Besides if you want to argue with Jon just hit up his website. http://yourbbsucks.com/forum/index.php

RANDKILLER99,

From the general rules:

Do not use the comments to continue arguments with other users from thread to thread

Use the comments to post useful information and comments, not to direct attacks on other users

Try to respect others who may have differing opinions

Take the arguements elsewhere, this is a blog, not a message board forum. This isn't the place for people to meet up and argue about this and that and this and that, that is what message boards are for.

Please have some respect for this site and make good use of the comments, take the personal discussions elsewhere!

RANDKILLER999,

wtf? i ask you to take it elsewhere and you just post it again? these are comments, not a message forum.

he has a forum, you can go talk to him there.

dz----
i really enjoyed dylans interview it was really nice.....

what do you think about the fact that mossad agents were caught red handed trying to bomb the mexican natl parliament building on 10-10-01?

remember we're all on the same side here!!

_____-
the loose change guys are great!!
they can help destroy the notion that mossad wasnt involved in 911hoax

THE MEXICAN PARLIAMENT ATTACK BY MOSSAD IS THE ULTIMATE SMOKING GUN

hopefully dylan and the guys can put that in loose change 3!!

then this big world will have beautiful peace eventually

we are a rising force
DESTROY ALL FALSENESS

YOU GUYS CANNOT DENY THIS

I'm downloading it. Slow, but works.

HEY MIKE JUNIOR!!!

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT MOSSAD AGENTS WERE CAUGHT RED HANDED TRYING TO BLOW UP THE MEXICAN NATIONAL PARLIAMENT BUILDING ON
10-10-01???

WHAT DO YOU THINK THE LOOSE CHANGE GUYS THINK OF THIS??

KEEP UP THE 911TRUTH!!!

IT'S GOOD TO HAVE SITES LIKE THIS SO WE CAN TALK ABOUT THESE THINGS WHILE WE'RE WAITING FOR 911HOAX REVELATION IN THE FAKE MSM

Guys, take some time to check out some similarities between London and Washington terror scams.

7/7: The London Bombing:
A Summary of the Evidence (20MB .WMV)

http://911truth.ie/video/77release6.wmv

Good 7/7 London bombings site:

http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/

DHS , all I can say is my my initial reaction , having just viewed this for the first time , and having worked extensively with photoshop,etc, is that it is a lazy cut&paste.Maybe a hologram?
just kidding.

stuart

refering to what you said....

it is true, i am smart

but i am also good looking
and i like to party

this is way more powerful than just kissing ass in "dirty politics"

this is the true polarization on this earth

How many have really looked into the science of holography?I've been fascinated with them for years ,and am bemused by mirage/plane theories.

Colin:

I ask because this is the image used in LC2E as the "aftermath" image.

it could be that it's a street/lawn and 2 rails between it.

dhs----are you going to put in the mossad 10-10-01 mexican natl parliament attempted bombing??

then you will make the truest movie-- that youre gonna be able to brag to your great grandkids about....

theyll be bragging to their great grandkids about it
_________________________-

this is like popping a big zit---and this mossad attempted mexican natl parliament bombing is the center of it

slightly excessive but you get the point

lets breakthrough these troubles

this is all overdramatic but it is the standard truth of what really happened

truth is the only thing thats going to cure this emptiness in this world

RAND:

email me 911HijackerDotCom@gmail.com anything that you think should be included... same goes for everyone...

RAND and everyone keep in mind I will only present documented fact/testimony, i will not speculate, and yes i will include building 7 (because its a fact that it collapsed and its a fact what the contents of the building were)...

In that Eric/LC2E interview dylan said "LC final cut has to be 100% provable, to which I said 90% needs to be removed then"

that's where i stand.

dhs....

here's your links brother---

a couple of posts back

RAND

i see no links on this thread, can u repaste them

DHS,have a close look at angle of the car ,and the previous pic of the railing, this is what drew my suspicion.I don't think that observation refutes or discredits Avery in anyway however.I'll have a closer look at that site now, though.Thanks DHS.I'm 27 myself,and detest the label of Genx ,I want to be an individual who makes the world a more beatiful place , and not sell out our grandkids' future,as I see has been the case for perhaps the last 40 years.

Colin:

Dylan has nothing to do with the picture. Nothing against him. I applaud his and his friends' efforts.

I was just asking about the picture.

