CNN Secretly Seeks Guests To Attack Charlie Sheen On 9/11
Alex Jones is saying that CNN is trying to get 9/11 activists to discredit Sheen
We have received word from numerous different sources that CNN is trying to bait 9/11 truth activists to appear as guests on its programs and attack Charlie Sheen.
WTC survivor and truth activist William Rodriguez was contacted by the Anderson Cooper show and asked if he would go on record as saying the new Pentagon footage dispelled all 9/11 questions. They also requested that he attack Charlie Sheen's public stance on 9/11.
After Rodriguez refused to take the bait and said he supports Sheen 100% CNN cancelled his appearance even as the car to pick him up was en route.
Lawyer Philip Berg and philanthropist Jimmy Walters were also approached by CNN and promised TV time if they agreed to debunk Charlie Sheen. Both refused.
Charlie Sheen is just one guy (brave, but admittedly not an expert).
Who is going to contact CNN and demand that they cover the many credible people with the resume to back up their claim that 9/11 was an inside job? Steve Jones is a physicist at a good university and has a sincere, convincing manner; Bob Bowman has the military (air force and Star Wars) resume; David Ray Griffin is not only an impeccable scholar but has a grandfatherly, professorial manner; Jim Fetzer has a fiery style and is a great debater; Webster Tarpley can explain the history of false flag operations from 1,000 different angles . . . (those are just the first 5 names that pop into my head).
What about them, CNN?
- Login to post comments
chicanery to a level beyond
chicanery to a level beyond comprehension...
I think Rodriguez should
I think Rodriguez should have lied to CNN so he could get on the air. Imagine, a 20 year WTC vet and WTC hero/survivor saying 9/11 was an inside job? Ooopsy.
Oh yeah, it's hard to have hope for cynical Bush hating young guys when they pretty much uniformly call anyone questioning 9/11 idiot nutjobs:
http://www.aintitcool.com/tb_display.cgi?id=23361#1166365
They wouldn't have aired it
They wouldn't have aired it had he said that.
http://resurrectingthelede.bl
http://resurrectingthelede.blogspot.com/2006/05/loose-change-author-on-c...
Raw Story has this in HUGE
Raw Story has this in HUGE BOLD LETTERS, but no story yet:
JUDITH MILLER TO CLAIM SHE GOT TIP OFF OF 9/11 ATTACK
Judicial Watch Says More
Judicial Watch Says More Pentagon Tapes To Come:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/180506moretapes.htm
REPOSTS (seem appropriate
REPOSTS (seem appropriate here)
I've spent a couple of hours looking at the newly-released Pentagon video.
I don't believe that AA77 struck the Pentagon, but I urge caution on this topic.
I believe they can manufacture more videos showing a very realistic-looking 757 attached to the "nosecone" theyÂ’ve presented.
Anonymous | 05.18.06 - 12:17 am | #
Charlie Sheen obviously scared the hell out of the perpentrators & their accessories!!! (Very underhanded of them to try to trick guests into smearing him.)
We really need a few more big celebs to support Sheen & the truth!!!
In the meantime, please keep spreading links to LC2E & truth sites. (I linked to LC2E on Crooks & Liars, but they removed it almost immediately. (Censorship is a dangerous thing and they are fools not to realize it.)
Anonymous | 05.18.06 - 12:27 am | #
http://www.rawstory.com/news/
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Former_NY_Times_reporter_Judith_Miller...
These media whores never
These media whores never cease finding new ways to disgust me.
Thanks for the link to Dylan
Thanks for the link to Dylan Avery being interviewed on Canadian tv.
It must be very difficult to field questions rapid-fire like that. What can one say when quickly asked..."Then what happened to the passengers?", with merely seconds to give an intelligent response.
" These media whores never
" These media whores never cease finding new ways to disgust me."
Instead of getting disgusted, why not help put them out of business?
I have posted a proposal on the Randi Rhodes show forum for replacing our current media with a new, sustainable media that facilitates the selection of "filtering agents". You can think of these as honest gatekeepers that YOU trust - and that keep out trivial information, rather than very important information that groups with economic and other hidden agendas prefer to hide from you.
The thread is entitled: "Putting the NY Times Out of Business"
The thread is subtitled: "Proposal to replace ALL corrupt media"
Link:
http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index.php?showtopic=76406
PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO ANYBODY WHO MIGHT BE INTERESTED
Is it just me, or does the
Is it just me, or does the MSM seem likes its ready for a fight with the forces of truth?
BRING IT ON (the infowars, or maybe mroe accurately, the truth, justice and freedom versus lies and oppression).
you do know what CNN stands
you do know what CNN stands for, don't you?
Certainly
Not
News
dsm, that Prison Planet
dsm, that Prison Planet article re: Judicial Watch you linked above is a must read. In part:
Judicial Watch president, Tom Fitton, projects himself as the premier "gov't watchdog", but he's always struck me as one of those young-Republican rising-star types.
