Flashback: Hannity and Colmes Cover Charlie Sheen's Comments on 9/11


YouTube Stream

Tomorrow night James Fetzer from Scholars for 9/11 Truth will be on Hannity and Colmes. The clip above should be a reasonable example of what Fetzer should expect tomorrow night. Be sure to note how Hannity puts on his compassionate conservative face and speaks on behalf of the 9/11 families - and how tonight he will continue to defend Ann Coulter's statements about the Jersey Girls.

You should be able to find the links to contact either Hannity or Colmes via the links above if you want suggest what information you would like to see discussed.

Good luck Dr. Fetzer!

Thanks Mike for the link and suggestion!

as far as Kyoto goes, the

as far as Kyoto goes, the republicans are more in bed with the oil industry than the dems are, therefor the republicans are dead set against Kyoto.more profits for big oil thanks to the republicans.

It seems so easy for the

It seems so easy for the masses to be distracted by information overload. The hidden evil people in institutions of formal power and the media know that and use it to their advantage. That's why it's very important to STAY FOCUSED on 9/11 and the truth about it. Building 7 and the ludicrous explanations for its fall should be point number one on which to focus.

Again, days go by while the masses are distracted and deluded by non-important news stories. And, meanwhile, Bush/Cheney, and most politicians, turn a blind eye to 9/11 truth and continue to spin fairy tales about it on which the masses build their reality.

Are we going to see 9/11 truth and suspicions of who the true criminals are breakout into massive public consciousness anytime soon?

I believe it is up to all of us to do our little part in our own lives every single day and stay focused.

Thoughts?

Anonymous: "A B-757 would

Anonymous: "A B-757 would NOT make a hole the size of a missile in the Pentagon."

Since you didn't clarify as to whether or not you meant the outer facade impact damage, or the punch-out hole in the C ring, I'll assume that you were refering to the outer facade impact damage.

If you actually believe that the damage to the outer facade of the Pentagon was only a hole the size of what it is presumed a missile would cause; you should seriously consider doing a better online search for other more detailed photos of impact damage to the Pentagon facade, then retract that comment about a hole the size of a missile because it's not true.

And please, feel free to post anything you desire.

I shall continue to voice my concerns about Fetzer.

I thanked Hannity and Colmes

I thanked Hannity and Colmes and asked them to please treat the Professor fairly.

dear hannity, i am writing

dear hannity,
i am writing this to let you know that the admiration you show for ann coulter is very much appreciated by all her fans! now you are our fan too! wheee!
sincerely your fans, butt & rebutt.

i agree about WTC7 being a

i agree about WTC7 being a main thrust. it speaks volumes that the Scarborough show managed to find the absolute worst video of WTC7 available.of all the clear videos of WTC7 circulating around the net, they managed to find the worst of them all. not a coincidence.

"left-wing political issues

"left-wing political issues like the Kyoto treaty and socialized medicine."

Kyoto is a left-wing issue? Now I've heard it all. I guess right-wingers have plans to move to a different biosphere. Good night!
Anonymous | 06.22.06 - 1:01 am | #
hahaha, really.

Anybody else agree with my

Anybody else agree with my observations about Fetzer?
Jeff | 06.21.06 - 10:11 pm | #
no, i think your just an angry conservative that doesnt like the fact that Fetzer is a strong willed liberal.whats the matter with talking about global warming? only far right,braindead lemmings think global warming is a hoax.(and i am actually a very big supporter of Alex Jones despite his moronic views on the subject.)and socialized medicine? well, there are about 45 million people in this country that dont have health insurance and if they get the wrong ailment, they will die.its ashame you dont know somebody in this boat, maybe you would be a little bit more compassionate.if i was to get cancer tomorrow, it would be a death sentence for me, and about 45 million others.

guess what conservatives?

guess what conservatives? poor people exist.not everyone comes up in life with the same oppurtunities.just because your middle or upper class doesnt mean there isnt millions of people out there struggling to get by every day. conservatives have no heart.

btw, there appears to be an

btw, there appears to be an intentional confusion of the subject matter surrounding Coulter between being against her statements, and being against her right to make those statements.

me personally, i disagree completely with her statements, but i of course advocate her right to say whatever she wants.

and for the record, the Jersey Girls are about 100x more moderate than Ann Coulter.

Is Fox going to take the

Is Fox going to take the MSM-lead in 911 exposure?

