Quick Survey of Six PhD Civil Engineers on 9/11 Collapses

A mini-survey of Ph.D. civil engineers - physorg.com

I finally got a day off, wherein I didn't sleep until 3 pm, and so I took the opportunity to speak to 5 civil engineers at Rutgers University today. I basically asked for a few minutes of their time, to ask them 2 questions:

1) Have you read the NISt Summary Report?
2) Are you aware of and have you read Professor Jones' paper on the collapses?
..
Apparently, 6 out of 6 Ph.D. civil engineers that I have talked to have neither read the NIST summary report, nor have they read Professor Jones' paper. Only 1 of them has definitely even heard of Professor Jones' paper. (One of the six may have read the NIST summary, and even Jones' paper, but forgotten. However, I find it far more likely that she did not read either, and this seemed to me to be the thrust of her comments.)

An obvious caveat is that 6 Ph.D. Civil Engineers is an awfully small sample. Even so.....

Frankly, this is not good news, and indicates that the 911 activist community has not done a good job in spreading the word to an obvious audience. Of course, it doesn't help things that the main stream media has a long history in kowtowing to its governmental and corporate masters. It further doesn't help things that even the "alternative" media seems to suffer a collective blindness when dealing with black op subjects of certains types (in particular, those that target American citizens). See leftgatekeepers.com, for more information on the subject of 'the alternative media that couldn't'.

An obvious and cost effective way to reach engineering faculty is to take out full page ads in student newspapers, presenting the strongest CD evidence. It will then be up to the students to discuss this with their professors, which I suspect many will do.

Also, if you want to see what 750 pages of discussion on the collapses on 9/11 looks like, then visit the link above.

http://www.911blogger.com/200

http://www.911blogger.com/2006/01/mail-campaign-to-professors-requesting...
http://www.911blogger.com/2006/03/follow-up-letter-to-700-structural.html

I emailed out the two above letters. I plan on doing another one soon, possibly with a theme of former government insiders speaking up, or the Alex Jones on CNN HN and other MSM news.

Thanx for posting one of my

Thanx for posting one of my favorite threads (Pg.3):

"I work at the American society of civil engineer, an office which contributed massively at the NIST report. I work at the public relation department, so if I seem angry when I post, its because my *** is on the line; they want to shut down our department because of people like you who oppose the official version. Politicians don't want another scandal."

Alex Jones said that Paul

Alex Jones said that Paul Craig Roberts says 9/11 was an inside job. But I cannot find an mp3 link of PCR actually saying this. Anyone have it offhand?

OT OT OT A couple times now

OT OT OT
A couple times now on RBN radio (Syzmanski, Stadtmiller shows) I've heard this awesome spoof song on Emperor aWol's recent "I'm the decider.." quote re keeping rumsfeld around.

I am the Egghead
I'm the Commander
I'm the Decider
Coo Coo ka Choo!

anyone know where I can find an MP3 laying around?

http://audio.wegoted.com/dail

I am curious about how the

I am curious about how the civil / structural / architectural community has responded to the collapse of the WTC towers?

Has there ever been a conference or position papers describing what the community should do differently when designing large tall buildings in the future?

Is any of this being discussed in engineering classrooms across the country.

If the engineering community is so conviced that WTC 7 fell due to fires, what would they do differently in the future?

Have they just ignored these issues and gone about biz as usual?

nuggets: standard procedure

nuggets:

standard procedure when a building collapses is to collect samples of the building and learn from it, making better buildings in the future, and report on it.

It is NOT standard procedure to allow a company named Controlled Demolition to come in and scoop the building up while the steel is still hot and bury it or ship it overseas.

Cross posted. Let me assume

Cross posted.
Let me assume my snottiest voice.
We took classes with these jerks. Let me repeat what my brilliant physics profs told me about these guys. They are are at best the handmaidens of physicists. If you obtained a physics degree you will recall these guys. Sleeping in class, eating lunch and chatting. When the final marks were posted they were stunned to see physics majors obtaining grades in the upper nineties while they strove to get marks in the fifties. They didn't give a shit about understanding physical reality. Do we have to explain the necessity of using calculus to solve second year physics problems again? I don't recall any of these losers being able to achieve that simple task. I'll say in again: if any of you engineers can publish a paper in a peer reviewed academic journal detailing how the towers could be brought down by two jet liners you will win a Nobel Prize in Physics. Go for it losers.
A physicist.

You want to reach a

You want to reach a mainstream audience, huh? In order to do that, you would need to organize sets of designated 9/11 Truth operatives to make posts on some of the most heavily-trafficked posting sites on the internet: slashdot.org, dailykos.com, huffingtonpost.com and imdb.com. (The IMDb messageboards for United 93, World Trade Center, V For Vendetta and Fahrenheit 9/11 are a good place to start.) All the movement needs is 5-10 people per site, monitoring relevant stories and posting when such stories show up. 9/11 Truth has all too often been preaching to the converted, avoiding more mainstream audiences.

