oh ya, the Visibility 9/11 show with Michael Wolsey from tonight is available, you can grab it here:

http://www.visibility911.libsyn.com/

here is what it covered:
This podcast takes a look at some of the 200+ Smoking Guns of 9-11 found in the Mainstream Media.

"This podcast takes a look at some of the 200+ Smoking Guns of 9-11 found in the Mainstream Media. "

one of my favorite 9/11 sites!

anyone catch the daily show tonight? i just missed what Stewart said after showing the Andrew Card and Bush 9/11 clip in the classroom..

Wow. What a clear cut case for lack of any thorough investigation. It's been nearly five years since!

More Remains Discovered Near WTC Site

And if I've learned one lesson this week, it's burn a bunch of copies of LC2E (or your preferred 9/11T doc) and get out on the streets. The kiddies love it!

GOOGLE ADS link at the botttom of SFGATE Page is how I got to 911blogger just now.
the ad:
9/11 Blogger - 9/11 News
Pay attention to 9/11 related news. Ask questions, demand answers.
www.911blogger.com
the site i was at:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/gate/archive/2006/03/29/notes03...

Why did the Media take no notice from what sharon stone said?
Charlie Sheen for President!
Best Regards from Good Old Europe,

Dondon

Please feel free to thank Mark Morford for this:
mmorford@sfgate.com
Sitting-Bull | 03.29.06 - 5:49 am | #

Better yet, for those in the SF area, write a supportive Letter to the Editor of the SF Chronicle (keep it under 200 words).

well i dont think that they are NSA spys. I more as so believe that they are cowards, or at best scared of failure

Shivers you are WRONG just because some people dont share the same view as you doent mean that they are a gate keeper. Your accusations are baseless! NSA spy HA! Just listen to yourself. Left gate keeper day. what a waste of time we should be rallying in public to get attention from the media not sitting behind out computers and TYPING insults.

Cowards? Chomsky KNOWS that 7 of the accused hijackers are alive, yet he still peddles his "19 hijackers" official story nonsense.

This from a supposed anarchist radical?

He is more than a coward. This has happened hundreds of times on every issue of importance. 9-11 is not the first time these gatekeepers have exposed themselves as undercover assets. I encourage you to read the article.

To call Chomsky a "coward" is far too naive. When we examine the entirety of his career, his agenda becomes frighteningly clear.

And he is just the tip of the Gatekeeper iceberg. These people are consciously avoiding the facts on 911 because if 15+ million leftists wake up, we might actually have a chance of removing the shadow government that planned the mass murder of nearly 3,000 Americans.

And Chomsky's job is to ensure that social-justice movement remain impotent and removed from reality.

Lets be honest with the harsh truth about the absence of the left. It's more than simple avoidance. It's on the orders of their bosses.

shivers.

Yizzo, I think that's closer on the money as well. What the left gatekeepers don't realize is that they've been brainwashed and controlled by the Karl Rove types, just like everybody else. That said, I do believe there are some who are AWARE and continue lying. At any rate, their time is coming -- 9/11 truth is breaking open.

OMG, that piece by Mark Morford is absolutely incredible. dz, somebigguy, you should feature the ENTIRE article at the top of your page. I wrote Mark Morford a thank you. Here it is:

Dear Mr. Morford,

I can barely believe what I'm reading in your latest piece "Long Live the 9/11 Conspiracy!" I've always enjoyed your writing, but this -- this, is absolutely the best piece I've ever seen on 9/11 truth. Nobody has made the case better, in such a short space. I'm absolutely blown away.

Thank you, thank you, thank you. I'll be forwarding this around to everyone I know. Keep up the excellent work!

Sincerely,

CitizenKit

article here: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/gate/archive/2006/03/29/notes03...

e-mail Mark Morford here: mmorford@sfgate.com

doh, i deleted someones post by accident trying to remove a spam post.. sorry to whoever it was.. it was a comment within the last 10 or so minutes.. sorry!

