Lost Its Sheen?

Like I always say, make sure you check out the credits at the end of the article (-;

When the naysayers start yelling that Charlie Sheen isn't qualified to make the statements he's been making, counter with the fact that the experts HAVE been speaking -- for years -- but nobody has been listening.

Quickly run through this list:

  • Former head of Star Wars and air force colonel, Bob Bowman
  • BYU physicist Steve Jones and Clemson engineering professor Judy Wood
  • Former high-level Reagan appointee and prominent conservative, Paul Craig Roberts
  • Former U.S. congressman Dan Hamburg
  • Former chief labor economist under George W. Bush, Morgan Reynolds
  • Former high-level intelligence analysts, Ray McGovern and Wayne Madsen (who briefed presidents and vice-presidents)

You can say all of this to anyone in about 20 seconds, and wake most people up to the possibility that they've been fooled by the government and media.

If you have great one-liners which stop people in their tracks with the force of persuasion, please post them here.

The first part of this post was written by somebigguy, who summarized in one sentence what would have taken me three.

"Building #7 was obviously

"Building #7 was obviously imploded.
See it for yourself: http://www.911revisited.com"

None of those you listed are

None of those you listed are "experts" in the relevant fields of expertise needed: structural engineering and forensic scince.

You're deluding yourself to think any of them are qualified to discuss the physics of the collpase

C'mon start THINKING!

That's what I call serfdom

That's what I call serfdom to experts!

No own thinking left!

Everytime a group I'm with

Everytime a group I'm with engages into discussion on 9/11 I'm alway the first to stand up and say "I don't think Osama did it"

One liners: "When the govt

One liners:

"When the govt made the fake Osama confession video in Dec 2001 they didn't actually intend that you should look at it - you have looked at it haven't you?"

"Do you like it when people lie to you? Then why do you believe it when they tell you that bin Laden confessed to 9/11?"

"VP Cheney watched flight 77 approach Washington from 50 miles out and he didn't lift a finger. But if he wouldn't discuss it with you I don't see why I should."

"Mohammed Atta liked pork chops, did cocaine and had a stripper girlfriend. Muslim fanatics are all like that."

"The top floor of the WTC fell down in ten seconds. Wasn't it nice of all the lower floors to just get out of the way?"

"We couldn't stop the planes because the 911 Report insisted that the airforce radar towers were all pointing the wrong way."

"Planes never go missing over London, Frankfurt and Tokyo, but because we were busy on 9/11 we lost some and only found them an hour later."

"You know they found one of the hijacker's passports unmarked in the wreckage of the twin towers. Do you think they should return it to him?"

"Bush didn't leave Sarasota school till 9.30 because he only got the first news at 8.30 and the CIA warning from the month before had only mentioned multiple hijackings."

Steel structured buildings

Steel structured buildings do not collapse at "free fall" speed because of fire.

I'll ask the obvious

I'll ask the obvious question again:

If your believe the government was responsible for 9/11, then how many people would have to be involved to maintain this cover-up? How many know "the truth"? How many in the media?

None of those you listed are

None of those you listed are "experts"....

Common sense is all that's needed to see that 9/11 was an inside job, false-flag operation.
Modern, steel-framed buildings do not fall because the over-insured shyster landlord speaks with a fire chief. Firefighters do not demolish/implode buildings.

And if Sylverstein meant the firemen should leave the building (not that the fire dept would give a shit what Silverstein thought), he would have said, "pull out" or "pull back", not "pull it."

Silverstein was on a PBS documentary. He lied about how WTC-7 imploded. This building was hundreds of feet from the towers & the "scattered fires on several floors" bullshit wasn't cutting it.

WTC-7 was pre-wired for a controlled demolition, and so were WTC-1 & WTC-2.

Flanstein, most people

Flanstein, most people involved in a huge convert operation only know about their own small part. They need not know what others are doing nor the ultimate goal.

Afterwards, there has been much deliberate disinfo & PsyOps successfully used to hush the media & the general public.

This one cracks me up: "You

This one cracks me up:

"You know they found one of the hijacker's passports unmarked in the wreckage of the twin towers. Do you think they should return it to him?"

Here's one I always use, if I'm having trouble getting a cell signal at work, I'll make the comment to those around me that I'd probably get a good signal if I was 30000 feet up.

1 liners: Deliberately

1 liners:

Deliberately destroying key evindence, ignoring the obvious (WTC-7 implosion), etc., ARE in and of themselves, key EVIDENCE.

Is it too late to get the evidence back from China regarding the biggest crime in history? Maybe the Chinese took better care of it than we did.

Yeah, we are all driving

Yeah, we are all driving around in the evidence now unfortunately.

Anyway, Flanstein, did you know that the U.S. imports about 50 percent of their oil from Canada?

Do you know just how dependent the American "way of life" is on Canadian resources?

You better think long and hard about who you are protecting, because I guarantee you they don't give TWO SHITS about you, your family, or your country.

This is not a game, and your indifference to it all will not help you in the long run.

Flanstien you disgust me.

Flanstien you disgust me. Are you really that stupid or are you a tool? As SBG just said this is not a game, people are DEAD! you piece of ......aw sorry guys, some days I have no patience for this. My bad.

*Current* U.S. Congresswoman

*Current* U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney?

No problem RC. I've been

No problem RC.

I've been thinking of the above statement by Damien, it would make an awesome T-Shirt.

In big letters:

They Found One Of The 9/11 Hijacker's Passport In The Rubble,

Apparently He Wants It Back.

