MSNBC RIGHT NOW!!!!!

Here's more, with lots of reader comments:

http://www.newshounds.us/2006/07/11/hannitys_bullyboy_theatrics_no_match...

today's tuesday, too.

just like 9-11.

wtf.

Does anybody know where that cartoon was originally posted? I want a copy to put up outside my office, and this one is illegible....

In fact, Barret looked like a twitching, irrational, conspiradroid doofus. Which is how many of your friends and workmates describe you lot behind your back.

In fact, Barret looked like a twitching, irrational, conspiradroid doofus. Which is how many of your friends and workmates describe you lot behind your back.
Terrence | Homepage | 07.11.06 - 12:39 pm | #

cant this tard be bann????

"In fact, Barret looked like a twitching, irrational, conspiradroid doofus. Which is how many of your friends and workmates describe you lot behind your back."

The last thing you'll ever see.

Hey Clarrence...we aren't your buddies, Hannity got his ass handed to him on a silver platter, I noticed your site isn't getting much traffic these days, you're a desperate fool just looking for attention cuz the tides are turning and you're starting to look even more like a bunch of no talent, uneducated fools.

Have a nice day loser.

Terrass, why don't you & Silverstein just "pull-it"?

Terrence...it's a metaphor. You do know what a metaphor is...don't you?

See...you read something or see something and you just believe what it is or what it means. You don't question anything. You see a gallow and you automatically think that means death.

This is what's wrong with your kind...with the sheep...with the rest of those who don't question the intent of thier leaders.

It's so sad to just see you buy into it. Truly sad.

just pull-it! pull-it! pull-it! pull-it....

Terrass would love for Bush & Cheney to crap all over him......Oh, they already have.

I do want to see you hang, and I don't have a problem in the world with that point of view.

Does this seem like your metaphor to you Mr. X?

Evil, ugly, illogical death merchants. Johnny hits bottom - digs...

Terrence, do you think Osama will, you know, hit us again? Maybe we should just pull-him, pull-him real good.

Did the CIA stop looking for the fatty bin Laden or the skinny bin Laden?

Why bother looking for a dude who merely killed 3,000 innocent citizens???

mom just called and said kevin was on cnn this morning - anyone confirm?

NEW FALSE FLAG TERROR ATTACK JUST HAPPENED

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Bombs_rock_India_commuter_trains_0711....

7/11.

No surprise I guess

You know you're in deep trouble when your country's Secretary of Defense can't get his story straight on what blew-up the WAR BUILDING!

Rummy, was it a missile, a plane, or a bomb??? If you don't know, how am I supposed to?

Does anyone else here want to see me dead because they disagree with me? Inquiring minds...

Terrass, would you be so flippant if you mother/son/daughter was murdered in the 9/11 false-flag operation!

Lying goverment scum!

There is something that has been bugging me for quite a while. On 9/10/2001 RumDumb himself announced that the Pentagon was missing two TRILLION dollars plus some "Loose Change". ( I couldn't resist throwing that in.) Two Trillion dollars looks something like this. $2,000,000,000,000. You can buy a lot of groceries with that kind of scratch. Where did the money go? Where is the outrage? The crimminality of the Bush administration is off the charts.

Jon, you're one of the best assest we have in this movement. That's why they're going after you. Don't interact with them. No one actually should. It's just a waste of time.

Terrass, would you be so flippant if you mother/son/daughter was murdered in the 9/11 false-flag operation!

Since there is no evidence of your silly false flag assertion, your question is moot. My question to you is simple - do you want to see me dead because i disagree with you?

I think it was $2.3 trillion that Rummy said he had accidentally misplaced. And the .3 trillion = $300 billion!

You can buy a lot of groceries with that kind of scratch. Where did the money go? Where is the outrage? The crimminality of the Bush administration is off the charts.
maddog | Homepage | 07.11.06 - 1:51 pm | #
which makes it painfully clear Rummy was deeply involved in 9/11. not that you guys didnt know that, but that point drives it home in my opinion.that point should be made in every 9/11 film.

My question to you is simple - do you want to see me dead because i disagree with you?
Terrence | 07.11.06 - 1:54 pm | #
that would be like killing a retard. how could i?

No, Terrass. I just want to see you in prison for at least 20 years for being an accessory-after-the-fact, which is a very serious crime, you know. (It doesn't matter if the gov't is paying you to spread your feces here.)

