Springer Wants Evidence.

Got this from one of the million or so news lists I'm on:

June 27th, 2006...

Hello everyone,

A little while ago I was listening to Air America as I drove. Jerry Springer was doing a show... when a caller asked him why he doesn't do a show about 9/11 being an "Inside Job".

Jerry responded by saying and this is almost verbatim: "if I could see some evidence, I would devote a full three hours to it." ...

I think we can overwhelm him with evidence.

DVDs (not streaming) should be mailed to him. I don't have a physical address but someone can find it.

Plus many of us have ready made email packets of websites, articles, streaming video links...

Springer contact.

we need jerry!!!! help us.

we need jerry!!!! help us.

Hey, Jerry was once mayor of

Hey, Jerry was once mayor of Cincinatti, his parents were refugees from the Nazis, and he has big $$$.

He's getting older, maybe he wants to do something important again. He could even sponsor LC3E with some of his $$$.

I used to work with Steve

I used to work with Steve Wilcos and Jim Sherlock (Springer security), I'll see if I can have them put a good word in.

-Culhavoc

Well I sent him an email

Well I sent him an email with several pieces of evidence that is impossible to ignore.
What the hell.

Looking for support of 9/11

Looking for support of 9/11 in any ideological forum is like looking for Bush at a Mensa meeting. The globalists behind ops like this play the 2 party system for all it's worth, and constant ideological warfare is the Professional Wrestling sham they use to obfuscate their real objectives and crimes.

Visit any Liberal message board that's discussing 9/11 right now, such as Randi's: you'll see the "divide and conquer" scenario in all it's glory. The Truthers talk evidcne, the shills spew their disinfo and denial. Ad infinitum.

Interesting.

Interesting.

"Zwicker said dont attack

"Zwicker said dont attack the left, just question and prod. Remember WHO IS on our side at Air America: The co founder, Randi Rhodes, Mike Malloy, Janeane Garafalo. Dont barage him, just send him credible information to make him think."....What is this about Randi Rhodes being one of us? The last time I listened to her (last week) she was still pushing the Osama did it myth. That realy hurts because I like her and she is a smart lady. I find it hard to believe she pushes the Osama fairy tail. I would love to see her in our camp. Same thing with JS but I don't think he has the balls.......maddog

a good write-up about the

Springer is a liar and a

Springer is a liar and a shill. I have heard him mention "Loose Change" on more than one occasion. On each occasion he stopped short of endorsing "Loose Change" because he, "hasn't had a chance to see it."

"Hasn't had a chance to see it"?

"HASN'T HAD A CHANCE TO SEE IT"!?!?!

Why AAR has this fake progressive on the airwaves is beyond me!

What's up with 9/11: Press

What's up with 9/11: Press For Truth?
Anybody heard anything about when they'll have a page up?
The trailer is good: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-330418413919565384&q=Press+for+...
But I don't want to start sharing it until the web page they push at the end actually works.
Where else can we get more info. on this doc?

Springer must really have

Springer must really have his head up his ass if he can't find 9/11 evidence. That is almost humorous.

Springer is a jerk. Who is

Springer is a jerk. Who is he trying to BS. He wants evidence, google 9/11 truth. He can't handle the truth.

Only like 10 people listen

Only like 10 people listen to Springer. Not like you're missing anything.

This "if someone will show

This "if someone will show me the evidence" line is the same BS I run into in discussion threads...

In some cases, in the past, it was useful to humor them and do the work for them but, at this stage, if they haven't seen the evidence, THEY CAN'T BE BOTHERED TO LOOK FOR IT.

In the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic US, at least, the percentage of households with online access is well above 90%, and the percentage with broadband access is well above 80%. A google search of "9/11", some curiosity, a desire to seek answers to questions, and some time are all that are necessary to "see the evidence". It's also useful to have a well-honed "crap detector" and a little perserverance, but these are not required simply to encounter enough questions and anomalies to beg the question. We are not in the business yet of "proof"; we are merely trying to convene a mass public grand jury or court of inquiry. Any one of us could cobble together a two-page list of web site links (just the links, not the text or the photos or the videos) which --if someone had the curiosity, or the anger, or the temerity to open and read -- should knock their socks off and bring them to a state of outrage. But, then, as Colby of the CIA put it back in the 60's when talking about the Warren Commission, "Americans don't read." And if we can't expect our media gate-keepers to read....

stop attacking potential

stop attacking potential allies.

stop acting like teenage boys.

we need Jerry, we need Alan, we need Al Franken's team of crack investigators.

