "The Hornet's Nest" is because I kept seeing UAE jets parked in strange out of the way places here in Cleveland right after 9/11. I think that this UAE port thing in the news is a hoot. "The Hornet's Nest" is a movie about international bankers and how they used crime families and the secret services from several powerful countries to pull off 9/11. (laundered drug money financed 9/11- there were no 19 hijackers, but there were 19 drug couriers) This is why UA 93's last flight is to Abu Dhabi airport.

http://mysyed.com/travel/ae_abu_dhabi_airport.jpg

The problem with the Bush

The problem with the Bush administration's support for a move by a United Arab Emirates-based firm to take over operation of six major American ports is not that the corporation in question is Arab owned.

The problem is that it that Dubai Ports World is a corporation.
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0221-27.htm