The in smaller print, off to the right:

'Hijackers Still Alive', CNN Sept 12, 2001

What do you guys think? We'd have to get the correct date, but it should be a CNN headline because of recent activities, maybe include a URL to 911blogger.com or something.

a few good quotes in this

a few good quotes in this ..

http://www.nypress.com/17/30/news&columns/AlanCabal.cfm

every suburban homeowner will want the miraculous PentaGrass!!!

"Hello, Mom, this is Mark Bingham"

what kid calls their mom and says that.

The plain truth can really

The plain truth can really flabbergast people. This is especially true with 911 truth and skepticism. So the best one liner for me is something like: Trust me, you will much happier for a little while if you donÂ’t borrow my copy of David Ray GriffinÂ’ speech.

Most of you folks need

Most of you folks need another visit to the logic store. Let me ask the question again - How MANY people do YOU believe are involved in the coverup of 9/11?

At least Flanstein is asking

At least Flanstein is asking some reasonable questions now.

HereÂ’s one line: I

HereÂ’s one line: I wonder if Tucker Carlson will have to respond to this Charlie Sheen thing?

Flanstein, unlike you, I do

Flanstein, unlike you, I do not believe in any conspiracy theories, such as the U.S. government's lying, self-serving, a-historical, a-factual, and provably false official fairy tale conspiracy theory concerning the 9/11 attacks.

Download the below clip which unmistakably shows explosive charges going from bottom to top on the World Trade Center 7 building, taken from the Naudet brothers' documentary *9/11*:

http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/Flashes/squibview.mpg

http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/video%20archive/squibview.7.qt

See also:

"Nails In The Coffin of Trade Seven - WTC-7 Collapse Footage Shows Unmistakable Demolition Charges," Mind_Virus, LibertyForum, November 27, 2004:

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=consp_911&Number=293...

---

See also the below articles:

"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006)

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):

http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):

http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

---

One can make a conclusive case proving the U.S. government staged the 9/11 attacks even without any physicalist inquiry into the plane crashes or collapsed buildings (even though the case for that is conclusive), i.e., via historical inquiry into the public record in conjunction with deductive reasoning. For example, in regard to such facts as listed below:

- The PNAC document in 2000 calling for "a new Pearl Harbor" as a pretext for Middle-East domination;

- the fact that the October 2001 Afghanistan invasion was planned months beforehand (thus, the U.S. government was certain months before the 9/11 attacks that a pretext would present itself allowing the U.S. government to invade Afghanistan, and lo and behold such a pretext arives right on time);

- the fact that the supposed hijackers weren't Muslim extremists but did cocaine, hired prostitutes, drank alcohol, partied hard, etc.;

- the fact that many of the supposed hijackers were trained on U.S. military bases and had their legal residences on U.S. military bases;

- the fact that the supposed hijackers apparently knew that they had protection from the highest levels of the U.S. government and repeatedly went out of their way to draw attention to themselves as crazed, potential terrorists, as if to build a "legend" back-story;

- the fact that the many FBI agents attempting to invastigate these supposed hijackers were repeatedly and consistently blocked and ordered not to investigate these supposed hijackers, despite forceful protestations from said FBI agents that terrorist attacks were going to happen;

- the fact that U.S. government agents who tried to investigate the supposed hijackers were persecuted yet those in the government who blocked the investigations were promoted and given bonuses;

- the fact that many of these FBI agents went to David Schippers, the former Chief Council for the House Judiciary Committee, informing him (in an attempt to try and get something done) about the planned terrorist attacks and that they were threatened with the National Security Act not to pursue their cases and not to talk about them;

- the fact that David Schippers tried to get high-level functionaries (such as John Ashcroft) in the U.S. government to listen to him but they weren't interested;

- the fact that Osama bin Laden is a protected CIA asset and that before the 9/11 attacks a number of governments offered to arrest Osama and turn him over to the U.S. government but every time the U.S. government wasn't interested, despite the fact that he was supposedly wanted in connection to a number of previous terrorist attacks;

- the fact that the U.S. government worked with, supplied and used Osama's al-Qaeda terrorist network against the Serbian government all the way up into at least 1998, despite the fact that Osama was supposedly wanted in connection to a number of previous terrorist attacks.

And the list of such facts documented by the mainstream major media news articles and in primary documentation (such as the PNAC report) go on and on and on. The above is barely even scratching the surface on such facts as can be found in the mainstream public record. Add to that the fact that the U.S. government has a well-documented history (i.e., modus operandi) of staging such Hegelian dialectical PsyOps attacks as the Pearl Harbor attack, Operation Northwoods (which although didn't go forward due to John F. Kennedy, all the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff approved it for implementation), the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, etc., etc.

For mainstream documentation on the above facts, as well as on more such facts, see the below documentation resources:

The below post by me contains the November 10, 2003 article "September 11--Islamic Jihad or Another Northwoods?" by Tim Howells, Ph.D., which is a very good, short introduction to just some of the more damning mainstream major media articles and U.S. government primary documentation which proves up one side and down the other that the 9/11 attacks and the following anthrax attacks were a Hegelian dialectical PsyOp staged by the U.S. government as a pretext in order to obtain more power and control. I append my own additional endnotes at the conclusion of Dr. Howells' article, in order to add further mainstream documentation.

From: James Redford
Newsgroups: soc.college,alt.education,alt.education.alternative,alt.education.research,misc.education
Subject: The U.S. Government Staged the 9/11 Attacks
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:49:56 GMT

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.college/msg/cdb2f90b15ea3233?dmode=so...

http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/tim-howells-september-11-islamic-jihad...

