Skillful psyop writer. This is the old left right diversion. It is very hard to avoid 9/11 Truth on the Internet.

http://www.psywarrior.com/links.html

The people who made that movie know that the Flight 93 "heroes" story is nothing more than a propaganda tool for the Republicans. They're marketing the movie the same way that Bush and Rove worked the election: bring out the "base."

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/other.html

Send suggestions for the above page to:

media@defenselink.mil

hey here's a little audio clip i mixed, its from condi's testimony a while back, with classical and insane techno.

http://www.usd.edu/~dstrong/condi%20remix.mp3

http://www.boozallen.com/home/services/services_article/zakheim?lpid=659368

http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/gonzales-bio.html
http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/rumsfeld-bio.html
http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/rice-bio.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1564448.stm

http://us-amnesia.blogspot.com/2006/04/united-93.html

"Hey JG

"PNAC lately might mean they will take down the website... I have the entire website archived if anyone wants it."

Do you have the original PNAC doc ?

I heard it was recently revised ??

Cheers"

I dunno. The "Statement Of Principles?

This is as of July 10th, 2004...

I found it in an old email I sent to someone...

Statement Of Principles

I just compared the one that's on the site with that one, and they appear the same.

Frank Rich: Downing Street Memo Proved Accurate

Supposed to be in the NYT tomorrow.

He's a little late wouldn't you say? It's been proved accurate 100x over.

Liberals are just a waste of skin & organs to me. Always disbelieving/hating the “establishment”, now they buy the "official story" of 9/11 hook, line & sinker!!! They could jettison the Repugs/conservatives out of office for eternity if they were on board with 9/11 truth! (Would this put them out of a job or something?)

There is a huge crew of liberals & art geeks in my neighborhood. Instead of helping in 9/11 truth, these jackasses are now spray-painting, “Friends don’t let friends drink Starbucks” graffiti all over the place!

After 9/11 truth finally breaks through, I’m going to rub it in every “liberals” face!
Anonymous | 04.29.06 - 2:25 pm | #
as a liberal i say your full of shit. liberals are more likely to see 9/11 truth for what it is. why do you think this bulshit movie was marketed to conservatives in the first place? give me a break dude, your full of shit.

tell me again, was it Mike Malloy or Rush Limbaugh who has 9/11 truth related shows? oh yeah, its the liberal. jackass.

That all changed when I learned the truth about 9/11 and realized that liberals rejected the truth more than conservatives. Fuck the democrats. I've tried to contact Lynne Woolsey about this so many times. Just go to her page at congress.org and you'll see all the letters I sent her.
Andy White | 04.29.06 - 4:59 pm | #
Andy, how many conservative politicians did you contact? did they get back to you? is Cynthia Mckinney a republican now? did i miss something?

i find this statement utterly hilarious:That all changed when I learned the truth about 9/11 and realized that liberals rejected the truth more than conservatives.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, really? have you ever went up to a hardcore conservative or Bush lackey and tried to explain how 9/11 was an inside job? now i get banned from "liberal" websites all the time for talking about 9/11 truth, but i dont even get in the door at conservative sites.

dont confuse democrats with real liberals. demcorats are NOT liberal anymore.

the democrats are useless, but to make a blanket statement like "liberals reject 9/11 truth more than conservatives" is a friggin joke.not to mention it plays right into the left/right parlor game.

It's time for our Unity music rations:

http://www.lovinrevolution.org/resistance_to_empire/divide_and_onquer.mp3
http://newjersey.indymedia.org/usermedia/audio/8/The_John_Kasper_Band_-_...
http://www.infowarsmedia.com/video/clips/king_george_bush.wmv
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Z7YCmm_rHX8&search=byobush

lest you forget that its mostly conservatives that wave their flags like sheep and dont dare question authority or "daddy" government,and continue to back fake wars based on fake terror threats.im begging you, go to a conservative website and try and spread some 9/11 truth and see what kind of a reaction you get.at least on the liberal sites i come across some OPEN minds.dont get much of that from the lapdog right.

AOL has posted the USA Today hit piece and has a poll asking what does the public think of the 9/11 conspiracy theories.

http://articles.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20060428074909990003&nc...

anyone sense we're on the verge of something big about to happen?

last i saw, the poll wasnt going our way.

i love that Bolton(great conservative huh?) clip. i need to know that womans name. what a brave chick.

Sorry, I have to agree with the notion that liberals are just as likely to believe the official version of 9/11, and ATTACK us. They are whining about Iraq, whining about corporations...yet they call US crazy when we say 9/11 was a massive coverup. WTF?