Hahahaa, Yes, it's illegal to kill people with IQs below 65!

interestingly enough, George W. Bush has put mentally ill people to death as governor of Texas. im against the death penalty myself though,but if i was for it, i wouldnt want you dead, i would just want you tried in a court of law for treason like anyone who aids terrorists.(government sanctioned or otherwise)your a disgusting human being whether you believe what you spew or not.i like to think its just plain ignorance and fear that keeps you from looking objectively at 9/11.i dont think your smart enough to get paid for what you do.

mentally ill/mentally slow*

Terrence, how do you think Osama "pulled-it" I mean, pulled-it off? Really, teach us with that brilliant mind of yours.

What's all this I am hearing about the World Trade Center being blown to
itty-bits by explosives? I mean it's not like buildings don't collapse every day.
There went another one in Manhattan just yesterday, and it had a strong wooded
frame, not like the flimsy steel that they made out of the Twin Towers. I mean my
gods - the stupid faulty steel beams that I got from there in my car from China wouldent
even stand up to a telephone pole when I crashed it in there.

I mean these guys on Fox's news show don't know what there talking about with their vegemite melting the columbs in the base and the times of falling through the tons of steel and carpets being the same as falling through the air out of the window when I was five.

Why do they keep telling us that the government did it when the boxcutters are still smoking.
I pray to some horrible god that is the same between the Jews and Christians and Muslims that we can all get along and not fight over him, because he will smite you because he is jealousy.

I believe in this country and it's President and Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman and Todd Beamer
and cellphones that work from the planes all the time. Didn't they see the video of the 757 crashing into the first floor of the Pentagon without the grass being disturbed by it. Lots of reekage of bodies everywhere!

I don't believe that they would spray toxic things out of the planes either, and would like to breathe the dust that they said was good for us at Ground Zero. I mean some people don't think it's a good thing that we are depleting Iraq's uranium - how can they be so dumb? If we didn't deplete it they could make a bomb and give it
to Osama Claus and he might put it under their Christmas tree and that's not good is it? No I don't think so.

I think they should have Cheney shoot some of these stupid paranoid media people - they are runing our empire and making more terrists and you can't even get on these tv programs unless your one of these nutbobs that want our country to cut the cheese and run. I mean these guys are stinking up our commercial system for the Mexicans.

So I really hope that you will use my scholarly peace or writing you for the blood that you are giving because my Hummer is getting hungary and full of bugs and that stuff from the planes that is not toxic except to the spotted owl
and eagles and who need them anyway, it's not like the eagles have been any good as a national symble since Joe Walsh stopped drinking anyway.

So can we please cut the trees down so Jesus can come and save us from His father?

I like that Jesus.

billy-bobba-o'reilly

I think the Bush pig killed over 130 people as Gov. of Tex-ass. He is diabolical piece of filth no matter where he is!

Where did the money go?

2.3 trillion in 1999... 1.1 trillion more in 2000. You'd think this would bring the fiscally-conservative Clinton haters on board.

VIDEO: Rumsfeld announces Missing Trillions on 9/10/01
http://www.solari.com/video/cbs2.3trillion.rm

.. and then about that Sneak Attack on the Pentagon:
"One Army office in the Pentagon lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts." - Pittsburgh Post Gazette, 12/20/01

The Department of the Army did not publish a stand-alone financial statement for 2001 because of "the loss of financial management personnel sustained during the Sept. 11 attack." - [sorry, don't have source handy]

Secretary of the Army was Thomas White, former high-level Enron guy. The same Enron who supposedly had files under investigation at WTC7.

Here's Murtha and another Democrat responding to a question about The Missing Trillions, by answering (paraphrase) "Hunh?! Pshaw, I woulda HEARD about that!" So why don't the neo-conneds use that clip against the dems...
http://www.freechannel.org/murtha_trillions.wmv

Terrence, you are also a disgusting piece of filth in aiding & comforting treasonous murdering liars.

Why do you try to bait people into saying you should be dead??? So you & the other gov't crimminals can get a wire-tap or warrant on them??????

Terrence, you are also a disgusting piece of filth in aiding & comforting treasonous murdering liars.

Why do you try to bait people into saying you should be dead??? So you & the other gov't crimminals can get a wire-tap or warrant on them??????

It's my fault that Gold wants me dead? Simply because I do nto believe what you folks do? This sounds rational in your mind?

Osama's last words, "Use the force Hanni!"

Gold didn't threaten you, you lying sack of shit!

Terrence,

I want you dead because you're fucking annoying.