I've already posted the following several times and it's my suggestion that other people cut, paste and post it, too:

Some critical URLs to 9/11 info-

[url]http://911research.wtc7.net/[/url] (The single best site on the internet on this topic; follows only the scientific method)
[url]http://www.911review.com/[/url] (The companion site to 9-11 Research)
[url]http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project[/url] (A comprehensive timeline backed only by major media sources)
[url]http://www.oilempire.us/bogus.html[/url] (Don't by fooled by misinformation, unscientific analyses and nonsense)
[url]http://www.st911.org/[/url] (Academia and former government officials weigh in here; beware links to some external, non-credible sites)
[url]http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html[/url] (Professor of physics at BYU writes peer-reviewed scientific paper)
[url]http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html[/url] (Yes, a 757 really [I]did[/I] hit the Pentagon)
[url]http://www.welfarestate.com/911/[/url] (At least 9 of the hijackers are still alive; backed by major media sources)
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theory[/url] (Wikipedia entry on unofficial interpretations of the 9/11 attacks)
[url]http://tinyurl.com/nl9u5[/url] (Misinformation/nonsense-free compilation of 9/11 videos at Google)
[url]http://tinyurl.com/ra58z[/url] (Another misinformation/nonsense-free video at YouTube)

One only need examine the science, and media coverage from that fateful day, in order to know the truth. No matter what your beliefs are, you owe it to yourselves to view the above links. Weigh the evidence. Test your faith. Decide. Save your country. Save the rest of the world. Or not. It's entirely up to you. Such are the burdens of a free society.

CB: I think it's this

CB:

I think it's this one:

http://www.electricpolitics.com/media/mp3/EP2006.02.07.mp3

Roberts basically says the official story of the collapse of the Towers is impossible, only controlled demolition could have brought them down. He says he's been told not to write about 9/11.

It's a long interview and the 9/11 bit begins at 00:36:36

Fred the Fred: Thanks! Will

Fred the Fred: Thanks! Will download that.

excellent interview. wow!

excellent interview. wow!

Yo The Decider, great song

Yo The Decider, great song isnÂ’t it, here's the direct mp3 link;

http://decider.cf.huffingtonpost.com/decider.mp3

^ Spread this song ppl!!

Still trying to find a

Still trying to find a structural engineer who will believe your kookiness? Keep looking...

"kookiness" - the CIA lady

"kookiness" - the CIA lady that was sacked for "admitting to leaking" the information about the Cheney Torture Camps in Europe is categorically denying that she admitted anything. It turns out that she failed a lie detectory test.

"kookiness" defines the "neocons". George Sr. referred to them as "the crazies".

why would I believe the story of liars. my own two eyes see too much to allow me to believe that they are anything but malevolent.

"If the engineering

"If the engineering community is so conviced that WTC 7 fell due to fires, what would they do differently in the future?"

You started with the wrong premise. WTC 7 fell from a combination of structural damage and uncontrolled fires that burned for 7+ hours.

And, yes, architects of large buildings and structural engineers are doing nothing but what they would do to change the building designs.

That's the point, isn't it?

" "If the engineering

" "If the engineering community is so conviced that WTC 7 fell due to fires, what would they do differently in the future?""

Try to ensure 100 story buildings not fall on them?

^No "S.King" the point is

^No "S.King" the point is steel beams were "partly evaporated" according to investigators. Which requires a temperature of 2860oC, how's you're criminal whitewash report going to explain that? When hydrocarbon diffuse fires like the ones in WTC7 burn no higher then 800oC in perfect conditions, and WTC7 was not providing perfect conditions. Leaving the fires probably no hotter then a 250oC domestic oven in random areas only?

"Engineers have been trying to figure out exactly what happened and whether they should be worried about other buildings like it around the country… Most of the other buildings in the [area] stood despite suffering damage of all kinds, including fire... ‘Fire and the structural damage …would not explain steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated’, Dr. [Jonathan] Barnett said. (Glanz, 2001; emphasis added.)"

http://nogw.com/documents/0927200307NYTimes7WTCwhy_page.htm

What's the "S" in "S.King" stand for... "Shill" perhaps?

Planes Simply Do Not

Planes Simply Do Not Vaporize - but threads on 911blogger.com do.

It must have been that definition of Conpiracy Theory I posted. It hit too close to home, I think.

Apparently, Randi Rhodes is

Apparently, Randi Rhodes is onboard!
The April 24 Randi Rhodes Show Newsletter has the following media link in the section of the newsletter entitled "RANDI MULTIMEDIA:"

DOCUMENTARY: 9/11 LOOSE CHANGE
Whether you accept the official 9/11 explanation or not, Loose Change is a fascinating look at unexplained issues surrounding 9/11 that you won't see on "the news."
http://mk1.netatlantic.com/t/36954/1204612/48/0/

What say you guys? Also, could you post this over at LooseChange911.com forums?

"No "S.King" the point is

"No "S.King" the point is steel beams were "partly evaporated" according to investigators."

Please give us the specific cite for that.

Anonymous, it's from a NY

Anonymous, it's from a NY Times article;

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/29/nyregion/29TOWE.html

^ You have to be a subscriber to read it though, that's whay I posted this link;

http://nogw.com/documents/0927200307NYTimes7WTCwhy_page.htm

It's a quote from "Dr. Barnett, a professor of fire protection engineering at the Worcester Polytechnic Institute."

"Dr. Barnett and Mr. Baker are part of an assessment team organized by the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to examine the performance of several buildings during the attacks."

I only found this site about

I only found this site about a month ago after Showbiz Tonight covered the Charlie Sheen comments. I had questions about 9/11 and I'd seen Dr. Jones on Tucker Carlson's show, but I had no idea there were so many resources on the net questioning 9/11.