The war is on against liberals AND conservatives ideology wise...I see no difference now between the two. In fact some of the TOP 9/11 whistleblowers have been republicans. Democrats piss me off almsot as much as Republicans.

Guys, no worries, check out the U93 forums:

http://www.universalpictures.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=1

It's a thing of beauty...

Fucking DU is jocking Flight 93. That makes me mad.

again, go to a "liberal" site and go to a "conservative" site and type the same 9/11 truth comments. i PROMISE you that the liberals will have more of an open mind.i push 9/11 truth every goddamn day, and i come into contact with a shitload of people on and offline, and i know for a fact conservatives are less likely to believe their own government would engage in false flag attacks than liberals.they are too "patriotic" to even broach the subject of 9/11 truth.but hey, keep telling yourselves "liberals" are the problem.

there is a reason most conservatives tend to say the same things as each other and use talking points so much.

"It's time for our Unity music rations:"

:)

good shit pocky, i just saw your comments at C&L about 9/11 and Wes Clark. too bad they already banned me.a lot of the people there were open to 9/11 truth until John Amato lost his fuckin head and started banning anyone questioning 9/11.

and pocky, at least liberals whine about corporations and the Iraq war(which seems to bother you for some strange reason).you dont expect conservatives to do that do you?

"HAHAHAHAHAHAHA, really? have you ever went up to a hardcore conservative or Bush lackey and tried to explain how 9/11 was an inside job? now i get banned from "liberal" websites all the time for talking about 9/11 truth, but i dont even get in the door at conservative sites.
Chris "

actually yes I have. My cousin is a raging Bush fan and he is now doing research. looking at the links I send him. I showed him 9/11 Evidence to the Contrary and he was extremely skeptical and said you can't compare the windsor fire to the twin towers so dismissed it right there. But when I said they were being compared to WTC7 he began to do more research. My grandpa however took months before he would drop the "its just too big to be possible" crap. And he is a big liberal. I shouldn't say liberal because it is too general I geuss, and it is playing into the left/right paradigm which is bs. But just from my personnal interactions with other people, that seems to be more of the case. It really frustrates me because alot of my beliefs are liberal, and all these people that go to dailykos for instance will not listen. I wasn't really insulting liberals in my comments. I was basically venting my frustration at these alleged open minded individuals. Sorry.

so you have 1 raging bush fan doing research and 1 liberal not willing to and that means "conservatives embrace 9/11 truth more than liberals"? really? because im in contact with more than my uncle and grandpa from both the liberal and conservative schools of thought and i have come to DRASTICALLY different results as far as open mindedness into 9/11 truth.your personal interactions should expand beyond your family, i have a feeling you would find most "raging bush fans" unwilling to even entertain the THOUGHT of an inside job.just a question though,(and they piss me off at KOS,C&L and all the other "liberal" sites as well),do you only go to liberal sites to spread 9/11 truth? are you saying you get a more positive reaction from conservative sites? honestly? because i would find that pretty hard to believe.

I found that majority of conservatives just wont even hear you out, call you a terriost or whatever. But between liberals and conservatives that do hear me out, its easier to convince a conservative becasue there not critical thinkers to say the least. They don't check your sources or anything. Which is a good and bad thing. :D

seriously Andy, go to RawStory.com right now, check the comments section for the "Flight93 questions remain" story. you will see 90% of the comments there are positive to the 9/11 truth movement.WOULD YOU EVEN FIND A POST LIKE THAT ON A CONSERVATIVE BLOG? AND WOULD 90% OF THE CONSERVATIVES ON THAT SITE BE POSITIVE TO US? sorry to type loud, but i highly doubt it.

Bush is a neo-con. Conservatives are libertarians. If bush called himself liberal he still wouldnt be. just like him calling him self conservative. he is a neocon

Only the brave enter here.

http://www.hannity.com/index/forum

But thereÂ’s an explanation for everything....

On 9/11.... it appears that Bush let the attack happen or made it happen on purpose. Or that some element within the Bush Administration let it happen or made it happen on purpose.

ThatÂ’s why there was significant insider trading of airline stock prior to 9/11.

ThatÂ’s why several FBI field agentsÂ’ warnings prior to 9/11 were ignored.

ThatÂ’s why Sibel Edmonds and Colleen Rowley have become prominent whistleblowers.

ThatÂ’s why FEMA units were moving into NYC on September 10th 2001.

ThatÂ’s why a US/Indian led investigation exposed how $100,000 was wired to Mohammed Atta and ordered by Pakistani Intelligence.

ThatÂ’s why the chief of Pakistani Intelligence was meeting with top security brass in DC on the morning of 9/11.

