What's The Truth-Updated

Here's an updated video from Dem Bruce Lee Styles, check it out:

WMV Format
If you have an iPod or iTunes, subscribe to it and let us know what you think.

I added some stuff at the

I added some stuff at the top of my page. Check it out!


pretty lame as far as these

pretty lame as far as these kinds of videos go.

not sure I liked the ending

not sure I liked the ending but the rest of it was good. I especially love the music chosen, who did the music?

I sent this letter I wrote

I sent this letter I wrote to most national newspapers. If anyone finds it useful to you, you may use it.

“. . . the dribble, dribble of [Barry] Bonds' shame has come from old-fashioned newspaper reporting and is now collected in one pile too tall to be ignored."

Bernie Lincicome, Rocky Mountain News, Friday March 10, 2006

"2 + 2 = 5"

Big Brother, 1984, by George Orwell

"Old-fashioned newspaper reporting."

I'm no trained journalist, but this is what I consider to be old-fashioned newspaper reporting:

1. Identify a story which deserves reporting.

2. Research all angles of said story as thoroughly as possible. Present the data clearly and accurately.

3. Dedicate print space (Front page? Business Section? Sports? etc.) based on the overall significance of the story (i.e. Front Page status for "Back to school, with a warning" [ the Jay Bennish teaching controversy] or "Human anatomy in exacting detail" [Gunter Von Hagen's plastinated corpses exhibit at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science].)

4. Follow up (i.e. "dribble, dribble . . .") Keep at it. A significant story is a repeated story; viewed from this lens, then the next, and the next in concordance with its importance and complexity.

The Barry Bonds steroid controversy is compelling for many reasons, not the least of which is that he may be indicted for perjury.

Here's another compelling story; one as yet to be classified "Front Page-worthy" by The Rocky Mountain News (and many other nationally-prominent newspapers):

346 Firemen, Police, and Port Authority rush into World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 in order to extinguish fires caused by jetliners crashing into the buildings and to evacuate trapped WTC workers. Less than two hours later, for the first time in the history of steel-frame skyscrapers, they collapse, killing them all. At around 5:30 p.m. WTC Building #7, which was not hit by a plane, dropped to the ground, looking exactly like a controlled demolition. Larry Silverstein, the WTC lease-holder ( and recipient of billions of dollars in insurance money due to the attacks and subsequent collapses) is even on videotape saying that he gave the order to "pull" it [Building #7] (i.e. demolish it with preplanted explosives.)
Even though these collapses marked the first of their kind in history, Controlled Demolition Inc. spearheaded a hasty crime scene debris-removal effort. The majority of the damaged steel ( critical evidence for engineers and architects and metallurgists to ascertain which elements, exactly, failed . . . and thereby how to avoid making such a design mistake in the future) was put on a slow boat to Asia and melted as scrap.

"Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that, 78th floor numerous 10-45 Code Ones."

Fire Chief Orio Palmer (seven minutes before the South Tower collapsed)

None of the Chiefs, or Captains, or Lieutenants coordinating the rescue effort believed that those buildings were in danger of collapse. Why should they?

"The building was designed to have a fully-loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door . . . this intense grid . . . and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting."

Frank A. DeMartini, Manager, WTC Construction & Project Management. (Interviewed on 1/25/01; died 9/11/01)

Indeed, many buildings have suffered fires which burned with obviously-greater intensity and duration, and they never collapsed; so firefighters and police and Port Authority and Emergency Medical personnel were confident that deploying their units into the Towers was a prudent action. It is probable that none of them considered their work that day to be a suicide mission.

Numerous individuals (official and civilian) reported explosions within the towers prior to their collapse. William Rodriguez has testified that a huge explosion occurred in the basement of the North Tower before the first plane struck.


Many of these interviews were” Classified" until August of 2005. Why?

Here's a partial membership list of Scholars for 9/11 Truth (http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org)

Steven Jones. Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University, co-chair of S9/11T (Scholars for 9/11 Truth) and the creator of its home page and its forum
James H. Fetzer. Distinguished McKnight University Professor of Philosophy at the University of Minnesota, Duluth, a former Marine Corps officer, author or editor of more than 20 books, and co-chair of S9/11T
David Ray Griffin. Emeritus Professor of Philosophy of Religion & Theology, Claremont School of Theology & Claremont Graduate University, Author or editor of some 30 books, including "The New Pearl Harbor" and "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions"
Morgan Reynolds. Texas A & M Professor Emeritus of Economics, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor for President George W. Bush, and former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis
Judy Wood. Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University
John McMurtry, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy, University Professor Emeritus Elect, University of Guelph, Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada, and the author of six books dealing with public policy issues
Lloyd DeMause. Director of The Institute for Psychohistory, President of the International Psychohistorical Association and Editor of The Journal of Psychohistory
Robert M. Bowman. Former Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" Space Defense Program in both Republican and Democratic administrations, and a former Air Force Lieutenant Colonel with 101 combat missions

