Tuesday Grab Bag

ABC Sets 9/11 Miniseries for Fifth Anniversary
Six-hour telefilm will air over two nights

ABC's "The Path to 9/11" miniseries will premiere as a two-night event coinciding with the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

9/11 Health Registry Weighed

Police Union Considers Tracking Health Effects Of Attack On Surviving Officers

"We understand that science takes time, but these officers don't have time," said PBA spokesman Al O'Leary. "Some have already died, and those who are alive today need to know what kinds of symptoms they should be watching for."

CLAIM vs. FACT: White House on 9/11 Illnesses
David Sirota

The newspaper reports that "nearly five years after the 9/11 terrorist attack, thousands of workers who toiled at the World Trade Center site continue to experience health problems, according to doctors at Mount Sinai Center for Occupational & Environmental Medicine in New York." Sadly, our government has resorted to lying about the whole thing - and those lies were originally shaped by someone who went through the revolving door.

9/11 Families United to Bankrupt Terrorism

"In fact," she said, "TSA seems more concerned with retaining unchecked, unwarranted and unaccountable authority to keep secrets than it does with its real mission of protecting the nation's transportation system."

"Et tu, Salon?"
Reprehensor's blog

"Look, I appreciate the careful attention to detail that people like Manjoo apply when they criticize 9/11 skeptics like Dylan Avery… but where the hell is this scrutiny when it comes to the Bush Administration’s official narrative of 9/11 which has the consistency of Swiss Cheese?"

Conspiracy Theorists Peddle 9/11 Myths

Gravois makes the radio.

"i think they had suicide

"i think they had suicide pilots within the elite Air Force, CIA, Special Operations Group or whoever carried it out"

I have difficulty believing that elite Air Force, CIA or Special Operations Group have pilots ready to sacrifice themselves.

Whatever the planes were, I believe they were remote-controlled.

The Boeing 757 and 767 are

The Boeing 757 and 767 are equipped with fully autonomous flight capability,Flight Management System (FMS), they are the only two Boeing commuter aircraft capable of fully autonomous flight. They can be programmed to take off, fly to a destination and land, completely without a pilot at the controls.

and that total Bullshit ABC 9/11 documythary will be nothing but propaganda as usual.

Im telling ya there is only ONE way we are going to be able to stop this bullshit and that is to literally attack the MSM, Boycott them, email their advertisers by the millions, and then protest by the millions outside of their studios until they are FORCED to report the truth.

Until we do that they are going to continue to LIE and spread total bullshit GOPaganda.

"Atta to me is the only high

"Atta to me is the only high level operative psycho enough to willingly fly a plane into a building. He was not Muslim. He was violent to women, loved cocaine, strippers, etc."

Yes, but their supposed motive was Islamic jihad, so why else would Atta do it then?

Drones a al Operations Northwoods.

Pockybot, if Mineta

Pockybot, if Mineta testimony implies a no shoot down order, and if a plane hit the Pentagon, it seems hard to believe it was flown into the building that way by a newbie. On very limited evidence, and in want of better minds and souls to look at it thoroughly, I vote remote.



charlie sheen la truth conference video

I just sent this to some of

I just sent this to some of the "elders" within the movement, and now I'm asking anyone here...


Before 9/11, what was the average response time for an intercept to take place? I know John Judge has written that in 65 times in the year prior to 9/11, the average response time was 6-10 minutes, however, he didn't source his work. That's basically what I need. A source. Any help would be appreciated.



Conspiracy Theorists Peddle

Conspiracy Theorists Peddle 9/11 Myths

Gravois makes the radio. here and now.

did anyone hear this? im at work and dont have rweal player.

First response... The

First response...

The official line is within 15 minutes as published on military web sites, etc. But as I recall PBS, C-SPAN or someplace had an officer say it was like 8-10 minutes. This was a big doc feature on NORAD. Sorry I can't recall more details. The official story had the Cape Cod planes informed at 8:46 and then were in the air at 8:52. That's six minutes. Sorry I can't be more helpful just now.

Is there any clear pictures

Is there any clear pictures of the underside, or the side of the WTC plane, or closeups of the plane parts in the streets? I keep reading all this time about people to suspect they were 767's outfitted for remote control, and Im wondering what you guys think about this theory?

I feel bad for people stuck like LIHOP as I was for so long. I guess it's so hard to believe the entire operation was planned.

Also, didnt USAtoday or some other big online news site talk about the LA conference? 1200 people, with big speakers in LA? Where's the media???

Pockybot, What do you think


What do you think of Jim Hoffmans analysis of the Pentagon aircraft parts? Especially the rivet patterns on the debris compared to a 757?

