Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime with Dutch Subtitles

Check it out, its only available so far from Google Video so you can't download or subscribe to it, but if you know someone who speaks Dutch, send them this:

http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=97

How/why would someone make a

How/why would someone make a 9/11 truth movie, at this stage of the game in 2006, that doesn't even mention or suggest 1 iota of all the compelling physical evidence behind 9/11 truth?

Looks half-cocked, & seems like lies of omission were made in withholding powerful evidence.

A few of EGLS producer John

A few of EGLS producer John Albanese's dubious quotes on our scientific evidence:

why do people keep hammering the "freefall speed" issue. I see no conclusive position from the physics community on this. if it was so OBVIOUS that the laws of physics were violated - there would be consensus on the issue.
there isn't.
some of you want to claim there is.
but there isn't
John Albanese | 05.19.06 - 5:07 pm | #

"I just get tired of all the speculation and almost desperate attempts to prove demolition.
John Albanese | 05.19.06 - 3:09 pm | #"

...i already talked about reports of explosions - and how they can POSSIBLY be explained by transformers throughout the building experiencing massive power surges as the structure failed...
john albanese | 05.20.06 - 1:29 pm | #

someone here asked me what happened to WTC7
i don't know
and either do you
we have evidence that seems to indicate controlled demolition
and we have evidence to the contrary
John Albanese | 05.20.06 - 12:04 pm | #

you give us an example of simple math - adding 1/2 second for each floor of the towers.
Surely you are aware that that is not a scientific analysis of the physics involved. If it was that simple the scientific community would be unified on the issue.
They are not.
John Albanese | 05.19.06 - 4:34 pm | #

You deliberately BASH our scientific evidence way too much for me, if that's really you, Albanese.

You consider Dr. Jones’ work to be "desperate attempts.” I beg to differ.

“but i disagree that the firemen are afraid to talk. there was just TOO much loss of life on that day to believe that these brave men would be silenced - and the families silenced - by a gag order.”

DonÂ’t patronize me on this John. Our entire mainstream media is silenced even without a gag order!!! Plenty of firefighters have spoken out re: explosions & other unexplained occurrences. There is fear & intimidation keeping them from organizing a movement.

I like this movie, does

I like this movie, does anyone have eng subs?

How/why would someone make a

How/why would someone make a 9/11 truth movie, at this stage of the game in 2006, that doesn't even mention or suggest 1 iota of all the compelling physical evidence behind 9/11 truth?

Looks half-cocked, & seems like lies of omission were made in withholding powerful evidence.
Anonymous | 05.21.06 - 5:26 am | #
i agree, while its a great movie, the lack of WTC7's destruction, and even the towers is a glaring ommission and keeps it from being as good as it can be.

Ditto. Shorten the "V for

Ditto. Shorten the "V for Vendetta" clip, loose the "Starwars" clip, and show WTC-7.
And stop bashing our scientific evidence!

It appears that anonymous is

It appears that anonymous is cyber-stalking John Albanese, and attempting to smear his work.

EGLS has been widely received in a very positive way by the community. The idea that anonymous is making accusations against Albanese, and reposting his quotes, out of context, seems like a deliberate smear campaign.

Anyone here ever notice how whenever someone achieves a breakthrough in this movement, they are immediately smeared and their work degraded?

EGLS is a very good film.

It is assinine to be stalking Albanese from message board to message board because he chose to make a film about the IGNORED evidence of government complicity.

I've already seen announcements to screen EGLS with LC2, because they make perfect compliments to each other.

Why are you attacking someone who is fighting to expose the truth behind 9/11?

EGLS is a great

EGLS is a great film.

Anonymous is a jealous activist from the NYC area. His earlier posts expose that he attended the EGLS screening at St Marks church, where accusations were made that ALbanese was making death threats against Nico.

Think about that.

A simple review of the boards here also exposes that Anonymous has been attempting to smear ALbanese and his film on multiple boards.

Albanese is a non-physical evidence documentarian. His work has now reached audiences nationwide, and as this board indicates been translated into Dutch. The reviews have been 90% positive.

So why are local activists from NYC dogging him on physical evidence, and smearing his work?

Michael Ruppert just did a

Michael Ruppert just did a great editorial on the physical evidence game, and how the government is manipulating all the tinfoil hat theorists with the release of the Pentagon film.

It appears that SOMEONE wants us to ONLY talk about physical evidence.

hmmmmmm

You know you've done

You know you've done something good when they come after you on bullshit like this.

I've seen Michael Ruppert attacked, David Ray Griffin attacked, etc etc

But yes, it does appear that anonymous is a local activist with a bone to pick against Albanese. And if you look at the quotes he is attributing to Albanese, they are not that bad.

New York probably has the

New York probably has the biggest disruption problems. For obvious reasons. Scene of the crime.

Thank you John Albanese.

Thank you John Albanese. We've received the free DVD and are planning a screening soon.

This is not a religion.

This is not a religion. Bashing Albeneses work because he does not believe in the same things as you is petty jealousy.

You act like no one is allowed to say anything to challenge what you call "science."

Not everyone agrees.

But slamming a film because it does not talk about physical evidence is stupid. It is still a MIHOP film with tons of evidence.

This is great news. The

This is great news. The film is getting international recognition. I agree that it is a shame that this board started with smears. We should all be very grateful for his work.