They understand the physics of the WTC collapses (including the all-but-UN-reported collapse of WTC Building #7) much better than I do, and they sure think that the pile of evidence contradicting the official version of the 9/11 structural failures is too large to be ignored. Why is what they have to say unworthy of Barry Bonds, or O.J.-like coverage? These scholars have placed their careers on the line by rigorously questioning our governments' explanation of what caused those three buildings to collapse the way they did. They are doing it because they believe that in order for a free society to function, it must have free and open debate.
Am I dreaming? Or do we now live in a society of unreason? Have so many of us forgotten the primacy of a free and open discourse that we allow a talking box of images to tell us what we may and may not think while our newspapers stand flaccidly by, acceding that 2+2=5?

I challenge you to headline this story. Present the facts. Give your readers the opportunity to decide for themselves. As it is, you're making, to borrow a phrase from Steven Ambrose, "Citizen Journalists" out of many of us.

I challenge you, Bernie Lincicome. There is a veritable mountain of scientific data available now; far more than enough to make this story front page news for months, if not years.
Until you speak up, in the name of those who lost their lives on September 11, 2001, and of their families and loved ones, I respectfully submit that you forever refrain from using the phrase "old-fashioned newspaper reporting."

Nothing we haven't seen

Nothing we haven't seen before but I love the theme from Last of the Mohicans.

I understand the artistic

I understand the artistic lisence with the "answer" to the question by showing the collapse of the buildings, but at this point in the game, I think a "watermark" YES should come in gradually after showing the buildings collapse...

Otherwise... it was very powerful.

Great work Dem Bruce Lee

Great work Dem Bruce Lee Styles.

Admittedly, I've never been able to see one of your movies because the format has never worked for me...

By "Watermark", I mean an

By "Watermark", I mean an opaque Yes, that gradually builds into a solid YES...

Through the footage of the

Through the footage of the collapsed buildings...

After you ask, "Do the lies

After you ask, "Do the lies extend to 9/11?"

I've been "theorizing"... I

I've been "theorizing"... I wonder if the coverage of 9/11 Truth was a "warning" to the administration NOT to invade or hit Iran, and to use the talks that they've set up to try and work out a deal...

Because you KNOW Karl Rove

Because you KNOW Karl Rove is smart enough to turn a "deal" between Iran and America into something that makes Bush look like a "hero" to the sheeple...

And in the end, it would "save face" for the "Invisible Government"...

That's a "theory"...

Very powerful -- the

Very powerful -- the sequencing of the film clips and images, the questions, and bringing it up to date by tying in questions about the mosque in Iraq. And, yes the music really propels this piece and lends a sense of urgency to having these questions answered. Thanks for this Dem Bruce Lee Styles.


I agree CitizenKit, this vid

I agree CitizenKit, this vid is definitely well done.

From Wayne Madsen: March 24,

From Wayne Madsen:

March 24, 2006 -- LATE EDITION -- According to various well-placed sources in Washington, special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald is preparing to indict "someone major" in his CIA leak investigation. The informed speculation is that it is Karl Rove who will be indicted. STORY DEVELOPING.


Bruce Lee was the real deal,

Bruce Lee was the real deal, from what I recall, not just an actor

Operation Northwoods: In

Operation Northwoods:

In 1962 the Joint Chiefs of Staff were going to paint a plane like a commercial airliner and swap it with a real one. Then they were gonna shoot it down and blame Castro for it. Then go to war against Cuba using this fake terrorism. This document shows a number of similar actions and they were willing to kill civilians to make this plan happen.

I think maybe they finally got around to using this tactic on Sept 11, 2001.

All you have to do is read history: : :



The new changes in it are

The new changes in it are minor, I've been really busy working on the main part of this documentary I'm trying to make that I've had like no chance to work on the intro again properly, I do want to get back to it though and eventually try and make it a bit better. So if anyone can in detail give some feedback as to exactly what would make it better, that would be priceless!!

Jon, that's a cool idea, the

Jon, that's a cool idea, the one thing I'm reluctant about doing though is giving too many answers cus I know some close minded people are like "well that's just an a opinion, how does he know it's a lie" etc, but if it fits really well I would do it regardless. Talking of watermarks though I want to get rid of the divx watermark at the beginning, I'm still working on that, it's not too much of a big deal but it would be cool to get rid of that somehow.

SBG, I don't think the link at the tops working dude, and the sounds kinda low on that wmv, it might just be my pc though I don't know?

carn, tell me why it's lame

carn, tell me why it's lame dude, give me some feedback and I can try and make it better!

CitizenKit, really

CitizenKit, really appreciate the comments thanks!!!

^ LOL what a total dumbass,

^ LOL what a total dumbass, I switched PC's and forgot to type my name in.