The world is getting more bizar every day.

If Fetzer promotes no plane

If Fetzer promotes no plane at the pentagon i'm going to slit my wrists.

The reason Fox will bring on

The reason Fox will bring on guys like Fetzer and other "truthers" on is because they figure 911 conspiracies make the left look bad. This also explains the gatekeeper mentality on the left.

The real trouble with a guy like Fetzer is that he's likely to blow his top and come off looking exactly like the caricature they'll be aiming to present. I don't have anything against Fetzer, and some of what he says makes sense, but if it was me and Hannity asked me on the air I'd be suspicious and I'd at least ask for help before I appeared.

I wonder how Fetzer is prepping for this?

This is going to be a brutal

This is going to be a brutal gig. I dont expect anything short of insults and interuptions coming from Hannity and Colmes

Fetzer should take the moral

Fetzer should take the moral high ground and emphasize that his beliefs fully honor the victims of 911.

We need to TAKE THAT AWAY from government apologists like Hannity.

How DARE he say that - believing that the government had a hand in 911 -somehow dishonors the victims!

Watch your back Fetzer. Go

Watch your back Fetzer. Go in with your eyes wide open. Your dealing with scoundrels. Act accordingly.

It's sick how "fair &

It's sick how "fair & balanced" Alan Colmes really serves as Hannity's whipping boy.

Colmes is to Hannity as the mute little wimp is to the giant lummox in Penn & Teller.

Interesting 9/11 truth site:

Interesting 9/11 truth site: http://www.unsungwar.com

(I'm reposting this with

(I'm reposting this with edits, sorry dz for the blogging etiquette.)

This should be good!!!!!
As long James doesn't allow them to push his political and emotional buttons which might cause him to go off on an interesting but ultimately fruitless diversions. Stick with the strongest facts ( molten metal, wtc 7, minetta testimony, Dr. Jones work, the support of Morgan Reynolds and David Bowman ect.)
He needs rapid fire, ala Alex Jones, facts. Don't make it too complicated, this is really for the general population to begin getting interested in our valid questions and irrefutable facts concerning 911.

Its clear that the MSM's most recent tactics has been to make us look crazy and unsympathetic the victims of 911.

I hope Mr. Fetzer keeps this in mind !!!! Don't let them get away with this!!!!!

It will be a delicate balance between not being talked over and cut off ( which fortunately Mr. Fetzer is the one person I trust not let this happen) and not coming off as an irrational emotionally charged liberal 'conspiracy ' theorist.

This show is clearly not real news coverage or a forum for rational debate on important subjects......but political theatre!!!!!
If we keep that in mind, we can use all these MSM opportunities to really get the Truth out and create a momentum that is unstoppable.

Its ultimately not about you, me or anybody in the truth movement but exposing the whole truth.....political aikeido will be needed.

On that note: Thank You James Fetzer and Go kick some political Theatre ASS!!!!!!!

Colmes plays the part of

Colmes plays the part of weak liberal very well. it will be nice to see a true, passionate liberal like Fetzer show that jellyfish how its done.and no, im not saying Fetzer should get political(although its hard not to with Hannity),im just saying it will be nice for Fox viewers to see a liberal with a backbone for once. Fox doesnt usually let them anywhere near their cameras.Fox's idea of a "tough liberal" is Juan WIlliams, who spends much of his time agreeing with the likes of Bill Kristol.

Hannity with Opie and

Hannity with Opie and Anthony, the liberal posers who attempted to smear LCE2 and the filmmakers.
http://www.myfilehut.com/userfiles/73396/My%20Documents/animated%20gifs/...

I hope I remember to watch

I hope I remember to watch this.

This guy Sean Hannety is

This guy Sean Hannety is such a joker, here's Alec Baldwin of all people pwning the crap out of him lol;

http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Whitman-Baldwin-Hannity-Levin.mp3

And here's the second funniest Hannity shit I've ever witnessed aside from the link above. It's an episode on the "Hannity and Colmes" show titled "Sweet Revenge - Sean talks with the prof. who gave him his lowest grade in college". But unfortunately for Hannity, his old prof gets on air and tears Fox news and Hannity a new one LOL!

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player05.html?062006/062006_hc_ollman&Hann...

Fetzer really shouldnÂ’t be afraid of these clowns.

