"Rodriguez...met former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad at the Perdana Leadership Foundation here yesterday...to give Dr Mahathir our version about what happened and would like his assistance in our work....adding that Malaysia was their first stop in a Muslim country."

So the story is that William Rodriguez met with the Former Prime Minister of Malasia to tell him about his story and seek his assistance?

Will most 9/11 truthers vote third party should the elections actually be held in November? Is there a 9/11 truth organization that is focused on changing things now that 42% doubt the official story? 42% is quite a force for change if channeled correctly. We don't need everyone to know the truth about 9/11 to implement great change.

at the Bilderberg meeting as reported by http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/story.html?id=12fd4eaa-1b87-48d...

[...]They carried signs protesting the "NWO" (new world order) and denouncing the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks as "an inside job."[...]

Hey, I don't get it. Last night on Larry King, David Horrowitz (I think it was) stated quite openly and plainly, that K. Breitweiser called Bush a murderer and was blaming him for 9/11. Larry King et al. just sat there and said nothing so it seems to me that all the people knew what Breitweiser was saying but refused to comment. Would it have killed them to say, Well yes, there are still a lot of issues and questions re 9/11 that the jersey girls want answered. The time for being frightened and shaking in our boots is over people.

Horrowitz then was allowed to go off on a tangent about some kind of crazy support for the office of president regardless of who is in it or how they got there.

I find myself increasingly concerned about the kid glove handling of this issue, even from S. Jones. Why can't we get the hell out there and simply shout re-open 9/11 cause it's a lie. Larry King obviously knows what the questions are, but nobody even dared mentioned it. We should all be emailing King to find out what the Jersey girls are really saying about 9/11 because all the panelists seemed to know and not even one said what are you talking about? It's not about Kerry and 2004 is it? The question was the elephant in the room.

Ann Coulter and Horowitz and other pundits look furious at what's going on, with 9/11, and questions about president Bush's involvement, on the internet. Coulter's face with Matt Lauer was truly enraged and was an outright attack on the Jersey girls. It wasn't about politics. It's about 9/11 and the whole Larry King panel knew it. Ann Coulter just did a pre-emptive strike against the truth movement. So now we're not allowed again to question the President cause it's a time of war. What utter Bull.

If there isn't a massive attack to respond to Coulter and I look really to the Jersey girls, then she and other pundits will try to totally discredit the truth movement.
So why don't we just come right out and say it openly now and stop this ridiculous pussy footing around.

And even worse, you guys haven't even really mentioned this open revelation on Larry King. That some people believe that Bush was behind 9/11. Come on guys. Put the pressure on. Everyone seems to know what's going on here and the Jersey Girls should be the first to stand up and say "coulter's right. We do have questions and here's why". This is the biggest non-secret of the century.

>Green party

Many top Republicans aren't in the 9/11 conspiracy is my guessing. But they stick to their party affiliation and refuse to criticise Bush. Bush got the Whitehouse 8 years under Republican control.

These people have to forced out of their cave to make a clear statement about 9/11 inside-job theories. Whoever still protects the official version, is out.

Dow down another 77 points so far today.

How low can it go?

Funny how the media is not talking about this. Its only an approximate 1,000 point drop in the last month.

In August - September 2001 the Dow dropped from approx. 10,500 to 9,600 - with a 400 point drop in the week preceding the attack.

Same as now.

not that this proves anything - but - its something to watch.

Mcgovern,Iran,the regimes falling numbers/power,the dow and sinking dollar in general,wargames etc. not to sound paranoid or anything.

you forgot Canada's recent arrests

and the London 'dirty bomb' scare

yeah, so sad to see Canada playing the bullshit game that is the "war on terror" now.

In August - September 2001 the Dow dropped from approx. 10,500 to 9,600 - with a 400 point drop in the week preceding the attack.

Same as now.

not that this proves anything - but - its something to watch.

and sinking dollar in general

all signs point to a summer attack.

***

That's true. Only one counter-point: The Dollar is strong since one or two weeks. The US bonds are too. My guess again: It won't be an attack in the US, more probably in the EU.

the dollar is well on its way to dying. thats one of the main reasons you see all the war-mongering you see now.

I think the bombings in Spain and London proved that attacks on Europe do nothing to bolster the strength or popularity of the regime here at home.

in fact, to a certain extent it hurt them in that Spain swung to the left, and world sympathy was with the europeans while animosity was directed at the USA for its Iraq policy.

@ Chris: Sure, in the long term you're right.

I have to admit i was wrong today. I said earlier that the market was down 77 points. That was incorrect. The market was down 86 points. I apologize for any confusion this may have caused.

The dow going below 10,000 will really turn me on to the idea of a summer attack. Until then I remain skeptical.

And I'm also more inclined to believe that this "attack" will not be on US soil, but overseas, perhaps Israel, blamed on Iran.

"I think the bombings in Spain and London proved that attacks on Europe do nothing to bolster the strength or popularity of the regime here at home."

51% Of OUR Country Want A Military Response To The London Bombings

The Bombing In London 'Worked To Our Advantage' According To Fox News - Video Inside

The "popularity of the regime", all depends on who's saying what on the television.

god bless the people of Spain for seeing what most americans cant see.can you imagine this country voting out the regime that failed to protect them from a "terrorist" attack? hahahahaha, we all saw what happened with that here.

Spain:

bombs. Confusion... call for a strong hand.. but then:

A single PLACKARD was seen on TV
by the whole nation, during evening news.

The sign said:

THE GOVT LIES TO US

The spanish TV has some lefties at the
video controls... so they showed it.

Imagine if your US news-"show" would
present the viewers with the following THREE DAYS BEFORE AN ELECTION:

Bush says something DISTORTED
==cut==
Protestors' sign says: Bush lies

Israel Nuke story:

http://www.opendemocracy.net/globalization/israel_bomb_3636.jsp

never forget RED MERCURY!

http://dtirp.dtra.mil/CBW/news/NG/ng_17jul05_1.pdf

In the opinion of outstanding US physicist Theodore Taylor, who miniaturized the atomic
bomb, the suitcase bomb "emits intensive heat radiation, generating a ball of fire more than
100 meters across. The core of the ball reaches a temperature of 10 million degrees Celsius."
The temperature that brought about the collapse of the WTC on 11 September 2001 was 5,000 degrees Celsius.

The mention of those facts together... what drove the author's mind?

=======

Amazing that Greg Palast says that
not IRAN but Venezuela is the next US target http://u2r2h.blogspot.com

911 eyewitness Micro Nuke claim

Done some reading ...

so, lets say RED MERCURY exists and a BALLOTECHNIC nuke exists that has a good tamper and Neutron reflector and thereby is radiation-free ...
would that not explain the extreme burn-wounds of the BALI victims (Joe Vialls [see wikipedia] was correct after all!) and the burned trees in Shanksville?

Mention 911 Eyewitness or mini-nukes on this site and you get shouted down as disinfo. That or ignored. Could it be that the truth is too 'explosive' for some of us?