ThatÂ’s why at least 4 US DOD war games were on-going during 9/11/01.

That’s why none of the hijacked airlines were shot down (at least none that were ‘officially’ shot down).

ThatÂ’s why it is possible that 8 of the 19 hijackers are still living.

ThatÂ’s why the four hijacked airplanes were not close to being filled to capacity with passengers (as they had been every day before 9/11).

ThatÂ’s why passenger lists from the hijacked planes have not been publicly released.

ThatÂ’s why original reports described debris from United 93 scattered over a several mile radius.

ThatÂ’s why the Pentagon was struck directly into the section under renovation and therefore virtually empty.

ThatÂ’s why the collapse of WTC building #7 appears to have been a controlled demolition.

That’s why Larry Silverstein said ‘Pull it’.

ThatÂ’s why Rudy Giuliani told reporters that he was warned the WTC buildings were going to be immediately falling.

ThatÂ’s why the debris from collapsed WTC buildings were not adequately preserved for further analysis.

ThatÂ’s why the NIST investigation into why WTC #7 fell is so controversial.

ThatÂ’s why NY firefighters have been gagged.

ThatÂ’s why Henry Kissenger was originally selected to lead the 9/11 Commission.

ThatÂ’s why Max Clealand was removed from the 9/11 Commission.

ThatÂ’s why Norman MinetaÂ’s own testimony contradicts part of the 9/11 Commission Report timeline.

That’s why the 9/11 Commission report is a ‘cover up’ report.

ThatÂ’s why there is a corporate media blackout on certain 9/11 issues.

ThatÂ’s why nobody from FAA, NORAD, or the NMCC have been fired.

ThatÂ’s why Robert Bowman, Paul Craig Roberts, Morgan Reynolds have questioned official version of the events of 9/11.

That's why Usama's December 2001 ‘admission’ tape is almost certainly done by a faked Usama.

ThatÂ’s why Usama Bin Laden probably hasnÂ’t been captured.

ThatÂ’s why the PATRIOT act passed.

ThatÂ’s why weÂ’ve gone to war in Iraq.

That’s why Bush was reading ‘My Pet Goat’ when it happened.

ThatÂ’s why .....

____________________________________

I was introduced to the 9/11 truth movement last November. Since then I have previewed books, videos, and internet site material. IÂ’ll have to say, this is an intriguing story. I have introduced the relevant issues to many of my friends. They were largely unaware, but in most cases, receptive to the idea that the official story is a shallow cover-up. That to me is one of the more interesting aspects: the cover-up, although widely accepted, is so flimsy that it barely covers. I often wonder how the official account, with its litany of contradictions and foul smelling conclusions, can maintain credibility.

I would like to see this crime receive a fair investigation. I would like to see the truth movement represented by a savvy media campaign. I would like to see a few more frames of footage from the Pentagon. So to all of you who are feeling in a similar way, keep pecking away. Our truth is closer to the truth than theirs is.

MT wrote,

"But thereÂ’s an explanation for everything...."

Including letting yourself fall for the claims of The 9/11 Denial Movement.

Clearly, you've never bothered to think thinks through rationally.

S King believes that Bush didnt lie to get us into Iraq, and th egovernment told the full truth about 9/11. Whose in denial?

Crhis: I agree liberals are more open to the topic of a 9/11 coverup; but why at every juncture online are liberals hand in hand with repubs in saying there is NO coverup.

No coverup? Republican Curt Weldon even said theres a massive coverup.

CrooksandLiars are the crooksandliars.
They wont even tough ANYTHING relating to a 9/11 coverup. Same with a lot of the top leftgatekeeper sites.

You have to understand how frustrating
it is to see countless cynical Bush haters on every forum LAUGH at the notion of a coverup. I post on forums with 100,000-2 million people registered, most liberal, who all think its crazy to question 9/11.

And then you have people promoting missle pentagon, pod, swap plane stuff. How can we begin to win people over?

Hey guys, I haven't seen the Flight 93 cockpit transcript mentioned anywhere on this site (or any other 9/11 truth sites for that matter), butI stumbled onto it while exploring Wikipedia, it's on the WikiSource site:
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Flight_93_Cockpit_Transcript

Is it just me, or does the text in the transcript make almost no sense at all?

Sorry if this turns into a double post, the site is acting sketchy on me.

The pro-Democratic Party gatekeeper blogs think this topic is rocking the boat regarding the election this November and they may be correct. "Politics is the art of the possible."

Chris, I believe that liberals and/or democrats who are silent about 9/11 truth do more harm to us than any hardcore conservatives. (I bumped the rest up onto the above thread.)