Shivers Citizen kit the concept of the left gate keepers as nsa or other agency operatives such as goodman may not be that far off. take a look at the stoplying site http://www.stoplying.ca/ Psytops part. And also though off topic take a look at "END GAME as well a good reason to join thoe protest of the immigration bill

it's official.. Tommy Lee has no brain cells

"Tommy Lee to Help Denise Richards Get Over Charlie Sheen"

http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_27264424.shtml

What an amazing article in SFGate!!!

If we can get it into a good format, I beleive this THE PERFECT FLYER WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR!!!!!
Just enoegh information to peak anybodies interest and it sends you in the right direction to get further information.

In color, one sheet would be the best.

Is there a copy right issue? Do they care? Do we care?

How about a mass mailing? Just the article nothing else.

This is BULLSHIT. Who can tell me why?

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0603290178mar29,1,204...

Nobody cares what ultraleftwingers think. So instead, here's a joke:

Philip Dru, Abraham Zapruder and Mike Ruppert walk into a bar. The bartender asks, 'Why is Jon Gold such a link whore?'

RE: Amy Goodman:

I emailed Democracy Now asking why they have no open forums: I got a reply that that is not a service they offer, but they take comments at such and such.

AAR: Springer & Franken:

Springer definitely a Gate Keeper. Fucking annoying listening to his whiney voice talking about everything but reality.

Franken: Harvard Grad Ultra-Gatekeeper never addressing 911 or questioning that there are terrorists & all the other government propaganda. Both he & Springer constantly talk about bigger & bigger national programs, port security, etc, which have nothing to do with reality again.

Franken & Goodman both are Harvard Grads. What secret or otherwise nefarious organizations are out of Harvard? S&B is Yale...

"Nobody cares what ultraleftwingers think. So instead, here's a joke:

Philip Dru, Abraham Zapruder and Mike Ruppert walk into a bar. The bartender asks, 'Why is Jon Gold such a link whore?'"

Hey dipshit, did you know your President passed a law that says you have to reveal your true name to me if you're going to insult me? Trolling is now a Federal Crime.

What's your name? dz, what's his IP address, and his ISP?

New Yorkers to Gather at CNN Studios 'Demonstration of Gratitude' Wednesday, March 29, 2006

New York friends of 9/11 truth and justice call for "Demonstration of Gratitude" at Time-Warner Center in NYC on 3/29/06, thanking CNN for coverage of Charlie Sheen's bold comments questioning the 'official line' on 9/11. "Showbiz Tonight" aired three nights of coverage of the issue, marking the first time mass media has looked into the myriad questions surrounding 9/11/01 in a reasonable manner. A series of events are held in NYC, featuring researchers and authors presenting information about this issue.

i think that were lucky that there isnt a large group that we are all a part of... these evil doers need to play both sides and without a large group to take control of or crush they find themselfs fucked....

just look at the black panthers....

chumpsky cant figure it out but zinn can?? HAHAH!!! come on...

you dont find it funny that none of these smart lefties have any questions about 911???? i sure do..

HAHAH!!!! what about churchill??? he says its racist to say that arabs couldnt have pulled 911 off.... thats funny....

"I do! You DON'T POST ENOUGH!"

Ok then.

No problem at all...

Go Ahead JG... It's fine by me considering all your efforts. ;)

The only moaners are the shill'tastic crew :)

Cheers

Sheesh Gold calm down. You ARE in the habit of posting many links to your website here, no?

(How do you know who anyone's president it?)

What about the part of nobody caring about the hard left?

Great, once again a thread is bogged down by silliness and "gatekeeper" accusations.

I guess I shouldn't be surprised to see Chomsky called an NSA agent - which, really, is beyond silly. The man has spent his life pointing out government-perpetrated violence upon the world, and has gotten a lot of flak for it - from the right and the left, both of which he calls out, and neither of which he pledges allegiance to. No one should be surprised that he's not jumping into 9/11 investigation, because he's a historian/linguist, not a scientist, and his work is filled with rigorous references - working with hypotheticals, as is the case with much 9/11 research, is not his genre.

Can we at least for a moment stop labeling every single person that doesn't exactly do what you want them to as a "gatekeeper", "disinfo agent", etc?