At the same time, the Moussaoui trial is in the news and I got curious about how he got apprehended in the first place. I.e., was he in place to be arrested and have on hand as a patsy to say, "Look, it must be Arab terrorists because we've got this guy who wanted to do the same thing."

Cooperativeresearch.org has a Moussaoui page and theres this little bit that I'd never read before:

"After just one day of training most of the staff is suspicious that he is a terrorist, especially after they discuss with him “how much fuel [is] on board a 747-400 and how much damage that could cause if it hit[s] anything.” Staff members call the FBI with their concerns later that day."

The first day! The first day and he's telling the instructors at this flight school that he's interested in hitting something with a 747! Its not like the term "Arab terrorist" was unknown in 2001 pre-9/11 to these instructors or anyone in America. How convenient that he had visa violations so he could be held. But if you look at Moussaoui's wanderings around the globe, and all the government agencies around the globe that flagged him, how did he get a visa in the first place? And what kind of visa was it?

There are so many questions about 9/11. Its been glossed over and why should we be surprised that engineers of any sort take the path of least resistance and go along with the official version, just like 98% of our media and 99% of our politicians of both parties.

Planes Simply Do Not


Planes Simply Do Not Vaporize - but threads on 911blogger.com do.


It must have been that definition of Conpiracy Theory I posted. It hit too close to home, I think.
S. King | Homepage | 04.25.06 - 8:51 am | #

Yeah i have to agree on S. King because i actually rebutted that entire piece...but i also saved it soooo
S. King could you put up your piece on Conspiracy Theories again :)

So nice to see Sky King is

So nice to see Sky King is back. For all those posting who don't know Sky King let me inform you. He has posted all over the web on various 9/11 sites and even military blogs. He is the biggest shill there ever was, and seems lately to come with a friend like Terence to corroborate his theories.

The theories go something like this and there is no substance or discussion allowed....You're all crazy and 9/11 myths, 9/11 myths. That's their job. Post as many references to 9/11 myths as possible and move on and engage no one in conversation. Really boring stuff.

I'm tracking you now Sky King and just so you know, I've been using one of the 170 different search engines on the net that can provide personal information about the person behind the IP address and of course email addresses. It's been fun and hey, maybe we can get together sometime and watch loose change....

"WTC 7 fell from a

"WTC 7 fell from a combination of structural damage and uncontrolled fires that burned for 7+ hours"

Actually the testimony on how damaged building 7 is highly controversial, but it doesn't really matter anyway and is a moot point because WTC 7 had no business falling straight down at that speed into it's own footprint.

Furthermore even FEMA said it the fires theory had a low probability of collapse. If WTC 7 was so easy to explain in the context of the official story then no doubt the 9/11 Commission would have covered it.

S. King... I asked you a

S. King... I asked you a couple of questions two threads below. Obviously you didn't see them.

Here's a couple of the MANY questions I have S. King.

Why was the United States preparing countries like Pakistan in July 2001, for an October 2001 invasion of Afghanistan?

Why were there plans to invade Afghanistan on the desk of George W. Bush September 9th, 2001?

Please S. King... answer those questions for me. You are, after all, someone "with a brain" apparently. You said so yourself.

And please... the tired rhetorical answer of, "we always have contingency plans for invading countries available" won't cut it. These were specific plans, based on a specific date, prior to the events of 9/11.

Well, I'm waiting for S.

Well, I'm waiting for S. King's answer to those questions.

Everybody Hates Larry (not

Everybody Hates Larry (not just us 9/11 truthers!)... wait 'til they find out what he really did!

http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2006/04/24/silverstein.php

Hey guys, did a little

Hey guys, did a little experiment the other day. We had a big bonfire going in my back yard. Thing was huge, at least 10 feet tall and 10 feet in diameter. Well shortly after lighting the fire I threw a short piece of metal in. Now I don't know what kind of metal it was, but it looked like it was used for supporting chicken wire, couple of feet long and not thick at all. Well I buried this thing in the coals, and the fire burned all day and all night long. Guess what, it's still strong as every. I even took a hammer to it to see if it got weak or brittle. It's still one solid, nondeformed piece. Go figure, I guess I need some kerosene next time.

S. King answers questions

S. King answers questions EXCLUSIVELY pertaining to the towers. He will not go into ANY OTHER aspect of 9/11. He'll try and make you feel bad by trying to say your setting him up as a straw man.

dz has banned him how many times now?

i guess the disapearing

i guess the disapearing thread he's referring to is the flight 93 flyer post? i think sbg was going to remove the post since he decided to stop linking to the flyer in that topic..

funny how s.king thinks it is all about him though.

S. King? No answer?

S. King? No answer?

If S. King refuses to answer

If S. King refuses to answer those questions, or ignores them, then he is officially owned by me.

"dz has banned him how many

"dz has banned him how many times now?"

If you provide logic, facts and critical thinking to 9/11 - you're guaranteed you'll be banned.

" If S. King refuses to answer those questions, or ignores them, then he is officially owned by me."

Just because you spend your life here jon, doesn't mean the rest of us do...

If you provide logic, facts

If you provide logic, facts and critical thinking to 9/11 - you're guaranteed you'll be banned.

Yea right Terrence, because that's EXACTLY what you've provided. You're excuse for a blog is a perfect example of facts and critical thinking too right?

your* rather. Examples of

your* rather.