"Is it just me, or does the
"Is it just me, or does the MSM seem likes its ready for a fight with the forces of truth?"
Maybe, but they certainly won't be fighting cleanly. I think this story gives some indication of the tactics they will employ in an attempt to destroy us.
This new Judy Miller
This new Judy Miller revelation is revealing.
Why didn't she ever write an article about this after 9/11?
Who is this source inside the government?
Condie's "this is a historical document" comment seems even more like bs now (not that it didn't before)?
But now what? I hope you're right George that the media wants this fight, but where are we going to get a fair shake? Not FOX. Not CNN. MSNBC?
I guess we just have to keep plugin along.
(sidenote: I handed some copies of LC2 today, and got some good responses.)
I'm only about 5 month's
I'm only about 5 month's into the truth, but I fear a huge honey pot is being set-up:
So many truthers will be screaming that AA77 did not hit the Pentagon (probably correct), but then the gov'y will release extremely realistic fabricated video of said event (they've had 5 years) & the honey pot will explode in our faces!!! (We will not be able to prove the high-tech videos are phony.)
Enormous BRAVO to Jon Gold, who was 1 of very few to fight off this treachery from the get-go!
I agree with Anonymous. This
I agree with Anonymous. This whole pentagon video thing stinks to high heavens. Why gamble with something that could backfire on us. I think it would be wise to stick with what we can prove. The controlled demolition of the twin towers and building 7.
The question should not be
The question should not be what hit the Pentagon but rather why it was allowed to be hit.
Testimony presented to the 9/11 Commission by U.S. Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta on May 23, 2003, which was omitted from its final report.
Mineta's testimony about 9/11 (video)
http://tyrannyalert.com/hamilton.wmv
I agree, and whats with
I agree,
and whats with promoting all the bullshit in LC2?
There are so many errors in that film that it discredits the facts. And its the most well known!
I know for a fact cell phone calls can be made and recieved in a plane! A friend of mine left his cellphone on by mistake and his mother called him! OMG
PLus all that pentagon bullshit...
the flight 93 in cleveland crap....
How will the movement ever gain credibility?
ACTION ALERT so i got to
ACTION ALERT
so i got to listen to parts of 3 shows on air america today (stephanie miller, thom hartman, ed schultz)--all w/ notable points.
first ed: to to http://www.wegoted.com/podcasting/archive.asp
scroll down and listen to the interview related to the pentagon. quoting the cnn correspondent:
"It is insulting to the family members who lost loved ones that there are people who still believe a plane did not hit the Pentagon."
this interview was blatant agenda-driven propaganda. email ed and tell them what you think. i noted (among other things) that the real insult goes to those of us who just want the truth and that their obvious spin and pejorative use of "conspiracy theories" serves nothing but to undermine what should be every decent american's common goal (the truth); and that if they want to be fair and balanced they should have on someone from ST911 for debate/discussion.
there is also a pentagon poll to click on.
quick notes: on stephanie's show her sidekick gave a fair presentation of some of the glaring questions surrounding the pentagon and went so far as to call the commission a "whitewash". let's give him props.
thom hartman: a caller voiced the existence of the bohemian grove and cremation of care. thom gave him fair time, didn't really respond except with a kind of "yeah, well they're not REALLY satanists though" response. interesting.
Why doesn't CNN engage
Why doesn't CNN engage Stephen Colbert??
The Newsnight report has now
The Newsnight report has now been added. Click on the Newsnight player, then follow the links:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/default.stm
As mentioned earlier, it would be a good idea to make them aware of the whole catalogue of evidence that has been ignored/covered up, forcing them to look at our allegations in more detail.
"Many suspect Judicial Watch
"Many suspect Judicial Watch is being used as a conduit for the dissemination of carefully staged government propaganda. When the subject of Operation Northwoods was raised, Farrell became noticeably evasive and began to talk about government incompetence as if reading from a prepared script."
Judicial Watch president, Tom Fitton, projects himself as the premier "gov't watchdog", but he's always struck me as one of those young-Republican rising-star types.
Anonymous | 05.18.06 - 1:14 am | #
________________________________________________________________________________
i know i have suspected as much, and after hearing Fittons comments bashing the truth movement, i think its pretty obvious thats just what they are.
im convinced Raw Story wants
im convinced Raw Story wants 9/11 truth to break wide open.i noticed they showed up for the screening of EGLS, and they have been upping the number of 9/11 stories in the past few months.seems like Raw is ahead of most of its "liberal" counterparts.Judy Miller knows she was used(make no mistake, shes still a fucking traitor), hopefully this is her way of making it up to America.she pushed the WMD lies, now she needs to push some 9/11 truth.
