Yizzo - look at Bush's poll numbers. People think there's nothing he wouldn't lie about.

Liberals are just a waste of skin & organs to me. Always disbelieving/hating the “establishment”, now they buy the "official story" of 9/11 hook, line & sinker!!! They could jettison the Repugs/conservatives out of office for eternity if they were on board with 9/11 truth! (Would this put them out of a job or something?)

There is a huge crew of liberals & art geeks in my neighborhood. Instead of helping in 9/11 truth, these jackasses are now spray-painting, “Friends don’t let friends drink Starbucks” graffiti all over the place!

After 9/11 truth finally breaks through, I’m going to rub it in every “liberals” face!
Anonymous | 04.29.06 - 2:25 pm | #

as a liberal i say your full of shit. liberals are more likely to see 9/11 truth for what it is. why do you think this bulshit movie was marketed to conservatives in the first place? give me a break dude, your full of shit.
Chris | Homepage | 04.29.06 - 7:01 pm | #

___________________________________---
Chris, my big-mouthed liberal friend, you missed my point.

When “liberal” intellectuals & media like Al Gore, Noam Chomsky, Ward Churchill, John Kerry, The New York Times, Amy Goodman, Bill Maher, John Stewart, Al Franken, etc., etc., etc., do not utter a single word about 9/11 truth, or worse yet, even endorse the official story, IT IS ALMOST FATAL FOR THE TRUTH MOVEMENT! These are the people everyone expects to jump on Bush & PNAC NeoCons if they do anything improper, let alone an astounding atrocity like 9/11!!! It’s the Democrats & Liberals who have always provided necessary checks & balances! Where the hell are they now when we need them most???

(No one expects red state, redneck Conservatives to lead the way in criticizing the Bushies on anything. Most of them are stuck on thinking Osama & Saddam are the same person.)

So, you see, my not so bright friend, the “liberals” total silence or “gatekeeping” is extremely effective in stonewalling the truth movement, because if they’re not even suggesting that 9/11 might have been an inside job, then they are clearly implying that they believe & support the “official story.”

I just heard Bob Woodward on Larry King talking about the Watergate scandal. Their discussion strayed into some discussion of the current administration. I was only half-listening though.

But I got the idea that it would be a huge boost for a famous investigatative journalist like Woodward to be involved in investigating 9/11.

I did a quick search for his contact info, but couldn't find it.

Bernstein?

We're not losing.

Yizzo wrote,

"Are we loosing [sic]?"

You first have to have something in order to lose it.
.

S. King. Its easy to debunk "your debunkers", poke holes in your theories (e.g. wtc7 coming STRAIGHT down from RANDOM structural damage..) but what is hard is having an extra 18,000,000 + 25 - 30M worth of media coverage to push out the truth...thats the only way i feel like we're loosing. that last aol poll was extremely discouraging..

although i have my TINY gripes with LC2E there is no way, ANYBODY and i mean ANYBODY can watch that and not find at least one or two "GAPING" holes in the official story. So if all of those people watched LC2E how can they say "Outrageous"

I sent this to the Courant who ran that article about Griffin.

In response to Ian Markham's comment that David Ray Griffin's book 'The New Pearl Harbour' represents a dangerous conspiracy, I would like to say that I have been studying the evidence closely for three months and , like the 83% who supported Charlie Sheen in a recent CNN online poll in his critique of the official story of 911, I am convinced beyond any doubt that Griffin's book is right and your nation has been grieviously misled and lied to . The facts support this view. The real danger is to believe unthinkingly the story that we have been fed by the media., which has brought the world closer than ever to the brink of nuclear war.

so Anonymous is giving a pass to the litany of conservatives who not only ignore 9/11 truth, but LOVE the fake war on terror as a whole, just because he wants to attack liberals.i detest every "liberal" that ignores 9/11 truth, but you make it sound like they are alone in that. sorry buddy, your still full of shit.

CORPORATE=REPUBLICAN=MEDIA=CORPORATE

you honestly think the media is liberal? you are dead wrong. the democrats are becoming more like the republicans because they HAVE TO.the media spins to the right, not only Fox News, so its becoming harder and harder for democrats to remain truly liberal.you should be mad at the corporate/conservative MSM for ignoring 9/11, not the fairy tale you speak of in the "liberal media". the Al Frankens of the world are useless when it comes to 9/11 truth, but that doesnt mean the "liberal media" is the biggest problem. the corporate/conservative MSM is a MUCH bigger problem.Mike Malloy has spoken out about 9/11 truth. has Rush Limbaugh? Wolf"AIPAC"Blitzer?

