If you read article that has been put in onto the Pravda (about blonde women) and you know the theories of David Icke, then you know that "they" are behind it. The references are obvious.

It is the problem with the mainstream they use the bullshit it costs us too much to keep content.

I suggest making your own local copies of what you don't want to vanish.

There are sites which make archives of content, I don't have them at my fingertips...

This is highly suspicious, it's not a question of sites not having room to keep content, the Pravda URL is in a directory dated 2001, yet the story that replaces it is dated 2005, someone is definitely tinkering here, but may not be the originating site, but external (i/e/ CIA/NSA) hackers...

Well, it's also strange how I get

Bad Request
Your browser sent a request that this server could not understand.

Request header field is missing colon separator.

1 ñ ; name_cookie=Blob

when I try to post on that congressional candidate. :)

Muslim nations 'in denial about 9/11'

IHT

Westerners and Muslims around the world have radically different views of world events, and each group tends to view the other as violent, intolerant, and lacking respect for women, according to a new international survey of more than 14,000 people in 13 nations.

In what the Pew Global Attitudes Project called one of the survey's most striking findings, majorities in Egypt, Indonesia, Jordan, and Turkey - Muslims countries with fairly strong ties to the United States - said, for example, that they did not believe that Arabs carried out the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York and Washington.

http://www.rawstory.com/comments/16447.html

chop chop truthers.

i hope they dont cancel Fetzer for Hannity tonight. i noticed hes not mentioned on the Fox website at all.

Former Bush Administration Official Says 'Official' 9/11 Story Is 'Bogus'

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm

Washington, DC, Jun. 13

A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."

Top Russian General Says International Terrorism is a Ruse
@ 09:43 AM (9 days, 6 hours, 54 minutes ago)
International Terrorism
Does Not Exist

By General Leonid Ivashov
1-22-6

General Leonid Ivashov was the Chief of Staff of the Russian armed
forces when the September 11, 2001, attacks took place. This military
man, who lived the events from the inside, offers an analysis which is
very different to that of his American colleagues. As he did during the
Axis for Peace 2005 conference, he now explains that international
terrorism does not exist and that the September 11 attacks were the
result of a set-up. What we are seeing is a manipulation by the big
powers; this terrorism would not exist without them. He affirms that,
instead of faking a "world war on terror", the best way to reduce that
kind of attacks is through respect for international law and peaceful
cooperation among countries and their citizens.
General Leonid Ivashov (left) at the Axis for Peace Conference 2005 in
Brussels, with Webster Tarpley
As the current international situation shows, terrorism emerges where
contradiction aggravate, where there is a change of social relations or
a change of regime, where there is political, economic or social
instability, where there is moral decadence, where cynicism and
nihilism triumph, where vice is legalized and where crime spreads.
It is globalization what creates the conditions for the emergence of
these extremely dangerous phenomena. It is in this context that the new
world geo-strategic map is being designed, that the resources of the
planet are being re-distributed, that borders are disappearing, that
international law is being torn into pieces, that cultural identities
are being erased, that spiritual life becomes impoverished...
The analysis of the essence of the globalization process, the military
and political doctrines of the United States and other countries, shows
that terrorism contributes to a world dominance and the submissiveness
of states to a global oligarchy. This means that terrorism is not
something independent of world politics but simply an instrument, a
means to install a unipolar world with a sole world headquarters, a
pretext to erase national borders and to establish the rule of a new
world elite. It is precisely this elite that constitutes the key
element of world terrorism, its ideologist and its "godfather". The
main target of the world elite is the historical, cultural, traditional
and natural reality; the existing system of relations among states; the
world national and state order of human civilization and national
identity.
Today's international terrorism is a phenomenon that combines the use
of terror by state and non-state political structures as a means to
attain their political objectives through people's intimidation,
psychological and social destabilization, the elimination of resistance
from power organizations and the creation of appropriate conditions for
the manipulation of the countries' policies and the behavior of people.
Terrorism is the weapon used in a new type of war. At the same time,
international terrorism, in complicity with the media, becomes the
manager of global processes. It is precisely the symbiosis between
media and terror, which allows modifying international politics and the
exiting reality.
In this context, if we analyze what happened on September 11, 2001, in
the United States, we can arrive at the following conclusions: 1. The
organizers of those attacks were the political and business circles
interested in destabilizing the world order and who had the means
necessary to finance the operation. The political conception of this
action matured there where tensions emerged in the administration of
financial and other types of resources. We have to look for the reasons
of the attacks in the coincidence of interests of the big capital at
global and transnational levels, in the circles that were not satisfied
with the rhythm of the globalization process or its direction.
Unlike traditional wars, whose conception is determined by generals and
politicians, the oligarchs and politicians submitted to the former were
the ones who did it this time.
2. Only secret services and their current chiefs * or those retired
but still having influence inside the state organizations * have the
ability to plan, organize and conduct an operation of such magnitude.
Generally, secret services create, finance and control extremist
organizations. Without the support of secret services, these
organizations cannot exist * let alone carry out operations of such
magnitude inside countries so well protected. Planning and carrying out
an operation on this scale is extremely complex.
3. Osama bin Laden and "Al Qaeda" cannot be the organizers nor the
performers of the September 11 attacks. They do not have the necessary
organization, resources or leaders. Thus, a team of professionals had
to be created and the Arab kamikazes are just extras to mask the
operation.
The September 11 operation modified the course of events in the world
in the direction chosen by transnational mafias and international
oligarchs; that is, those who hope to control the planet's natural
resources, the world information network and the financial flows. This
operation also favored the US economic and political elite that also
seeks world dominance.
General Leonid Ivashov with journalist Christopher Bollyn from American
Free Press
The use of the term "international terrorism" has the following goals:
Hiding the real objectives of the forces deployed all over the world
in the struggle for dominance and control;
Turning the people's demands to a struggle of undefined goals against
an invisible enemy;
Destroying basic international norms and changing concepts such as:
aggression, state terror, dictatorship or movement of national
liberation;
Depriving peoples of their legitimate right to fight against
aggressions and to reject the work of foreign intelligence services;
Establishing the principle of renunciation to national interests,
transforming objectives in the military field by giving priority to the
war on terror, violating the logic of military alliances to the
detriment of a joint defense and to favor the anti-terrorist coalition;
Solving economic problems through a tough military rule using the war
on terror as a pretext. In order to fight in an efficient way against
international terrorism it is necessary to take the following steps:
To confirm before the UN General Assembly the principles of the UN
Charter and international law as principles that all states are obliged
to respect;
To create a geo-strategic organization (perhaps inspired in the
Cooperation Organization of Shanghai comprised of Russia, China,
Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan) with a set of values
different to that of the Atlantists; to design a strategy of
development of states, a system of international security, another
financial and economic model (which would mean that the world would
again rest on two pillars);
To associate (under the United Nations) the scientific elites in the
design and promotion of the philosophical concepts of the Human Being
of the 21st Century.
To organize the interaction of all religious denominations in the
world, on behalf of the stability of humanity's development, security
and mutual support.
General Leonid Ivashov
General Leonid Ivashov is the vice-president of the Academy on
geopolitical affairs. He was the chief of the department for General
affairs in the Soviet Union's ministry of Defense, secretary of the
Council of defense ministers of the Community of independant states
(CIS), chief of the Military cooperation department at the Russian
federation's Ministry of defense and Joint chief of staff of the
Russian armies.