@ Jon: Even if I don't know you personal, I'll can judge about your person online as well.

It's a little bit harder, taken the fact that ironic or sarcastic word meanings are more difficult to unterstand, but, after all, possible.

E.g. there's no reason for me to distrust you, I'll appreciate your work and your efforts.

Even if you were on a gov' paycheck- as long as you bring the 911 truth movement forward, it just doesn't matter.

(no way meaning you were!)

So, who's trying to bring distrust to us, instead of attacking the real perpetrators, and bringing forward the 911 truth movement?

And the 10 agents could each have dozens of different screen names.

Mark Morford Rocks!

Hi all,

I'm searching for videos of the plane hitting the South Tower. I'm especially interested in the one in which the plane is seen approaching it from the opposite side of the tower, ie from the front of the plane.

So far I've come up with sites analyzing photos of the planes upon impact. I'm currently not interested in that. All I want is all the different video footage shown of the plane hitting the tower. Thanks in advance for help.

I posted the Morford story in a discussion thread at a Left Gatekeeper site, smirkingchimp.com.

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/viewtopic.php?topic=64251&forum=12

generally the admins there lock/delete 911 Truth threads. But they've posted many Morford articles to their main page in the past (search "Mark Morford" in the search window, upper left); so it'll be curious to see how they deal with this bombshell article, from their trusty old friend MM.

vesa,

www.terrorize.dk should have those videos

I'm paid to be here. dz pays me.

dz, about all of the videos there are in slow motion or are cropped etc. I'd like to find completely unmodified videos (or as unmodified as the published videos were).

Any other sites? I remember seeing a good video on Google, but of course I can't find it any longer...

Vesa:

this site has some:

http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/05-10-05/discussion.cgi.73.html

Frederique,

smirkingchimp, eh?

I did my yeoman's service there;
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=9%2F11+reprehensor&num=10&hl=en&btnG=G...

There will be one poster, called "cewillir" who will come along, start throwing feces, and cause the thread to be closed.

Tiedrich should ban him, and allow open discussion of 9/11 skepticism.

ST911 actually ran a blog ad there last month. He had no problem taking their ad money.

But he lets the troll "cewillir" shat on everyone's 9/11 party, whether it be speculation, theory or fact.

A great story by Mark Morford in the San Francisco Chronicle today on the 9/11 cover-up.

Link:

http://www.sfgate.com/columnists/morford/

Here is your must-read for the month. Here is your oh-my-God-I'm-sending-this-piece-to-every-smart-person-I-know hunk of outstanding, distressing, disquieting media bliss.

OK....I have to brag about my hometown....

San Francisco fucking rocks!!!! Mark Morford is my hero!!!!

I have a new reason to be proud of where I live. Seems like the city is livin' up to it's reputation!!

andi, that cage metaphor story was excellent -- keep 'em coming!

Cheryl, yes indeed, Morford is really making waves with that one -- the best piece for newbies that I've ever read, IMHO.

Fredrique, excellent -- let's all continue posting at the progressive blogs where 9/11 truth is still a no-no. They'll get up to speed eventually.... or they'll get LEFT BEHIND (if you'll pardon the reference).

9/11 Truth Calling Oprah!...I emailed her, how about you? peace,pw

Mark Jacobson: The Ground Zero Grassy Knoll; A new generation of conspiracy theorists is at work on a secret history of New YorkÂ’s most terrible day. 3/29

http://nymag.com/news/features/16464/index.html

=======
Mark Morford: Long Live The 9/11 Conspiracy! Anyone still care about the heap of disturbing, unsolved questions surrounding Our Great Tragedy? 3/29

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/gate/archive/2006/03/29/notes03...

=======
TVNL Editor's Comments: CNNÂ’s 9/11 Balancing Act

CNNÂ’s Showbiz Tonight cancelled the appearance of Ed Asner last night because they could not find any guests to provide an opposing point of view related to his position on the subject of 9/11 truth. They wanted to present a balanced discussion of this topic.

Well, not all things are balanced. This is like requiring a balanced view of a weather report where you have someone talking about sunshine when the entire area is inundated by rain!