And:

The Truth About the 9/11 Attacks:

http://www.geocities.com/vonchloride/ (Note that this website by me hasn't been updated in a long time, so some of the links on it have gone dead. You can use http://www.archive.org to revive some of the dead links.)

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

Hey Flanstein if run that

Hey Flanstein if run that logic store I bet you find your customer base shrinking pretty fast these days.

Sorry, if you run that logic

Sorry, if you run that logic store. I guess thats the reason for preview.

a good idea to include links

a good idea to include links for each person as well.

... and STILL no one here

... and STILL no one here has the courage to even guess at the amount of people required to have pulled this off...

Flanstein, who would've

Flanstein, who would've imagined that f*ck-up Hitler & his band of assholes could have destroyed Germany & devestated the world merely 60 years ago? Wise up.

"Flanstein, who would've

"Flanstein, who would've imagined that f*ck-up Hitler & his band of assholes could have destroyed Germany & devestated the world merely 60 years ago? Wise up."

Translation:

I realize that a conspiracy of this size would have to involve hundreds of people from all levels of government and the media and is therefore illogical...

Flanstein, unlike you, I'm

Flanstein, unlike you, I'm not into guessing. I stick with the provable facts, such as the provable fact that the U.S. government staged the 9/11 attacks.

Download the below clip which unmistakably shows explosive charges going from bottom to top on the World Trade Center 7 building, taken from the Naudet brothers' documentary *9/11*:

http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/Flashes/squibview.mpg

http://st12.startlogic.com/~xenonpup/video%20archive/squibview.7.qt

See also:

"Nails In The Coffin of Trade Seven - WTC-7 Collapse Footage Shows Unmistakable Demolition Charges," Mind_Virus, LibertyForum, November 27, 2004:

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=consp_911&Number=293...

See also the below articles:

"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006)

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):

http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):

http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

"Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories," Prof. David Ray Griffin, 911Truth.org, January 18, 2006:

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060118104223192

One can also make a conclusive case proving the U.S. government staged the 9/11 attacks even without any physicalist inquiry into the plane crashes or collapsed buildings (even though the case for that is conclusive), i.e., via historical inquiry into the public record in conjunction with deductive reasoning. For example, in regard to such facts as listed below:

- The PNAC document in 2000 calling for "a new Pearl Harbor" as a pretext for Middle-East domination;

- the fact that the October 2001 Afghanistan invasion was planned months beforehand (thus, the U.S. government was certain months before the 9/11 attacks that a pretext would present itself allowing the U.S. government to invade Afghanistan, and lo and behold such a pretext arives right on time);

- the fact that the supposed hijackers weren't Muslim extremists but did cocaine, hired prostitutes, drank alcohol, partied hard, etc.;

- the fact that many of the supposed hijackers were trained on U.S. military bases and had their legal residences on U.S. military bases;

- the fact that the supposed hijackers apparently knew that they had protection from the highest levels of the U.S. government and repeatedly went out of their way to draw attention to themselves as crazed, potential terrorists, as if to build a "legend" back-story;

- the fact that the many FBI agents attempting to invastigate these supposed hijackers were repeatedly and consistently blocked and ordered not to investigate these supposed hijackers, despite forceful protestations from said FBI agents that terrorist attacks were going to happen;

- the fact that U.S. government agents who tried to investigate the supposed hijackers were persecuted yet those in the government who blocked the investigations were promoted and given bonuses;

- the fact that many of these FBI agents went to David Schippers, the former Chief Council for the House Judiciary Committee, informing him (in an attempt to try and get something done) about the planned terrorist attacks and that they were threatened with the National Security Act not to pursue their cases and not to talk about them;

- the fact that David Schippers tried to get high-level functionaries (such as John Ashcroft) in the U.S. government to listen to him but they weren't interested;

- the fact that Osama bin Laden is a protected CIA asset and that before the 9/11 attacks a number of governments offered to arrest Osama and turn him over to the U.S. government but every time the U.S. government wasn't interested, despite the fact that he was supposedly wanted in connection to a number of previous terrorist attacks;

- the fact that the U.S. government worked with, supplied and used Osama's al-Qaeda terrorist network against the Serbian government all the way up into at least 1998, despite the fact that Osama was supposedly wanted in connection to a number of previous terrorist attacks.

And the list of such facts documented by the mainstream major media news articles and in primary documentation (such as the PNAC report) go on and on and on. The above is barely even scratching the surface on such facts as can be found in the mainstream public record. Add to that the fact that the U.S. government has a well-documented history (i.e., modus operandi) of staging such Hegelian dialectical PsyOps attacks as the Pearl Harbor attack, Operation Northwoods (which although didn't go forward due to John F. Kennedy, all the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff approved it for implementation), the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, etc., etc.

For mainstream documentation on the above facts, as well as on more such facts, see the below documentation resources:

The below post by me contains the November 10, 2003 article "September 11--Islamic Jihad or Another Northwoods?" by Tim Howells, Ph.D., which is a very good, short introduction to just some of the more damning mainstream major media articles and U.S. government primary documentation which proves up one side and down the other that the 9/11 attacks and the following anthrax attacks were a Hegelian dialectical PsyOp staged by the U.S. government as a pretext in order to obtain more power and control. I append my own additional endnotes at the conclusion of Dr. Howells' article, in order to add further mainstream documentation.

