Former Bush Economist to Present 9/11 Inside Job Evidence
Somebigguy Sat, 04/22/2006 - 6:35pm
Check out this newscast from storytoday.tv, thanks to Cathy for the heads up:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZS5j2pBur8
Dr Morgan Reynolds, will speak out on September 11th being an Inside Job at the University of Wisconsin Madison State Historical Society on May 6. Will also present evidence that top Bush official orchestrated the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center.
They also describe the fabrication of Al Qaeda and lots of other interesting stuff.
- Login to post comments
Anyone here ever think about
Anyone here ever think about making up some flyers that could be passed outside showings of the Flight 93 movie?
This could be a good opportunity to expose people to important "questions" that remain about that flight and the official story.
Just an idea..
*offended
*offended
I've never heard of these
I've never heard of these people, but that was surreal.
Thanks SBG Dr Morgan
Thanks SBG
Dr Morgan Reynolds speech should be interesting :)
If he sticks to the facts and steers clear of speculation, this should be great exposure !!!
Cheers
Watch today's
Watch today's broadcast...
http://www.storytoday.tv/mov/storytoday20060422_S3.mov
I just sent them a thank you
I just sent them a thank you letter.
Holy crap Jon, that
Holy crap Jon, that broadcast was not only corny, it was also pornographic.
Good lord ~
Sounds like these guys are
Sounds like these guys are completely on board with this judging by some of the other things they talked about.
But they're actually
But they're actually reporting news. And making it interesting. Truthout.org, crooksandliars (still mad at them), etc...
And it's obvious they're
And it's obvious they're "low-budget"...
What were you saying Jon? I
What were you saying Jon? I was just replaying the porn story...
The fact that they included
The fact that they included Morgan Reynolds... without any "opinion" is amazing... they just reported it as if it was news... wierd.
"What were you saying Jon? I
"What were you saying Jon? I was just replaying the porn story..."
I like the blonde. I wouldn't mind a date with her.
Sorry to ruin your hard on
Sorry to ruin your hard on The Professional, but...
That pisses me off beyond
That pisses me off beyond being pissed off.
Much like the anger about
Much like the anger about the environmental disaster surrounding 9/11.
And I'm sorry I didn't have
And I'm sorry I didn't have a class this week.
No problem.
No problem.
You want a class on the
You want a class on the environmental disaster surrounding 9/11?
Here...
Bush had Christie Todd Whitman tell everyone the air was safe to breathe, and the water was safe to drink. They just did an autopsy on James Zadroga, the first person to die from the exposure to that "air that was safe to breathe". The Associated Press described it as a" chilling confirmation to many 9/11 rescuers that more than four years later, the disaster is still claiming lives". 15,000 more people are having problems because of the "air that was safe to breathe". Imagine what those people are going through right now. Not knowing if you're going to die.
BUSHCO DESERVES TO HANG FOR THAT ALONE
There's your 9/11 class on the environmental disaster surrounding the events of 9/11.
You guys REALLY need to
You guys REALLY need to watch the "New News" section at the YBBS. REALLY We don't bust our asses for nothin' over there, ya know?
It's news "By The People, For The People", and that's EXACTLY what it is... ;)
Sorry...
Sorry...
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt04
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0475276/
check out my review under comments, right now its the featured one!!
"the concrete of history is forming before our very eyes"
i suggest everybody go and register an account and write a detailed review and rate the movie a 1. You need to go "would you like to comment on this movie". If might not show up untilt he next day, but someone at IMDB must like me, mine went up within 4 hours.
people are waking up (not a parody of alex jones i really mean it!)
It wasn't you The
It wasn't you The Professional... it was the news about the soldiers.
does someone have a link to
does someone have a link to the New York Gallup poll about 9/11 and government involvment?
http://www.zogby.com/news/Rea
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=855
Gallup.. Sorry.
Gallup..
Sorry.
thanks Jon! had the polling
thanks Jon! had the polling firm wrong :-)
Does this have
Does this have it?
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8110
Fighter Jets intercept
Fighter Jets intercept United Airlines Flight
No Drills to Confuse NORAD this time
Associated Press | April 22 2006
Comment: No Presidential orders needed, the scrambling of fighter jets in this situation is automatic and has been for decades. So where were the F-16s on 9/11? Why were three airliners allowed to hit their targets despite being known to be hijacked?