Who is John Gravois?

Who is John Gravois?

The media blackout ALONE is

The media blackout ALONE is proof there's more to 911 than the commission stated.

What a crock of shit.

How can anyone researching for that ABC special "the events leading up to Sept 11th" NOT discover even ACCIDENTALLY something peculiar and rotten with the facts?

Pockybot talks perfect

Pockybot talks perfect sense.

Bill O'Reilly just said on

Bill O'Reilly just said on the Factor, "See, I get it from both sides, which is how I like it."

Israeli tanks just entered

Israeli tanks just entered the Gaza strip.

Reminder: As listed on

Reminder: As listed on st911.org:

27 June 2006
Interview: Jim Fetzer will be the guest on the Alan Colmes Radio Program
11 PM/CT? (10 PM-1 AM/ET and 7-10 PM/PT)
alancolmesradio.com, (archive) LISTEN:
Have Your Say!
Call Alan at 1-877-FOR-ALAN (1-877-367-2526)

Call now if you want to be on the show!

In case I didn't make it

In case I didn't make it clear... you can listen to the interview LIVE at
www.alancolmesradio.com, tonight 6/27 at 10 pm ET

I just tried calling in

I just tried calling in Alex. There was no answer.

Speakin' of peddling 9/11

Speakin' of peddling 9/11 myths...

[9/11 Commission EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR] Prof. Zelikow's area of academic expertise is the creation and maintenance of, in his words, “public myths” or “public presumptions,” which he defines as “beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community." In his academic work and elsewhere he has taken a special interest in what he has called “‘searing’ or ‘molding’ events [that] take on ‘transcendent’ importance and, therefore, retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene.

>767's outfitted for remote

>767's outfitted for remote control,

I don't give too much for these photo/video analysis.
If they had a remote control installed this would not necessarily be visible on the outside. The plane has radio contact as-is and doesn't need extra antennas.

And above all, my opinion is they didn't even need remote control at all. What for? To save 1 life? ONE life in a mass murder like 9/11?? No, i think they had suicide pilots within the elite Air Force, CIA, Special Operations Group or whoever carried it out.

I just listened to Colmes

I just listened to Colmes "upcoming show" commercial, and he address Professor Fetzer as "respected"...



FrankV, Bryan Sacks covers


Bryan Sacks covers that in "Hidden History", FYI. It was the first I had heard of it.

Thanks reprehensor, I'll

Thanks reprehensor, I'll have to check that in between DVD burns. I think I read it here in these comments in the last week. It's been tormenting me since then #^!*

Jon... I was going with the

Jon... I was going with the assumption that earlier callers had the best shot at getting on... that seems to be the case with most call in shows... maybe they don't open up the lines until 10.

Keep it comin with the

Keep it comin with the colmes updates ,this is great.

"FrankV, Bryan Sacks covers


Bryan Sacks covers that in "Hidden History", FYI. It was the first I had heard of it."

He's good, huh? I love his writing.

Listening to Colmes: "what

Listening to Colmes:
"what happened to the guest that we were *supposed* to have on at this time . . ."


Jon, Gravois is the writer


Gravois is the writer of the Chronicle piece that hammered on Jones.

Oh, and yeah, Sacks is a

Oh, and yeah, Sacks is a good informative writer. Between him, Benajmin DeMott and Griffin, there is nothing but little bits of paper left of the 9/11 Commission Report.

Did they drop'im?

Did they drop'im?

Colmes just said Fetzer will

Colmes just said Fetzer will be on at midnight.

Why , did his producers have

Why , did his producers have last minute reconsiderations?

A caller called in asking

A caller called in asking when Fetzer will be on. Colmes said midnight. Then that caller said that his local station only carries the show up to midnight.

I guess that's my answer

I guess that's my answer right there. Let's call in and press the issue.

Good. Fetzer still set to go

Good. Fetzer still set to go at Midnight.

What does it mean if Colmes

What does it mean if Colmes is converted ? Not being naive , just fantasizing.

pocky, it was recently

pocky, it was recently pointed out that the 2 planes that hit WTC were flown out of Boston. If you have very marginal piloting skills, why risk flying 200 miles when there are 3 airports within eyesight of WTC.

A shill said they flew out of Boston because of weaker security. However, UA93 flew out of Newark, NJ, no more than 10 miles from the WTC!

What if colmes was the

What if colmes was the chosen 911 gatekeeper/infiltrator .

I'm not very optomistic

I'm not very optomistic about ABC's 9/11 mini series. More than likely it will be tripe.