From: James Redford
Newsgroups: soc.college,alt.education,alt.education.alternative,alt.education.research,misc.education
Subject: The U.S. Government Staged the 9/11 Attacks
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:49:56 GMT

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.college/msg/cdb2f90b15ea3233?dmode=so...

http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/tim-howells-september-11-islamic-jihad...

And:

The Truth About the 9/11 Attacks:

http://www.geocities.com/vonchloride/ (Note that this website by me hasn't been updated in a long time, so some of the links on it have gone dead. You can use http://www.archive.org to revive some of the dead links.)

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

Yes, yes, I've read all of

Yes, yes, I've read all of your conspiracy stuff - but to practical matters - how many do you think are involved and why are you afraid to say?

Flanstein, unlike you, I do

Flanstein, unlike you, I do not believe in any conspiracy theories, such as the U.S. government's lying, self-serving, a-historical, a-factual, and provably false official fairy tale conspiracy theory concerning the 9/11 attacks.

And also unlike you, I'm not into guessing. I stick with the provable facts, such as the provable fact that the U.S. government staged the 9/11 attacks.

For more on that, see the below articles:

"Why Indeed did the WTC Buildings Collapse?," Prof. Steven E. Jones, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006)

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

"Thinking About 'Conspiracy Theories': 9/11 and JFK," Prof. James H. Fetzer, University of Minnesota, to be contained in 9/11 and the American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, editors (Northampton, Massachusetts: Olive Branch Press [an imprint of Interlink Publishing Group, Inc.], 2006) and in The 9/11 Conspiracy, James H. Fetzer, editor (Chicago, Illinois: Catfeet Press [an imprint of Open Court Publishing Company], forthcoming):

http://www.d.umn.edu/~jfetzer/fetzerexpandedx.doc

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

"The Destruction of the World Trade Center: Why the Official Account Cannot Be True," Prof. David Ray Griffin, based on a lecture given in New York, New York on October 15 and 16, 2005, to be contained in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001," Research in Political Economy, Vol. 23, Paul Zarembka, editor (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, Spring 2006):

http://www.911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

"Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories," Prof. David Ray Griffin, 911Truth.org, January 18, 2006:

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060118104223192

One can make a conclusive case proving the U.S. government staged the 9/11 attacks even without any physicalist inquiry into the plane crashes or collapsed buildings (even though the case for that is conclusive), i.e., via historical inquiry into the public record in conjunction with deductive reasoning. For example, in regard to such facts as listed below:

- The PNAC document in 2000 calling for "a new Pearl Harbor" as a pretext for Middle-East domination;

- the fact that the October 2001 Afghanistan invasion was planned months beforehand (thus, the U.S. government was certain months before the 9/11 attacks that a pretext would present itself allowing the U.S. government to invade Afghanistan, and lo and behold such a pretext arives right on time);

- the fact that the supposed hijackers weren't Muslim extremists but did cocaine, hired prostitutes, drank alcohol, partied hard, etc.;

- the fact that many of the supposed hijackers were trained on U.S. military bases and had their legal residences on U.S. military bases;

- the fact that the supposed hijackers apparently knew that they had protection from the highest levels of the U.S. government and repeatedly went out of their way to draw attention to themselves as crazed, potential terrorists, as if to build a "legend" back-story;

- the fact that the many FBI agents attempting to invastigate these supposed hijackers were repeatedly and consistently blocked and ordered not to investigate these supposed hijackers, despite forceful protestations from said FBI agents that terrorist attacks were going to happen;

- the fact that U.S. government agents who tried to investigate the supposed hijackers were persecuted yet those in the government who blocked the investigations were promoted and given bonuses;

- the fact that many of these FBI agents went to David Schippers, the former Chief Council for the House Judiciary Committee, informing him (in an attempt to try and get something done) about the planned terrorist attacks and that they were threatened with the National Security Act not to pursue their cases and not to talk about them;

- the fact that David Schippers tried to get high-level functionaries (such as John Ashcroft) in the U.S. government to listen to him but they weren't interested;

- the fact that Osama bin Laden is a protected CIA asset and that before the 9/11 attacks a number of governments offered to arrest Osama and turn him over to the U.S. government but every time the U.S. government wasn't interested, despite the fact that he was supposedly wanted in connection to a number of previous terrorist attacks;

- the fact that the U.S. government worked with, supplied and used Osama's al-Qaeda terrorist network against the Serbian government all the way up into at least 1998, despite the fact that Osama was supposedly wanted in connection to a number of previous terrorist attacks.

And the list of such facts documented by the mainstream major media news articles and in primary documentation (such as the PNAC report) go on and on and on. The above is barely even scratching the surface on such facts as can be found in the mainstream public record. Add to that the fact that the U.S. government has a well-documented history (i.e., modus operandi) of staging such Hegelian dialectical PsyOps attacks as the Pearl Harbor attack, Operation Northwoods (which although didn't go forward due to John F. Kennedy, all the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff approved it for implementation), the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, etc., etc.

For mainstream documentation on the above facts, as well as on more such facts, see the below documentation resources:

The below post by me contains the November 10, 2003 article "September 11--Islamic Jihad or Another Northwoods?" by Tim Howells, Ph.D., which is a very good, short introduction to just some of the more damning mainstream major media articles and U.S. government primary documentation which proves up one side and down the other that the 9/11 attacks and the following anthrax attacks were a Hegelian dialectical PsyOp staged by the U.S. government as a pretext in order to obtain more power and control. I append my own additional endnotes at the conclusion of Dr. Howells' article, in order to add further mainstream documentation.

