Online Journal Member Comments on Flight 93

"Flight 93" the movie, why? -

Why would anyone make a 9/11 movie based on a number of cell and air phone calls that might have been scientifically impossible on September 11, 2001, simply because the technology couldn’t handle calls of that distance, six to seven miles up.

Well, they made Flight 93 because the calls were used as spin-evidence that a band of brave Americans fought off a smaller vicious band of terrorists, when in fact the entire event is surrounded in a mire of questions? Like the once-quarried bog that supposedly swallowed Flight 93’s 757 in a grassy field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, leaving a smoking hole, grave deep, some 20 by 10 feet wide, and little else.

But maybe the “why” can be answered in part by “who” made Flight 93. It arrived packaged and promoted by Universal Studios, which is owned by NBC Universal, which also owns NBC, which is all owned by General Electric, media giant and major weapons contractor. What’s more according to, General Electric donated $1.1 million to GW Bush for his 2000 election “run.” MSNBC is an NBC joint venture with MS or Microsoft that kicked in $2.4 million to get GW Bush elected. Now, where do you think the movie’s point of view is coming from?

Also, Flight 93’s patriotic spin landed before the sentencing of Zaccharias Moussaoui, who has been thrust in the role of scapegoat for the entire 9/11 debacle, even though he was in jail at the time. So we have a little multi-media propaganda to stir up the jury and America’s misguided rage. There are no accidents in the world of US government spin.
But then we have one of the most important 9/11 books, David Griffin’s, The New Pearl Harbor – Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11. Griffin is a professor of philosophy and religion at the Claremont School of Theology in California for over 30 years. He also is the author and editor of more than 20 books, a fastidiously scrupulous and honest scholar, not a writer of blockbusters, though The New Pearl Harbor became one simply because of its amazing array of factual and logical thinking that contradicted the 9/11 myth, including Flight 93.

In Chapter Three, pages 49-55, Griffin presents us with a very different scenario. It amounts to the fact that numerous eyewitnesses saw two F-16’s tailing Flight 93 minutes before it went down, at 10:06, which time was arrived at by a seismic study. That is not 10:03, the official time, which leaves the last three minutes off the cockpit recorder tape, the most important part, what’s said as it hits. Subsequent to 9/11, Griffin also reports, the government released flight controller transcripts, except for Flight 93.

Again, according to eye-witness reports in Chapter Three, one of the F-16s moved closer and fired, once, then twice, what were probably two sidewinder missiles, thump, thump, and boom, one of them catching at least one of the huge engines and the “plane dropped,” someone said, “like a stone.”
Were those scenes in the movie, the fireball in air and the parts falling, or Cheney and Rice in the White House? And were those eyewitnesses mentioned by Griffin and Thompson considered misguided, blind or on acid? This film poses as totally “factual.” In Hollywood that may have a slightly different meaning.

Thanks Carol for the heads up!

Daily Inspiration Character

Daily Inspiration

Character is the discipline to follow through with resolutions long after the spirit in which they were made has passed.

for me..this means debunking that 285pg document and 911myths even though i know its going to cost me a lot of saturday nights :-/

I love this site! I feel as

I love this site! I feel as if I am not going insane with my opinions on all the psyops etc that have been going on the past 5 years.


Let go of your hate, let go

Let go of your hate,
let go of your fears.
The "collapses" weren't caused by "planes",
so stop blaming "Muslim hijackers".

Great article, but the movie

Great article, but the movie is called United 93, not Flight 93- probably the nastiest product placement of all time.

Anyone else notice that

Anyone else notice that Google took Loose Change off the top 100 videos the last couple of years. Its back at 76 today but I highly doubt it wasn't one of the top 100 the day of the USA today article. Google was already caught censoring once with the Charlie Sheen story.

It was in positions #4 and

It was in positions #4 and #8 the day BEFORE the USA Today piece hit and the day of it disappeared from the top 100 despite and increase in site traffic twenty times the daily average.

Sure, Google isn't a controlled organ of the MSM, whatever.

PDF that "debunks" Loose Change.

Take it for what you will. LC2E isn't one of my favorites but by no means do I consider it 100% harmful to people. It does a good job at getting people's attention.

DHS: Terrence uploaded that

DHS: Terrence uploaded that PDF in the thread below.

oh ok i wasn't getting the

oh ok i wasn't getting the comments section for about 2 hours...

i'll have to read what was said

I noticed that the comments

I noticed that the comments link keeps disappearing. Anyone know why?

Anonymous, I think our


I think our comments were down the last couple of hours, or at least very spotty.. nothing within our control..

Don't have to be any type of

Don't have to be any type of engineer to see that "falling" buildings are really erupting & exploding.

Nor to observe WTC-7 implode & Mr. Silverstein explain that he & the Fire Dept had "pulled-it."

Too bad he wasn't a

Too bad he wasn't a strucutural engineer - his screed might have had more credibility...
Terrence | Homepage | 05.01.06 - 10:41 pm | #

He has a hell of a lot more credibility than G.W. Bush

Im reading through this pdf.

Im reading through this pdf. What a joke. They claim PNAC is not related to 9/11 and that the ratio of the opening scene of New York is increased. WTF? Look at what they have to say about the stock options. It uses the 9/11 commissions answer. It lies saying La Figaro reported the CIA dubai bin laden meeting, when I recall very vividly the UK Gaurdian doing so. It claims NORAD was only responsible for foriegn threats and had only once attempted an intercept in the previous decade. LOL, it tries to say WTC 7 was suffering from enormous fires and that its collapse was completely normal. This is a bunch of rediculous lies. They actually think this debunks LC? What better way to defend lies from truth than more lies. I really don't think this does anything to hurt the truth.

Yeah... that document is

Yeah... that document is ridiculous... Half the comments are exactly what you point out, tired lies, and the other half are judgements about the creators of the film. Saying things like "what an effing insensitive jackass this guy is".

"It lies saying La Figaro

"It lies saying La Figaro reported the CIA dubai bin laden meeting, when I recall very vividly the UK Gaurdian doing so."

I think Le Figaro reported it, too.

Hello! Question: What's the


Question: What's the latest on the documents the moussaoui judge ordered to be released?

DON'T LET the UNITED 93 hype pass by.

Now it the best time to stoke the fire of interest in that WEIRD CRASH.

We need to know more what happened that day ...more DETAILS is our best chance... please set up WHISTLEBLOWER-safe-encrypted-anonymous-posting!!

Truth is what happened, and it happened IN A PARTICULAR WAY. And we don't know it. Through speculating we can get closer, so I AM ALL FOR SPECULATIONS.

The mushroom cloud indicates that a AMMUNITION EXPLOSION happened in shanksville. AFTER the crash...
because there are really TWO craters.

One it long with pointed edges, just like the wings of an aircraft. But the hole is TOO SMALL for it to have been a 757 with 37m wingspan.

What do you people think caused
the shape of the hole?

I made a graphic for you:

reminder of shanksville photos:

source of the 1994 photo

the german movie:

a discussion about the details of the


Ah, come on Yizzo. Then

Ah, come on Yizzo. Then Terrence & Shill King will have to spend their Saturday nights writing another one.

PDF that "debunks" Loose

PDF that "debunks" Loose Change.

Take it for what you will. LC2E isn't one of my favorites but by no means do I consider it 100% harmful to people. It does a good job at getting people's attention.
DHS | Homepage | 05.01.06 - 10:05 pm | #

i LOVE seeing shit like this. you know what that is? thats fear. thats desperation. keep the hit pieces coming you bastards.

I still think we have to

I still think we have to debunk the hit piece otherwise we'll look weak.