There has been 5 years of propaganda. It’s our turn. The balancers have had enough airtime! Think about it! – Jesse, Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

=========

9/11 Truth Calling Oprah!
An Appeal from TvNewsLIES.org

For more than five years now, the entire mainstream corporate news media apparatus has been controlled by a handful of behind-the-scene power brokers. In all that time there has been a total blackout on any mention, never mind discussion, of the truth behind the events of 9/11.

Despite their credibility and expertise, high-powered and extremely convincing voices of truth have been denied access to the public via the mainstream media. In the years following the attacks of 9/11, a significant number of knowledgeable people have attempted to alert the nation about the mountain of evidence that has been unearthed by their investigations, and which shoots large holes in the ‘official’ version of events sold to an unsuspecting and unquestioning public.

These people include former Bush administration officials, CIA analysts, FBI whistleblowers, scholars, academics, theologians and eye witnesses to the events of that tragic day. Not one of these people has been allowed to present his or her individual and collective conclusions that the Bush administration was either totally negligent or fully complicit or in the events of 9/11.

The media blacklisting of any and all members of the independent 9/11 truth community, no matter how impressive his or her credentials, has resulted in widespread ignorance of the huge number of anomalies and inconsistencies in the official version. No questions have been allowed to be raised, and not one shred of evidence that refutes the official version has been presented to the viewing or reading public anywhere but on the Internet.

Recent events, however, suggest that there may be a breach in this wall of silence. It seems that the only way for the 9/11 truth movement to attract the attention of the public is for well-known individuals in the entertainment arena to come forward and demand the truth.

Sad but true, a large number of Americans believe nothing until they see it on TV! There can be no question about the enormous influence and effect of television broadcasting on public opinion, a very frightening fact in these troubled and dangerous times. It was exactly for that reason that I created TvNewsLIES.org and dedicated these past years to exposing the lies and deception emanating from our broadcast news industry. And that is why I now am calling for help from one of TVÂ’s most popular and respected performers.

Last week we witnessed a five-cent example of how the single TV appearance of a well-known performer, a celebrity if you will, could initiate a terribly important word-of-mouth grass roots movement. The support of one show-biz personality helped the 9/11 research community gain more attention than the efforts of hundreds of less famous people who have been trying for years to gain access to the corporate media.

Last week Charlie Sheen became a legend. He became the first celebrity (to attract the attention of the corporate media) to risk all to ask the common sense questions that formed in his mind when he examined the 9/11 crime scene evidence. SheenÂ’s brief appearance on CNNÂ’s Show Biz Tonight showed how millions of Americans could be made aware of the convincing and damning evidence that has been hidden from them for years by our corporate criminal media.

Predictably, Mr. Sheen soon became a prime target of people who make the illogical argument that a valid message is not to be accepted if it arrives in even a mildly tainted envelope. As compelling as Mr. Sheen's comments and observations are, there will always be those who ignore his words even as they follow the Sean Hannity illogic of shooting the messenger when you can not defeat the message.

Sorry Charlie, - you will always be a hero to me for your efforts, but what we really need now is a Charlie Sheen heart and head in a bulletproof package. And I think I know who that package is.

I submit to my fellow 9/11 truth seekers and truth bearers that our effort to alert the public will be victorious if Oprah Winfrey gets on board. If we could convince Oprah to provide a platform for presenting the information that is in our possession, weÂ’ll have it made. Oprah has been a champion for so many for so long that we can only hope that she has just half the courage and sense of duty of our new hero, Charlie Sheen.

Oprah Winfrey is the closest thing our generation has to a Walter Cronkite outside the news field. Her credibility and popularity are unmatched. Her words will ring loudly and people pay close attention to her program. And she comes without an iota of challengeable baggage.

Therefore, I am suggesting that a powerful, focused effort be made to inform Ms. Oprah Winfrey of the piles of evidence that give lie to the official story of 9/11. I also suggest that we try to convince this very powerful woman to use her show as a format for that evidence to be presented to the viewing public.