Who The Hell Is Farhad

I just got this from my

I just got this from my Canadian friend Corinne. It has nothing to do with 9/11 truth but it does have a lot to do with getting rid of Bush and Cheney. From: ProgressivePortal.org

Tuesday, 27 June 2006
4:10 p.m. PDT

Dear ProgressivePortal.org user:

If you can, please act before 7 p.m. to counteract a crowd of Fox News
viewers who are mobilizing at this very moment.

I'm writing to you from the back seat of a limousine returning me from
Fox News Channel studio in San Francisco, where I was just interviewed
on The Big Story with John Gibson.

The subject of my interview was a vote coming up TONIGHT at the
California City Council on whether to put a referendum on the ballot
for impeachment of George Bush and Dick Cheney. Within minutes of
the right-wing Fox audience began dumping pressure on Berkeley's
Council to
ditch the measure.

Berkeley is the first of more than 40 cities to take up the measure,
promoted by a nationwide group called Constitution Summer. The goal is
spark a national grassroots discussion about the checks and balances
and the
rights contained within the U.S. Constitution; why they are so
and how the Bush Administration has exceeded them. In the interest of
I won't go into all the arguments here. You can view the text of the
proposed referendum in Adobe Acrobat (pdf) format (72K) at:

As Gibson noted in interviewing me, national Democratic leaders are
away from this movement out of fear that Karl Rove and company will use
to raise money for Republican candidates in the fall. They will -- but
only way to prevent that from happening is for the Democrats to say
about anything. Rove will always find plenty of ways to reach into the
pockets of his extremist donors.

Our most basic Constitutional principles and freedoms are at risk, as
Bush Administration tramples on even the limits imposed on it by the
Republican Congress. This is not a time for timidity. We can't count on
Democratic leadership to lead the charge to restore the Constitution,
is why Constitution Summer is going the grassroots route, calling for
citizen referenda on the November ballot in cities throughout the U.S.

Whether an impeachment process begins or not, it is clear that most
citizens are woefully ignorant of the Constitution's limits on
powers, of our Constitutional rights, of how these are being eroded,
and of
the consequences of that erosion. It's vital to get the public
started, and I know of no better way than to put these issues before

The Fox News crowd throughout the U.S. is bearing down on Berkeley
now, and it's possible some of our Council members will get weak-kneed
before tonight's vote if they don't get countervailing messages from

Please take a moment and write to the mayor of Berkeley immediately,
on him to vote "yes" to put the impeachment referendum on the November
ballot. If you get a chance, send a separate message to each of the
members listed below.

If the Foxies kill this measure tonight, it will be a big setback. If
Berkeley puts the item on November's ballot, the national conversation
the Constitution will move forward.

I will let you know what has happened, and how you can help bring this
movement to other communities throughout the U.S.


Contact the Mayor of Berkeley, and others (listed in order of
importance) if
you have time, to urge them to put the impeachment referendum on the
November ballot:

Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates
e-mail: mayor@ci.berkeley.ca.us
phone: (510) 981-7100
fax: (510) 981-7199
TDD: (510) 981-6903

Council Member Linda Maio
e-mail: lmaio@ci.berkeley.ca.us
phone: (510) 981-7110
fax: (510) 981-7111

Council Member Darryl Moore
e-mail: dmoore@ci.berkeley.ca.us
phone: (510) 981-7120

Council Member Gordon Wozniak
e-mail: gwozniak@ci.berkeley.ca.us
phone: (510) 981-7180

Atta to me is the only high

Atta to me is the only high level operative psycho enough to willingly fly a plane into a building. He was not Muslim. He was violent to women, loved cocaine, strippers, etc.

Im willing to think that perhaps they were psycho enough to fly the planes in, and it is less complicated...however, remote control is more of a sure thing so as to not hit the explosives. That floating small ball you see 15 seconds before the plane hits may be something.

So quick poll:

planes switched and remote?
real planes but remote?
or psycho double agents willing to die?

I think either way it was remote, especially at the pentagon. Can we all agree Pentagon was remote?

1.planes switched and

1.planes switched and remote?
2.real planes but remote?
3.or psycho double agents willing to die?

pockybot | 06.28.06 - 1:34 am | #
i lean towards 1, it could be 2, no chance of 3.

IMO they were most likely

IMO they were most likely flown by remote. Why risk human error when high tech remote control equipment can be used and garauntee a high probability of success. Imagine if the plane missed on the first pass or instead of completely hitting the building, only the wing hit while the rest crashes into the street below (along with all the jet fuel that now cannot be used to "explain" the buildings collapse). Humans would be too risky for use.