Zwicker said dont attack the

Zwicker said dont attack the left, just question and prod. Remember WHO IS on our side at Air America: The co founder, Randi Rhodes, Mike Malloy, Janeane Garafalo. Dont barage him, just send him credible information to make him think.
Personally I dont think Bush is responsible for 9/11, and that it was Cheney, the neocons and a global criminal syndicate.

Springer is a clever,

Springer is a clever, cunning swine.

He would do ANYTHING to have power.

But 9/11 is STILL too hot to handle for him. I think he is a lost cause.

Did you hear his show on the morning of 9/11?

Jerry Springer? Howard Stern..

I MEANT Howard Stern..

I got confused. But I wouldn't be surprised if they are similar arseholes.

... a witness described a plane
circling and hitting the tower... it looked like a MD80, he said.

at Minute 151 ... http://faultgame.com/images/stern/09-11-01WTC-24.mp3

And then there is this eyewitness on BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/1537530.stm

" I saw a plane coming, it had two engines on either side of the tail"

Who's going to come out in

Who's going to come out in the beer-stained tank top for the 1 hour humiliation? Please let it be Cheney.

Err, on second thought...

Err, on second thought... who here thinks Springer would make a good representative of this movement?

We may as well be lobbying professional wrestlers or the producer of COPS(R).

-Culhavoc

Why AAR has this fake

Why AAR has this fake progressive on the airwaves is beyond me!
African American | Homepage | 06.27.06 - 11:04 pm | #
Mike Malloy needs to corner him and give him a good talking to.

Culhavoc, reasonable point.

Culhavoc, reasonable point. But maybe Springer could do some behind-the-scenes kind of stuff like sponsoring $$$ a video or something.

we really have to think abou

we really have to think abou this. Springer, once a respectable Mayor, had one of the "raunchiest and dispicable" shows of ALL TIME. and he himself admitted that he did not agree with 90% of the content on his at the time it was on air. But why did he keep doing it? because of the Almighty Dollar thats why...and if he was willing to comprimise his image and intergrity for money, why would he mention 9/11 truth knowing the potential impact it could have on his funds.

maybe im being pessimistic but i still sent him a link of wtc7 ;)

Yeah, yizzo. But there are

Yeah, yizzo. But there are far, far worse people than Springer & his dumb tv show in this world.

i am not anti

i am not anti semitic----

but there are some people that misread the talmud and think it is their job to abuse (and even murder) non jews (which they call 'goyim')

it says in the talmud that you are doing gods work if you kill a non jew

personally i think that it is just a metaphor
____________________
but there are groups of talmudists that think it is their job to try to hurt non jews

jerry springer seems like he might be one of these

jerry springer continually brings on non jews to the show and tries to smear them

thats the whole underlying theme of the show

to try to smear the citizens of america is the one and only goal of the jerry springer show _____everyday airing demoralizing psy-ops to break down the masses----to try to make it easier to manipulate them

this is outdated thinking and will eventually backfire on them in a huge way_____labeling someone as 'trash' smears the person making the accusation more than the intended targets
____________________
i hate to say it---i have friends that are jews

but watch shows that have 'jewish producers'---and you can see alot of these kinds of themes

misguided people who think they are helping israel by "smearing the goys"

he will probably never help the 911truth movement---cause he mistakenly thinks it would be against israel's best interest

I don't think we're getting

I don't think we're getting the gist here. Anyone in the public eye who's been duplicitous about "knowing" about 9/11 or being "unaware of the details" at this late in the game is simply a gatekeeper, or currently unable to voice their true opinion, either from intimidation or fear of career damage.

If it's the latter, then they're choosing money and success over truth. If it's the former, then why would you invite a gatekeeper to come onto your team and help shut your movement down or discredit it?

Anyone with a brain and sufficient intellectual curiosity has by now been made aware that 9/11 is riddled with anomalies that demand investigation, even if just privately, with their web browser. If they claim they havene't a clue what all the fuss is about, then it's about 98% certain they are part of the problem.