Its interesting to watch the
Its interesting to watch the government's strategy play out. As long as us Truthers stay honest and focused, we'll be OK.
The problem is if they get one of our many short fused members on CNN, shooting their mouth off, that could be trouble. I guess when that happens, we will have found a mole.
i think we all need to
i think we all need to contact Anderson Cooper and let him know how we feel about this.
wow..just wow. why would
wow..just wow. why would they want a person to say anything specific? isnt the whole point of democracy freedome of speech and thought? :( this makes me feel so sad, after AJ Hammer was our CNN Savior
yeah, now Glenn Beck has AJ
yeah, now Glenn Beck has AJ Hammers times slot. funny how that worked out.just mere weeks after Hammer has objective coverage of 9/11, his show gets pulled and replaced with a hardcore conservative lackey.coincidence?
now Glenn Beck has AJ
now Glenn Beck has AJ Hammers times slot
WOW. are you seriouis? I thought Showbiz tonight still came on?
Guys lets me ask you an honest question. If you are a celebrity, or a journalist, or anyone of some type of fame, fortune, or influence, is it really worth it to go against the MSM who controls your income? Charlie got trashed, divorced and ridiculed. AJ was demoted, Cynthia Mckinney is being prosecuted, I mean unless Hundreds or more of people come out simultaneously do you think that it makes any sense for these "lone rangers" to be sticking their neck out?
it might still come on, but
it might still come on, but not at the same time. Glenn Beck took over his time slot, at least the one at night.
it may not make sense Yizzo,
it may not make sense Yizzo, but what would you do if you were famous? would you stay quiet knowing what you now know about 9/11? i like to think that i wouldnt.
"and whats with promoting
"and whats with promoting all the bullshit in LC2?
There are so many errors in that film that it discredits the facts. And its the most well known!"
make your own film, bud, so I and everyone else can go on websites and talk trash about it then.
the movement HAS credibility, "Wilson," and we're gaining traction every day.
whether or not you choose to accept it, our movie is very big part of the movement, and we are NOT going away.
wow..just wow. why would
wow..just wow. why would they want a person to say anything specific? isnt the whole point of democracy freedome of speech and thought? this makes me feel so sad, after AJ Hammer was our CNN Savior
Yizzo | 05.18.06 - 8:45 am | #
incase you didnt know its 1984, bud...
whether or not you choose to
whether or not you choose to accept it, our movie is very big part of the movement, and we are NOT going away.
dylan | Homepage | 05.18.06 - 9:32 am | #
dont worry dylan, no one can stop your film from what its doing!!!!
here is my quote of the day!!!!
Anyone that thinks that LC2 hiurts the 911 truth movement is in question of being a shill!!!!!
thank you dylan for not listening to any of these internet fools!!!!
the Flight 93 in Cleveland
the Flight 93 in Cleveland story is not "crap" as you say. its a crucial piece of evidence. dont you realize that initial, local news reports are the most reliable? its before they can "mold" the story.(do yourself a favor and watch the segment on OKC bombing in Alex Jones first 9/11 film.local news is always more reliable.) just because the Flight 93 landing in CLeveland story doesnt fit with your views on 9/11 doesnt mean its "crap". they put out that story for a reason. they also scrubbed it from their website for a reason.
it might still come on, but
it might still come on, but not at the same time. Glenn Beck took over his time slot, at least the one at night.
Chris | Homepage | 05.18.06 - 9:16 am | #
glen beck is a rightwing wackjob.. i could understand fox taking him but cnn??? jesus... his whole show on the radio is making fun of liberals...
How will the movement ever
How will the movement ever gain credibility?
Wilson | 05.18.06 - 3:51 am | #
it sure wont be by crying about someones film on the net....
Wilson, your above post is a
Wilson, your above post is a prime example of how sneaky shills try to discredit LC2E.
it might still come on, but
it might still come on, but not at the same time. Glenn Beck took over his time slot, at least the one at night.
Chris | Homepage | 05.18.06 - 9:16 am | #
glen beck is a rightwing wackjob.. i could understand fox taking him but cnn??? jesus... his whole show on the radio is making fun of liberals...
inside | 05.18.06 - 9:53 am | #
just further proof that CNN is trying to outdo Fox when it comes to being rightwing shills. they recently hired that racist asshole Bill Bennett as well.
Fox News gets the highest
Fox News gets the highest ratings by far. they are clearly rightwing puppets. so CNN is gonna try and get its ratings up by being like Fox.sad but true.
lc2e has done good stuff for
lc2e has done good stuff for the movement like getting people to question things.
I remember downloading LC1 a while back (my volume always died for a minute or so whenever the phone call part came up, or was it the shanksville witnesses)
either way, #1 on google video, so someone is watching x 1000000.
Glen Beck is a Ruch Limbaugh
Glen Beck is a Ruch Limbaugh wanna-be. I can't think of a lowlier aspiration.