Remembering The "Lessons Of

Hannity with Opie and

Hannity with Opie and Anthony, the liberal posers who attempted to smear LCE2 and the filmmakers.
http://www.myfilehut.com/userfil...-with- Hanni.gif
Cloak & Swagger | Homepage | 06.21.06 - 8:08 pm | #

^LOL, classic!

Having Betsy question

Having Betsy question Charlie's credentials was rich, sort of like Glinda patronizing the scarecrow on the way to OZ. At least the words "Controlled Demolition" were repeated several times.

HAHAHAHA, ALec Baldwin shit

HAHAHAHA, ALec Baldwin shit all over Hannity. that was truly hilarious.

wow.... ive been traveling

wow....

ive been traveling for a month or so and i come back and things here are really exciting

give em hell fetzer!!

show those bitches what its like to talk to someone who is confident (unlike those slivering worms)

"building 7 proves bush did 911"

that statement would scare the hell out of them----you would be attacking them right at their core

dare ye?

http://www.opieandanthony.com

http://www.opieandanthony.com/

send Opie and Anthony some hate mail and call them republican puppets.

DHS: "If Fetzer promotes no

DHS: "If Fetzer promotes no plane at the pentagon i'm going to slit my wrists."

He's proudly promoted, supported and propagated that in every other radio and video clip that I seen/listened to of him; it's a pretty sure bet that he will.

That's one reason, of several, that I've been suspecting Fetzer of being a possible disinfo & destruction agent.

I also happen to suspect that one of his main purposes is to sideline, sidetrack and ultimately try to discredit Professor Jones's work.

Who started Scholars for 9/11 Truth, the website? I know that it's a joint-cooperation between Fetzer and Jones, but who actually registered the website, came up with the main idea, created the website and is in charge of dictating what is published at the website?

Because there is a lot of nonsense that's been published at www.st911.org that shouldn't have ever been published there. And instead of trying to stick to a limited amount of strong, inarguable, irrefutable points to make the case for 9/11 having been an inside job, there is loads of unimportant distractionary links, non-evidence and the like.

I don't like it. If you do, okay. But I don't.

I don't know, but I personally suspect that Fetzer is in charge of dictating the main direction of the website, and inparticular, what is primarily published there.

As I recall, Fetzer didn't burst onto the 9/11 scene with his paper Thinking about "Conspiracy Theories": 9/11 and JFK, until almost immediately AFTER Professor Jones released his first public draft of his beautiful research paper "Why Indeed Did The WTC Buildings Collapse?" online.

I've been looking at it like this:

1) I thus far trust Professor Jones, although he's done a few things that I don't like, for the most part he's been doing beautiful work! Just amazing work!

2) But with Professor Jones being a credible, highly educated, and reputable person, would it not be safe to assume -- and should it not be expected that -- people working in the capacity of agents of disiniformation, distraction & destruction, would try to befriend Professor Jones, or infiltrate any honest groups he may belong to, in an attempt to hinder him and his work from reaching a critical mass of exposure, ultimately trying to destroy him and his work, from the inside out?

Seriously.

And would it therefor not be safe to assume, that someone [possibly] working in the capacity of an agent [Fetzer], who happens to also be a Professor, would be one to attempt to befriend Professor Jones, since it's probably not that difficult for people who work in the same Professional fields, or have the same Professional Job description [Professor, Ph D], to connect in a friendly manner?

Especially if one of them [Jones] is going to probably be very receptive to someone else [Fetzer] who he [Jones] thinks is honestly searching for, investigating and trying to present evidence of the same thing [9/11 = Inside Job]?

I don't know if Fetzer is an agent, I am not saying that he is an agent for certain. I do, however suspect that he may, in fact, be an agent.

Remember, guilt by association is a very strong tool to use, to discredit something. www.st911.org hosts extremely important information in Professor Jones's research paper "Why Indeed Did The WTC Buildings Collapse?". But then has ridiculous links such as Morgan Reynolds "no plane hit the WTC towers, it was hologram missiles" paper -- as only one example of what should NOT have ever been published at www.st911.org Especially since it is of utmost importance to stick with what can be scientifcally proven. Remember, guilt by association is a very strong tool to use, to discredit something.

How can someone as apparently intelligent as Professor Fetzer -- if he were to be looked at uncritically, as just some honest person -- continuously promote, support and propagate the "no 757 hit the Pentagon" hoax? When there is so much credible evidence against it that shows that a 757 hit the Pentagon on 9/11.