Related: Wargames Were Cover For the Operational Execution of 9/11
A passenger who claimed to have a bomb aboard a United Airlines flight was subdued by passengers as the California-bound plane was diverted to Denver International Airport, airport officials said.
Two F-16 fighter jets from Buckley Air Force Base scrambled to escort the plane as it flew into Denver Friday, according to Lt. Commander Sean Kelly, a spokesman for NORAD.
"They followed to make sure nothing untoward was going to happen," he said.
Jose Manuel Pelayo-Ortega was arrested after the plane landed around 4:30 p.m., FBI spokeswoman Monique Kelso said.
Three Secret Service agents traveling between assignments who happened to be on the plane helped detain the passenger, said Secret Service spokesman Eric Zahren.
After the A-320 Airbus landed, it taxied to a remote part of the airport where the passengers got off and were bused to the terminal.
None of the 138 passengers or six crew members was injured, airport spokesman Chuck Cannon said. The flight was headed to Sacramento, Calif., from Chicago.
Authorities searched the aircraft for explosives and re-screened luggage and passengers before they reboarded the plane, which took off for its original destination around 7:30 p.m., Kelso said.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/220406_b_intercept.htm
surprise surprise.
surprise surprise.
Nice catch
Nice catch Chris...
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=9739
I think it's interesting to
I think it's interesting to note that the best people have been able to do since 9/11 is have a bomb on board... as opposed to going through all of the trouble of flying them into buildings... less "teamwork" as well.
Like Moussaoui's good friend
Like Moussaoui's good friend Reid.
You would think that the
You would think that the "terrorists" would be plentiful in people willing to do the same thing that was done on 9/11... considering our aggressive behavior since then.
It's also interesting to
It's also interesting to note that the Secret Service were on the plane to assist.
Hey - I have a suggestion,
Hey - I have a suggestion, if you want to have your personal little tirads with one another, fine, do it on Yahoo messenger. Please stick to the subject and try and reduce the number of petty little personal comments that take up visitor's time with absolute nonsense. I've written constructive things here that went completely ignored while idiots above talk about their porn news stories and hard ons.
Get a grip, women are on this as well, and stop thinking you're in guys' club on this blog. When you converse with one another and have no regard for the audience reading this stuff, you are doing a disservice to this blog.
And that Fox News, MSNBC,
And that Fox News, MSNBC, and CNN don't have this on their front page.
Cheryl... boys will be
Cheryl... boys will be boys... I appreciate what you're saying, and I respect what you're saying, but to me, if there isn't a certain amount of levity, we would all go insane. Please try to remember that.
Didn't Jan Hoyer just create
Didn't Jan Hoyer just create a new flyer for 93?
Thanks! There is also a new
Thanks!
There is also a new redesigned Flight 93 flyer.
http://digitalstyledesigns.com/pages/downloads.htm (comments and suggestions about flyer content is always welcome)
A two up Flight 93 flyer, and perhaps a four up flyer may also be posted soon. Keeping the cost as low as possible for activists seems very important these days.
Someone I greatly respect recently told me that the Flight 93 propaganda will be becoming huge, so flyering is imperative. It occured to me that we should have another Fahrenheit 9-11 like flyering campaign, like we did at 911Visibility for the Fahrenheit 9-11 movie "Dude, There's More to the Story" (the main flyer for that campaign is also on my download page).
Best regards,
Jan
Here is her WTC7
Here is her WTC7 flyer...
http://digitalstyledesigns.com/pdf%20files/WTC7new.pdf
Here's a flyer I made a
Here's a flyer I made a while back...
http://home.comcast.net/~gold9472/911flyer3bw.pdf
Here's one SBG made a while
Here's one SBG made a while back...
http://home.comcast.net/~gold9472/BushKnew2.pdf
" There is also a new
"
There is also a new redesigned Flight 93 flyer.
http://digitalstyledesigns.com/p...s/ downloads.htm (comments and suggestions about flyer content is always welcome)
A two up Flight 93 flyer, and perhaps a four up flyer may also be posted soon. Keeping the cost as low as possible for activists seems very important these days.