I agree that LC2E may do
I agree that LC2E may do more to discredit the movement because it covers too much information. This is not a bashing of Dylan Avery as it was his film that first attracted me to the movement. Yet, I am definitely not mainstream. I showed the video to my father and he turned it off less than halfway and didn't buy it. Too much for him to believe.
The 9/11 Truth Movement needs to penetrate the mainstream for justice to ever occur. To do this, this movement must focus on only a few key issues. Mainstream will tune out if overloaded. Any business person knows that if they are giving a presentation, they limit the number of points that they want to convince their audience to just a handful.
We can argue all day what you might focus on if you could only argue five points. My vote would be as follows: 1) US Governments foreknowledge of the pending attacks including insider trading; 2)Lack of military response to Pentagon plane; 3) Bush's response in the classroom; 4) The controlled demolition of WTC-7; and 5)The controlled demolition of WTC1 & 2.
I fear that Loose Change is just too shocking and may scare the masses away. You've got to start small and then once their hooked, bring it on.
My hope is that the Chicago conference will further unify our movement and help us clarify where to put our attention. Its not that the whole story isn't important but what's the goal here: TO GET AN OVERWHELMING NUMBER OF AMERICANS TO CALL FOR A TRULY INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. To do this, we must utilize all we know about marketing and influencing people.
Let's be smart as too much is at stake.
Jako
Seriously guys you got
Seriously guys you got me....I'm a sneaky shill. This is where your tax money goes :)
The reason I call something like the flight 93 in cleveland story "crap" is because it doesn't make sense...have you ever thought that it was taken off the website because it was an error? it could be one could be the other...YOU DONT KNOW. STICK TO WHAT YOU KNOW!
The first released news CAN BE JUST AS WRONG! that is a rediculus argument.(sometimes they dont get the whole story right away)
plus it's useless for the reason stated by the above...STICK TO THE CLEAR EVIDENCE...If you are actually trying to convince people, stop confusing them with side issues and pointless specualtion that only will turn people off and your only preaching to the choir.
As soon as someone notices a weak arguement and they know your wrong, you've lost em forever.
Controlled demolition~ thats all you need...thats what killed the most people...thats what is scientifically provable...fuck the pentagon...their just gonna release a clear video to back up the VAST MAJORITY of the eyewitness testimony.
It would be nice if you made a LC3 and REALLY became academic with it.
I would pose you the same question George strombolopulous did "how much of the fictional parts make it into the doc?"
I do applaud your effort in
I do applaud your effort in making a film. If I had the time and means to do so I would...I will continue to wake up my friends and family to 9/11...And I will continue my research
LC2 has been the most
LC2 has been the most effective tool in spreading 9/11 truth.FACT. the cleveland story is important.FACT. fuck what you heard.
saying FACT is not a fucking
saying FACT is not a fucking argument. LC2 is also an effective tool in spreading useless 9/11 truth mixed with bullshit and speculation.
Unlike some people, I refuse to blindly believe something is a FACT just because someone said it in a video. I can do my own research and come to my own conclusion thank you. It's one of those skills I learned at my school.
I know for a FACT that cell phone calls can be made and recieved in a commercial airplane.
The Cleveland story is worthless.
the popularity of LC2 is only setting up the movement for a fall because of its obvious errors.
If any film should be copied and handed out its that new one "whats the truth".
the LC2 bashers are like
the LC2 bashers are like jilted,jealous females. you guys reek of jealousy. is LC2 perfect? no, its a documentary so its kind of hard to please everyone.comments like this make me chuckle:
the popularity of LC2 is only setting up the movement for a fall because of its obvious errors.
If any film should be copied and handed out its that new one "whats the truth".
Wilson | 05.20.06 - 3:03 am | #
yes, because if somebody sees LC2, they will have no desire at all to do research into 9/11 themselves.what kind of argument is that? as if LC2 is the ONLY alternative 9/11 movie/website/group out there.LC2 is gonna bring down the whole 9/11 truth movement right? give me a break, thats a bullshit argument and you know it.
the Cleveland story probably
the Cleveland story probably has more truth to it than the corporate bullshit you seem to be more likely to believe. the Cleveland story was out before anyone had a chance to mold the official story.far from bullshit, more than likely more reliable than CNN or Time magazines "investigative reporting".but it doesnt fit with your views on 9/11, so its clearly useless right? you pick and choose worse than the guys you hate so much, the LC2 crew.
interesting qoute from
interesting qoute from Wilson:Unlike some people, I refuse to blindly believe something is a FACT just because someone said it in a video. I can do my own research and come to my own conclusion thank you. It's one of those skills I learned at my school.
so why do you assume people who are exposed to LC2 cant do the same thing? its as if you think if somebody watches LC2 they will forever be forced to see things the same way as Dylan.more bullshit.