Examples of Terrence's critical thinking:

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5585/2633/320/conspiradroid.jpg

http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5585/2633/320/Dog-village-idiot.jpg

Banned from http://www.911blogger.com/
The cowardly turnip-brains of the 9/11 "truth-movement" have banned me from their blog (http://www.911blogger.com/) because I asked questions they could not answer. Cowards? Witless? Pathetic?

http://911conspiracysmasher.blogspot.com/2006/04/banned-from-httpwww911b...

Hell yeah Terrence! I'm back to believing the official story!

"Just because you spend your

"Just because you spend your life here jon, doesn't mean the rest of us do..."

Haha, thats funny terrance. Your comments have plauged this board daily, despite the fact that you have your own blog for your dubious 'critical thinking'. Why do you indulge and harass the people you consider to be 'kooks', would it not make more sense to leave them to their own 'delusional' theories?

What is you end goal? To make us see that were on a hiding to nothing? To convince us that it would be somehow WRONG to have the events of 9/11 reinvestigated independently?

If that is your intention, then all the time you've spent on this blog, which is obviosly alot, has been wasted and your entire enterprise is a collosal failure.

Still waiting S. King...

Still waiting S. King... Terrence, if I wanted your opinion, I would tell it to you.

Shill King: WTC-7 didn't

Shill King:

WTC-7 didn't implode due to some scattered fires & debris from 350+ feet away. How do I know this, you ask?

It's easy. A well-connected insider said so. His name is Mr. Silverstein & he said "pull-it." !!!!!!!!!

If you visit the following

If you visit the following website of the Tokyo Journal (English
version). You'll see that the Japanese have certainly got their facts
straight on 9/11.

http://www.tokyo.to/255/911Conspiracy/

Hey do any of you have a

Hey do any of you have a link to the general guy giving his testimony infront of the 9-11 commission talking about Chaney and the "70 mile out, 60 miles out..etc." quote.

I'm talking 9-11 with these guys.http://www.finheaven.com/boardvb2/showthread.php?p=2334295&posted=1#post2334295
Thanks

http://www.finheaven.com/boar

http://www.finheaven.com/boardvb2/ showthread.php?p=2334295&posted=1#post2334295

There's the link. You have to be a memeber, but it's free. I'm gillist43605.

S. King is officially owned

S. King is officially owned by me.

S. King wrote: "WTC 7 fell

S. King wrote: "WTC 7 fell from a combination of structural damage and uncontrolled fires that burned for 7+ hours"

WTC-7 fell seven- hours after the North Tower. Are you claiming the fires in Seven started even before the North Tower collapsed? What triggered those fires? The dust from the collapsed South Tower?

Mike Jr: we Finns burn large bonfires during the midsummer festivities ("juhannus" in Finnish). It's hilarious to think that the huge heat sink of the South Tower disintegrated in 56 minutes -- in less time than what many bonfires burn...

Good point Vesa. Kinda

Good point Vesa.

Kinda wondering if anybody has that video of dude talking about Chaney giving the "stand down" order.
And yes I'm looking for it right now. I look for things before I ask.

Ernest Partridge tackles

Ernest Partridge tackles 9/11, worth writing to him.

I forgot to tell him, what about the fact that no one got fired and everyone got promoted after 9/11? I love that one.

http://crisispapers.org/essays6p/skeptic.htm

Norman Mineta's Omitted And

I love how Lee Hamilton

I love how Lee Hamilton tries to coerce Mineta into admitting that the order was a "shoot down" order... and Mineta says, "I didn't find out until later what the order was"...

Mike Jr., here you

Mike Jr., here you go:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y&search=mineta

Gold, yeah soooo pwned!!!! Heh.

I would LOVE to see S. King

I would LOVE to see S. King explain Mineta away.

Thanks guys. one more

Thanks guys.
one more question.
Got a link to the pic of the Twin Towers under constrution that show the core columns real well? I've been looking but I can't find them.
I thought they was on this site.. http://www.greatbuildings.com/buildings/World_Trade_Center.html

Hey

If you visit the following

If you visit the following website of the Tokyo Journal (English
version). You'll see that the Japanese have certainly got their facts
straight on 9/11.

http://www.tokyo.to/255/911Conspiracy/
AmandaReconwith | 04.25.06 - 11:59 am | #

Amanda: ha, yeah, facts look good, especially FLIGHT 63! ha.

Mike, Jr. scroll down and

Mike, Jr. scroll down and you'll see a pretty good pic.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

I just heard Paul Craig

I just heard Paul Craig Roberts in an interview. He said he has no idea who committed 9/11 (he is NOT saying it's an inside job). However, he did say he believes the fall of the towers is possibly a controlled demolition. I cannot remember where I heard the interview. Sorry.

Well I'm sending some people

Well I'm sending some people this way to check out the site for the first time. I hope they ask questions.

Remember not everyone is a

Remember not everyone is a shill, just misinformed.

Any one seen this linked at

Any one seen this linked at WRH
Autopsy:No Arabs on Flight 77 (two part series) in Sierra times by Thoma Olmstead
....Comments? Further insights?

On a different subject(some what)......I was just going through my old 911 archives and had this question?
Does any one know who MalcontentX was / is? He / she was one the first skeptics of 911 along with FTW.
Just curious.

