Spot on George Washington ;)

There are certainly similarities between 9/11 and 7/7.

These include, terror drills "coincidentally" occurring at the same time as the real events and motives and benefits, the scale of 9/11 was of course in a league of it's own, sadly...

A great 52 min vid on Google video draws some parallels.

Link : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7193024010983572797&q=7%2F7+9%2F11

Cheers

SB,without reading your paper(i gotta go in 1 min), i can tell you i think that all of those things you listed are connected.im assuming thats the point of your paper.the main purpose of the vote fraud was to make sure that a puppet regime like Bushs would be installed so that the great farce that is the "war on terror" could be started. kicked off by 9/11 of course.i'll read it as soon as i get a chance though.

Can anybody pls. source that BBC NEWSHOUR 4min interview from some other source than prisonplanet? I can't find the BBC archive for this show..

thanks

UK is out of natural gas hard core style - north sea gas fields are collapsing before their eyes. If it wasn't for the helpline electricity from french nuclear plants they almost shut down the country last winter. It just takes one press conf. where Tony or Gordon explain to brits it was for the safety energy supplies and everything is ok.. What is 80 dead britons against the safety of multimillion nation, nothing..

What is 80 dead britons against the safety of multimillion nation, nothing..

Where did you get that figure from ? Have some respect !!!

52 killed on 7/7 and don't forget there was 400 Brits killed in the WTC buildings on 9/11 too.

they almost shut down the country last winter

Source please... With prices the way they are, they can't supply it quickly enough...

As they say in the UK... Use your Loaf !!!

UK natural gas reserves are approximately 600 bcm (billion cubic metres) and consumption is approximately 100 bcm per year. Domestic extraction rate is falling fast such that the UK is expected 50% depended on imports by 2010 and 80% dependent by 2020 (6).

The capacity to import anything like that volume doesnÂ’t exist yet though it is planned and is being built. UK appetite for gas is immense, France uses ~50 bcm, Italy ~70 bcm, Germany ~90 bcm. To think we can export that appetite is short-sighted.

Seven closed by 2010 (-31% capacity)
All but three closed by 2014 (-70% capacity)
One remaining past 2023 (-90% capacity)

Within nine years we lose 70% of the capacity which is currently responsible for 22% of our supply.

Not only is the UK losing indigenous natural gas supplies but also nuclear generating capacity.
---
UK gas originates almost entirely from the North Sea, with a small amount able to be imported through the interconnector with Belgium. The extraction rate from the North Sea peaked in 2000 and has been falling since, production last year was 12% down from the peak.
---
EnergyBulletin
__________----

12% fall in just 4 years, britons are about enjoying some serious thermostat and tv watching adjustments, they don't have juice..

SBG , just curious if and when fetzer/colmes audio is coming up. Jon , do you know?

by law, the NSA cant censor anything in our e-mails, but when has the law stopped these bastards before?

i wouldnt doubt that it happens. you know some homeland security goons were caught opening some dudes mail because of "national security"? i think the guy was like 70 or something.what a joke.

Re: Email Filtering

We have had experiences here in Florida already where 9/11 emails are being filtered by Yahoo.

They are trying to stop the Truth Movement before we get too big

"SBG , just curious if and when fetzer/colmes audio is coming up. Jon , do you know?"

I'm still at work unfortunately. I'll be here until 7 or so.

George?

Sitting Bull!!

http://dirk-gerhardt.homepage.t-online.de/Bilder/Bushseduced-911-Iraq-Bo...

very good. but must better.

the first sentences are IMPORTANT. Yours are o.k. but not nice. Make them nice.. humour can relax the reader .. but strained humour does theopposite. Ergo: concentrate on getting the first few sentences right.

the rest is good, but

===== content =====

indicate TIME-stamp:

Iraq war:

- when troop-movements began to the gulf (Sept2002?)
- when attack began (21mar2003?)

=== formatting ======

You need to decide, or do both:

ONLINE version:
Make it in HTML.