This has to be done carefully. The effort can backfire if a poorly planned, incoherent or unconvincing presentation is made to Ms. Winfrey who can place a nail in the coffin of the truth movement as quickly as she can blow the lid off of the suppression we have experienced.

For starters, here is what I would do if I were to make a presentation to Oprah Winfrey:

I would hand her a printed copy of an official news article from an authoritative mainstream source showing that several of the hijack suspects have surfaced ALIVE!
I would ask her what she would think if she had a guest on her show whose child had been raped and the following had taken place: A neighbor of the child had written about the need to hire more local police, but had also written that the only way the people in the neighborhood would agree to that would be if there were a crime such as the rape of a child in the neighborhood! What if it also turned out that this neighbor had a long, complex connection to child molesters and it turned out he had vouched for several child molesters so that they could move into the neighborhood. Then I would ask her if she would seriously consider the possibility of that personÂ’s involvement in the crime?
I would then explain that this is exactly what happened on 9/11 when the members of PNAC, who wrote about the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" were running drills on 9/11 after George W. Bush had called off all investigations into the Bin Laden family and Al Qaeda.
Next, I would implore her to watch the Second Edition of Dylan Avery's DVD, Loose Change. If that doesnÂ’t do it, nothing will.
At this point, unless she has been compromised by the power elite of this nation, OprahÂ’s own intelligence and humanity would come into play. She could not possibly ignore the evidence if were to be presented to her properly. Then, if she chose to use her incredible power and public integrity, Oprah most probably could be the straw to break the back of the 9/11 cover story. She owns the forum that can bring inordinate attention to this topic. Exposure of the evidence on her show could encourage millions of people to have serious doubts about what they have been told by their government, and to demand answers to the questions that have been raised about the worst attack on our nation in history.

I truly believe that the evidence is so powerful that it will speak for itself. But it has to have an avenue to reach the people of this nation, all of whom have a right to see it and draw their own conclusions.

The ultimate goal would be for Oprah Winfrey to dedicate a week of programming to the evidence that has been collected by the independent 9/11 truth community and that has been kept from public view for all this time.

WARNING: If a gatekeeper goes forward with this and proceeds to make an unintelligible and unconvincing case, this effort will set us back to square one. We donÂ’t want a repeat of the scene in A Few Good Men where Demi Moore's character provokes the judge into adding credibility to the oppositionÂ’s argument. Simple is better. The message should focus on the PNAC statement, the drills taking place on that day, the collapse of Building Seven and the still-living accused hijackers. The unstoppable force created by the information flow that follows will supply its own momentum.

I am offering my services to review and coordinate a presentation to Ms. Winfrey because I know how to keep the message focused and bulletproof. We cannot afford to be distracted by minutia or a myriad of theories. The last thing we need is to talk about a suspicious flash on a wing when we have authentic videos of the collapse of a 47 story building along with a confession about its destruction by its owner.

So, to those of you who seek the truth, and to

"I mean, did you hear writer Robert Fisk, in a special ABC broadcast of his speech just the night before, suggest the September 11 attacks may have been the work of . . . Americans?"

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,18636966%255E2...

did you guys already see this?

http://www.rense.com/general70/asner.htm

Booh, what garbage in the herald sun. To good for the author that he don't post his email addy.

And a LTTE is wasted time on this newspaper, I fear.

Mail @ Oprah: done in the most kindliest way.

any word on that CNN march?

9/11 Truth Calling Oprah!...I emailed her, how about you? peace,pw

9/11 Truth Calling Oprah!
An Appeal from TvNewsLIES.org

For more than five years now, the entire mainstream corporate news media apparatus has been controlled by a handful of behind-the-scene power brokers. In all that time there has been a total blackout on any mention, never mind discussion, of the truth behind the events of 9/11.

Despite their credibility and expertise, high-powered and extremely convincing voices of truth have been denied access to the public via the mainstream media. In the years following the attacks of 9/11, a significant number of knowledgeable people have attempted to alert the nation about the mountain of evidence that has been unearthed by their investigations, and which shoots large holes in the ‘official’ version of events sold to an unsuspecting and unquestioning public.