And how can you [anyone reading] then look at Fetzer, and not be suspicious and question his true motives or purpose in the 9/11 truth movement?

The continuous promotion, supporting, and propagation of the "no 757 hit the Pentagon hoax" is one strong reason that I am highly suspicious and distrusting of Professor James F. Fetzer.

If you trust him and like him, okay. But I don't.

I'll have to wait and see what he does tonight on FAUX News.

84 unreleased videos of the

84 unreleased videos of the Pentagon. all under lock and key for a reason.thats all im saying.

"building 7 proves bush did

"building 7 proves bush did 911"

I would say it proves 9/11 was an inside job. It's much bigger than Bush and a few of his cronies in government.

true dat

true dat road66....

BUT---

if you got 13 seconds on one of those faggot's stupid shows---might as well start a fire

The trouble with calling

The trouble with calling somebody an agent is that it distracts from the issue in the same way as talking about "no planes" distracts from the issue. Unless you have evidence it's not a good idea to speculate.

I think Fetzer has been unreliable. He's not conservative enough for my taste, meaning he is willing to speculate (I'm not referring to his politics, but his caution.)

Again, the far right media pick the weakest advodcates to exhibit. I had a friend in the anti-war movement who was constantly asked to appear on Lars Larson's radio program. It was obvious to me that they chose my friend because he was susceptible to their tactics. He was quick to anger, he didn't have his facts lined up, he made wild claims or wild sounding claims.

But who knows. Maybe Fetzer will surprise me.

Morgan Reynolds strikes me

Morgan Reynolds strikes me as a particularly bad rep for these ideas.

I have my suspicions about

I have my suspicions about how good Fetzer has been for the 9/11 movement. I certainly respect the work and time and energy he has put into talking about 9/11 on radio shows, speaking engagements, etc. However, I have listened to a lot of his interviews, and I have found that he almost always mixes 9/11 discussions with left-wing liberal and/or controversion unrelated political issues, such as global warming, socialized medicine, and other polarizing topics that are sure to turn off many conservatives and libertarians. I have written him asking him to stop talking about unrelated political issues like these, but he has ignored me and continues this. And I have noticed that he does mix the hardest 9/11 evidence with softer 9/11 evidence. I wish that we could put more peer pressure on him to change this for the good of 9/11 truth exposure. Anybody else agree with my observations about Fetzer?

type meant controversial,

type meant controversial, not "controversion"

typo

typo

Jeff, that's what an agent

Jeff, that's what an agent would do full time. It's not respectable if it aim to destroy the mouvement. Just a thought.

I've been suspecting Fetzer

I've been suspecting Fetzer of being a possible disinfo & destruction agent

how can you then look at Fetzer, and not be suspicious and question his true motives or purpose in the 9/11 truth movement?

I think Fetzer has been unreliable.

Morgan Reynolds strikes me as a particularly bad rep for these ideas

I have my suspicions about how good Fetzer has been for the 9/11 movement.

listen to you geniuses! as if.
__________--

- Ø®£Z -How can

- Ø®£Z -How can someone as apparently intelligent as Professor Fetzer -- if he were to be looked at uncritically, as just some honest person -- continuously promote, support and propagate the "no 757 hit the Pentagon" hoax? When there is so much credible evidence against it that shows that a 757 hit the Pentagon on 9/11.

There is no CREDIBLE evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon, especially not AA77! Why is it your mission to pretend that there is?

"That's one reason, of

"That's one reason, of several, that I've been suspecting Fetzer of being a possible disinfo & destruction agent."

WTF? So if you don't see eye-to-eye on the Pentagon and some of the stuff on st911.org you automatically assume he may be an agent? Sorry, but the Pentagon remains an open question. Many people will think you are an agent for writing this post and trying to create divisions within the scholars group. In fact, b/w you and him, it is more likely you than Fetzer.

On the contrary, I think

On the contrary, I think it's more likely you & Ø®£Z are agents, because you're the ones accepting the "official story", while I'm poking holes in it.

"There is no CREDIBLE

"There is no CREDIBLE evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon, especially not AA77! Why is it your mission to pretend that there is?"

Maybe HE is the government agent, not Fetzer.

Only an imbecile or a shill

Only an imbecile or a shill would boast that "there is so much credible evidence against it that shows that a 757 hit the Pentagon on 9/11."

I laugh so hard when anyone

I laugh so hard when anyone tries to accuse me of being any sort of agent whatsoever.

