I don't remember the lack of all alarms or evactuation procedure being mentioned in Loose Change. I mention Loose Change because it is the vessel by which mean are first exposed to 911 truth. Can't wait for Final Cut.

I don't remember the lack of all alarms or evactuation procedure being mentioned in Loose Change. I mention Loose Change because it is the vessel by which mean are first exposed to 911 truth. Can't wait for Final Cut.
Oregon Truther | 07.14.06 - 1:18 am | #

LC v3 will be more in depth into:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_Express

I missed the quotes on the automatic anti-aircraft defenses and the friendly or foe signals. Where in there article are they, and what are the quotes?

Way to go GW...

AG: Yes I was focusing on getting help and getting out. With that in mind, the images are etched in my mind. When I review the pictures regarding the Boeing, in my opinion, the hole didn't appear to be big enough for the 757. I don't know the scientific theory that was created to justify it being a hole created by a 757. What we need to consider is how did the plane go thru the building with all that heat and not burn us (those on the inside) to a crisp? We need to consider, how did the plane break up so to the point it created a perfectly round hole considering the rate of impact?

I didn't know it was a plane until I was informed at the hospital. If I wasn't informed I would have never believed it.

hello? 757 believers? funny how you guys never show up in threads like this..........

"hello? 757 believers? funny how you guys never show up in threads like this.........."

Hello? Freedom believers? Funny how you guys never show up at PA 9/11 Visibility meetings, and you're IN THE AREA...

It's time to STOP trying to figure out how/what happened.

WE WERE LIED TO, AND THE PEOPLE WHO LIED TO US HAVE BENEFITTED THE MOST FROM 9/11. THERE WERE THINGS THAT HAPPENED THAT DAY THAT COULDN'T POSSIBLY HAVE HAPPENED IF NOT FOR GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT. GET OUTSIDE. TELL YOUR NEIGHBORS. HAND OUT FLYERS. PARTICPATE IN LOCAL GROUPS IN YOUR AREA, OR FORM ONE.

Stop arguing about how it was done. You will be on these boards forever, and NOTHING will ever be accomplished.

keep ignoring CD you douchebag.

how about you shut the fuck up? you got defensive because your weak on the Pentagon and CD. i get it. that doesnt mean you should assume things about me. i was working yesterday during the meeting.considering my current sitiuation,working is a bit more imprtant to me than going to a meeting about 9/11 or anything else. based on your comments here, im glad i was working and didnt show up.all i did was make an observation that people like you dont usually show up in the threads that support the theory that a 757 DID NOT hit the Pentagon,and you get defensive and make take a personal slap at me.im 23,whats your excuse for being so immature?

I get defensive for two reasons.

1) Comments like, "hello? 757 believers? funny how you guys never show up in threads like this.........." ARE OFFENSIVE.

2) The "What Hit The Pentagon" argument is something that will keep whoever is interested in it occupied for decades, as opposed to getting people off their asses which is needed more than anything right now.

Speaking of local 9/11 Truth groups, is there a group for northeastern New Jersey?

Jon, you're pathetically weak on the Pentagon & controlled demolition at WTC. Perhaps you should just not speak of it whatsoever. We have enough people who support the "official story" on those issues, so please shut-up about it. Thank you in advance.

Chris, I know Jon is exasperating on the above issues, but let's cool the language, ok?

"Jon, you're pathetically weak on the Pentagon & controlled demolition at WTC. Perhaps you should just not speak of it whatsoever. We have enough people who support the "official story" on those issues, so please shut-up about it. Thank you in advance."

01000111011011110010000001100110011101010110001101101011001000000111100101101111011101010111001001110011011001010110110001100110001000000111100101101111011101010010000001101100011010010111010001110100011011000110010100100000010000010110111001101111011011100111100101101101011011110111010101110011001000000111010001110010011011110110110001101100001000000111011101101000011011110010011101110011001000000110111101101110011011000111100100100000011100000111010101110010011100000110111101110011011001010010000001101001011100110010000001110100011011110010000001110011011101000110000101110010011101000010000001100110011010010110011101101000011101000111001100101110

now youre going to spam this site??/ i really dont get you gold....

Come on, Jon! Cut it out.

i would bet that i have turned more people on to 911 this week then gold has in the past 3 years...

put options arent going to do it gold...

why dont you try passing out some copies of loose change 2 around you office and tell us what people say... although, im sure they think your crazy already because of how you go about telling them about 911....

Jon, you do like LC2E, correct?

We must hit them with all available evidence. The most obvious/shocking first!

Jon, you do like LC2E, correct?
Anonymous | 07.14.06 - 12:32 pm | #

i dont think so... he likes the movie that i hate.. HAHAHHA!!! Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime... i think this movie is crap... so, of course gold loves it...

this is where gold calls me andy and banns me from his site... HAHAHHAHA!!!

Nice "tag team" effort.

I can't wait for the day when I don't have to associate with trolls and shills.

In Jon's defense, he has put in TONS of hours into 9/11 truth over the past few years! I suppose he has his reasons on the Pentagon & WTC. I don't know.

gold, i dont know why you dont get it everyday... you should!!!

dont act like your little follower dont attack me when i call your bullshit...