These people include former Bush administration officials, CIA analysts, FBI whistleblowers, scholars, academics, theologians and eye witnesses to the events of that tragic day. Not one of these people has been allowed to present his or her individual and collective conclusions that the Bush administration was either totally negligent or fully complicit or in the events of 9/11.

The media blacklisting of any and all members of the independent 9/11 truth community, no matter how impressive his or her credentials, has resulted in widespread ignorance of the huge number of anomalies and inconsistencies in the official version. No questions have been allowed to be raised, and not one shred of evidence that refutes the official version has been presented to the viewing or reading public anywhere but on the Internet.

Recent events, however, suggest that there may be a breach in this wall of silence. It seems that the only way for the 9/11 truth movement to attract the attention of the public is for well-known individuals in the entertainment arena to come forward and demand the truth.

Sad but true, a large number of Americans believe nothing until they see it on TV! There can be no question about the enormous influence and effect of television broadcasting on public opinion, a very frightening fact in these troubled and dangerous times. It was exactly for that reason that I created TvNewsLIES.org and dedicated these past years to exposing the lies and deception emanating from our broadcast news industry. And that is why I now am calling for help from one of TVÂ’s most popular and respected performers.

Last week we witnessed a five-cent example of how the single TV appearance of a well-known performer, a celebrity if you will, could initiate a terribly important word-of-mouth grass roots movement. The support of one show-biz personality helped the 9/11 research community gain more attention than the efforts of hundreds of less famous people who have been trying for years to gain access to the corporate media.

Last week Charlie Sheen became a legend. He became the first celebrity (to attract the attention of the corporate media) to risk all to ask the common sense questions that formed in his mind when he examined the 9/11 crime scene evidence. SheenÂ’s brief appearance on CNNÂ’s Show Biz Tonight showed how millions of Americans could be made aware of the convincing and damning evidence that has been hidden from them for years by our corporate criminal media.

Predictably, Mr. Sheen soon became a prime target of people who make the illogical argument that a valid message is not to be accepted if it arrives in even a mildly tainted envelope. As compelling as Mr. Sheen's comments and observations are, there will always be those who ignore his words even as they follow the Sean Hannity illogic of shooting the messenger when you can not defeat the message.

Sorry Charlie, - you will always be a hero to me for your efforts, but what we really need now is a Charlie Sheen heart and head in a bulletproof package. And I think I know who that package is.

I submit to my fellow 9/11 truth seekers and truth bearers that our effort to alert the public will be victorious if Oprah Winfrey gets on board. If we could convince Oprah to provide a platform for presenting the information that is in our possession, weÂ’ll have it made. Oprah has been a champion for so many for so long that we can only hope that she has just half the courage and sense of duty of our new hero, Charlie Sheen.

Oprah Winfrey is the closest thing our generation has to a Walter Cronkite outside the news field. Her credibility and popularity are unmatched. Her words will ring loudly and people pay close attention to her program. And she comes without an iota of challengeable baggage.

Therefore, I am suggesting that a powerful, focused effort be made to inform Ms. Oprah Winfrey of the piles of evidence that give lie to the official story of 9/11. I also suggest that we try to convince this very powerful woman to use her show as a format for that evidence to be presented to the viewing public.

This has to be done carefully. The effort can backfire if a poorly planned, incoherent or unconvincing presentation is made to Ms. Winfrey who can place a nail in the coffin of the truth movement as quickly as she can blow the lid off of the suppression we have experienced.