From: James Redford
Newsgroups: soc.college,alt.education,alt.education.alternative,alt.education.research,misc.education
Subject: The U.S. Government Staged the 9/11 Attacks
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 13:49:56 GMT

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.college/msg/cdb2f90b15ea3233?dmode=so...

http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/tim-howells-september-11-islamic-jihad...

And:

The Truth About the 9/11 Attacks:

http://www.geocities.com/vonchloride/ (Note that this website by me hasn't been updated in a long time, so some of the links on it have gone dead. You can use http://www.archive.org to revive some of the dead links.)

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

Its getting annoying around

Its getting annoying around here.

It was already answered

It was already answered Flanstien:

Flanstein, who would've imagined that f*ck-up Hitler & his band of assholes could have destroyed Germany & devestated the world merely 60 years ago? Wise up.
Anonymous | 03.26.06 - 5:24 pm | #

" It was already answered

" It was already answered Flanstien"

It wasn't of course, and I can see no one here has the courage to postulate an answer. Why? Because the sheer numbers of people required to have done this - if conspiracy crack-pot ideas are to be believed - would preclude keeping this a secret for more than two minutes.

Sorry for messing up your fantasies with logic...

Flanstein; From "Crossing

Flanstein;

From "Crossing The Rubicon" by Michael Ruppert, P.2
__________
One of the most trumpeted themes in the post-9/11 world has been a blanket
assertion that such a large conspiracy (if conducted within the US government) could never be concealed from the American people or the people of the world before the crime was committed. It has been sounded by the likes of David Corn at The Nation and former National Security Counterterrorism Chief Richard
Clarke. Clarke wrote in his 2004 bestseller Against All Enemies,
Conspiracy theorists simultaneously hold two contrary beliefs: a) that
the US government is so incompetent that it can miss explanations
that the theorists can uncover, and b) that the US government can
keep a big and juicy secret. The first belief has some validity. The second
idea is pure fantasy.1
Richard Clarke misled you here. He also informed, in some very surprising
ways. In fact, as I will show you later, he misled in many places in his book. From the Manhattan Project to the Stealth fighter, the US government has successfully kept secrets involving thousands of people. Secondly, in order to execute a conspiracy of the size and type I am suggesting, it is not necessary that thousands of people see the whole picture. The success of the US in maintaining the secrecy
around the atom bomb and the Stealth fighter, or in any classified operation, lies in compartmentalization. A technician in Tennessee refining uranium ore in 1943 would have had no knowledge of its intended use, or any moral culpability in any deaths that occurred as a result of it. Another technician in Ohio, mixing a polymer resin in 1985, would have had no knowledge of what an F117A looked like or what it was intended to do.
__________

Mr. Ruppert's documentary "Truth & Lies of 9/11" covers history, persons and paper trails, you might find it more intriguing than demolitions/planes/etc. If you have broadband, give this google video version a look-see:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8797525979024486145

Flanstein, as I said before,

Flanstein, as I said before, I'm not into guessing, unlike you. I stick with the provable facts, such as the provable fact that the U.S. government staged the 9/11 attacks.

You mentioned people not being able to keep secrets. The Bush patriarchs are dark occultists (i.e., Satanists) in the dark occult organizations Bohemian Grove and the Brotherhood of Death (a.k.a. the Order of Skull & Bones). Extreme sexual deviancy (such as child sex-slavery and child snuff-films) is used as blackmail by the Western intelligence agencies and their occult secret societies in order to keep their key people in line. Those directly involved in intentionally carrying out the U.S. government-staged 9/11 attacks would be thoroughly compromised in such a way that they wouldn't dare go public with their knowledge; not to mention the fact that such people would be admitting to complicity in mass-murder.

An example of this form of blackmail is former President George Bush, Sr.'s sexual fondness for young boys:

"Homosexual prostitution inquiry ensnares VIPs with Reagan, Bush: 'Call boys' took midnight tour of White House," Paul M. Rodriguez and George Archibald, Washington Times, June 29, 1989:

http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/wtpage1smaller.gif

http://www.thelawparty.com/FranklinCoverup/WTpage1.gif

http://www.thelawparty.com/FranklinCoverup/WTpage2.gif

The below documentary, "Conspiracy of Silence," was produced by Yorkshire Television (U.K.) under contract by the Discovery Channel. The documentary was scheduled to air nation-wide in the U.S. on the Discovery Channel on May 3, 1994. It was listed in the April 30th-May 6th edition of TV Guide and in newspapers for that day.

This documentary exposed a network of business leaders, Washington politicians and other high officials involved in a child sex-slave ring that flew children to Washington, D.C. and elsewhere in the U.S. for sex orgies. This documentary film turned out to be very presciently named, because close to the time before airing, various congressmen threatened the cable TV industry with restrictive legislation if this documentary was aired. Almost immediately, the rights to the documentary were purchased for some half-million dollars by unnamed persons who ordered all copies destroyed. A copy of the rough-edited version of the film was furnished anonymously to attorney and former Nebraska State Senator John DeCamp, among others.

Former CIA Director William E. Colby is also interviewed on the documentary "Conspiracy of Silence," wherein William E. Colby backs up the legitimacy of these charges and also talks about the real risks of assassination that John DeCamp faces for taking up this case (other investigators into the Franklin, Nebraska child sex-slave scandal were assassinated).

