Their contradictions to Dr. Barrett's position are as follows:

1.) The Bushling said...
2.) The Kean-Hamiliton Commission...

Irrefutable, eh?

Alternet's newest 9/11 article is a major hit piece on the 9/11 movement: The 9/11 Faith Movement (By Terry J. Allen, In These Times. Posted July 12, 2006).

well, i think we were ALL skeptics at one time or another were we not? i think we need to have some empathy for those who have yet to discover the conpiracy behind the attacks of 9-11. i was just as deceived as they were at one time, ya know. i see it as another feather in the proverbial cap. in the end, despite a little spin, WTMJ still aired alot of Kevin Barrett's talking points on 9-11. we are making steady inroads for sure.

tallen@igc.org

Feel free to mail stupid Terry.

Ugh, I'm from Milwaukee...Mike Gousha is by far the worst local newscaster as far as not reporting anything of value, who for some reason, keeps winning local awards for most popular. Guess stories on sex offenders moving a mile away from a Chuck E Cheese really earns this guy "trust" (which is their main promotional ads...his self promoting ass sitting a chair [with tons of makup on], talking about how Trust is the only thing important to him). Never send this guy respectful mail...send the station mail if you think they did a good job, but that guy can go straight to hell.

'mornin, Terrance, how many 9/11 Truth DVDs have you burned and distributed today?

Please don't feed the trolls.

i thought the anchor persons reported fairly. The actual reporter was a local reporter stereotype (aka Dink Dinkersen).

Kevin's fearless presentation is what is selling here.

Go Kevin!!

Ummmm, what about the thermal images that show the hot spots under all 7 buildings?

im finding that it is super easy to turn people on to the truth...

i fliped my red neck buddie in 5 mins, then he watched lc2 and told me that theres no way its wrong...

people need to remember that most people have never heard that 911 was an inside job....

first i ask them if they want a dvd about 911... then i tell people right off that our government did 911... next i ramble off a few facts that make them go hmmmmm.... if theyre not interested by that point, fuck them, theyre retarded!!!!

ive only had one person say that they didnt want one...i think that guy thought that he was too cool for school... lol..

anyways, im having new hope!!!! that a good thing...

9/11 disinfo agents who are protecting their NeoCon masters are in far more trouble than they believe. Their deception is clearly that of an ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT!

Accessories after the fact--are people who receive, comfort, or assist a felon knowing that he has committed a felony, or is sought in connection with the commission or attempted commission of a felony. See 234 A. 2d 284, 285. The term thus applies to anyone who obstructs justice by giving comfort or assistance to a criminal offender in an attempt to hinder or prevent his apprehension or punishment. 378 F. 2d 540, 542.

Last time I checked, mass murder of 3,000 people is still a felony in the USA!

9/11 disinfo agents who are protecting their NeoCon masters are in far more trouble than they believe. Their deception is clearly that of an ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT!

Accessories after the fact--are people who receive, comfort, or assist a felon knowing that he has committed a felony, or is sought in connection with the commission or attempted commission of a felony. See 234 A. 2d 284, 285. The term thus applies to anyone who obstructs justice by giving comfort or assistance to a criminal offender in an attempt to hinder or prevent his apprehension or punishment. 378 F. 2d 540, 542.
Anonymous | 07.12.06 - 12:08 pm | #

im not trying to be a dick but do you really think that that goes for internet message board???

i dont..

inside, for all you and I know, these are paid or even unpaid gov't shills/trolls who are deliberately trying to obscure the truth behind a mass murder of 3,000 office workers & subsequent genocide of hundreds of thousands of Muslims IN AFGHANISTAN & IRAQ!!!

NOT SERIOUS ENOUGH FOR YOU???

Here's my email to the crew at WTMJ:

__________----

Regarding Mike Gousha and Mick Trevey's piece on 911 conspiracy theories..

Thank you for covering Kevin Barrett and his beliefs.
It was a breathe of fresh air to see this on TV.

Mick says he did a "careful look" into Barrett's assertions and follows that up by saying that "he facts to back up Barrett's assertions are “thin."
As a concerning citizen who HAS looked carefully at the evidence I can assure you that the evidence is OVERWHELMING that we have not been told the truth about 911.
Just follow some of the links below...

Mick says that the news footage on 911 does not show molten metal. Mick..... can I remind you that the molten metal was UNDERNEATH the pile? News cameras were never allowed onto the pile, but NASA photos show it CLEARLY. Are you doubting the validity of the molten metal photo that you DID show?

Mick then says that the collapse of the twin towers "according to federal experts" collapsed in a pancake fashion.
This idea was first proposed by FEMA and then the more thorough analysis by NIST came up with a DIFFERENT idea (truss failure) that debunked the FEMA straight pancake theory.
Both of these ideas are thoroughly debunked by Jim Hoffman here:

http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/index.html

This was followed up the BYU physics professor Steven Jones.
You can read his peer reviewed paper here:

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

Theologian David Ray Griffin takes a different approach to the same thing here....
http://911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

And Mick... don't forget to cover Building 7 in the future.
It was hit by NO plane but fell symmetrically at free fall speed at roughly 5pm on 9/11.
The best the government can say is that all if it's theories about it's collapse have "a low probability of occurrence."