Anonymous: "There is no CREDIBLE evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon, especially not AA77! Why is it your mission to pretend that there is?"

You would benefit from searching for more evidence then, if you honestly feel that way. Because it does exist. And I am not talking about the [as of yet] unreleased surveillance tapes.

Only an imbecile or a shill

Only an imbecile or a shill would boast that "there is so much credible evidence against it that shows that a 757 hit the Pentagon on 9/11."
Anonymous | 06.22.06 - 12:11 am | #

No.

Duh, oh, ok, duh, yeah AA77

Duh, oh, ok, duh, yeah AA77 hit the Pentagon. Even Dick Cheney assured us that it did, so it must be true.

Yeah, evidence on

Yeah, evidence on 9/11Myths.com and in your imagination.

Anonymous: "WTF? So if you

Anonymous: "WTF? So if you don't see eye-to-eye on the Pentagon and some of the stuff on st911.org you automatically assume he may be an agent? Sorry, but the Pentagon remains an open question. Many people will think you are an agent for writing this post and trying to create divisions within the scholars group. In fact, b/w you and him, it is more likely you than Fetzer."

First of all, I didn't write all of the reasons of why I suspect that Professor Fetzer may possibly be an agent.

So your comment about what you think that I wrote, is incorrect.

I am not an agent.

I'm glad to hear that you're

I'm glad to hear that you're not an agent.

And I won't waste my time

And I won't waste my time going back and forth with you about that either lol

I'll say it once more.

I don't work for anyone in any capacity with regard to 9/11 and/or anything government related in any way, shape and/or form, whether online and/or offline, period.

Clear enough, Anonymous?

ugh.

ugh.

Yes, sir. So I'm sure you

Yes, sir. So I'm sure you won't mind if I repost this:

Face it, the Pentagon is a huge smoking gun!

- Hani Hanjour could not have flown back from the Kentucky/Ohio to D.C.

- Hanjour could have not made that incredible maneuver in a B-757 to hit the renovated section of the Pentagon.

- A B-757 would NOT make a hole the size of a missile in the Pentagon.

- 80 videos of whatever hit the Pentagon are being withheld for no damn good reason except to cover-up. The only video released looks like a missile or a drone!

- There is no way in hell they could ID a planeload of people that smashed into the Pentagon @ 530 mph. The fictitious DNA results were made to bolster the official lie.

"I don't work for anyone in

"I don't work for anyone in any capacity with regard to 9/11 and/or anything government related in any way, shape and/or form, whether online and/or offline, period."

Stop throwing out bullshit about Fetzer. Clear enough?

Goodnight all. Sleep well.

Goodnight all. Sleep well.

Yes, honey.

Yes, honey.

Well in any case, I hope

Well in any case, I hope that Professor Fetzer does a good job tomorrow night for the 9/11 movement. My biggest suggestion to him is to stay focused on 9/11 and not go on tangents related to left-wing political issues like the Kyoto treaty and socialized medicine.

Fetzer's one of the best out

Fetzer's one of the best out there. I haven't seen a shred of evidence that would indicate a 757 hit the Pentagon.

"left-wing political issues

"left-wing political issues like the Kyoto treaty and socialized medicine."

Kyoto is a left-wing issue? Now I've heard it all. I guess right-wingers have plans to move to a different biosphere. Good night!

hey guys, instead of

hey guys, instead of bitching at one another, how about send in some emails to hannity and colmes?

Hannity@foxnews.com
Colmes@foxnews.com

Is it possible to watch this

Is it possible to watch this live on FOX on the internet?
Could someone please give me a link on where to go when the program start, and also, what time is it?
Its 8 AM here in Norway now, so I guess you figure out the timedifference by looking at when I posted this? :)
Thanks for any help!

thanx dz, that's what i'm

thanx dz, that's what i'm going to do right now -

will the real anonymous please stand up! ha ha
_____________

well, you posted yours from

well, you posted yours from norway at 2.07 and i posted mine from conspiracyville at 2.10 so hmmm there must be a 3 minute time zone difference!

