"i think they had suicide pilots within the elite Air Force, CIA, Special Operations Group or whoever carried it out"

I have difficulty believing that elite Air Force, CIA or Special Operations Group have pilots ready to sacrifice themselves.

Whatever the planes were, I believe they were remote-controlled.

"Atta to me is the only high level operative psycho enough to willingly fly a plane into a building. He was not Muslim. He was violent to women, loved cocaine, strippers, etc."

Yes, but their supposed motive was Islamic jihad, so why else would Atta do it then?

Drones a al Operations Northwoods.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsgXqusTX84

charlie sheen la truth conference video

Conspiracy Theorists Peddle 9/11 Myths

Gravois makes the radio. here and now.

did anyone hear this? im at work and dont have rweal player.

Is there any clear pictures of the underside, or the side of the WTC plane, or closeups of the plane parts in the streets? I keep reading all this time about people to suspect they were 767's outfitted for remote control, and Im wondering what you guys think about this theory?

I feel bad for people stuck like LIHOP as I was for so long. I guess it's so hard to believe the entire operation was planned.

Also, didnt USAtoday or some other big online news site talk about the LA conference? 1200 people, with big speakers in LA? Where's the media???

Who is John Gravois?

Pockybot talks perfect sense.

Israeli tanks just entered the Gaza strip.

Good. Fetzer still set to go at Midnight.

What does it mean if Colmes is converted ? Not being naive , just fantasizing.

pocky, it was recently pointed out that the 2 planes that hit WTC were flown out of Boston. If you have very marginal piloting skills, why risk flying 200 miles when there are 3 airports within eyesight of WTC.

A shill said they flew out of Boston because of weaker security. However, UA93 flew out of Newark, NJ, no more than 10 miles from the WTC!

What if colmes was the chosen 911 gatekeeper/infiltrator .

I'm not very optomistic about ABC's 9/11 mini series. More than likely it will be tripe.

Who The Hell Is Farhad Manjoo?

http://fraudbusterbob.com/blog/2006/06/13/who-the-hell-is-farhad-manjoo/

I just got this from my Canadian friend Corinne. It has nothing to do with 9/11 truth but it does have a lot to do with getting rid of Bush and Cheney. From: ProgressivePortal.org

Tuesday, 27 June 2006
4:10 p.m. PDT

Dear ProgressivePortal.org user:

If you can, please act before 7 p.m. to counteract a crowd of Fox News
viewers who are mobilizing at this very moment.

I'm writing to you from the back seat of a limousine returning me from
the
Fox News Channel studio in San Francisco, where I was just interviewed
live
on The Big Story with John Gibson.

The subject of my interview was a vote coming up TONIGHT at the
Berkeley,
California City Council on whether to put a referendum on the ballot
calling
for impeachment of George Bush and Dick Cheney. Within minutes of
air-time,
the right-wing Fox audience began dumping pressure on Berkeley's
Council to
ditch the measure.

Berkeley is the first of more than 40 cities to take up the measure,
promoted by a nationwide group called Constitution Summer. The goal is
to
spark a national grassroots discussion about the checks and balances
and the
rights contained within the U.S. Constitution; why they are so
important;
and how the Bush Administration has exceeded them. In the interest of
time,
I won't go into all the arguments here. You can view the text of the
proposed referendum in Adobe Acrobat (pdf) format (72K) at:

As Gibson noted in interviewing me, national Democratic leaders are
backing
away from this movement out of fear that Karl Rove and company will use
it
to raise money for Republican candidates in the fall. They will -- but
the
only way to prevent that from happening is for the Democrats to say
nothing
about anything. Rove will always find plenty of ways to reach into the
pockets of his extremist donors.

Our most basic Constitutional principles and freedoms are at risk, as
the
Bush Administration tramples on even the limits imposed on it by the
Republican Congress. This is not a time for timidity. We can't count on
the
Democratic leadership to lead the charge to restore the Constitution,
which
is why Constitution Summer is going the grassroots route, calling for
citizen referenda on the November ballot in cities throughout the U.S.

Whether an impeachment process begins or not, it is clear that most
U.S.
citizens are woefully ignorant of the Constitution's limits on
executive
powers, of our Constitutional rights, of how these are being eroded,
and of
the consequences of that erosion. It's vital to get the public
conversation
started, and I know of no better way than to put these issues before
the
voters.

The Fox News crowd throughout the U.S. is bearing down on Berkeley
right
now, and it's possible some of our Council members will get weak-kneed
before tonight's vote if they don't get countervailing messages from
progressives.

Please take a moment and write to the mayor of Berkeley immediately,
calling
on him to vote "yes" to put the impeachment referendum on the November
ballot. If you get a chance, send a separate message to each of the
Council
members listed below.

If the Foxies kill this measure tonight, it will be a big setback. If
Berkeley puts the item on November's ballot, the national conversation
about
the Constitution will move forward.

I will let you know what has happened, and how you can help bring this
movement to other communities throughout the U.S.

__________________________________________________-

Contact the Mayor of Berkeley, and others (listed in order of
importance) if
you have time, to urge them to put the impeachment referendum on the
November ballot:

Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates
e-mail: mayor@ci.berkeley.ca.us
phone: (510) 981-7100
fax: (510) 981-7199
TDD: (510) 981-6903

Council Member Linda Maio
e-mail: lmaio@ci.berkeley.ca.us
phone: (510) 981-7110
fax: (510) 981-7111

Council Member Darryl Moore
e-mail: dmoore@ci.berkeley.ca.us
phone: (510) 981-7120

Council Member Gordon Wozniak
e-mail: gwozniak@ci.berkeley.ca.us
phone: (510) 981-7180

Atta to me is the only high level operative psycho enough to willingly fly a plane into a building. He was not Muslim. He was violent to women, loved cocaine, strippers, etc.

Im willing to think that perhaps they were psycho enough to fly the planes in, and it is less complicated...however, remote control is more of a sure thing so as to not hit the explosives. That floating small ball you see 15 seconds before the plane hits may be something.

So quick poll:

planes switched and remote?
real planes but remote?
or psycho double agents willing to die?

I think either way it was remote, especially at the pentagon. Can we all agree Pentagon was remote?

1.planes switched and remote?
2.real planes but remote?
3.or psycho double agents willing to die?

pockybot | 06.28.06 - 1:34 am | #
i lean towards 1, it could be 2, no chance of 3.

IMO they were most likely flown by remote. Why risk human error when high tech remote control equipment can be used and garauntee a high probability of success. Imagine if the plane missed on the first pass or instead of completely hitting the building, only the wing hit while the rest crashes into the street below (along with all the jet fuel that now cannot be used to "explain" the buildings collapse). Humans would be too risky for use.