For starters, here is what I would do if I were to make a presentation to Oprah Winfrey:

I would hand her a printed copy of an official news article from an authoritative mainstream source showing that several of the hijack suspects have surfaced ALIVE!
I would ask her what she would think if she had a guest on her show whose child had been raped and the following had taken place: A neighbor of the child had written about the need to hire more local police, but had also written that the only way the people in the neighborhood would agree to that would be if there were a crime such as the rape of a child in the neighborhood! What if it also turned out that this neighbor had a long, complex connection to child molesters and it turned out he had vouched for several child molesters so that they could move into the neighborhood. Then I would ask her if she would seriously consider the possibility of that personÂ’s involvement in the crime?
I would then explain that this is exactly what happened on 9/11 when the members of PNAC, who wrote about the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" were running drills on 9/11 after George W. Bush had called off all investigations into the Bin Laden family and Al Qaeda.
Next, I would implore her to watch the Second Edition of Dylan Avery's DVD, Loose Change. If that doesnÂ’t do it, nothing will.
At this point, unless she has been compromised by the power elite of this nation, OprahÂ’s own intelligence and humanity would come into play. She could not possibly ignore the evidence if were to be presented to her properly. Then, if she chose to use her incredible power and public integrity, Oprah most probably could be the straw to break the back of the 9/11 cover story. She owns the forum that can bring inordinate attention to this topic. Exposure of the evidence on her show could encourage millions of people to have serious doubts about what they have been told by their government, and to demand answers to the questions that have been raised about the worst attack on our nation in history.

I truly believe that the evidence is so powerful that it will speak for itself. But it has to have an avenue to reach the people of this nation, all of whom have a right to see it and draw their own conclusions.

The ultimate goal would be for Oprah Winfrey to dedicate a week of programming to the evidence that has been collected by the independent 9/11 truth community and that has been kept from public view for all this time.

WARNING: If a gatekeeper goes forward with this and proceeds to make an unintelligible and unconvincing case, this effort will set us back to square one. We donÂ’t want a repeat of the scene in A Few Good Men where Demi Moore's character provokes the judge into adding credibility to the oppositionÂ’s argument. Simple is better. The message should focus on the PNAC statement, the drills taking place on that day, the collapse of Building Seven and the still-living accused hijackers. The unstoppable force created by the information flow that follows will supply its own momentum.

I am offering my services to review and coordinate a presentation to Ms. Winfrey because I know how to keep the message focused and bulletproof. We cannot afford to be distracted by minutia or a myriad of theories. The last thing we need is to talk about a suspicious flash on a wing when we have authentic videos of the collapse of a 47 story building along with a confession about its destruction by its owner.

So, to those of you who seek the truth, and to those of you who suspect the truth and to those of you who know the truth about 9/11, I ask your help. Send out an SOS to Oprah Winfrey. Imagine if she were to receive tens of thousands of requests for a series of shows that would reveal the evidence that has been accrued over these years.

Please take five minutes of your time to send a message to the Oprah Winfrey Show, and let her know that you want a show about 9/11. And if you choose to do so, please add that IÂ’d be happy to appear as a representative of the Truth Community. HereÂ’s where you can type in your suggestion for a future show:

http://www.oprah.com/email/reach/email_showideas.jhtml

Think about it!
Jesse - Editor, TvNewsLIES.org

http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_truth_calling_oprah.html

peace,pw

I agree pw. I've been emailing Oprah for awhile now, eg. George Washington's tipping point idea.

The Jersey Girls on Oprah, for example, would be like lighting starting the thunder

What city does Oprah live in?

What a thread!!!

andi- great cage metaphor

Fredrique- keep using the Mark Morford article to get them to take this seriously

Citizenkit- Has any one pursued the copyright questions about turning the Morford article into a flyer? ( work will keep me from doing too much until later)
P.S Please don't use the 'newbie' word, its incredibly condesending. I don't want to have to use profanity again.

dk-Freedom from fascism...excellent...I'm actually glad they don't include 911 in this, it would just complicate it. Hit them at the wallet!!!That will wake up average americans, just look at almost any recent political campaign.....bread and butter issues
But going after the federal reserve, now that 's really chewing on the strings of power above the puppets.

Corner the market on boxcutters and take over the world! Very good AmandaReconwith.

Fisk audio link here:

http://www.abc.net.au/rn/bigidea/audio/big_26032006_2856.ram

Fisk is big!!!! He's the preemient reporter of things Middle East, and is frequently on Amy Goodman's show.

If he starts saying that, could break down more left gatekeeping gates... er, left gates, er... you know...

dont forget to listen to my favorite radio show!!!!!