RANDKILLER | 06.28.06 - 1:57

RANDKILLER | 06.28.06 - 1:57 pm | #

That was a bunch of b.s.^

pussy anonymous --- no

pussy anonymous ---

no that's not bullshit---there really are some wicked talmudists out there

they dont count as "jews"

but i would encourage you to research this

goyim bashing television is a big mainstay in "jewish hollyweird"
_________________________-
the okc bombing investigation is now being re-opened because there are ties linking elohim city to mossad---
and that it was a fake racist front that was really being used by "fake jews"

-there is a history of racist organizations(LIKE THE KKK) in america being fronts that are operated by misguided fake jewish talmudists at their core--

THE TALMUD IS FREAKING WEIRD

and lots of people throughout history have used it as a front to murder people

WHEN IT IS INTERPRETED BY SOMEONE THAT HAS A GOOD HEART IT IS A WONDERFUL RELIGIOUS TEXT_____---

these illusions must be destroyed

Springer and Rhodes are

Springer and Rhodes are gatekeepers. Don't let your guard down and think AAR is on our side. Mike Malloy is the only truth seeker they have. Notice that the only way New Yorkers can listen to Mike is on the net? He's off the am dial in New York. The power Rhodes and Sprnger have is substantial, and they are waisting it on diversions such as flag burning and old news. Don't look to them for help, they're fighting for the other team.

Don't look to them for help,

Don't look to them for help, they're fighting for the other team.
Jim Long Island | 06.28.06 - 2:58 pm | #
thats way too strong a statement. is Randi doing enough? in regards to 9/11 specifically, absolutely not.(although she regularly raves about Paul thompsons terror timeline and has plugged Loose Change and other 9/11 truth stuff on her show) but playing for the other team? i dont fucking think so.

Chris, I hope you're right.

Chris,

I hope you're right. I stopped listening to Randi and Springer after emailing them over and over about discussing 911 on their shows. On numerous broadcasts, both said the government couldn't ever possibly do something so evil. That's when I turned them off. Let me know when they get enlightened.

Randi said that? how long

Randi said that? how long ago? because the last time i heard her,which was probably at least 6 months ago, she was pretty clear that she had nagging questions abotu 9/11. she didnt utter the words "inside job" or anything close, but like i said, she has plugger some 9/11 truth people/stuff on her show.dont give up on her! shes a very smart chick, i love her passion, and i think she is worth listening to despite her timid approach to 9/11.

plugged*

plugged*

Chris, Like I said, I don't

Chris,
Like I said, I don't listen to her anymore. I really think she's too into herself. She really believes that everything in the US would be fine if we could just get the deomocrats elected in November. Like Hillary and Spitzer would get into the truth. We need people in power that have a backbone. I'll change my opinion when Randi gets on Lou Dobbs and works 911 truth into the conversation, Alex Jones would.

This is all about 'divide

This is all about 'divide and conquer' guys. Right now, they must separate the Jerry Springers from the Mike Malloys. Randi Rhodes is somewhat on the fence - she's skirting the edges, but not fully on board yet. So what they need to do is further delineate the two sides, and get her firmly back on the LIHOP-at-best side of the fence. Hence, we're seeing a lot of "fuck Randi" all over the net.

If you cave in to this and give up on her - start calling her a shill - that's what will happen. In regards to Randi, she has 2 choices - get off the 9/11 Truth bandwagon and keep her career, or keep on in her current direction and eventually start lising her audience, because that's how these guys work.

Use the conflict in any way they can - 9/11 has to be and endless debate, so that the lines can be clearly drawn. Why do you think they came up with LIHOP and MIHOP in the first place.

Can't tell the players without the bowling shirts.

Not everyone who defends the

Not everyone who defends the official theory is stops at LIHOP is a shill or an agent. Until February I was LIHOP, only because I hadn't been exposed to the writing of DRG and Steven Jones.

Now, those who go out of their way to disrupt, discredit, and destroy the 9/11 truth movement are the ones who are suspect.

But don't confuse ignorance and disbelief for shilling and disinformation.

That's "or stops at LIHOP"

That's "or stops at LIHOP"

Personally I dont think Bush

Personally I dont think Bush is responsible for 9/11, and that it was Cheney, the neocons and a global criminal syndicate.
pockybot | 06.28.06 - 1:19 am | #

I tend to agree with this. Bush looked utterly bemused after Card whispered in his ear. I don't think he knew wtf was going on down at NYC.

Personally I dont think Bush

Personally I dont think Bush is responsible for 9/11, and that it was Cheney, the neocons and a global criminal syndicate.
pockybot | 06.28.06 - 1:19 am | #

I tend to agree with this. Bush looked utterly bemused after Card whispered in his ear. I don't think he knew wtf was going on down at NYC.
Andrew Lowe Watson | Homepage | 06.30.06 - 12:10 am | #
me too, and if you listen to Tarpley, he thinks Bush was actually a target that day, and he was warned not to blow the whistle and to go along with everything. hes been the puppet president ever since, in my opinion.