Senate Hearings on Bush, Now

Thanks to BB for sending this in. Vanity Fair has articles????

http://www.vanityfair.com/features/general/articles/060417fege08

In this VF.com exclusive, a Watergate veteran and Vanity Fair contributor calls for bipartisan hearings investigating the Bush presidency. Should Republicans on the Hill take the high road and save themselves come November?
...
I retired from the military four months before the invasion, in part because of my opposition to those who had used 9/11's tragedy to hijack our security policy." The decision to invade Iraq, he said, "was done with a casualness and swagger that are the special province of those who have never had to execute these missions—or bury the results." Despite the military's determination that, after Vietnam, "[W]e must never again stand by quietly while those ignorant of and casual about war lead us into another one and then mismanage the conduct of it.… We have been fooled again."
...
Certainly any investigation of the president and his administration should include both disasters. Before 9/11, Bush and Condoleezza Rice had been warned in the starkest of terms—by their own aides, by the outgoing Clinton administration, and by experts on terrorism—of the urgent danger of a spectacular al-Qaeda attack in the United States. Yet the first top-level National Security Council meeting to discuss the subject was not held until September 4, 2001—just as the F.B.I. hierarchy had been warned by field agents that there were suspected Islamic radicals learning to fly 747s with no legitimate reasons for doing so, but the bureau ultimately ignored the urgency of problem, just as Bush had ample opportunity (despite what he said later) to review and competently execute a disaster plan for the hurricane heading toward New Orleans.

There will forever be four indelible photographic images of the George W. Bush epoch: an airplane crashing into World Trade Tower number two; Bush in a Florida classroom reading from a book about a goat while a group of second-graders continued to captivate him for another seven minutes after Andrew Card had whispered to the president, "America is under attack"

Carl Bernstein, of

Carl Bernstein, of Bernstein&Woodward Watergate fame, called for a formal inquiry into the Bush Administration on variety of issues, with 9/11 among them. This could be one of the best avenues available, given the investigative powers in the Congress, albeit one currently led by the Party of the President. There may be other serious efforts available, or even underway that we don't know about in important DA offices, as well.

bernstien never says 9-11 is

bernstien never says 9-11 is an inside job

he also views iran as a threat

zionist??????????????????

what kind of super journalist is he? when average joes have scooped him, and 9-11 happened over 4 and a half years ago

sorry i expected more

"zionist??????????????????" S

"zionist??????????????????"

So if you see Iran as a threat, that automatically makes you a "Zionist"?

What about those people who see the Iran Oil Bourse as a threat? Are they "Petrodollar Zionists"?

I expected more, too, but

I expected more, too, but you have to take 'em where you can get 'em. Consider Walter Payton running the football. No daylight, but he keeps fighting, and noone can bring him down. Then, a hole opens up. Should he complain that he didn't have daylight for four and half years? Or should he run to daylight?

I'm not defending Bernstein,

I'm not defending Bernstein, or Isikoff, or Hersh, or any of the more famous journalists for not even quesitoning 9/11. Lord knows their silence is killing this country. I'm just saying every discussion on this site should not revolve around the "Zionist Conspiracy".

Carl Bernstein is a Vanity

Carl Bernstein is a Vanity Fair contributing editor. His biography of Hillary Rodham Clinton will be published by Knopf next year.

A kinder, gentler gatekeeper.

Vanity Fair is a Zionist

Vanity Fair is a Zionist publication owned by this Jew

http://www.forbes.com/finance/lists/10/2003/LIR.jhtml?passListId=10&pass...

Articles like this help to perpetuate the al-Qaeda attack myth. There were no hijackers on 9/11. This is mind control clap trap.

So is the difference between jet planes and images of jet planes.

http://nineeleven2001.tripod.com/images/ua175-1-a.swf

Countries organized around

Countries organized around religion are the problem whether it is a jewish country or an islamic country.

God as a particular entity is Santa Claus for people who don't have the courage to look through the Hubble Telescope and see the truth

On Bernstein: "A liberal is

On Bernstein:

"A liberal is a conservative who has acquired property."

AmandaReconwith... You are

AmandaReconwith...

You are an anti-semite.

Amanda,

Amanda, http://nineeleven2001.tripod.com/

This site is a complete joke. Let's please add it to the list of sites that we reject, as it is an embarrassment to the movement. Anything by Jack White is also to be laughed at and rejected.

Sites like this that feature people with no training trying so hard to nitpick photographs and coming up with ridiculous conclusions only hurt the truth movement.

And yea can we please quit

And yea can we please quit with the anti-semitism? What is that about already?

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/0

I take offense to

I take offense to AmandaReconwith. I'm jewish.

Yeah, he owns Vanity Fair, a

Yeah, he owns Vanity Fair, a magazine that ran a story on Sibel Edmonds in September 2005. He owns the New Yorker, a magazine that ran a story on the 9/11 Truth Movement last month. Damn zionists.

yeah, but they are limited

yeah, but they are limited hangout disinfo bastages.

j/k.. you see, this is why mags dont touch the issue, because as soon as they do they get just as much negative press from the people who supposively want them to cover the subject..

if you want magazines to cover 9/11 and to at least mention that there is a massive segment of the public that knows it is a fraud, then don't bitch and condemn them when they do.