Someone I greatly respect recently told me that the Flight 93 propaganda will be becoming huge, so flyering is imperative. It occured to me that we should have another Fahrenheit 9-11 like flyering campaign, like we did at 911Visibility for the Fahrenheit 9-11 movie "Dude, There's More to the Story" (the main flyer for that campaign is also on my download page).
Best regards,"
YES, if all of us do this in our respective CDs, we will msot definitly make an impact. i am very excited about the prospect of the power of this info war
I'm assuming those videos
I'm assuming those videos were intended as a joke - right?
I won't really argue too much about the content, but the way in which it was delivered, paricularly on the most recent one, yeah - it was pretty cheesy.
Yes, it was very cheesy, but
Yes, it was very cheesy, but at least they're trying.
Also, it probably wouldn't
Also, it probably wouldn't hurt to present a better photo of this Morgan Reynolds guy: http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e294/cloakandswaggeronlineimages2/Morg...
I mean, seriously, I file that shit straight into my politicoparody folder.
You mean like this one?
You mean like this one?
See a whole bunch more,
See a whole bunch more, here...
my guess is that the plot
my guess is that the plot started as a hijacking but evolved as more people found was to benefit from the false flag attack.
these are the "shock and awe" people and 911 was "shock and awe".
It needs to be a press
It needs to be a press credential portrait shot.
Otherwise, you might as well show nothing at all, because IMO, you'd only do worse if you showed a freakin' mugshot of Nick Nolte.
Just speaking truth here, the dude looks either drunk and/or exhausted in that photo.
Peace.
...also, the frizzy white
...also, the frizzy white hair adds an instant "insanity" label to the photo.
Also just out: Guns and
Also just out: Guns and Butter Interview with Ted Gunderson, former head of LA FBI.
Amazing interview, covering OKC, 9/11, WTC '93 and even Charles Manson.
http://www.kpfa.org/archives/index.php?arch=13687
http://forums.craigslist.org/
http://forums.craigslist.org/?act=Q&ID=42057442
Can you guys see this?
Not only register at
Not only register at IMDB.com, but go to the message boards concerning the movie.
Visit message boards for:
World trade center
Flight 93
George w Bush
Fahrenheit 9/11
Fahrenheit 9/11 1/2
The Soapbox(accessable from the meassage boards menu, this is the fastest board)
All the boards are very fast, thousands read daily. You will find fellow truth seekers, and many in stiff opposition.
Hope to see you there
"The apparatus that could
"The apparatus that could ultimately have led to the plane with 138 passengers and six crew members being shot down, [B]put in place after 9-11[/B], was fully operational Friday, with agencies that included the Federal Aviation Administration and the Department of Homeland Security on an open phone line monitoring the flight."
Read This
And this.
Read this. And this.
Read this.
And this.
CJCSI 3610.01A Actual
CJCSI 3610.01A
Actual Document
Click Here
As a Director for Operations of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Fry issued an 'Instruction', CJCSI 3610.01A, which superseded earlier Department of Defence procedures for dealing with hijacked aircraft. The document, dated June 1, 2001, effectively stripped commanders in the field of all authority to act expeditiously, by stipulating approval for any requests involving "potentially lethal support" must be personally authorized by the Secretary of Defense, then as now Donald Rumsfeld. The order further requires the Secretary of Defense to be personally responsible for issuing intercept orders.
Fry issued CJCSI 3610.01A for the purpose of providing "guidance to the Deputy Director for Operations (DDO), National Military Command Center (NMCC), and operational commanders in the event of an aircraft piracy (hijacking) or request for destruction of derelict airborne objects." The CJCSI further states, "In the event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious means by the FAA. The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate responses as authorized by referenced, forward requests for DOD assistance to the Secretary of Defense for approval."
New video page from OKC
New video page from OKC Bombing Speakers Forum, Ten Year Anniversary Event
http://digitalstyledesigns.com/pages/moviesokc.htm
Birdwatcher... this was
Birdwatcher... this was recent? As in this week?
WAY TO GO!!!!
Yes, just today. I encourage
Yes, just today. I encourage people to listen to the videos in their entirety, because some of them have valuable content towards the end.
Also, a note from my blog, about a newly released video.