BREAKING NEWS: A new video

BREAKING NEWS:

A new video of Zarqawi, leader of "Al-Quaeda in Iraq" has appeard.

Now we have all three of them in only a week time: Osama, Zawahiri, Zarqawi

so al-Quaeda must be real!

Just received my issue of

Just received my issue of TIme Out New York magazine......it has an article that discusses the controversal film that will be the "kick off' for the Tribeca Film festival.

The film is United 93!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The controversy: " is it to painful and too early for New York to experience the tradedgy of 911"

Why no mention of this in the Crisis In America post for their movie below?

Also No mention of Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime in the Time Out article!
Is it really part of the official Tribeca festival?
I can't seem to get into the official sight (tribecafilmfestival.org) to check this.

I see absolutely no mention

I see absolutely no mention of "Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime" on their list of films.

WTC 7 fell from a

WTC 7 fell from a combination of structural damage and uncontrolled fires that burned for 7+ hours.

S. King | Homepage | 04.25.06 - 8:19 am | #

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA. im gonna let that comment sit on its own. HAHAHAHAHAHAA.wow.

Thanks for looking into this

Thanks for looking into this Jon.

Whats going on here?

The "Call for Unity Post" from crisis in america definately implies that it is part of the festival!!!!

Sky King: You are a very

Sky King: You are a very talented comedian.

S. King is waiting for a new

S. King is waiting for a new thread to be created because he's been owned in this one.

And in the next one, he'll

And in the next one, he'll make the same accusations, as if whatever was said in this one never happened. It's the trick of the trade for your average shill.

For instance... "somebigguy

For instance...

"somebigguy has never once provided evidence to substantiate his claims"

SBG says...

"Of course I have, here's link one, video one, audio one, and so on..."

Next thread...

"somebigguy has never once provided evidence to substantiate his claims"

SBG says...

"WTF S. King, I just provided you information"...

What the shills do is post, incessantly, the same bullshit because they know the newcomer probably didn't read the thread prior, etc...

Jon, pretty much.. i know he

Jon,

pretty much.. i know he has pegged a number of times with eyewitness accounts and video from 9/11 eyewitness.. he always says its fake or something of that accord and then stops responding, until the next time that steven jones is mentioned..

im pretty well convinced that all he does is search the web for 'steven jones' and/or 'wtc demolition' - any time he finds a hit he goes there and does the same thing..

do a search for his email address, he has posted 3000+ posts along these same lines all over the web, on almost any and every site that has ever mentioned the subject.

I've come across him several

I've come across him several times.

Ask him if he remembers 9/11

Ask him if he remembers 9/11 Truther... I am the original 9/11 Truther for those who didn't know. I think I came up with the name as well. :)

Which is why my 9/11 Forum

Which is why my 9/11 Forum is called, "The 9/11 Truther Forum"...

You know, sometimes, I think I just like to hear myself talk.

UPDATE on the new Zarqawi

UPDATE on the new Zarqawi video:

quote from http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2151611,00.html

"
[...] he had a snub-nosed Kalashnikov by his side, exactly the SAME PROP USED BY OSAMA bin Laden in some of his recorded messages [...]
"

al-CNN-da is back!

Can you guys imagine the

Can you guys imagine the hell that would have been unleashed if Cheney had indeed given a shoot down order, and the plane had succeeded in hitting the target anyway?

He'd have taken that orderly hunting.

None. These people are

None. These people are teflon coated. We are fighting against the entire bureaucratic system. All that exists in Washington D.C. right now, are people who only want to keep their campaign war chests happy.

I think, what it will

I think, what it will finally take, is something to happen for the American people to say, "Ok, that's the LAST STRAW", and then we storm Washington D.C. Literally, MILLIONS of us... and we take back the Government. Peacefully... we stand outside their offices, and we don't leave until they do as we say.

I think that Last Straw

I think that Last Straw would be 9/11... if the people only knew... unfortunately, the majority of them don't... we would need like a 3 hour special on at 8pm, on a thursday night, that went through ALL of the unanswered, and answered questions.

Good quote from the REAL

Good quote from the REAL Osama Bin Laden from Dec 2001:

How many villages have been destroyed and how many millions have been pushed out in the freezing cold?

"[...] These men, women and children who have been damned and now live under tents in Pakistan, have committed no sin.

They are innocent. But on a mere suspicion, the United States has launched this fierce campaign. [...]"

On a mere suspicion...

Vermont lawmakers to call

Vermont lawmakers to call for Bush impeachment:

http://www.vermontguardian.com/local/042006/VTSaysImpeach.shtml

3 hours? i could spend 3

3 hours? i could spend 3 days straight - as i'm sure you could as well..

can I get a "best of" on

can I get a "best of" on this huffington thread?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rachel-sklar/united-93-how-soon-is-no_b_19...

Flight 93 movie as a lie. Put it on the top please, thanks.

In all honesty, can I ask

In all honesty, can I ask you guys a question.

How often have you used Paul Thompson's timeline in your research?

How often have you used Paul

How often have you used Paul Thompson's timeline in your research?
Jon Gold | Homepage | 04.25.06 - 4:00 pm | #

Lots! Many times he will have at least a link to an Easter Egg I've been looking for.