Democrats Support Military

i got a kick out of this

i got a kick out of this one:-)

Yesterday on Rush Limbaugh, embattled Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld said that those who criticize the Iraq war are being manipulated by terrorists, including Zarqawi and bin Laden, through the U.S. media:
There have always been people who have opposed warsÂ…I think we just have to accept it, that people have a right to say what they want to say, and to have an acceptance of that and recognize that the terrorists, Zarqawi and bin Laden and Zawahiri, those people have media committees.

They are actively out there trying to manipulate the press in the United States. They are very good at it.

an·ar·chy

an·ar·chy

More remains found at

If some aspect of the

If some aspect of the Israeli government or political parties have some responsibility for 9/11, they are "rogues" just like whatever individuals/groups in the US government who were involved. Its insane to be angry at the whole nation and people of Israel, just as its been insane to bomb Afghanistan and Iraq and kill tens of thousands of innocent people on the excuse that terrorists or possible terrorists were there.

The Democrates are totally

The Democrates are totally complicit in covering-up 9/11! These jellyfish won't even critize the Repugs on incompetense, let alone any LIHOP or MIHOP.

Take Hillary & Schumer, the

Take Hillary & Schumer, the two Senators from NY. They do nothing while Bush/Cheney lead us into a Nazi-like State and crap all over the U.S. Constitution. Not a peep out of these two Democratic frauds.

if bush supports democracy

if bush supports democracy abroad, it should include technology

ie nuclear power

i take offense to jews who

i take offense to jews who refuse to point a finger at thier own

jack white is very correct

the usa altered photos of the pentagon crash

what do you say to that gold?

your the anti pentagon guy, who is also jewish

you sir are a disinfo agent

You got me.

You got me.

Hehe is "disinfo agent" the

Hehe is "disinfo agent" the new "red?" Before we turn into a bunch of McCarthies, let's try to think a bit deeper.

The people who perpetrated

The people who perpetrated 9/11 are not "my own" people. They are fascists, murderers, corporatists, perverts, etc...

Not my crowd.

i guess im trying to say

i guess im trying to say this

anti semitism will get seriously out of control the longer this drags on

let the chips fall where they may

i killed zero people on 9-11

i am pretty sure gold didnt kill anyone either

as a non jew blue collar type, i can say people really dont like jews, for whatever reason

me i dont care if your purple and worship a head of lettuce

it is a fact that this is a war of israeli aggression, and arabs didnt pull off the 9-11 war crimes as stated by the government

the fallout from 9-11 is going to hang alot of people

but they made that choice, to cover it up

just as we choose to seek truth- to un cover the cover up

anonymous, don't diss jon

anonymous,

don't diss jon like that, he has busted his ass for the last 2 years doing what he can. so he thinks flight 77 hit the pentagon, so do a lot of other people who still question 9/11. just because you believe the government is covering up the event doesn't mean you have to believe in every single 'theory' others have.

i respect a good number of 9/11 activists out there who think 77 did hit the pentagon, but question the ability of hanjour to do it himself, these people aren't 'disinfo', they just don't think there is 100% solid evidence to believe in those claims.

btw, i have been into digital photography and photoshop for around 10 years now. at least half of those jack white photos are just his lack of understanding on perspective and depth of field.

3 years, but thanks. ;)

3 years, but thanks. ;)

I gotta stand up for Jon as

I gotta stand up for Jon as well, he works tirelessly for this cause, and is entitled to his own opinions just like everyone else.

I personally don't believe 77 hit the Pentagon, however, if some incontrovertible evidence came out that proves it did, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it. Whether or not 77 hit does not change the ultimate logical conclusion in this matter, 911 was an Inside Job.

someone posted this

someone posted this earlier:
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/pentagon/index.html

apparently it was recently updated (march).. i think hoffman does a fine job arguing the point that 77 did hit the pentagon.. but, i dont chastise those that disagree.. i think we all agree that the approach was questionable for someone like hanjour, that there should have been an intercept, that the tapes should be released, etc. etc.

"it is a fact that this is a

"it is a fact that this is a war of israeli aggression, and arabs didnt pull off the 9-11 war crimes as stated by the government"

It is a war of Bush/Cheney/Rummy aggression/madness.

Jon's not disinfo, he is a

Jon's not disinfo, he is a tireless 9/11 activist.

Fred Burks, who runs

Fred Burks, who runs www.WantToKnow.info, passed on the following idea to me from one of his readers:

On the 11th of each month, everyone who knows that 9/11 was an inside job wears white.

This could be a secret code, so that 9/11 truthers who are "in the closet" about their knowledge of 9/11 can identify each other.

Those who are more bold can respond to any questions or comments about their attire by saying something like

"I've whitewashed myself ... just like the 9/11 Commission whitewashed what really happened on 9/11".

Good idea?

" take offense to jews who

" take offense to jews who refuse to point a finger at thier own
"

i take offense to your extremely immature and myopic view of the situation. Please get off this website if you cant be civilized.

