Follow Up Letter to 700 Structural Engineering Professors

In January we posted about a campaign to email information on the 3 collapses on 9/11 to 700 Structural Engineering Professors. These efforts have been headed up by CB and Stallion4.

They have just sent out the following email to these same 700 professors as a follow up in response to the recent lectures by Dr. Steven Jones.

BYU Physics Professor Steven Jones wrote an academic paper detailing 13 specific reasons to consider a new investigation of the World Trade Center collapses on 9/11. His hypothesis, available at BYU’s website, suggests pre-positioned explosives may have been used.

Dr Jones makes a point of WTC 7, a 47 story steel framed skyscraper. It was NOT hit by an airplane. Yet it had a complete, almost symmetrical, near freefall collapse. Official government reports say it collapsed from random fires and debris from the falling Towers. CBS News video clip of the WTC 7 collapse:

Professor Jones conducted two very well received seminars in February.

The Daily Herald, Central Utah's Newspaper, provides reviews of both:

A brief excerpt from a Netxnews review: “Jones spoke to a full and attentive audience, with room CS 404 entirely filled, people standing in the aisles, as well as multiple overflow rooms that were watching the presentation through electronic transmission”

His February 1st seminar can be viewed online in Flash format:
Professor Jones is co-chair of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, a new organization dedicated to revealing truths about 9/11. Now with over 150 members, including several engineers, Scholars for 9/11 Truth has been penetrating news media outlets. There’s a wealth of material available at their website. Take a look!

Scholars for 9/11 Truth is currently petitioning Congress for release of 9/11 information:

Other members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth include Dr David Ray Griffin (Professor of Emeritus, Christian Theology, at Claremont School of Theology) and Dr Judy Wood (Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University).

Professor Griffin has given numerous lectures on the events of 9/11. His most popular, from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, was broadcast on C-SPAN two separate times. He also attended the day-long Congressional Briefing on the 9/11 events in Washington, also broadcast on C-SPAN. Both videos are downloadable via Griffin, author of numerous books, also wrote two 9/11 pieces: "The New Pearl Harbor" and "The 911 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions". He has also written several papers concerning 9/11, all linked via , including “The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True” , which is scheduled for publication by Elsevier in the book “The Hidden History of 9-11-2001” .
Perhaps you can join Scholars for 9/11 Truth! Structural engineering professors would be extremely valuable. Kindly share this information with your trusted colleagues.

Thank you again. Please speak up for the future of our country.

You can find the entire text of the letter at the bottom of this rawstory forum post. Feel free to use the letter yourself!



very nice, indeed! When is

very nice, indeed!

When is Jones on CNN? Anybody recording?

Right now.

Right now.

Good job guys, keep it up!!!

Good job guys, keep it up!!!

The CNN poll is now at 82%.

The CNN poll is now at 82%.

Here goes guys!

Here goes guys!

cool! Someone taping? How

cool! Someone taping? How long till its up here?

Love you!!!!!

Wow... WAY TO GO ALEX!!!



I am cautiously

I am cautiously optimistic.

When Monday comes, if it is still a topic, I'll be slightly more optimistic.

Holy Crap, this Erica Jong

Holy Crap, this Erica Jong is on our side too!!!

This just keeps getting better, the show is still on guys!!!

"It is very patriotic to investigate"

Erica just called Bush a Dictator!!!!

Holy shit!!!

She is all but saying the

She is all but saying the War on Terrorism is false!!!

That was a complete gift,

That was a complete gift, she was on promoting a book, and spent 5 minutes discussing 9/11 and supporting Sheen.

I am speechless!!! When did

I am speechless!!! When did Showbiz tonight become a real news show???

3 nights ago I guess.


come on! speak to uncle T!

come on! speak to uncle T! what is going on?

You ain't kidding, this is

You ain't kidding, this is unbelievable,they still have the author of an article coming up, so its like the whole hour is devoted to 9/11.

Erica Jong spent 5 minutes discussing 9/11 and 30 seconds discussing her new book.


and dz said that author did

and dz said that author did a fair and good job earlier today on Air America. here is his review from a different thread:

Rachel Maddou (spelling?) on Air America interviewed a guy this morning. I think his name was Mark Jacobson. Anyway, he wrote an article in the March 20th issue of New York Magazine titled “The Ground Zero Grassy Knoll.” His interview was really good. Basically he said there are 4 groups of thought about 9/11:

* the official story
* the official story, plus the idea that the government had plenty of warning but was too incompetent to do anything about it
* LIHOP, or the New Pearl Harbor theory (he actually used these terms)

He said that he believed the second scenario, but that after talking to some people he is moving closer to LIHOP. He also said that these people (meaning 9/11 conspiracy theorists) are mostly intelligent, sane people, including physics professors, etc. He admitted that some of them seemed crazy, but that didnÂ’t mean they were wrong. But he really emphasized that most of the people are not crazy at all.

wow...i didnt expect that.

wow...i didnt expect that. LOL the MSM spinmeisters are going have to a field day trying to discredit Alex Jones, Charlie Sheen, Erica Jong, Seth Green..the list just keeps growing!

Did Seth Green say

Did Seth Green say anything???

I feel like crying..... this

I feel like crying..... this is just so crazy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AWESOME!


Seth basically said the war

Seth basically said the war is about Oil, and that people are more concerned with crappy tv shows than politics

Oh, I missed it.

Oh, I missed it. Sonofabitch, everyone is coming out swinging!!!

Just wanted to say that most

Just wanted to say that most if not all of the credit should go to CB for putting together the Structural Engineering thing. Excellent work CB!

Great developments. I can

Great developments. I can only wish more celebrities come in support of Sheen very soon. And I do think they should form an equivalent of Scholars for 9/11 Truth -- like Artists for 9/11 Truth. It is easy to attack an individual, no matter how prominent. It is more difficult to attack a group comprised of prominent individuals in their field.

I think it would be really important for more of such groups to appear.

Physicists should be asked

Physicists should be asked about Conservation of Momentum. Free fall doesn't make sense from the physics perspective.

Anyone have a link to the new CNN clip?

They let Alex back on CNN?

No Way!

I will be the first to tell you that these buildings could have very easily collapsed..... in due time... if these fires had burned at their maximum efficiency or anywhere near maximum for several hours.

Their structures could have easily failed.

But you are saying that two structures

with two completely unique patterns of structural damage.

With two unarguably distinct fire spreads.... locations and intensity.

Clearly inefficient fires creating heavily sooted dark smoke

In around an hours time fell in EXACTLY the same manner.... relatively straight down into their own footprint at near free fall speeds passing directly through the path of most resistance. Somehow creating instant visual evidence of pulverized concrete.

Should I include all the other characteristics of a conventional controlled demolition which this collapse / implosion resembled?

These collapses if not aided by a controlled demolition would have met resistance at some point as they fell either:

1. causing the falling structure and debris to topple sideways into the streets and other buildings leaving much of the lower part of the structure still standing.
2. causing the upper portion of the falling structure to be impeded thus halting the collapse leaving the lower portion of the structure mostly intact.
3. slowed the fall of the falling debris at least 100% causing the time of the total collapse to double.

at the very least in one of the THREE collapses that day.

Please argue this...... I DARE YOU!

Together in Truth!