I probably never would have seen this link:

http://www.inq7.net/nwsbrk/2001/nov/15/nbk_4-1.htm

If it wasn't for the Terror Timeline.

put the link to the scholars

put the link to the scholars petition on the blogger site for newcomers to the truth movement. they need less than 2,000 signatures to go. Lets do this!

WTC 7's column damage was

WTC 7's column damage was skewed far to the Tower 1 side, obviously.

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.h1.jpg

Shills claim this bnuilding fell striaght down due to this asymmetrical damage.

Then they calimed it fell "over a bit, towards the damaged side." In reality, it fell almost into it's footprint, but somewhat to the NE corner, AWAY from the "damaged" side, as it twisted slightly counterclockwise as it fell.

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/9-11%20Picture2.jpg

Do you think they could

Do you think they could successfully create a movie based on the Timeline?

OT: My 101 on the money

OT: My 101 on the money issue:

As long as we have debt based interest loaded fiat currency all over the world, all our problems will stay forever.

My sources: Congressman Jerry Voorhill, Out of debt, out of danger. 1943.

http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=31&products_...
49

Gertrude Coogan: Money Creators. 1935. with a forword of Robert Latham Owen,
Sen. and chairman senate financial and currency committee 1913 at the time
of the Fed act.

http://yamaguchy.netfirms.com/coogan_g/coogan_index.html

He himself wrote the book: The federal reserve system. in 1919.

http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/bibdisplay.pl?index=O000153

Later he changes his mind completely:

http://www.sonnet.com/usr/kidogo/coogan.html

Stephen Zarlenga: Lost science of money.

http://www.monetary.org/lostscienceofmoney.html

Silvio Gesell: Natural economic order.

http://www.systemfehler.de/en/neo/

Bernard Lietaer:

http://www.transaction.net/money/bio/lietaer.html

http://www.transaction.net/

And the movie: The Money masters.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8442305921010099392

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5020331178524208549

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3510313821923167501

I know, a lot of stuff. But money is the core of all our problems.

Nice work SB, you've seen

Nice work SB, you've seen the interview @ my homepage link?

I know, a lot of stuff. But

I know, a lot of stuff. But money is the core of all our problems.
Sitting-Bull | 04.25.06 - 4:14 pm | #
===================================
Here here, second to that.

Also check out "The Creature from Jekyll Island."

http://digital-mixes.com/BONA/Creature.mp3

dz, sbg, check "submit news"

dz, sbg, check "submit news" for a new Upcoming Event May 3, so that I don't have to repeat it all here. David Ray Griffin dinner & lecture at Matteo's Restaurant in Los Angeles, a fundraiser for http://www.911truthla.us

Jon wrote: I love how Lee

Jon wrote:

I love how Lee Hamilton tries to coerce Mineta into admitting that the order was a "shoot down" order... and Mineta says, "I didn't find out until later what the order was"...

* * *

And then the Commission claims in its report that Cheney was not even there to give any orders! Again, I ask: why isn't this clear evidence being debated in court?

@ The Professional: Not yet.

@ The Professional: Not yet. I have to register?

@ Rumpl4skn: That one is also recommendable! ;-)

SB, reg doesn't require a

SB, reg doesn't require a valid e-mail or anything, takes less than sec.

I don't remember where I

I don't remember where I heard about it, but one of the best 911 Truth sites I've seen is PentagonResearch.com.

You'd be hard-pressed to find a more professional and thorough discussion of the evidence. The author also includes pages relating to Operation Northwoods, PNAC, and other essential background info.

I think, what it will


I think, what it will finally take, is something to happen for the American people to say, "Ok, that's the LAST STRAW", and then we storm Washington D.C. Literally, MILLIONS of us... and we take back the Government. Peacefully... we stand outside their offices, and we don't leave until they do as we say.

I agree with you Jon...i told someone to stop bitching about Gas prices, this is exactly what they want. They looked at me like are you crazy? I said well what have you done to prevent it? they said "well......nothing, what can i do, the republicans are.." and i stopped them right there. and i said..well you mean to tell me that if a republican steals some money from you all your going to do is complain..no your going to take action. and i told them: write a letter, stage a protest, call your local media, hand out flyers about Gas Gouging..Put your foot in your local Democrats ass for not putting their foot in their Republican counterparts assess...do something..or shut the hell up

I thought the Iran war would

I thought the Iran war would do it, but so far, it doesn't seem like anybody cares.

hum.. this article shows up

hum.. this article shows up in Google news, but is nowhere to be found on http://www.aspendailynews.com/

"9/11 conspiracy making sense
Aspen Daily News, CO - Apr 21, 2006
... that would indicate the attacks on the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11 were staged ... It's appearing more and more that truth is indeed stranger than fiction ... "

I thought the "last straw"

I thought the "last straw" would be Bush turning out to be the "leaker" of the CIA agent. But then, do you really expect him to fire himself?

.. this article shows up in

.. this article shows up in Google news, but is nowhere to be found on http://www.aspendailynews.com/
___________________________________--
hmmmm, I read that article when it was first put up. That makes three 9/11 truth articles that I have seen once and were then subsiquently removed.

The others were the one that Jon Gold cited to ybbs about bush having plans on his desk to invade afgahnistan on sept 9th

Another was an article called something like (im sorry, it was long ago) "Pnac project is a scary look at the future"

"And then the Commission

"And then the Commission claims in its report that Cheney was not even there to give any orders! Again, I ask: why isn't this clear evidence being debated in court?"