Below is an RM file (33.3 MB) of "Conspiracy of Silence":

http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/conspiracyofsilence56k.rm

You can download this same video in the below higher resolution format. Windows media (39.6 MB):

http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/conspiracyofsilence2.wmv

"Conspiracy of Silence" doesn't attempt to go into the Satanic and human-sacrifice angle of the Franklin incident, although that is very much part of this case, as this case is directly connected to Bohemian Grove and other child sex-slave rings. For more on this aspect, see the below book by former State Senator John DeCamp:

The Franklin Cover-Up: Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska by John W. DeCamp (AWT; 2nd edition: December 1, 1996), ISBN: 0963215809:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0963215809/

One of the best introductions to the background and subsequent cover-up of the above film, "Conspiracy of Silence," is from the below excerpts from the book The Franklin Cover-Up by former State Senator John DeCamp, wherein he also talks about his relationship to former CIA Director William E. Colby (who himself was assassinated). Do a search for "Yorkshire" to go directly to the section concerning this film:

http://www.davidicke.net/tellthetruth/coverups/decamp.html

or:

http://mysite.users2.50megs.com/coverups/decamp.html

One of the victims, Paul Bonacci, testified in court to being forced into deprived sexual acts with men and other boys, including snuff films made at Bohemian Grove, with U.S. Senior District Judge Warren K. Urbom presiding. Bonacci won the court case and was awarded one-million dollars by Judge Urbom.

Below is the text of the ruling by Judge Warren K. Urbom mentioned above:

Paul A. Bonacci, Plaintiff vs Lawrence E. King, Defendant, 4:CV91-3037, Memorandum of Decision Filed February 22, 1999:

http://www.raven1.net/ra1.htm

Below you can read more on the above case. Scroll down to the section entitled "Snuff kiddie porn at Bohemian Grove":

Bohemian Grove Dirt:

http://www.geocities.com/bohemian_grove_dirt/

###############

In addition to the above, phoney wannabe Texan and actual New Haven, Connecticut Yankee carpetbagger President George Bush, Jr. is a closet-case who is queerer than a three-dollar bill. Take the case of Victor "Victoria" Ashe, George Bush, Jr.'s long-time homosexual lover and fellow member in the Brotherhood of Death (a.k.a. the Order of Skull & Bones)--the former Mayor of Knoxville, Tennessee, and now the current Ambassador to Poland, appointed by Bush, Jr.

Below is the Globe and Mail's own tactful way of subtly "outing" Bush, Jr.:

"Bush prefers our pretty boy to his pretty boy," Jane Taber, Globe and Mail, January 16, 2004, Page A1:

http://www.rense.com/general47/bushsmitten.htm

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20040116/...

See also:

Bush's Secret Life in 84:

http://bushssecretlifein84.tripod.com

Also revealing, on the Nixon tapes from May 13, 1971, Nixon says of Bohemian Grove:

""
"But it's not just the ratty part of town. The upper class in San Francisco is that way. The Bohemian Grove, which I attend from time to time--it is the most faggy goddamned thing you could ever imagine, with that San Francisco crowd. I can't shake hands with anybody from San Francisco."
""

(From "All The Philosopher King's Men--President Richard Nixon, John D. Ehrlichman, and H. R. Haldeman," James Warren, Harper's Magazine, February 2000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/032604nixontape.html .)

Yet the Bushes just can't get enough of Bohemian Grove.

Also interesting, as Mayor, Ashe spent $200,000 for a 7.9-foot black granite Egyptian obelisk (i.e., the Phallus of Osiris) on which is the laser-etched names of the people that died in the 9/11 PsyOps attacks, and which is in front of the City-County Building:

http://www.greatestcities.com/3854pic/266/CP5266.jpg/MVC-016F.JPG

---

And then there's the case of Bush, Jr.'s gay male escort Jeff Gannon (a.k.a. James Dale Guckert), who sidelined as a scripted softball White House reporter:

"Secret Service records raise new questions about discredited conservative reporter," John Byrne, Raw Story, April 24, 2005:

http://rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/secret_service_gannon_424.htm

"Homeland Security: 'We're still looking for Gannon credentialing,'" Raw Story, April 4, 2005:

http://rawstory.com/exclusives/byrne/homeland_security_responds_jeff_gan...

"The smoking scalp?," Jeff Wells, February 15, 2005:

http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/02/smoking-scalp.html

###############

Concerning the hidden video caught by journalist Alex Jones of a dark occultic ritual performed every year at Bohemian Grove, see:

http://www.infowars.com/bg1.html

See also the full video Dark Secrets: Inside Bohemian Grove by journalist and documentary film-maker Alex Jones, which you can view in full for free below:

Dark Secrets: Inside Bohemian Grove:

http://www.archive.org/details/DSIBG

Additionally, you can view clip excerpts Part 1 and Part 2 of Jon Ronson's documentary Secret Rulers of the World, which also documents Alex Jones' infiltration of Bohemian Grove, at the below link:

http://www.sacredcow.com/allnew/index_content.php?n=multimedia_video_alex

Below can be found audio and a transcript of ABC News' Monday, April 23, 2001 World News Tonight with anchor Peter Jennings program concerning nightvision video secretly captured on Saturday, April 14, 2001 by New York Observer reporter Ron Rosenbaum of an occultic ritual conducted by the Brotherhood of Death at Yale (a.k.a. the Order of Skull & Bones):

"April 23, 2001 ABC News Report on Hidden Video Captured of Skull & Bones Ritual," PsyOp911, October 4, 2005:

http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/skull-and-bones-2001-04-23-abc-report....