Chris, you are really dense. You name Malloy & 1 or 2 other libs who have mentioned 9/11 truth. Where are the other THOUSANDS OF YOUR LIBERAL HEROS??? I'll tell you. THEY ARE ACTING AS GATEKEEPERS IN OBSTRUCTING THE TRUTH!!!

If just a handful would grow some balls, they COULD BREAK THE TRUTH WIDE OPEN!!! By them remaining mute, they condone & encourage the "official story."

Which part of the above do you not understand?

whatever man, your a conservative, and your angry that liberals are ignoring 9/11 truth? what about your conservative heros that still back the "war on terror" %100?

site admin: stop with the useless profanityEdited By Siteowner

just trying to moderate a bit this morning, since terrence and s.king are prowling as usual.. just try to keep it civil, and that goes for everyone, not just you.

so you HATE liberals because "a handful of them could break the story wide open if they grew some balls". so again, you just give your conservative heros a pass? the same conservatives that push the terror myths MUCH more than any liberal? you fall right into the left/right trap with your hatred towards liberals.

the guy called me dense, thats like the pot calling the kettle black.

because the right doesnt gatekeep right? they dont lie on the right to further the governments cause right? they dont blindly accept whatever "daddy government" does on the right, right? Fox News doesnt gatekeep(or worse) right? all those conservative talkers dont gatekeep right? right?

yeah dz, im still trying to figure out who pays them.

Tell your liberal heroes to stop gatekeeping 9/11 truth. They believe the government has caused every single problem in the world, and they do not hesitate to say so. But ask them about 9/11: "Oh, Arabs did that."

How can these smart people be so dumb. WAKE-UP LIBERAL!

just as soon as you tell your conservative heros to. see how stupid your logic is? how smart can conservatives be if they not only think arabs did it, but are blood-thirsty for war with said arabs.

will you just admit that its not even worth trying to convince conservatives about 9/11 truth because they are all bootlickers and slaves to the government/media? if you would admit that conservatives are a lost cause on this issue, i would understand you ONLY attacking liberals for ignoring 9/11 truth.otherwise, i dont get you.

your anger should be at both sides, i dont understand only hating liberals for ignoring the truth. as if Fox News is clammoring to have David Ray Griffin on.

This is the power of the media to choose the news, to decide when and how to shield Bush from negative publicity. Sins of omission can be just as bad as sins of commission. And speaking of a sycophantic media establishment bending over backwards to accommodate this White House and to regurgitate pro-GOP and anti-Dem spin, I urge readers to pick up a copy of Eric Boehlert's new book, Lapdogs. It's a powerful indictment of the media's timidity during the Bush presidency. Boehlert rips away the facade of a "liberal media" and exposes the invertebrates masquerading as journalists who have allowed and enabled the Bush administration's many transgressions to go unchecked, under-reported, or unquestioned.

Chris, everyone on this board knows that Bush/Cheney/Rummy/PNAC/NeoCons are evil criminals! Give us some credit on that, will you.) I expect & want moderate, liberal, thoughtful people who are on tv everyday, to cover 9/11 truth.
Take Amy Goodman for example. She has spent years bashing the Repugs. She saw WTC-7 implode IN PERSON (she was caught on video shrieking). She has a daily tv show entitled "Democracy Now." BUT SHE DOES NOT UTTER A WORD ABOUT 9/11 TRUTH! So to her many followers, she is gate-keeping 9/11 truth from them!

Again, what part of the above do you fail to understand?

yes, and i have bashed Amy Goodman regularly. whenever i come across a Democracy Now fan, i tell them how much of a coward she is. my point is, you have so much hatred towards liberals that ignore the truth, but dont make a f*cking peep about the right. the "liberal" media may be weak and pathetic, but at least they dont blindly push for war,NSA spying and everything else.i guess what i dont understand about you is how you can attack only one side of the aisle.especially when the side you are attacking has less blood on their collective hands.

in Goodmans defense(and it pains me to defend her) she at least had David Ray Griffin on. do you think Griffin could get booked on any rightwing show? she may be a gatekeeper, but you would NEVER see a man like Griffin on any rightwing show unless it was to be attacked and smeared like Steven Jones on Tucker Carlson.

How could men like Al Gore & John Kerry have no idea that 9/11 was a false-flag inside job, but you & I do???
Those guys are highly-connected political-insiders with decades of experience.
The only plausible answer is that they are gatekeeping the truth from their constituents!

Come on, man. When Goodman had Griffin on her show, she let some jerk heckle him almost the entire time! It looked like a set-up.