You need one of Thomas Jefferson's polished boots to your ass, you treasonous goon!

Uh no... I want to see you hang because you're actively, and aggressively attempting to hurt the 9/11 Truth Movement. If you didn't believe what we do, and just stayed away, that would be one thing.

However, you do as I described, and that makes you an accomplice after the fact.

Yeah, what exactly is the penalty for accessory after the fact in HIGH TREASON?

Where is S. Jones? He has the power...but is this information of his conclusive? Some have suggested there should be more testing for Barium was it? Is that true?

Let's send flowers to Congressman Steve Nass for bringing publicity to 9/11 truth and ask him to keep it up.
I think that would be the best way to show our appreciation. Does anyone live near his offices so we could deliver the flowers personally? It really would be an appropriate "we're going to win" statement.

Never mind the fake Osama, what about the fake airplanes?

Check tis beauty, use your controls to view this one frame at a time. The "airplane" enters at frame 240

http://www.positiontoknow.com/S-11/vid/Spectacular%20angle%20of%202nd%20...

Email representative Steve Nass and let him know you appreciate him bringing more attention to 9/11 truth.
With him and Sen. Rick Santorum on our side how could we lose?

rep.nass@legis.state.wi.us

Itsaputon, what did i miss about Santorum? i hate that scumbag, did he make comments about Barrett or 9/11?

DHS--

Much-belated thanks for the link! Almost forgot I had asked about it this morning....

The "IN THESE TIMES" article is now online, with a comments section at the bottom;
http://www.inthesetimes.com/site...n/article/2702/

I am challenging "IN THESE TIMES" to publish a rebuttal;
http://www.911blogger.com/2006/0...s- magazine.html

Personally, I think snail-mail will be more effective to send "IN THESE TIMES" a message, but a comment or two probably wouldn't hurt. Just please don't abuse their comments section.
reprehensor | Homepage | 07.11.06 - 2:29 pm | #

After reading an article like that, it is clear that those who would like to try to debunk us will us the weakest pieces of evidence to try to discredit the entire rebuttal of the official theory.

These stories should be good learning experiences to us.

Really, I think the Silverstein "pull it" quote is not the strongest piece of evidence we have about the questions about Building 7's collapse.

I think it is important for us and our spokespeople to focus only on the most unimpeachable, strongest evidence we have.

For that reason, I don't think it is good strategy for Fetzer or A. Jones or others to be mentioning the "pull it" quote or other rebuttable pieces of evidence. I say, only use the strongest evidence, and go with that.

CDI: 'Pull It' Means 'Pull It Down'

For those who still question what Larry Silverstein meant when he said "pull it" when talking about the collapse of the WTC 7, Jeff from PumpItOut.com called demolition experts Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) and asked them what "pull it" means in demolition terms. This is what CDI told him:
Click here to listen to conversation

http://www.pumpitout.com/phone_calls/controlled_demolitions.mp3

All the world's shills can´t change this. Pull it, in demolition circles, means to pull a building down.

Remember, we're dealing with psychopaths in the media covering for other psychopaths whose self-preservation depends on cover ups. These people will do anything to accomplish their purpose and lie all the way to the gallows. The guy at inthesetimes is just another shill.

Female receptionist: Good afternoon, Loizeaux Company.
Jeff: Um, sorry, do I -- is this Controlled Demolitions?
CDI: Yes it is.
Jeff: Ok, I was wondering if there was someone I could talk to briefly -- just ask a question I had?
CDI: Well what kind of question?
Jeff: Well I just wanted to know what a term meant in demolition terms.
CDI: Ok, what type of term?
Jeff: Well, if you were in the demolition business and you said the, the term "pull it," I was wondering what exactly that would mean?
CDI: "Pull it"?
Jeff: Yeah.
CDI: Hmm? Hold on a minute.
Jeff: Thank you.
CDI: Sir?
Jeff: Yes?
CDI: "Pull it" is when they actually pull it down.
Jeff: Oh, well thank you very much for your time.
CDI: Ok.
Jeff: Bye.
CDI: Bye.

"I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

--- Larry Silverstein's famous remark

Hey Blob, good stuff, we posted that about a week ago, and nobody seemed to notice...

Jeff: Well I just wanted to know what a term meant in demolition terms.
CDI: Ok, what type of term?
Jeff: Well, if you were in the demolition business and you said the, the term "pull it," I was wondering what exactly that would mean?

Only conspiradroids could take solace in the response from a receptionist...

Don't engage the trolls, please. I don't think anyone should be making veiled threats, and it only makes us look bad.