Regulated Resistance (illustration by Jan Hoyer)
http://www.newtopiamagazine.net/articles/30
A newly released 911 truth movement video clip from Feb. 2004 shows challenges faced with the upcoming historic peace protest's distribution of 9/11 Visibilty Project's Stop the 911 Cover-Up signs.
http://digitalstyledesigns.com/movies2/911VisSignPlans.mov
It is very interesting to consider the context of how much has changed with the increased general public awareness, and how little has actually changed with the peace movement's leaders continued refusal to address the critical 9/11 issue.
It is way past time for members of the peace community to demand that this situation change.
Jan H.
I love you dear.... ;)
I love you dear.... ;)
Anybody else having problems
Anybody else having problems with blogger?
Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.
Request header field is missing colon separator.
__utma=248788510.1794700987.1137964098.1137964098.1137964098.1;
ok here JG
ok here JG
anyone know where to find
anyone know where to find official documentation of "standard operating procedures" in regard to planes going off course (not necessarily hijacked)?
Has anyone ever seen
Has anyone ever seen anything about the normal passenger loads on those 4 regularly scheduled flights? One of the things Lionel brought up in that first batch of excellent radio podcasts was that he'd found it normal for airlines to find a way to cancel flights with such light loads and put you on the next flight, especially cross country flights.
that stupid bitch: Lawyer:
that stupid bitch:
Lawyer: Rice Allegedly Leaked Defense Info
By MATTHEW BARAKAT
The Associated Press
Saturday, April 22, 2006; 12:59 AM
ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice leaked national defense information to a pro-Israel lobbyist in the same manner that landed a lower-level Pentagon official a 12-year prison sentence, the lobbyist's lawyer said Friday.
Prosecutors disputed the claim.
The allegations against Rice came as a federal judge granted a defense request to issue subpoenas sought by the defense for Rice and three other government officials in the trial of Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman. The two are former lobbyists with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee who are charged with receiving and disclosing national defense information.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/21/AR200604...
Rice and AIPAC. a perfect
Rice and AIPAC. a perfect match.
Wanna see something REALLY
Wanna see something REALLY scary?
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0422-01.htm
You mean
You mean this?
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/images/0422-01.jpg
Cheryl, Thanks for your
Cheryl, Thanks for your input on the discussion on this blog. I tend to agree.
And, btw, I checked out your music page and am listening to "Mastered Gotta Tune the World Out." Love it -- and boy can I relate to what you're singing about. Keep up the great work and please come back here and leave more comments.
Regarding
Regarding Rice...
http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7612
Jim Hoffman has created a
Jim Hoffman has created a new comprehensive, folded handout about Flight 93, filled with excellent information.
http://911research.wtc7.net/materials/flight93/index.html
link from
link from st911.org
http://mujca.com/bushwhacked.htm
I just had some long
I just had some long correspondence with Ted (the guy in this news broadcast)... I'll see if he'll let me post it... he's a truther.
goddamn that Condi picture
goddamn that Condi picture is scary.
I Seen The Lights Go Out On
I Seen The Lights Go Out On Broadway
seriously man, you dont have
seriously man, you dont have to get so offensive Jon. its not that serious Jon.
HOW CAN YOU MAKE A FLIGHT 93
HOW CAN YOU MAKE A FLIGHT 93 HANDOUT WITHOUT PUTTING THE REPORT THAT IT LANDED IN CLEVELAND WITH A BOMB ON BOARD
"HOW CAN YOU MAKE A FLIGHT
"HOW CAN YOU MAKE A FLIGHT 93 HANDOUT WITHOUT PUTTING THE REPORT THAT IT LANDED IN CLEVELAND WITH A BOMB ON BOARD"
Because that news account was retracted.
Jon, could you elaborate on
Jon, could you elaborate on your last post? Retracted when?
Someone posted it here not
Someone posted it here not too long ago. I don't know what the link is.
Jon, are you saying that the
Jon, are you saying that the story is no longer valid, or just that it was retracted and/or removed. (When I read it a long time ago, it seemed very credible.)
"Jon, are you saying that
"Jon, are you saying that the story is no longer valid, or just that it was retracted and/or removed. (When I read it a long time ago, it seemed very credible.)"