If I knew the answer to that question...

Randy, got it, we'll get it

Randy,

got it, we'll get it posted this evening.

S. King answers questions

S. King answers questions EXCLUSIVELY pertaining to the towers. He will not go into ANY OTHER aspect of 9/11.

wow imagine that.

911hoax.com
_________________

Vesa... take a look at

Vesa... take a look at this... and you'll be able to FEEL the anger from me...

I just saw this - it was

I just saw this - it was written around 1985 -

http://holywar.org/txt/bernstein.html

As the collapse of Israel draws near, one of two courses of action by the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv Triangle is likely to be taken:

1. Israel could trigger a large scale Mideast war, a large war which Israel could not win alone. Then the New York leg of the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv Triangle would use its influence on the U.S. Government to send U.S. military forces to aid Israel. It isn't expected that the Moscow leg of the Triangle will become militarily involved. Moscow will merely sit back and let the U.S. weaken itself in helping Israel fight the Arabs. At some point during the war, when the U.S. military is deeply involved and the U.S. citizens demoralized, the Zionist oriented Jewish International Bankers will make their move. Evidence leads to the conclusion that it is these bankers who own the Class A Stock of the U.S. Federal Reserve, America's central bank. In
this position of power, these Zionist bankers can, and likely will, trigger
an economic collapse in America - like they did in 1929 when they caused the stock marked crash and started the severe depression of the 1930's.
Since the money system currently used in the U.S. is not backed by gold, silver or anything of value, the paper dollars and tin coins now in use will be worthless.
In the resulting state of confusion and in an effort to obtain food and other necessities, the American people will accept the 'New States Constitution' which has already been written. This will place the American people under the dictates of 'ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT' run by the Zionist oriented International Bankers and Zionist/Bolshevik Jews.
_________________

at the risk of appearing to be an anti-semite, there it is.

Thanks dz. It's going to be

Thanks dz. It's going to be a great event. Really looking forward to it!

Well, my research shows that

Well, my research shows that S. King's first name is actually Stin. That's right, yo, his full name is Stin King. Anybody could've figured that one out, though...

"If S. King refuses to

"If S. King refuses to answer those questions, or ignores them, then he is officially owned by me."

Jon, don't lower yourself to King's level. You know he was banned here this morning.

ROFLMAO Anonymous, nice try.

ROFLMAO Anonymous, nice try. You're using S. King's blog as your 'homepage' link.

How sad S. King.

Jon wrote, "Why was the

Jon wrote,

"Why was the United States preparing countries like Pakistan in July 2001, for an October 2001 invasion of Afghanistan?"

If true, how does that translate into proof of controlled demolition?

"Why were there plans to invade Afghanistan on the desk of George W. Bush September 9th, 2001?"

If true, how much thermite was required to bring down the WTC towers?

"And please... the tired rhetorical answer of, "we always have contingency plans for invading countries available" won't cut it."

I never said anything about contingency plans, did I, Jon?

Now, back to the questions you deliberately avoided on Thermite:

How were the towers brought down with "controlled deolitions"?

How much Thermite was required to bring down each tower?

How much detonating cord was required?

How were the cords attached to each other with no one seeing them or any of the holes cut into the walls to reach the steel columns and girders?

How were the columns reached without making wholes in the walls to get to them to plant the explosives?

You see, Jon, these are hust a few of the implications you have to deal with to claim controlled demolition, amd I not correct, Jon.

And let's not have any more of "the government can do anything" crap.

Meanwhile....

"S. King answers questions EXCLUSIVELY pertaining to the towers. He will not go into ANY OTHER aspect of 9/11."

LOL. According to you guys ALL aspects of 9/11 are connected - the destruction of the towers was ALL part of one big government conspiracy, right, TP?

So you should be able to prove controlled demolition by the government, right, TP?

The trouble is what you call consider "evidence" and proof doesn't hold up - and I show you why.

And, Jon, you pretended to own this thread when you knew I was banned yesterday morning. So why unban me now?

Don't worry though, I don't expect any of you to honestly address any of the issues concerning your claims of controlled demolition. You've all continued to demonstrate what I say on my blog and what Terrence says on his on-target blog. I'll continue to use the evidence from 911blogger.com to illustrate the characteristics of The 9/11 Denial Movement.

S. King, Jon Gold has no

S. King,

Jon Gold has no abilities to ban people, only I do.

And you aren't being unbanned, your IP address is just changing each time you login to your ISP I would assume, and you keep coming back despite knowing you have been banned prior.

I don't really care to ban you, but I also don't care for your methods of wrapping everyone who questions different aspects of 9/11 into one title and then bashing and/or mocking them - or deriving your opinion on every aspect on 9/11 just from your opinions on Steven Jones and C.D..

there is a lot more to 9/11 than just the idea of C.D., that is just what is lately getting all the focus it seems - and that is exclusively what you focus on.. i would guess there are at least 50 or so aspects on 9/11 which have questions remaining, why are you so incessant on deriving everything to just that one subject?

so, you've made your opinion apparent about the ideas of controlled demolition and steven jones's work in particular, so what about the other aspects of 9/11?

S. King... I think the

S. King...

I think the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition, and the reasons I think that have nothing to do with Professor Steven E. Jones.

