POLL: 9/11 Conspiracy or Not?

By definition, a conspiracy occurs when two or more people get together to plan something illegal or immoral. Based on that, 9/11 was a conspiracy regardless of who was behind it.

However, to those still brainwashed and in denial due to the government propaganda technique known as "conspiracy theory", a conspiracy usually equates to anything that goes against the government party line and should be dismissed without a second thought.

So, based on this, was 9/11 a conspiracy? Vote here:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/2/25/154011/415#39

Who orchestrated 9/11?

  • Neoconservatives (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Rove, Perle, et al.)
  • Al Qaeda (Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, et al.)
  • Both Neoconservatives and Al Qaeda working together
  • Some other group

My cousin is a structural

My cousin is a structural engineer with the firm that built #7 and close to retirement. I asked him about his take on it and collapse of #7.

His words-

"I don't want to discuss this with you or anyone, ever. I have a family to think about, you jerk, and what's done is done. I don't ever want to discuss this with you again."

That might explain a little bit the reticence of those who ought to be "crawling out of the woodwork" to expose this.

They're scared to death.

Hey Norton, thats

Hey Norton, thats interesting isn't it? Why so scared, has he been threatened already?

That is why simply spreading the word is so important, there is safety in numbers, the more people that know the better.

Spread flyers around, when you walk through parking lots, put them on windshields. Leave them in display cases at malls, rest areas, etc. Tack them to bulletin boards everywhere you go.

Here's a good one to get you started:

http://www.911blogger.com/flyers/BushKnew.pdf

Re above: I think many

Re above: I think many people are afraid to come forward. They don't want to risk having a "burning tire" put around their neck (I think this was Dan Rather's remark about reporting 9/11 truth.) Conversely, it must be difficult to continually play "The Emperor Has No Clothes" if one really knows the true story.

My current vote is PNAC loving NeoCons M.I.H.O.P. using al Queda as fall guys. (Some al-Queda-type kooks may have willingly or unknowingly helped in some smaller aspects of the overall plot.)

that Mia person on DailyKOS

that Mia person on DailyKOS is working overtime. hahahaha, i wonder whos paying her/him?they are getting very scared.look at the progress we are making as a movement.they are dedicating state department web pages to debunking us.they are creating bullshit websites like 911myths.com to debunk us.they are most likely sending people to websites like KOS,etc.(maybe even here!) to try and discredit us.we should feel very good about the past few weekes. ive seen noticable change.

i voted for none of the

i voted for none of the above.Al-Qaeda were patsies, but so were the Bush Administration for the most part.(except Cheney and a few select others.)in my opinion.

and i noticed on the KOS

and i noticed on the KOS board that the excuse they are using a lot is the fact that this administration is so inept(katrina,Iraq,etc.) that they couldnt possibly have "done" 9/11.we need to be clearer about that.it doesnt take a whole administration.just a few key people in key positions.we gotta stress that in my opinion.

After reading the comments

After reading the comments over at DailyKos these are the three that stuck in my mind. At least they are the most straightforward. I appreciate honesty.

*****************
For all their evils... (none / 1)

I cannot and will not believe 9/11 was anything more then an al Qaeda plot.

by AUBoy2007 on Sat Feb 25, 2006 at 02:30:39 PM PDT
*****************

*****************
It's said (none / 0)

...? I still think Al Queada operationalized 9/11. As an American, I can not let myself believe that any president would sacrifice 3000 lives for political hegemony. What I will say ...

by never forget 2000 on Sat Feb 25, 2006 at 03:36:14 PM PDT
*****************

*****************
I just find this so sad... (none / 1)

It's sad and quite frankly stupid. Bush and the neo-cons are not evil, they're just wrong.
Sorry to be insulting but the tinfoil hat stuff is just plain dumb.

by Puddinhead Wilson on Sat Feb 25, 2006 at 04:11:04 PM PDT
*****************

Luckily the percentage of people that just don't want to know is obviously diminishing of late. The rate of opinion change is really taking off. Unfortunately people that are exhibiting signs of COGNITIVE DISSONANCE also tend to be the most vocal. Often purposely giving a website reader the impression that they represent the majority of... whoever.

Personally, I don't waste time engaging people who are incapable of believing the US Gov would kill 3000 Americans. Are they really not aware of the genocide carried out against Native Americans? Perhaps they've never studied South or Central American history? And of course... Iraq (!?)

The current KOS poll results seem to be going nicely.
Maybe someone could remind their readers of the Zogby poll conducted in NY back in '04?