Thats not much :p

Thats not much :p

I think we avoid any name

I think we avoid any name calling amongst the 911 truth movement and also be careful about calling anyone a disinfo agent. What I think happens more often is that people simply have different ideas of what actually happened on 9/11. Some people are better at discovering the truth or interpreting the evidence than other, so what?
We have to accept that we don't know yet exactly what happened, but poisoning the discussion and the movement by ad hominem attacks will not contribute to our goal of getting the truth out.
In fact, I think one the strategies of the NWO is to try to bring the 911 truth movement to self-destruct itself down through internal rivalry and distrust.
Therefore I say, just trust the people in the movemnt. Just trust that everyone is trying to do their best. Then a few bad people won't spoil the lot.

I know Jim, work with him,

I know Jim, work with him, and although we are polar opposities politically, he is an honest man.

Take that for what it's worth.

Damn right about that crappy

Damn right about that crappy video of WTC-7. Clear videos are all over the web. Why did they show one you could hardly see?

And please, feel free to

And please, feel free to post anything you desire.
I shall continue to voice my concerns about Fetzer.
- Ø®£Z - | 06.22.06 - 3:07 am | #

Thanks. Do you mind if I continue to voice my concerns about you?

i agree about WTC7 being a

i agree about WTC7 being a main thrust. it speaks volumes that the Scarborough show managed to find the absolute worst video of WTC7 available.of all the clear videos of WTC7 circulating around the net, they managed to find the worst of them all. not a coincidence.
Chris

Your absolutely right Chris!!!! They only thing they edited from my letter to the editor, which they printed, was a reference to 'three" center Towers. There was absolutely no reason to edit that reference, from that point on I knew #7, was the smoking gun.
As for the Pentagon, and what ever happened there, if the Government, the MSM, and the most divisive and caustic people involved in 911want you to emotionally embrace the Pentagon debate: Pro or Con.....
That should raise HUGE red flags!!!!!!!!
I'll say that again: That should raise Huge red flags!!!!!!!!!!!

Since day one I have always

Since day one I have always said WTC7 isn't just a smoking gun, it is absolute proof of an inside job. I have challenged anyone and will still challenge anyone to prove me wrong.

Anyone who calls Fetzer a

Anyone who calls Fetzer a disinfo agent is talking out of their ass or is one themselves.

There is no proof that a 757 hit the Pentagon, and Fetzer has the right to say it. From what I can tell, the people who deny this lack of proof fall into 3 camps: the limited hang-outs (ala Alex Jones), those who lack research on the subject, and the disinfo agents.

Having said that, Fetzer is genuine and is entitled to his opinion, but the main issue here in 9/11 truth seeking isn't WHAT hit the Pentagon, but HOW something could hit it at all! Keep that in mind!

anyone have any video

anyone have any video footage of Fetzer i can watch or listen to?

You can see him in 911

You can see him in 911 Revisited at 911revisited.com. Go to st911.org for mp3's of his new show on RBN "Non Random Thoughts".

but the main issue here in

but the main issue here in 9/11 truth seeking isn't WHAT hit the Pentagon, but HOW something could hit it at all! Keep that in mind!
Mike in Spokane | 06.22.06 - 2:27 pm | #
EXACTLY!!!!! how quickly people forget that the Pentagon was supposed to be the most heavily defended building on the planet, the nerve center of the strongest military on the planet. gimme a friggin break, it was a "friendly" aircraft, thats why it was allowed to hit!

AFTER THE FRIGGIN TOWERS GOT

AFTER THE FRIGGIN TOWERS GOT HIT TOO!!!!!!!!!! COME ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The only problem ive ever

The only problem ive ever seen with Fetzer is his poot handling of the st911 wikipedia entry

i see that fetzer supports

i see that fetzer supports jack white's previous work on the moon and jfk photos.. i do not support white's work regarding the pentagon photos, but thats just my opinion.

the main issue here in 9/11

the main issue here in 9/11 truth seeking isn't WHAT hit the Pentagon, but HOW something could hit it at all! Keep that in mind!
Mike in Spokane

I agree completely, and thats a great way to redirect the Pentagon questions in any interview or conversation.

ha, i just watched that

ha, i just watched that fetzer clip above.. i dont think we have to worry about him being talked over ;)

Anonymous said: "I know

Anonymous said: "I know Jim, work with him, and although we are polar opposities politically, he is an honest man.

Take that for what it's worth."

Thanks for sharing that, Anon. He certainly strikes me the same way.

As long as Prof. Fetzer focuses the physics of the collapses, etc, and doesn't go off on conjectural tangents or spouts non-911 political rhetoric, this could end up being one of the better MSM interviews.