The size looks close, but maybe a bit large. The speed is definitely way too slow.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12318129/site/newsweek/?bclid=44147144&bctid...

Oddly, very carefully worded piece on the released Pentagon video. Neither 100% for or against "conspiracy" theories on 9/11.. The best part is the fact that 9/11 Truth has gone above ground. Watch for yourself.

huge titanium compression blades - where are they margaret, i seemed to have misplaced my massive titanium compression blades.

here is a link to a great thread over on the LooseChange forum. it has photos showing a 757 next to the same kind of fire trucks that were at the Pentagon. finally puts a plane to scale in my eyes rather than some CGI mock up. it has most definitely convinced me a 757 DID NOT hit the Pentagon given the damage seen before the collapse.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=3157

interesting stuff.

Among the no-planer's is also Morgan Reynolds: He wrote an article raising suspicion about the hole in the first WTC tower that got 'hit', about the steel being bent outward etc.

Also don't forget: there was a (collect-) call from Neo-Con whore Barbara Olson from Flight 77, and this was exploited as the undisputable evidence that Flight 77 crashed in W.DC - definitely a fake phone call.

And the Pentagon strike was a key element of the so called "attacks" of 9/11: it added a military component to it all, an adequate justification to declare war. Osama had loudmouthly declared a "war on America" - which was in truth confined to embassy bombings and alike - and Bush responded with the "war on terror", a justifiable concept, unless 9/11 is a lie.

How's this look? An A3 streaking across the lawn (with an AA logo on the tail):

http://damall.com/pix/A3.jpg
.

I think catching a plane with 2 frames/second in the picture at 350mph is too much to ask (can someone do the math, please),
but it couldn't just have disappeared, with all the passenger seats, all the bodies, all the tons of aluminum and steel. Suppose some passenger had a titan watch, and anotherone had a diamond ring. Where is this stuff, why was nothing found?

Pentagon missile attack 9/11? http://www.newsfollowup.com/flight77_6.htm

Yes, unfortunately people are that gullible.

The video is not clear enough to deduce it is a plane, not even close. The fact that the gov't and media are claiming it is 100 undeniable proof of anything is boggling my mind. I saw them talking about the video on the news last night with one of the family members, and never once did they mention the fact that nothing is really visible in the clip. They just talked as if the video of an airplane was as clear as day.

Simple answer to the question of whether or not a plane hit the pentagon is:

I don't know. The government says it did, but who believes the government?

A 757 enine: http://srv3.myweb.fvtc.edu/yogerst/AdamandYogiin757engine.JPG

>A 757 enine: >http://srv3.myweb.fvtc.edu/ >yoger...in757engine.JPG
>Anonymous | 05.17.06 - 2:47 pm | #

exactly. The 757 story doesn't fit common sense: the hole in the wall was about as big as one would expect from 1 turbine hitting through, but not the whole plane with 2 monster turbines, a huge body, plus wings.

The 757 tale is something that they can convince you of in a history text-book, but not when you see it for yourself.

Alex Jones offers 2 interpretations, which sound very reasonable to me:

"1) The government truly is frightened to death of releasing any images which accurately depict what happened at the Pentagon because it doesn't jive with the official version of 9/11.

2) Or the government knows that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon and has clear footage of the incident, but is deliberately releasing these speculative images in order to stoke the debate so it can later release the high quality video and use it to debunk the entire 9/11 truth movement.

The media obsession with this one facet of an entire smorgasbord of 9/11 questions, and their refusal to address more hardcore 9/11 evidence, leads us to fear the latter explanation is the case."

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/160506giantpsyop.htm

I can only hope that someday we learn the truth.

which video Mike Jr? the msnbc one?

Caution is Good, but if you check out the photo anyalsis at www.st911.org

I don't think we have anything to worry about.

It was SO NOT a plane, only extremely doctored video would be able to make all the remains disappear completely.

Caution is good, but not so necessary in this case. There is enough complete evidence to support the fact that it was ABSOLUTELY NOT a large passenger plane.

This is just psy-ops on the masses... just talking points for FOX... which means it's a distraction for something else.

Keep your eyes peeled. They're trying to control the internet right now - maybe that's it?

"Simple answer to the question of whether or not a plane hit the pentagon is:

"I don't know. The government says it did, but who believes the government?"

Logical fallacy.

Anyway the vast majority of the evidence comes from independent sources, not from the government.

Might i point out that the Pentagon video shows a much smaller object going to fast to positively identify. Nooe can tell that it is flight 77.

spot the shill!!!! i'll give you a clue. his name is VERY ironic.

The Prisonplanet animation has the scale of the plane far too big for where it crashed into the Pentagon and did not take account the distortion of the extreme wide angle of the security camera lens.

The height of the Pentagon is 77ft. The height of the tail of the 757 was 44.5ft off the ground when the landing gear was down. With these relative heights, it is easy to see that the Prisonplanet animation has the tail much taller then the height of the Pentagon at the know point of impact. So the 757 depicted in the animation is far too big.

Here is a far more accurate depiction of AA77's crash into the Pentagon done to proper scale. Watch the several animations:

9/11 Models, Renderings, and Animations