As for the videos on Osama purported to be fake.
You say that 911 truth advocates are wrong because President Bush says it really is Osama?
Are you kidding us?
This is the same president that lied about weapons of mass destruction, lied to us about domestic surveillance and we are supposed to believe him on this critical matter?
And the 911 Commission says that Osama was responsible for 911?
This is the same Commission that is run by Bush administration insider Phillip Zellikokw – who had so many conflicts of interest that he had to be interviewed by his own commission?
And do you not know that the FBI recently stated that they have no evidence linking Osama to 911?

Please do some real research on this topic here
http://www.st911.org/
You will find that the evidence is NOT thin.
We would love to see a followup piece!

Keep sending UW e-mails in support. Lets bomb them with e-mail. I have been at least 2 a day. They're getting the message, slowly. Chris in Iowa

Nice work Solar- Roller.

Here's the 9/11 poll Kevin Barrett referred to during H&C.

It's a little convoluted, but the clear majority of the over 4700 participants thus far, clearly agree that Mr. Barrett raises some legitimate concerns.

Oops, here's the link for that poll:

http://www.channel3000.com/news/9457154/detail.html

That is good solar...i've been pointing people to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_D._Zelikow to show them that Zelikow is the guy whose expertise is to "crate public myths", and he even predicted EXACTLY what would happen had the towers come down in 93...

How ANYONE could view him as an objective person to head the 9/11 Commission is beyond me...someone tell Mike Gousha about Zelikow's uncanny expertise/psychic abilities.

I can't spell today...

Reprehensor, I already did challenge Alternet in the comments section (under my "other" name). It reads as follows (minus the links I listed there because Haloscan says I have too many to post here):

You know, if so many supposed liberals are this incredibly blind to the overwhelming evidence that 9/11 was -- to a greater or lesser degree -- an inside job by an administration they all despise and consider evil, or, at the very, very, very least, that it is painfully obvious that 9/11 did not happen the way Philip Zelikow's 9/11 Commission Report says it did (not even close), then I can assure you that there is absolutely no hope of EVER enlightening conservatives on any issue regarding the Bush Administration's criminal/dictatorial behavior (and we need to enlighten some of them, or else nothing will ever change).

Let me rephrase that: If certain mainstream liberals refuse to have an open mind (even for a brief time) on the blatant flaws, lies and inconsistencies in Philip Zelikow's 9/11 Commission Report, regardless of who really engineered the 9/11 attacks, then the vast majority of mainstream conservatives will never heed the warnings of sites like Alternet on such issues as Iraq, Iran, immigration (no, wait, lots of liberals naively, foolishly trust the evil Bush Administration on immigration), environment, oil, Halliburton, the Carlyle Group, the NSA spying scandals, Social Security, pharmaceutical companies, reproductive rights, privacy rights, internment camps in the U.S., the Constitution, global warming, prisoner torture, violating the Geneva Convention, and two stolen elections (soon to be three and four because so many democrats and liberals refuse to see it, and because so many liberal web sites give it zero coverage). The list could go on and on.

If certain liberals are this stubborn in the face of overwhelming evidence that the official story of 9/11 is a joke (once again, regardless of who the perpetrators were), then Alternet writers and editors are wasting their very valuable time and our internet bandwidth trying to enlighten the generally uninformed, lazy populace (not all of whom are conservatives, obviously) about the Bush Administration.

In the interest of 1.) a free press, 2.) the truly free exchange of ideas in a democracy and 3.) equal time, concepts that I'm sure Alternet believes in (basically, it's what they preach every day), they should play fair and give at least one 9/11 Scholar (by that, I mean a respected professor and/or author, not some amateur who couldn't argue his way out of a set of monkey bars) an opportunity to present the 9/11 Truth Movement's side of the story here at Alternet. There is no shortage of such people. You can even preface it with a disclaimer that his or her beliefs do not necessarily represent your own. So far, on this one issue, you have conducted yourselves just like the neocon mainstream media. You have been blatantly one-sided on this issue without presenting any cogent arguments as to why your beliefs are accurate and provable. If the 9/11 Scholar's editorial is weak, it will be obvious to one and all. What is there to be afraid of, Alternet?

inside, for all you and I know, these are paid or even unpaid gov't shills/trolls who are deliberately trying to obscure the truth behind a mass murder of 3,000 office workers & subsequent genocide of hundreds of thousands of Muslims IN AFGHANISTAN & IRAQ!!!

NOT SERIOUS ENOUGH FOR YOU???
Anonymous | 07.12.06 - 12:33 pm | #

for all you and i know he is just some dumb fuck that believes al ciaduh did 911...

Here's my e-mail to WTMJ:

Dear WTMJ:

As a concerned citizen, I would like to personally thank you for reporting on the Kevin Barrett, 9/11 story.

After studying the issues myself, I think it is clear that there are many, many, MANY more questions then there are answers.

For example, how did WTC #7 collapse given no plane hit that building at all?

Contrary to your reporters assertion, this evidence is far from "thin". In fact, it may very well be the smoking gun.

I encourage you to re-visit the over-whelming evidence and to continue providing coverage of this extremely important issue.

Many thanks,

Chris Rose

I think if we all pepper them with short and sweet (and polite) emails dropping little nuggets of truth, then just maybe...

oh who am I kidding!?!? I think these are all a bunch of government shills being paid to do what they are told to do... and nothing more. These people are not stupid, they just think we are.

I still think we should try though.

BTW, way to go Solar-Roller!!! Very nicely done.

Wow. Check out CNN's main page for the link to an extremely even-handed introduction to Kevin Barrett.

holy cow, nice find casseia!