Wednesdays 1-2pm PST (4-5pm EST) - KPFA 94.1fm

http://www.gunsandbutter.net/

guns and butter was the first place i ever heard someone say 911 was an inside job on the radio... i wasnt 100% sure at that point and it sure helped me feel sane....

2 new ones:

Dear Government Employee:

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/03/dear-government-employee.html

Boomerang:

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/03/boomerang.html

Oh dear... Australia Press is
often the LABORATORY for the rest

It is the first sign that the Corporate Media is afraid, and it FEARS to have to admit that 911 was an inside job..

Looks good.

But I am worried about people smearing chomsky, and right-wing pea-brains taking up guns and running on the street, finding "gatekeepers" and lynching them..

u2r2h's first law:

People who publicly criticize Chomsky, don't read him.

Chomsky USED TO BE great!

But he's totally lost it (read my totally off-topic post on global warming here:

http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2006/03/global-warming-cold-facts-o...

where Chomsky says he's okay with fascism). OKAY WITH FASCISM???

Gosh, Radical Pragmatist, since when is the term "newbie" considered condescending? I was a newbie in 2003 when I woke up to 9/11 truth -- we've all been there at some point in our lives.

At any rate, my point was that Morford's article is great for those just starting to wake up. Those of us who have been at this awhile won't learn anything new from his article -- BUT, it's one of the most compelling and concise pieces I've ever read on 9/11, period. Just my opinion.... it'll be interesting to see what kind of impact it has (if Morford does a follow-up about the response he's receiving at his in-box).

Bush Blames Iraq Instability On Saddam

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Dumb ass.

Really. I can't believe he doesn't realize it is Clinton's fault.

Wait a second... I thought everything was hunky-dory in Iraq, and it was the media who was lying about the instability. Now he's admitting to the instability, but blaming it on Saddam.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Since I know people controlling this board don't practice what they preach This message will be deleted really really fast.

If you google: "Dylan Avery Zulubabe"
"Dylan Avery Rabid Jew Hater"
"Dylan Avery Spook"

You'll see that hes a lying thieving spook controlled by a criminal network.

Anyone who collaborates with the enemy is a fucking traitor.

Paul Isaac Jr (Sentinel)
Rsqsrvs@Yahoo.com

I don't care much for LC or LC2E anyway.

Paul Isaac Jr. I did as you said, and this was returned.

lgf: Porsche 911
lgf: Gittin' Meta Wit' It

Not telling the truth?

In your posting about the David Ray Griffin interview on Guns & Butter, it says that the show will be posted for a week.
Actually if you go to the Guns and Butter website, the shows are posted for months, years. There are 122 archives available 7 pages worth of archives.

Hey I think,
The rumor is that the government spent about 1.6 billion to ‘market’ the official story. Compare that with this blog and a tiny budget. I distribute flyers and disks too. I know that we are making a difference. But after thinking about it for a couple of days I just had to make a donation. So I did. It’s worth fifty bucks easy. I’ll remember that I this when everyone, REALLY EVERYONE, doesn’t believe the official story.

See, someone might ask- “what did you do?” .Make a donation to 911truth or 911blogger or similar sites and you’ll feel much better in the future. The truth is coming now. I’m sure of it.

Radical Pragmatist -- thanks for the explanation. Understandable.

I haven't looked into the copyright issue with the SFGate article -- too much work piled up here -- but, I'll look into it later. I could do it for personal use, I'm sure -- but, putting it here would probably not be cool without SFGate's approval.

http://www.silver-investor.com/charlessavoie/cs_dec04.pdf

Meet the world's money power- the Pilgrim Society is much more powerful than the skulls, Trilateral, Carlyle, CFR, and bilderberg.

http://blogs.albawaba.com/Alexanderjames/2067/2006/01/13/9229-world_mone...

pw my man!

Two of us have passed out 1500 of our 8-hour internet compilation DVDs, with 6 known active enthusiastic self-sufficient self-sustaining duplicators downline. Another couple hundred total of Reopen, LC2, and Martial Law DVDs. Quite satisfying!! Always scribble on the label side "Free" and "Pass it on".