Definitely see also the below very important article series which contains extensive documentation on the child sex-slave and snuff-film rings run by the globalist elite:

"The Pedophocracy," Parts I through VI, by David McGowan, Center for an Informed America ( http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com ), August 2001:

http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/pedo1.html
http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/pedo2.html
http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/pedo3.html
http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/pedo4.html
http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/pedo5.html
http://www.geocities.com/psyop911/pedo6.html

Flanstein, it's hard to

Flanstein, it's hard to identify specifically the persons involved in 9/11. But you need to understand that the US has been infested for decades with drugs and arms trafficking, corruption and crimes of various stripes that cut right through US administrations going back to the Kennedy assasination.

Basically, if you enter a bazaar full of thieves and you wallet gets stolen you might have some trouble finding the exact culprit, but you know some of them did it. Some themes you might like to pursue:

(1) Iran Contra and drug trafficking (Then read Daniel Hopsickers stuff on drug trafficking through Huffman Aviation and ask yourself if it was unlikely one or more regulatory agencies were aware of the presence of the terrorists when they were permitting Huffman to illegally drug traffic?)

(2) Remember, also, the WTC was bombed in 1993 by MAK guys (precursors to al Qaeda). These guys had the plans to the WTC as far back as 1989!! You could then read Peter Lance's article about this, or my summary of it. On 5 Nov 1990 islamic terrorist Sayyid Nosair assasinated Israeli terrorist Rabbi Kahane in NY. That night the NYPD and the FBI raided Nosair's house and found 47 boxes of evidence which included: 1400 rounds of ammunition, top secret manuals from the U.S. Special Forces Warfare school in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, maps of the World Trade Center, pictures of the World Trade Centerand bomb recipes.

So some of these Islamic terrorists had interesting connections to say the least, if they could get Fort Bragg material as far back as 1989!

Then look at one of Nosair's associates Ahmed Refai who hung out with the 1993 WTC bombers. When Refai was interviewed by journalist Peter Lance he had this to say:

"Do you know why the FBI did not discover 9/11?"

I [Lance] didn't understand what he was saying. I said, "Well that's what my book seeks to answer."

And he said, "No do you understand what my people believe? This is not bin Laden. This is not the Sheikh. This is the U.S. Government doing this for Israel."

I said, "What??" I looked at FBI agent Joe O'Brien and he looked over at me. We were stunned. I said, "Let me get this straight: you are saying that your people believe that the 3,000 people were murdered by the U.S. Government on behalf of the State of Israel?"

He said, "This is what my people believe."

That's from a guy who was cheek and f**ing jowl with the guys who did the 1993 bombing!!

(3) Now let's quote from FBI translator Sibel Edmond's recent interview with Maria Heller (Edmonds discovered financial connections between the terrorists and thei support network - which included US polticians):

"I don't have any direct information that relates to these 19 hijackers - I've never said that I did have any direct information. The information that I reported to COngress and the 911 Commission and the Inspector General's office - and even during a court hearing - that had to do with indirect involvement of certain people and/or entities and organizations involved with the money laundering aspect of it.

In certain cases - in return for bribery - providing certain visas for some of the hijackers - that information didn't directly relate to the hijackers themselves - but to their support network, their financial network. So to answer that question - I never had any direct information about the hijackers.

However - there were - and there still are today - certain individuals and entities and organisations who are very closely associated with the terrorist network - and they have not been touched.

....What occured with the 911 related investigation - be it the FBI, or the Department of Defense, or the Department of State, or the CIA or the Pentagon - they choose to basically publicise the deal (?) at the hijacker level - and completely went about covering up certain entities that they had DIRECT evidence, DOCUMENTED evidence of the support networks - be it the financial support networks, or communications, or obtaining visas - they have not touched those individuals. Those individuals are still roaimng free! Today!"

You've got to do some homework on this Flanstein. But if you sincerely want to know what's going on then your questions will be welcome here.

damien, it was the FBI that

damien, it was the FBI that bombed the World Trade Center in 1993:

None of this would be known today if it were not for the FBI's undercover agent Emad A. Salem taping his conversations with his FBI handlers (unbeknownst to them). Salem thought that the FBI might try to pin it on him so he took measures to protect himself. Indeed, without the FBI the '93 WTC bombing would never have happened, as it was agent Salem who built the bomb for the would-be Muslim "terrorists." Salem wanted to use fake ingredients for the "bomb" but the FBI ordered him to make a real one. When the making of the bomb was complete Salem told the FBI that they could now arrest the would-be terrorists, but the FBI told Salem that the bombing is to go forward. After agent Salem went public with his tapes in a news conference the FBI found it necessary to pay him over a million dollars just to shut him up.

For more on the above, see the below New York Times article:

"Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast," Ralph Blumenthal, New York Times, October 28, 1993:

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b3c830e34de.htm

And see also:

"Who Bombed The World Trade Center? FBI Bomb Builders Exposed," Paul DeRienzo, Frank Morales and Chris Flash, The Shadow, October 1994/January 1995 Issue:

http://pdr.autono.net/WhoBombedWTC.html

On the above webpage you can find the below two audio clips from one of Emad A. Salem's recorded conversations with one of his FBI handlers, FBI Special Agent John Anticev:

http://nwo.media.xs2.net/tape/emad%20salem.mp3

The above clip is an excerpt from the below longer clip:

http://nwo.media.xs2.net/tape/SalemWBAI.mp3

The above clips were recorded from a broadcast on WBAI Radio in the city of New York which aired this taped conversation between Emad A. Salem and FBI Special Agent John Anticev.