It said something about not being factually correct, and therefore removed.
Whoever posted it, please post it again.
http://web.archive.org/web/20
http://web.archive.org/web/20021109040132/http://wcpo.com/specials/2001/...
Plane Lands In Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard
Reported by: 9News Staff
Web produced by: Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM
A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.
White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.
United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.
United said it was also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.
On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: "The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.
"United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights," he said.
many times, initial, local
many times, initial, local news reports are the most honest accounts you can get of an event.there was a reason the report was pulled, and its not because it was a "mistake".
Right, and now it
Right, and now it says...
Plane Lands In Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard
Reported by: 9News Staff
Web produced by: Liz Foreman
9/11/01 11:43:57 AM
This story has been removed from WCPO.com.
It was a preliminary AP story, and was factually incorrect.
Yes, and notice how it was
Yes, and notice how it was removed from their site that was otherwise a showcase for the "official story."
Jon discounts that story
Jon discounts that story because he swears a 747 hit the pentagon. i still say initial news reports are more honest than the stories that follow.(see Oklahoma City bombing for proof) if it fit his story, i suspect he would say the same thing as well.they changed it for a reason, it didnt fit with the "official" story.but keep telling yourself it was because it was "factually incorrect".
because the media NEVER
because the media NEVER changes stories that dont fit with "official" accounts right? come on now......
"if it fit his story, i
"if it fit his story, i suspect he would say the same thing as well"
You know me Chris? You know how many contradictions and lies I've caught in the "Mainstream Media" Chris? Before you make an assumption about me, you'd better think long and hard about it.
then why pass off this story
then why pass off this story so quickly? obviously i know you dont trust the media based on your work, thats why i find it so strange that you trust their message that "This story has been removed from WCPO.com.
It was a preliminary AP story, and was factually incorrect." i know your views on the Pentagon so i put 2 and 2 together.it doesnt fit your views so you trust the MSM in this instance.feel free to correct me, thats just how i see it.
Gentlemen, Gentlemen, relax.
Gentlemen, Gentlemen, relax.
Jon, I generally agree with you 99% of the time, but I think you may have missed something big in this Cleveland retraction story.
Why retract it now, 4.5 years later???
Gee, is there a Flight 93 movie coming out shortly? They wouldn't want people doing a little research & seeing a story that it landed in Cleveland and the people were evacuated to a "secure" area, now would they?
"It was a preliminary AP
"It was a preliminary AP story, and was factually incorrect." i know your views on the Pentagon so i put 2 and 2 together.it doesnt fit your views so you trust the MSM in this instance.feel free to correct me, thats just how i see it."
No... but I know that if I tried to pass that off as evidence, the first thing a shill would do, would be to show me the retraction. Therefore, it's not an "argument" I would waste my time with.
Jon, you're making me
Jon, you're making me nervous the way you are blindly dismissing this! Okay?
"Jon, you're making me
"Jon, you're making me nervous the way you are blindly dismissing this! Okay?"
I'm not "blindly" dismissing anything. I explained to you the why... When I talk to someone regarding 9/11, I always always always go with "the best" stuff. I spend too much time doing this stuff, and don't like to get caught up in endless discussions. I certainly don't like to present articles that have a retraction.
I am the LAST person to trust the mainstream media, and am COMPLETELY AWARE of how they no longer work for the people.
However, I'd like to see a second mention of this cleveland story. I'd like a better understanding or corroboration as to how it relates to 9/11.
If a story breaks tomorrow that says, "Flight 93 flight recorder tampered with" or something to that affect, you bet your ass I would go back to the Cleveland AP story, and say, well what about this?
However, right now, for me, it goes on the shelf.
Jon, the story was retracted
Jon, the story was retracted just now, with Flight 93 about to debut! The story is very clear & detailed about it having landed in Cleveland, with a bomb on board, & passangers taken to a secure area. Why/how was all this "error" written in the first place on 9/11, by a reputable news agency????? It just came about for now reason??? Come on now, let's be realistic, Jon.
Anonymous, read my post in
Anonymous,
read my post in the top open thread, it was removed 18+ months ago, not 'just now' as you state. go to archive.org, type in the old web address, and look at the history, it was removed october of 2004 - not 'just now'.