How many have really looked into the science of holography?I've been fascinated with them for years ,and am bemused by mirage/plane theories.
Colin | 05.15.06 - 9:05 pm | #

are we not all quarks? wave interference patterns? holograms, if you will?

stuart

refering to what you said....

it is true, i am smart

but i am also good looking
and i like to party

this is way more powerful than just kissing ass in "dirty politics"

__________----

Obviously I was wasting your time with my suggestion.

I'll get back to the business of admiring your thoughtful posts... And reposts. And reposts.

DHS Very true, the nature of the mind is holographic ,and therefore it could be argued that all of percievable reality is holographic,But man made holograms using lasers have a long way to go before even R2D2's mini 3dprojection is possible.
That being said, hopefully it wont be too long for that sort of thing.I wonder if any major theatres will try to ban LC , this year.

stuart...

thats right you were wasting your time

cause youre a lifeless slug...

keep kissing ass and trying to conform to sheep

Has any one been able to watch the 'take back 911' doc, that mike kindly provided for us.

I can't seem to play it.

dhs

google(yahoo)

mexican national parliament bombing

and it's like the third or fourth one down----there's probably alot more

the only thing 9-11 and 7/7 have in common is israeli prior knowledge

Radical,
Same trouble here with 'take back 911'

stuart...

i was just kind of joking with you/didnt mean to come off as disrespectful to you

obviously youre the smart guy---who knows how to deal with these lame-o's

I am a Ph.D. physicist who has made many, many holograms ovr 20 years. I am not joking.

Drop this hologram thing like a hot potato. It's a bunch of nonsense.

"stuart...

thats right you were wasting your time

cause youre a lifeless slug..."

==================

So quick to bark, but no bite. Your anger and childish name-calling just reinforce my first post. You need to refocus all that into a more positive mindset. As for me being a conformist sheep, my real name's at the bottom of each of my posts. And you are?

My view is one of practicality, not conformity, and if you knew anything about me that'd be apparent to you.

The more negativity you spew here, the more people will stop listening to you.

Kevin, It has been dropped and stepped on already,we're just joking around.Seriously though,do you think we'll see Loose Change banned this year?If it has distribution as he claimed in the blackops interview, it will be hard for msm to just ignore it.

"stuart...

i was just kind of joking with you/didnt mean to come off as disrespectful to you

obviously youre the smart guy---who knows how to deal with these lame-o's"

Posted before I saw this. I guess the "lifeless slug" part did feel a little disrespectful, yes. But, hey. We're all in this together, and I forgive very easily.

Cheers,
S.

ouch

ha ha

Where is Rolling Stone in all this ,wrong issue to be sitting on the fence about , don't you think?Where is their new Hunter s.Thompson?I watched Alex Jones (via Sheen) almost get through to a mocking MTV crowd,on air,once.I'm sure their apathy will turn to rage soon enough.

Dylan Avery and freinds do Letterman.Just a fantasy, so far.

Stuart, speaking of prosecuting , How is Fitzgerald doing in your opinion? Is he gunning for the big boys or what?Is Bush's speech today a distraction from Rove?

from what i understand....

rolling stone is a fake left newspaper to help keep up the fake "hegelian dialect"

they keep a fake left vs right pardigm for the sheep---while really the plutocrats are controlling both sides for a singular goal

fake hippie newspaper run by the cia to control "the beautiful people"

RANDKILLER999, do you harbour any resentment for the 'hippies' past or current?Just curious.Why didn't America learn the lessons of Vietnam?

"Stuart, speaking of prosecuting , How is Fitzgerald doing in your opinion? Is he gunning for the big boys or what?Is Bush's speech today a distraction from Rove?"

It's fiendishly difficult to say, really. We could easily put on the cospiracy cap and say that all of his work is merely a distraction to make the public think we still have a three-branch system of government. I am hoping that he is a man with integrity, and in many ways I believe that he's demonstrating that he is just exactly that.

As for the Leopold article over the weekend (the one proclaiming that Rove will be indicted this week on perjury and obstruction charges). I'm always a bit upset when I hear about leaked grand jury testimony or rumors of coming indictments. There are good leaks and bad leaks. The NSA and CIA leaks to the press are generally good, because without them we would not be as acutely aware of how our rights are being dissolved. The jury box and lawyer leaks are bad because they can be grounds for a mistrial or dismissal. You can bet that no matter what happens, the appeals courts will be seeing lots of Scooter and Rove (if in fact he is indicted).

I do find it interesting that Rove is everywhere in the media today. He's put on a human mask too, and emulating behavior his studies have determined to elicit feelings of sympathy and kindness. This is Rove at his most dangerous, because he's so brilliant. He's truly one of the best strategists of our time. Too bad he's on their side, but sane people wouldn't give him this much power on his own without being elected to office.