In my opinion, we don't need to convince everyone, just a large enough percentage. Of course if you have the energy and time to engage everyone, more power to you.

I'll remain active in my own way.
http://www.indymedia.org/en/2006/02/833988.shtml

I just posted.

I just posted.

seriously Jon, you need to

seriously Jon, you need to put that Mia person in their place. clearly a plant. ive noticed his/her comments have being going on virtually the whole time it has been posted, and he/she has an answer for everything.latest defense:signifacant debris actually hit WTC7 and caused it to fall.
GIVE ME A FRIGGIN BREAK!!!!!! somebody put that puppet/agent/jackass in their place.

"Personally, I don't waste

"Personally, I don't waste time engaging people who are incapable of believing the US Gov would kill 3000 Americans. Are they really not aware of the genocide carried out against Native Americans? Perhaps they've never studied South or Central American history? And of course... Iraq (!?)"

Yes. Another prime example is Hitler, Nazi Germany & the concentration camps. Most Germans will say they never, ever dreamed such atrocities could possibly take place in their society. (And this wasn't 500 A.D. folks, it happened only 60 years ago!)

"seriously Jon, you need to

"seriously Jon, you need to put that Mia person in their place. clearly a plant. ive noticed his/her comments have being going on virtually the whole time it has been posted, and he/she has an answer for everything.latest defense:signifacant debris actually hit WTC7 and caused it to fall. GIVE ME A FRIGGIN BREAK!!!!!! somebody put that puppet/agent/jackass in their place."

Where is their latest post?

pretty close to yours.

pretty close to yours.

Ok... I said

Daily Kos is a Left

Daily Kos is a Left Gatekeeper, and the poll choices reflect that. Selections are, neocons, al CIAduh, or some mix. Nothing about the bankster/MIC/NWO oligarchs who control both the repugnicrats and the demublicans. Even though the demublicans have been perfectly complicit in the patriot act, war rubber stamping, fake voting blackbox, etc game.

Kos wants their flock to believe its a viable, ideologically opposed 2 party system, and if we can just evict the neocons and get the demublicans back in power we'll really make a difference and get back on track.

exactly Poopy, which is why

exactly Poopy, which is why i voted for none of the above.buncha fuckin patsies.

cool Jon, but you should ask

cool Jon, but you should ask her who she works for. hahaha.

Chris... watch the master.

Chris... watch the master.

She's taking forever.

She's taking forever.

uh...so this was my post

uh...so this was my post over at dailykos. I had a feeling that there were more people over there that questioned the official story. Now we have a little insight into what that community thinks. It's interesting that although over 75% of the people think that the neocons were somehow involved, this idea has NOT ONCE been posted about on the front page.

Those in the "liberal blogosphere" love to claim that the DC Dems are too "inside the bubble". But unfortunately, they themselves have fallen into the same trap as those that they despise for.

Watch the master??? OK, tell

Watch the master???

OK, tell me when you need me....

i know the choices aren't

i know the choices aren't the best, but i didn't want to make it too complicated. I wanted an overall feel for what the community thinks. We can get into the dynamics of that later. But for now, we see that Kos is being a gatekeeper, even if he thinks he isn't.

The master... I ask

The master... I ask questions Neocon's refuse to answer. ;)

I'm one of the two people

I'm one of the two people who chose "Some other group" as their choice.

I recently changed to LIHOP (afa the Bush administration) after some deep thinking, based on the following:

1. No evidence supporting the Bush administration planting explosives in the WTC, or planning the drone aircrafts. (Or course they did "assist", such as Cheney not shooting down the plane headed for the Pentagon.)

2. The US is not run by their government, but instead by the Forture 500 and private bankers

3. PNAC called for a new "Pearl Harbor", not a new "Reichstag Fire"

If Dailykos did not bunch Bush administration members in with neocons, I would have voted for neocons! Of course, PNAC members are neocons... I'm still thinking about that one

afa the third choice, neos and Al Qaeda, there's no evidence that the so called hijackers were even on the planes. So that choice is out.

IMO.. things are working out exactly how the "secret government" wants things to. People are blaming the Bush administation. When they are removed, the secret government will still be in power.

Polls like in Dailykos are not helping matters. For they brainwash people into thinking that if it was neocons, then PNAC and/or the Bush regime must have been involved in the orchestration. But their is zero evidence.

Let's not forget the

Let's not forget the Pentagon & Flight 93.

:)

Yes, that's true. Cheney has

Yes, that's true. Cheney has the fake flight 93 shot down over PA. And he probably ordered the plane that hit the Pentagon to not be shot down. But did he actually plan and setup the drone crafts in the first place?

also a question...... is

also a question...... is there any evidence suggesting how the WTC got wired? Other than the South Tower power down, and W's brother being one of the directors of security?