Look, Terrence BELIEVES there is WMD's and Iraq has a connection to 9/11. Seriously. Were talking about a neocon supprter who doesn't even think it was "incompetence"(Ive seen both him and S King bash people for saying that on other forums)

PLEASE IGNORE the no planers and truth bashers. Thank you.

I'm against the death penalty, and disagreeing with the 911 Truth movement is not a crime.

I against the death penalty too, Mr. Laim.

However, deliberately acting as an accessory after-the-fact (helping a criminal conceal a crime and/or evade justice) is indeed a very serious crime in itself!

Blob -

the problem is I think the official line is that there is a distinction between 'pulling' a buiding down and a controlled demolition - pulling is (apparently) when they pull down the remaining structure with a crane

ben, this is really desperate.

ben, this is really desperate.
Blob | 07.12.06 - 10:00 am | #

yes it is..

Some bogus 'kikes' (why did I even post there?) and "whatever the truth is" -type diversive/divisive/distractive comments there...

People may not deserve to have their stolen Constitution returned to them as long as they remain so preoccupied with both being divisive and trying so hard to figure out what did happen that they fail to notice that we can already prove what did not happen!!!!!!!!!!!!

If it's true that "The greatest psychopathology in our country today is the fear of questions.", then the 2nd-greatest psychopathology is the fear of ignorance. This manifests itself in 2 main, illogical ways: 911 truthers who are more intent upon advancing some theory of their own rather than merely disproving the government's impossible theory of 9/11, and also the great undecided masses of people who are too reluctant to reject the government's impossible theory until a better theory comes along.

The two are related in a chicken-and-egg manner. To break out of the vicious cycle, all we need to do is to vigorously DISPROVE the government's theory instead of trying to advance theories of our own (and expect the undecided masses to prefer our half-baked theories to the govt's).

Example: how come so few within the "'truth' 'movement'" have noticed and mentioned (this should be a HEADLINE, folks!) that the aircraft (barely) seen in the government's Pentagon Video Evidence is TOO SMALL TO BE A 757!!!

Could so many people be limiting themselves over fear of an imaginary "booby trap", as espoused by the govt-friendly limited-hangout disinformationists pervading the "truth movement"? (We have nothing to fear but fear itself. The only "booby trap" is fear of a booby trap!!!)

Without a signed confession, we might never know precisely how the WTC buildings were brought down and disintegrated. BUT WE ALREADY KNOW THAT THE GOVERNMENT'S STORY IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!

Fortunately, it does not take a (superior) theory in order to disprove a(n impossible) theory! (It only takes one good counter-example...) The compulsive perceived need to come up with a better conspiracy theory than the government's should be suppressed; we don't need no stinkin' theories! Unfortunately, much (most?) of the so-called 9/11 truth movement has been diverted into compulsively playing some kind of "guess what happened" or "pick your favorite theory" game. (And some of the theories being bandied about are total non-starters! see, for example, http://911u.org/Physics/graphics/PlasmaVsThermite.gif )

We shouldn't be waiting/sitting/screwing around until we can prove what did happen before we stand up and loudly proclaim that we can prove what did not happen (and that our illegitimate government is lying through its teeth!), in earnest.

Knowing that it WAS NOT A 757 WHICH HIT THE PENTAGON puts us just one teeny-tiny logical step away from knowing that we cannot blame 9/11 on "evil suicidal Muslim hijackers", which demolishes the very core of The Big Lie of 9/11.

Isn't that the task at hand?
_________________________________________

I think DHS was (is?) operating under, and has posted, a logical fallacy by trying to equate the holding of a microphone with writing:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/dazinith/115263446490875410/?a=42964#16...

I can't write with my left hand, but that's the hand I use to hold a telephone handset (or microphone)...

===================================================

This looks, to me, like it could be yet another sly attempt to steer Dylan Avery into throwing the evidentiary baby out with the bathwater, as was done in LC2E by having removed the Naudet video flash frame (from the 1st WTC impact) along with all the speculation about pods and missiles related to the 2nd impact (the one we were expected to be able to see/replay/review, and argue about endlessly...).

Like the blatantly obvious Naudet video flash frame, fake Osama is one of our better pieces of evidence, and there's DHS trying to steer Dylan into omitting it.

Shame on DHS!!!

Even though we cannot observe motives, disinfo agents reveal themselves by their illogical actions(/words), which are highly observable.
__________________________________________

fake osama is the man!!