The buildings completely disintegrated. Buildings dont disintegrate. The 100's of witness accounts that say they heard explosions. The fact that the steel was shipped off to China before it could be reconstructed to find the cause of the collapse. Larry Silverstein's "Pull It" comment, etc...

However, I don't focus on the controlled demolition aspect of 9/11 Truth because #1, I'm not a metallurgist, structural engineer, physics professor, etc... #2 As I said, the evidence has been removed, and shipped to China.

All except for a small portion stored in JFK Airport, and they won't allow us access to that.

Anywho... I can prove complicity without mentioning Controlled Demolition, and I can prove complicity without mentioning what "might" have hit the Pentagon.

YOU, however, don't have the ability to debate anything other than Controlled Demolition. You obviously chose to focus on that topic because, as I said, the evidence was removed, and you know that you can say no to our yes, up to our down, left to our right, etc... and we would never be able to prove one way or the other who's right or wrong.

Unless they give us access to the steel sitting in JFK Airport.

What I mentioned above has nothing to do with Controlled Demolition, yet, you OBVIOUSLY tried to turn the conversation back to Controlled Demolition.

Are you that much of a coward that you can't discuss anything other than Controlled Demolition?

Why was the United States preparing countries like Pakistan in July 2001, for an October 2001 invasion of Afghanistan?

Why were there plans to invade Afghanistan on the desk of George W. Bush September 9th, 2001?

Don't be the coward everything thinks you are, and answer those two questions.

An obvious and cost

An obvious and cost effective way to reach engineering faculty is to take out full page ads in student newspapers, presenting the strongest CD evidence. It will then be up to the students to discuss this with their professors, which I suspect many will do.

This is a great tactic presented by the physorg poster. It makes perfect sense. If Prof. and students are presented fall times of towers and WTC 7 and nothing else, it will pique curiosity and the rest will fall into place.

http://www.usu.edu/ust/index.cfm?article=7676

DZ and Jon, I always wonder

DZ and Jon,

I always wonder why you don't actually read what I write.

"If Prof. and students are

"If Prof. and students are presented fall times of towers and WTC 7 and nothing else, it will pique curiosity and the rest will fall into place."

That would be self-defeating since the collpase times are not what 9/11 CTers claim.

For instance, video shows that WTC 2 took 12+ seconds to fall, and WTC 7 took almost 13 seconds to collapse.

These are documented on video and imnpossible to refute.

911 Commision report put the

911 Commision report put the time at 10 sec. NIST stated 11 and under 12 sec. Even at 12 to 13 the NIST report and models only go to the point of failure which students and proffesors alike will find very interesting. All it will take is a little nudging to get some curiosity going and you will be out of a job Sky King.

Here is a good link to the

Here is a good link to the integrity of the investigations.

http://www.questionsquestions.net/documents2/wtc_obstruction.html

Hodge wrote, "911 Commision

Hodge wrote,

"911 Commision report put the time at 10 sec. NIST stated 11 and under 12 sec. Even at 12 to 13 the NIST report and models only go to the point of failure which students and proffesors alike will find very interesting. All it will take is a little nudging to get some curiosity going and you will be out of a job Sky King.

LOL. Totally irrelevant canard, Hodge.

We only need to know what causes inititiated the collapses of the towers.

If an airplane explodes in midair, we want to know WHY and HOW; we don't bother modelling its fall to the ground.

The fact is that the 9/11 Denial Movement claims that the buildings fell at "free-fall" speeds and could ONLY fall through controlled demolition.

We in the real Truth movement know otherwise.

http://www.questionsquestions

http://www.questionsquestions.net/documents2/wtc_obstruction.html

No S.King, you have a theory. Unfortunately your theory doesn't match the data as well CD does.

The pancaking 'theory' does not account for ejected debri, behavior of the stucture during collapse, low fall times, squibs etc. And, of course, the symmetrical 6.6 second collapse of WTC7.

"The pancaking 'theory' does

"The pancaking 'theory' does not account for ejected debri, behavior of the stucture during collapse, low fall times, squibs etc. And, of course, the symmetrical 6.6 second collapse of WTC7."

Let me help you out, Hodge.

"Pancaking" refers to what happened to the floors with the structures of WTC 1 & 2. As you well know, the floor trusses connected to the core and the outer walls to provide the rigidity of the entire structure.

When the collapses of each tower occurred, the floors "pancaked" with the tremendous kinetic energy within the structure leaving BOTH the core and the outer walls without the support that kept them standing. The outer walls were destroyed and forced outward.

This is no mystery to structural engineers and should not be to you either.

For WTC 7, it is easy to see from the CBS video that the collapse time was not 6.6 seconds but around 13 seconds. The collapse took place in stages with internal collpases occurring first.

If you want a link to the video, just ask.

Sky King pushin the OCT...

Sky King pushin the OCT... First this http://www.questionsquestions.net/documents2/wtc_obstruction.html

Pancaking does not fully explain the video record and you know. It also doesn't explain the fall times, you know this also. WTC7 roofline to ground: 6.6 seconds.
Funny you should know so much about WTC7 Sking, since the NIST have yet to release their report. You are stating facts that aren't substantiated by evidence, concerning WTC 7.

4 and 1/2 years later,2 countries, 120,000+ lives,Mothers and Fathers, Brothers and Sisters, Sons and daughters, Patriot Act, Homeland Security, Wiretapping, State sponsored torture.
And we still don't have an explaination for WTC 7, except for yours of course.