Good idea, but black somehow

Good idea, but black somehow seems more appropriate..

Thank you my minions... now

Thank you my minions... now go forward, and spread the truth...

"Good idea, but black

"Good idea, but black somehow seems more appropriate.."

I agree, but black is sort of an "in" color among some people.

But if there was a good spin on it, maybe that would work.

"I'm wearing black because 9/11 was a black op" just doesn't sound very catchy.

i like black over white..

i like black over white.. cause i could wear all black (pants + shirt), whereas i wont be wearing any white pants anytime soon.. ;)

Most people in the business

Most people in the business world wear white pretty often anyway, so this won't do any good. Unless we're supposed to wear a white suit or something, in which case we'll all look like pimps.

How about those yellow

How about those yellow ribbon things, but with a 9/11 inside job message instead of "support the troops"

?

I just read a website about

I just read a website about where that yellow ribbon tradition came from:

http://www.loc.gov/folklife/ribbons/ribbons.html

We'd have to come up with a good spin on it to make it fit.

"Support our Constitution
ST911.org"

?

anybody else think this

anybody else think this vanity fair article is really bad?

its basicallty saying clinton/democrats good, republicans/bush bad. Cant these people get out of this goddamn bubble? Im getting so frustrated by this partisan nonsense

Yeah, I think we need to be

Yeah, I think we need to be a little less subtle, wearing all white won't accomplish a whole lot.

I was thinking of 911blogger baseball caps, you could pretty much wear those every day, everywhere you go, especially in the summer.

Something good on the front of the cap, like one of the firefighter quotes, or a picture of a building with a squib shooting out of it. Then on the back strap, have it say www.911blogger.com, or some other website. That way your advertising when your coming and going.

Re:

Re: http://nineeleven2001.tripod.com/

The one image that intrigues me from this site is #20, from the Naudet video, where you see a smoke cloud appear in the distance (New Jersey?) at about the same time as Building 2 collapses.

http://nineeleven2001.tripod.com/images/newyork-20.html

I'd seen this before and always wondered about it - anyone have any further info? Was there some kind of unrelated explosion miles away from Ground Zero at 10 am that day.. any news reports, etc?

I like that, sbg. I'd also

I like that, sbg.

I'd also like to think of something for people to wear who wear business suits or other formal attire.

CNN Showbiz Tonight: Neil

CNN Showbiz Tonight:

Neil Young: 'Let's Impeach the President'
Rocker records protest album, 'Living with War'

http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/Music/04/18/leisure.young.reut/index.html

Heck of a job, Bushie.

Heck of a job, Bushie.

Scotty "I've Got A Pink

Heck of a job, Scotty.

Heck of a job, Scotty.

Don't Panic (In large,

Don't

Panic

(In large, friendly letters)

I find the jew haters

I find the jew haters amusing. You do know Christians were involved also. Some Americans were involved also, should we blame the entire population of the usa for 9/11. When you judge races of people like that you are no better than people who hate arabs because of 9/11.

I find people that post

I find people that post things totally irrelevant to the topic amusing!

This is embarrasing. Things

This is embarrasing.
Things like 9/11 are only possible because large numbers of people are willing to entertain ridiculous notions of "blame the arabs", "blame the jews" or "blame the martians".

It´s all a matter of pointing fingers at an outside enemy, that "isn´t like us". We haven´t moved one bit closer to the truth if we just substitute the enemy du jour with the next one.

I disagree with Jon on quite a few topics, but none of them has anything to do with him being jewish.
If something he says/does, is SO damaging that it needs to be dealt with, I suggest people could post a little bit about that, instead of this nonsense.

Please get a grip. The criminals are on the loose, and immature racist blindfolds aren´t going to put them in jail.

Moralistic rant over
Peter Kofod, Denmark

CJ--"The one image that

CJ--"The one image that intrigues me from this site is #20, from the Naudet video, where you see a smoke cloud appear in the distance (New Jersey?) at about the same time as Building 2 collapses."

Interesting smoke clould. My guess is that it seems to be rising from the southern tip of Manhattan, rather than New Jersey. (Possibly an underground tunnel between the smoke site & the Towers?)

"I disagree with Jon on

"I disagree with Jon on quite a few topics"

Just out of curiosity... such as?

Jon wrote: "Just out of

Jon wrote:
"Just out of curiosity... such as?"

Well... for starters, you find SBG attractive... I don´t :)
And then there´s a minor matter regarding what hit what on 9/11.

Best,
Peter

"Well... for starters, you

"Well... for starters, you find SBG attractive... I don´t"

That is "disinformation".

"And then there´s a minor matter regarding what hit what on 9/11."

That's nothing new within the movement.

We don't all have to agree on every aspect of 9/11. We do have to agree that those differences of opinion shouldn't splinter the movement.

I've said it once, and I'll say it again...

WE aren't our enemy. ;)

"We don't all have to agree

"We don't all have to agree on every aspect of 9/11. We do have to agree that those differences of opinion shouldn't splinter the movement."

My point exactly!

That´s why I DIDN'T feel a need to adress the points.. :-)

Best,
Peter

except for the part about

except for the part about SBG ;-)

Peter