Jesse Questions Why 9/11 Attacks Originated From Boston
dz Thu, 06/15/2006 - 10:00pm
Flying a Plane Into the World Trade Center? Why Not Fly Out of LaGuardia? - tvnewslies.org
Here is a new, and so far unasked question about the badly debunked official explanation of the events of September 11th 2001. If you spend years planning a spectacular attack the World Trade Center in New York City, and you are a less than adequate pilot, and you wanted to ensure the attack would be completed without giving the U.S. air defense apparatus the chance to follow their normal procedures and intercept your plane, why would you choose to fly out of Boston? Why would you choose to risk getting lost or stopped as you try to fly 190 miles to your target when you can hijack a plane from one of three airports within sight of the target?
- Login to post comments
Or, the "hijackers" were put
Or, the "hijackers" were put on those planes thinking they were going somewhere else, for other reasons, unaware of what they were being used for.
Who handles security for
Who handles security for LaGuardia?
Who handles security for Boston's airport?
handled* (as in, on 911)
handled* (as in, on 911)
Interesting question,
Interesting question, horrible attempt at an answer. This article is written by someone who doesn't understand the goals of the movement.
Because they had to pass
Because they had to pass over Stewart AFB. Both AA 11 and UA 175 both flew pretty much directly over Stewart AFB at the same time, where the planes were likely switched. This is why they had to take off from boston. I wrote a paper on the subject. http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth911/paperflightpath.html
-www.truth911.net
It was a simple choice. Atta
It was a simple choice.
Atta and associate flew out of Portland, Maine, where security procedures were weaker than in NYC. They flew to Boston where security procedures were also weaker than NYC.
There were no guarantees that they would be successful. That's why there were 4 flights out of 3 different airports. If only one flight succeeded, the mission would be considered a success. As it was 3 flights were successful.
There's little "anonymous"
There's little "anonymous" shill defending the official story again^, shilly ass.
A key reason the "hijackers" (sure, they really flew those planes, LOL) traveled via Maine to Boston was so that Atta's incriminating luggage could conveniently fall into the governmentÂ’s hands.
Because the flight from Portland to Boston was delayed, AttaÂ’s bags did not make it onto AA11. When found by the gov't, they contained airline uniforms, flight manuals, and a four-page document in Arabic, copies of which were also found with the terrorists of the other three planes (how these materials survived the crashes is also fiction). It contains a list of instructions, such as "make an oath to die and renew your intentions," "you should feel complete tranquility, because the time between you and your marriage in heaven is very short," "check your weapon before you leave and long before you leave. You must make your knife sharp and you must not discomfort your animal during the slaughter." What b.s.
Furthermore, UA93 flew out of Newark, NJ; merely 10 miles from the WTC!!! So why didnÂ’t the "hijackers" who were aiming for the towers fly out of Newark???
What about AA77 flying out of Dulles Int'l in D.C.??? Lax security there too???
If anything, a couple of
If anything, a couple of Arab Mafioso-looking dudes are going to be much more conspicuous in small Maine airport than in a NYC airport.
I've just had a brainstorm
I've just had a brainstorm for the title of the next big Hollywood movie,"How to bring down the free world with a box cutter"
Why investigate 9/11?
Why investigate 9/11? Because the current administration has failed
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=1002
is also published in al jazeera?
Work begins on Pentagon's 9/11 attack memorial
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3702436a12,00.html
Unocal Burma Pipeline news:
Doe v. Unocal Settled; Unocal to Compensate Villagers
Unocal has agreed to settle the claims in Doe v. Unocal and compensate the villagers who sued the firm for complicity in forced labor, rape, and murder.
Plaintiffs in this case seek redress for the human rights abuses associated with the Unocal pipeline project in Burma. The plaintiffs are Burmese peasants who suffered a variety of egregious violations at the hands of Burmese army units that were securing the pipeline route. These abuses included forced relocation, forced labor, rape, torture, and murder.
http://www.earthrights.org/content/view/1/25/
They flew out of Boston,
They flew out of Boston, because one of the Bush brothers companies handled security at thet airport.