I just responded to Mia.

I just responded to Mia. Let me know how it turns out.

the plant did her job. shes

the plant did her job. shes gone now.

The phrase "left gatekeeper"

The phrase "left gatekeeper" is disinformative: It helps prevent people from being able to think about gatekeepers/gatekeeping without them being sucked [back] into the false/fake/phony Left-Right paradigm. If you can't say/think "gatekeeper" without saying/thinking "left gatekeeper" then the propaganda has taken its toll on you!

I've spoken with Karl W. Koch, the engineer who ran the company which erected the steel for the WTC. He acted dumbfounded (but not scared) when I pointed out to him that, at the moment of the collapse, the steel his family company had erected and which had supported the towers for 30 years suddenly offered no resistance to the "collapses" whatsoever.

Back on original topic, it is a divisive diversive distraction to worry about "who orchestrated it" when so many of us remain so clueless about what "it" really was (ie, supposedly-intelligent people now trying to blame all that supernatural heat and excessive damage on a few backpacks' worth of "thermite"?)!

The real main true serious point is that it is a preposterous absurdity to keep blaming 9/11 on "evil suicidal Muslim 'hijackers'", regardless of "who dunnit". (It is wrong, and misdirective, to foster the belief that we must provide our own truth and culprits before we can dissect and demolish the government's lies.)
______________________________________

> Maybe someone could remind

> Maybe someone could remind their readers
> of the Zogby poll conducted in NY back in '04?

It would be good to see Zogby run that poll again, and see if there's progress. Maybe someone in the US should raise a fund and pay Zogby, or any other more or less reliably poll co to do a more detailed and extensive (nationwide) poll.

Not to say the Kos poll is no indication, but internet polls do tend to give tainted results.

i would love to see a nation

i would love to see a nation wide poll on 9/11, not just a New York poll.that would be interesting to see.

HAHAHAHAHA, that agent over

HAHAHAHAHA, that agent over at KOS, Mia, is still working overtime trying to defend the government. the bitch even brought up the P.M. hit-piece. HAHAHAHAHA, too fucking typical.i was wating for her to drop that one on us.hahahaha.

I just outed Mia. Her

I just outed Mia. Her evidence is the 9/11 Report.

"My evidence? The NIST report. The 9/11 commision report. The eyewitness accounts of the crashes. The phone calls from people in the planes."

You guys have fun now. Anything she says from this point on is utter nonsense.

Jon....i'm in awe watching

Jon....i'm in awe watching you work her over there. (and i'm learning a few things new things!)

:)

:)

Ian C. If you stand your

Ian C. If you stand your ground, you can't lose. Facts are facts. Just because Neocons say something over and over and over again doesn't mean it's the truth. They like to think it becomes the truth, but for those of us in the "know", it's nothing more than lies.

You have to control the conversation though. Notice how my first comment was to say hello, and to ask a question, completely disregarding everything else that was said?

I won't be dragged into an argument that was started by them because it's probably an argument that they're comfortable arguing about. It's best to bring something new to the table.

Also, try to set them up so you can use their words against them. I do it all the time with the media. Talking with a person is no different.

And the #1 rule of debating, use logic.

The Bush Administration, the one group of individuals who did benefit from 9/11, didn't want to investigate 9/11. Hmmmmmm...

And THAT is how it's done.

And THAT is how it's done. :)

as soon as she said "debris"

as soon as she said "debris" from towers 1 and 2 brought down WTC7, i knew she was being paid.

As soon as she said, "9/11

As soon as she said, "9/11 Report", she was finished.

haha....that was great. i

haha....that was great. i noticed what you were doing in that conversation too, and it worked brilliantly. You had her on the run the whole time. And you notice she wont even touch the standard opporating procedures for hijackings...

Take THIS

"haha....that was great. i

"haha....that was great. i noticed what you were doing in that conversation too, and it worked brilliantly. You had her on the run the whole time. And you notice she wont even touch the standard opporating procedures for hijackings..."

Thanks... just remember... most of the sources these people use to "debunk" us don't cover the whole story, and always cover "half-truths"... witness testimony from one side of the coin, etc...

I don't see mention anywhere in the popular mechnics article of Sibel, the conflicts of interest in the commission, Mineta's testimony, the energy task force meetings, etc...

It's easy to attack the towers. If you pay an "expert" enough money, they'll say anything you want them to, giving these people "sources" for their counter-argument.