As for Bush's speech, I didn't catch it. What I can say is that the sending of troops to the border is a publicity stunt to stave off the radical right. If Bush believed in securing the borders, he'd have done it years ago when we weren't in a Congressional election year. Also, more ominously, the normalizing of troops operating amongst the general public SHOULD BE ALARMING. The fact that the media doesn't talk about this, well, I think that everybody here already knows what I'm about to say....

damn hippies...

'fiendishly difficult to say', but I think you did a good job of it Stuart.Sometimes I think some of this administration would love to be indicted over something like immigration,something not 911 related ,which would receive a slap on the wrist,a la Nixon.Do you think impeaching on any count would lead to a break in the truth dam in general?Surely Bushco must see the writing on the wall?The only other alternative that explains their arrogance , is that another stunt is in the works ,and martial law.Bleak.

Has anyone read or looked into "The German Intelligence Report Concerning 911" that is being posted on the Scholars for 911site in the foreign news section?

I don't no when it was originally posted but I hadn't heard of it.

I find it highly, highly suspect as an authentic document, just because of how it is written, not necassarily its contents. But who knows, it was translated from German.

There is a long blurb at the begining that warns the reader that the authenticity of the document can not be proved one way or the other, and they are asking people to do their own research to try and validate its authenticity.
That seems a little strange, considering Andreas Von Buelow, the former director of the German secret service and former assitant of the German Defence Ministry, is a member of 911 Scholars for Truth.

I think he might have some insight into its authenticity....you would think.

I assume they asked him before publishing it on their website, but he is not mentioned.

Maybe someone with more public credentials in the movemnet could ask Mr. Fetzer or Von Buelow about this.

What sort of German 911truth movement exists?You'd think a highly cynical populace would immediately see this as another Reichstaag Fire?Maybe they're preparing a nice little hotseat for Cheney at the Hague right now.

The nightmare scenario for me is this:

Somehow, magically, we are able to convince the Armed Services Committee to launch a full-scale investigation into 9/11 failures, with criminal negligence being on the table (best case scenario, probably). Behind closed doors, the government admits limited complicity and extreme negligence (again probably reaching). Something similar to this may have already occurred. Why wouldn't we have heard about it?

Well, national security. But not it the way the term is usually used. It can be reasonably argued, that the vast majority of Americans have slipped into a xenophobic, consumption-oriented, propoganda-suckling, coma-like state of denial and apathy. It could be said, and not that inaccurately, that if we were to wake up suddenly (a la Matrix), there's no telling what could happen. Especially given the extreme circumstances. A murderous, lying, psychopathic culture in Washington. Right under your stupid little nose, citizen (dramatic effect, not you personally).

Riots. Looting. Political chaos. The stock market completely falls apart. Foreign venture capitalists move in and buy everything. A depression that lasts for decades. The economy, ruined. Famine. Disease. Death...

Literally citizens setting up gallows and holding their own trials. THE ANGER FROM THE PUBLIC COULD BE EXPLOSIVE!!! I for one wouldn't want to be Karl Rove facing a street full of angry moms who lost their only sons in Iraq. They'd be fingerpainting on the Washington monument with the contents of his intestines.

Now, imagine seeing this potential from the perspective of any law enforcement agency, from dipshit sheriff Danny Jo Bob in El Paso to every field office of the FBI. If the truth about 9/11 came out, the populace would no longer recognize the authority of any government agency or representative. I mean, would YOU if your cozy little world came crashing down? Most people in this country would freak out if they knew the extent of the atrocities commited by these monsters. Kind of like Dennis Hopper saying, "The truth, you can't handle the truth!" In a lot of ways, they have a point. If the actual facts became public, there is a potential that all kinds of hell would break loose. Of course, the flip side of the coin is that perhaps that's just exactly what needs to happen...

Back to the scenario.

So, the Justice Department's solution? Keep 9/11 a secret, and dispense justice with a much more subtle approach. Emasculate the administration, allow them to flounder publicly and basically burn out, look like fools, and lose their House and Senate majorities. Many, many politicians from both parties would argue vehemently that this is in fact the ONLY acceptable way to deal with this type of crisis.

We, as the public, will be informed that mistakes were made on 9/11 and in Iraq, but not much more. The administration would change its tone to a much more docile and financially-oriented one, and the media would keep talking about Brad and Angelina. Life would continue, and the dark realities of 9/11 would fade into the abyss of history.