The below transcript is from 2:57 to 4:31 min:sec from the longer clip (SalemWBAI.mp3):

FBI Special Agent John Anticev: But, uh, basically nothing has changed. I'm just telling you for my own sake that nothing, that this isn't a salary, that it's--you know. But you got paid regularly for good information. I mean the expenses were a little bit out of the ordinary and it was really questioned. Don't tell Nancy I told you this. [Nancy Floyd is another FBI Special Agent who worked with Emad A. Salem in his informant capacity.]

Emad A. Salem: Well, I have to tell her of course.

Anticev: Well then, if you have to, you have to.

Salem: Yeah, I mean because the lady was being honest and I was being honest and everything was submitted with a receipt and now it's questionable.

Anticev: It's not questionable, it's like a little out of the ordinary.

Salem: Okay. Alright. I don't think it was. If that's what you think guys, fine, but I don't think that because we was start already building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the D.A. and we was all informed about it and we know that the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful, great case!

Anticev: Well.

Salem: And then he put his head in the sand and said "Oh, no, no, that's not true, he is son of a bitch." [Deep breath.] Okay. It's built with a different way in another place and that's it.

Anticev: No, don't make any rash decisions. I'm just trying to be as honest with you as I can.

Salem: Of course, I appreciate that.

Anticev: And as far as the payments go, and everything like that, they're there. I guarantee you that they are there.

##########

For more on government-staged terrorism, see the below post by me:

"Documentation on Government-Staged Terrorism," September 30, 2005:

http://www.armleg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2&mforum=libertyandtruth

Some nut wrote, "Flanstein,

Some nut wrote,

"Flanstein, unlike you, I'm not into guessing. I stick with the provable facts, such as the provable fact that the U.S. government staged the 9/11 attacks."

Your number one problem is that NO such thing has been proven.

You actually need evidence and your videos are not evidence, never have been, never will be.

Wise up and start using your brains.

James, I will follow up on

James, I will follow up on your links. As you can see from my comments I have just given the official story, but I made the two points that (a) these guys had Fort Bragg material early on and (b)that Ahmed Refai made the claim that al Qaeda didn't do it. So I left the door open. I might also add that the Peter Lance article (go through my summary mentioned above) also points out that the FBI were called off monitering the MAK guys back in 1989!

So I am more than prepared to accept the FBI may have had some role in WTC 1993(perhaps even a major one). It's just not an area I've investigated fully. My point to Flanstein was that the story about islamic terrorists has been a smoke and mirrors exercise from way back.

Thanks for the links James. I'll give them a good going over. Cheers!

Flanstein,if this were a

Flanstein,if this were a scientific pursuit data would be observed, but before data is resourced a hypothesis would need to be formed. Let's say the hypothesis is the offical version of 9/11 performed by the 9/11 commission may be inaccurate. We would try and collect as much data as possible. In this particular situation, some data is hard to come by because it is considered classified (in one form or another). But we can still collect data. If you read the above comments you would see that such data exists. Much of it is verifiable. So, if you dont trust the data you can do some research to check its validity. I'll give you where to start... if you address this particular comment... or if anyone does.

Addressed to "Some nut

Addressed to "Some nut wrote... anonymous"

The claim you made stating that film cannot be used as evidence, never have never have been is faulty and contradicted. Reasons:

1. Everything on the videos provides data in one form or another.
A. Times can be calculated
B. Which towers were hit at what time by what method.
C. When they collapsed.
D. The weather on that day.
E. How the collapse behaved.

2. Video is used often as !strong! evidence in courts of law all over the world.
A. Bank Robberies
B. Toll violations.
C. Other types of robberies.
D. Need more be listed.

3. Video is a widely us form of communicaiton i.e. transfer of information (information...?data?)

4. Unless you mean that the videos won't be allowed to be used as evidence, which is a possibility that definately moves me in a deeply profound way.

We use video everyday to make informed decisions albiet the things we make decisions on might be extremely trivial. Don't be scared to question. All most people are calling for is a fair review of the information surrounding the events of that day.

Terms like get over it, move on, let go, or other types of pressure used to achieve those ends either to others... but more importantly to yourself are what leads to slavery in one form or another. Everything we learned growing up about civics told us to be involved, vigilant, and honorable. We'd like to think thats how the fathers of this great country were. Maybe they weren't perfect, maybe some look out and see the buildings that once stood for something no longer hold meaning. I disagree. I live about 15 minutes away from a beautifully constructed court house. Its a very powerful looking structure. When I was little I thought of it as a castle, and important place.It held justice and everything involved. This faded until i realized that the building held no meaning, quite possibly i looked to it as a blatant contradiction that seemed to weigh on me.
See when i lost that reverence it wasn't for the building itself, but it was for the IDEA the CONCEPT that the building held for me. And we cannot let that happen. We cannot fool ourselves into believing those concept never existed. Those things call unalienable rights. Under no conditions can they be compromised. If they are then the constitution we learned to love in grammer school civics; The Constitution that seemed invulnerable to the effects of time and stains of corruption, this constitution will just become a piece of paper. BUT!!! The ideas and concepts cannot die. They will never perish as long as there is the possibility of a mind willing to search.....

Hey, guys ... It looks like

Hey, guys ...

It looks like having 911Blogger on CNN has attracted the attention of the disinfo trolls.

Good point, they are

Good point, they are attacking the messenger, while ignoring the message. Just dissinfo from the government is all that they are.