Can someone suggest a few mainstream-type blogs that would be good to spread 9/11 truth on? Preferably large blogs of reasonable people who are not yet informed on 9/11 truth?

I've contacted John Aravosis of Americablog on this topic a few times.

So far, he has stated that he doesn't think he could publish anything for lack of being "credible."

You can contact him through the link at

http://www.americablog.blogspot.com

There is certainly a lot of commentary on the site, but no threads dedicated specifically to this topic.

Just some grist for the mill

Check out the lead editorial at antiwar.com today,( War against Iran, April 2006, by Jorge Hirsch)

With all of the current 911 exposure we should step back once and while and ask , Why Now?

Is it a warning to the adminstration, not to go forward with their insane plans for Iran? As Tarpley, and others have suggested?

Or is it a way to bury 911 skepticism, by a limited exposure just before the next horrific action of the neocons and their supporters.
Remember Rumsfeld decided to voluntary mention that 2.3 Trillion dollars were unaccounted for on Sept. 10 2001.

Like 911, I don't have all the answers, but these are very reasonable questions that shoudn't be ignored.

If we do this, I beleive we will have a lot of sane people in the military, intelligence and government supporting our efforts.

Just an FYI, Seth Green and Erica Jong brought up the idea that Bush knew about 9/11 on Real Time With Bill Maher last night on HBO. It aired at 11:00 EST. It reruns daily for about 4 or 5 days at least.

Bill Maher thought that that premise what unbelieveable. "I mean I don't like George Bush, but you're telling me he knew 9/11 was going to happen?" He was pretty skeptical but he let them speak. The most revealing thing I thought though was representative Dana Rohrbacher saying he warned Bush the day before 9/11 about terrorist attacks. He said he didn't believe the "bush knew" theory but just by revealing that it's pretty damning against Bush no matter what.

Manhattanite,

It is amazing that this is the second article about the bird flu possible being used as false flag to attack Iran, talk about conspiracy theory, but they won't touch 911
If you read the interview with Paul Craig Roberts, he says that the editors absolutely refuse to publish anything about 911, although he has tried. They're reasoning as told to him is that if they cover 911, they will be labeled as crazy conspiracy theorists and all of the other important subjects/topics that they cover would be ignored after that labeling.

As with many otherwise perceptive news sites I think they are waiting for a safe or more receptive climate before they cover 911.

I personally don't think we have the time to wait for that and I will let them know. I encourage others to do the same.

D. Doug, "Even if the truth movement is CORRECT, and the Bush admin. is guilty of helping to murder 3,000 people on 9/11, it's "better for the Libertarian party" to "let if go" and "focus on current problems?"

Great observation! I think many other self-serving groups/people besides the Libertarians share this same disgusting philosophy of "let's only do what's best for us."