PRINT VERSION (pdf).. just use NUMBERED Web-links and a general SHORT link:

www.911pdf.de/23 >> redirect >> Scott Ritter Article (or whatecer)

AND MAKE SURE ALL LINKS WORK!!

I think we now know why the planes went off radar, why they went in with millitary precision, why people believe they were 767s, why people think the planes were 767's. I used to call people saying they were remote control 767's crazy. No more. After exhaustive research, what I learned at the LA conference, etc. Looking at the flight paths, etc...Im convinced the planes used at the WTC were remote control switched planes. And its funny, this article explains why the planes went the wrong way and out over
millitary instalations. The hijackers didnt turn responders off. The planes landed. Check this out: Guy who helped with the PNAC 'new pearl harbor' thing is a top suspect in 9/11:
http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=6702

U2r2h,
I'm chasing you from thread to thread, but I want to know if you have found any other sources for the german article about the LA Times filtering their reporters access.
I haven't found any, .....yet.
I'm ready to to send my letter to the editor of my local Tribune paper and their journalists, who I believe will print this if its done correctly. But referencing a german translation will not pass.....I know there are journalist in this newspaper who are dieing to cover all of this if we can only force the opportunity on the editors and publishers.

Thank you for your help in this matter and your insightful posts on 911 blogger.

SB

Sorry for the WSWS link? Are you nuts?

wsws.org has VERY GOOD analysis!! They are really well informed..

Even their arch-socialist conclusions are ACTUALLY CORRECT... even if it is hard to agree with them.

New Cartoon on my blog:
http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/ about the new CTO at Microsoft.

Sorry.. The telepolis.de link has LINKs EMBEDDED .. look there,

best.

Noplane people, listen: Isnt it possible
theyre NOT "cartoons", but switched remote control planes??? If theres ANY altering of the images from the news, its to cover the fact they are fake planes. Why do you people push the no planes at the wtc? That doesnt explain how everyone saw a plane or the cutout on the building.

intresting point pocky, some eyewitnesses claimed to see a commercial size plane, but it had no windows and there were numerous mentions of a "cargo plane".

This has everything to do with 9/11. It's the same cross-bred intel communities, staging the same false-flag attacks.

Why do you think this happened during the G8 period, and what do you think was the purpose of Tony Blair's visit to the White House immediately preceding the 7/7 bombings?

The Dov Zakheim story is so incredible. I am convinced he is involved. Everything fits so well, you dont even need to make speculation. He oversaw the outfitting of 767's with remote control to the same areas where the planes magically disappear from radar.

There is a problem with the no plane theory. A photographer for a major Australian newspaper managed to photograph the plane right before it went in. I wish there was a giant .png version, as it would prove it was not the real plane. There is too much amatuer footage of the 2nd plane impact to say it was fake.
Now heres some long range footage that shows the flight that hits:
http://www.vialls.com/wtc/radiocontrol.html

Doesnt that Don Gran Prix Lt. Col. guy say he believes it was remote control real planes? Its important to note that if one part of 9/11 is an inside job, than the WHOLE part has to be very very controlled so theres no fuckups. There was no fuckups. It was perfect. People say what about Shanksville? A hero's story is the icing on the cake. A strike at the white house would have crippled America.

Sitting Bull: I liked your timeline. In the event that you would like to polish the (basically very good)English grammar in your introduction and conclusion, I would be happy to help.

remote controlled is what I meant by drones pock:)

How come this idea is never thrown out there? I think it's a variation of the Stanley Hilton story, but it's something I always think about.

FBI, ATC, CIA, MOSSAD, whatever, were on board those planes, alongside Atta & Co. Something was released to knock out the passengers as well as Atta & Co. Those "agents" then radioed in the "hijacking", and then somehow set the planes so they could be controlled from the ground, and then parachuted to safety.

ATF

Interview: Jim Fetzer will be the guest on
the Alan Colmes Radio Program TONIGHT
11 PM/CT? (10 PM-1 AM/ET and 7-10 PM/PT).

The question mark is on the ST911.org website.

BTW, if any links in this article http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/07/why-road-to-911-truth-passe...

are broken, its cause its a year old.