It doesn't take a very deep understanding to 9/11 to recognize that Dems do not oppose Reps in any serious meaningful manner, any more than do two professional wrestlers. It's mostly scripted staged 'opposition' for our amusement, entertainment, and, most of all, diversion.

The only thing more revealing than Bush's repeated incriminating 9/11 witness statements is the total non-reaction to them by Reps and Dems alike.

Then there's the 'little' matter of Prescott Bush, who served as Hitler's banker during WW II, and had his companies taken away from him by Congress in 1942 under the Trading With The Enemy Act, becoming a U.S. Senator in the years following WW II when "Nazi" was the dirtiest word in the USA, which reveals Dems' complicity in keeping such a deep dark election-busting secret for their Rep 'opponent' and from the voters. IOW, this charade has been going on for generations. But that only makes sense -- any good student of 9/11 knows by now that it requires at least one lie bigger than even 9/11 itself in order to keep The Big Lie of 9/11 under wraps so well for so long.

So expecting Spitzer -- or any Dem for that matter -- to want to completely unravel 9/11 is totally unrealistic.
______________________________________

Nothing?

I heard Sander confronted Spitzer. He was shouted down by the audience and asked to leave. Spitzer gave a non-answer. And the Media turned away from Spitzer and onto Sander. This I just heard second hand. Can't find the link referred to above.