Jon, S. King of all people left a message here that someone was impersonating you on some other blog yesterday. What happened with that?

BTW, I've attacked both of you in the past.

People, we should all be working on the same team not fighting with each other over who's information is right and who's wrong.

We all have a peice of the puzzle and we are all trying to assemble it. Just because someone thinks their peice is the one that fits does not mean that is the case.

Let's keep focused on NAILING the asses that really attacked us, you know those people sitting in the WH.

RB, you are correct, Sir!

ok mike i see how it is, gold can say anything he wants about me but once i say anything im a fucking shill...

you guys are so fucking smart!!!

Gayest. Thread. Ever.
Anonymous | 07.14.06 - 3:18 pm |
____________________--
No, gayest. comments. ever.
I liked the thread. Lets go back to questions like these...
I missed the quotes on the automatic anti-aircraft defenses and the friendly or foe signals. Where in there article are they, and what are the quotes?
jj111 | 07.14.06 - 5:56 am | #

________________________________________________________________________________

yes GW - you say that AG confirmed both of these things, but just like jj111... I don't see where...
Michiel Brumsen | Homepage | 07.14.06 - 8:05 am |

I love everyone on here...except for the no planers and the 9/11 Truth bashers. Those are the people ya should be verbally barraging:)

Hey I dont espouse CD and Pentagon as the main focal point, but use it as an all out "opening salvo" of why the official story is a fraud. Theres a few theories I dont buy, but they are more of the minor ones. Bottom line the story of "Osama and 19 boxcutter guys" pullin goff 9/11 alone is a total lie, and will be used to excuse every war, every bad act.
I think everyone on here is doing their part...

and it is utterly SILLY to attack someone because they dont focus on one or two theories or issues.

Its like if I attacked someone because they dont focus on Mossad.

Oh and there are no shills on here, cept the no planers and anti Truth people!

"you are now standing in one of the most secure building in all of the United States."

"The real question is what is the probability or likelihood that no anti-aircraft defense, warning alarms or additional security mechanism functioned on that particular day?

And then we need to think how likely is it then there was a glitch in all the security mechanisms, anti-aircraft defense and warning alarms?"

"Me: I would imagine that security procedures are different now than they were prior to 9/11, so I don't think you would be revealing any confidential information by answering this question. I have heard that, as of 9/11, the anti-aircraft batteries were automated, in other words, that they would have automatically fired against any incoming aircraft that did not transmit the appropriate friend or foe signal. Is that true?

AG: Yes that is true. They are either to attempt to guide the incoming aircraft that has violated the airspace to a safe location to land. Making reasonable effort to guide it down. Or shoot it down."

She didn't specifically say missile batteries, but she did confirm that "as of 9/11, the anti-aircraft batteries were automated, in other words, that they would have automatically fired against any incoming aircraft that did not transmit the appropriate friend or foe signal."

inside, thats great that you pass out dvds of loose change, but it dosen't mean crap....
MikeJr. | Homepage | 07.14.06 - 1:56 pm | #

Come on now, Jr.! Passing out LC2E DVDs has to be about the best way to spread 9/11 truth!!!

Has anyone seen this?

It's from Rick Siegel's site.

"Audio report from Republic Broadcasting Network.
Summaries via LibertyForum July 7, 2006:
"Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press, reports:

Samuel Danner (electrical engineer for AmTrak), was involved in the clean-up at the Pentagon crash site and inspected the debris at the site. He said, "It was not a Boeing 757 that hit the Pentagon. The plane looked like a hump-back whale." He thinks a Global Hawk hit the Pentagon. (There were only seven made as of 9/11/01 and two were missing at the time.)

Danner is a former pilot. He said the aircraft that hit the Pentagon was very quiet with one engine near the back. He also saw a second plane overhead and wonders if it was controlling the plane that hit the Pentagon. He walked the lawn and picked up small pieces of debris with others. He did not see any bodies from the aircraft.

Danner is very ill now with lymphoma, which may be the result of DU exposure at the Pentagon on 9/11. He wants to talk now (after seeing "Loose Change") because "it's been bugging me."

The Global Hawk fired a DU missile that penetrated the thick concrete wall of the Pentagon. DU was detected at the time and workers on the scene later in the day wore protective equipment.

____________________---

Yep, this 53-yr old Sam Danner, a pilot since the age of 16, was a first-hand observer of the crash. He pulled his car over to the south of the pentagon on the right side of 395 when he saw the approach of the plane that hit the pentagon.

He also observed a bunch of guys outside the pentagon standing there looking through binoculars.

He got a good view of the plane's approach, for a duration of at least three seconds. He says that the plane was not a 757, no way. "It was like a humpback whale" he says. . . . one engine on the backside with a "V" tail and no windows he could see. And it was very quiet. Going about 400mph. Overhead, at an estimated 15,000 feet he saw another plane.

As an EMT, he ran over to help at the pentagon, but found no bodies, no wreckage from a boeing aircraft on the scene. He smelled cordite and he saw a 3-foot single engine on the ground there. He picked up graphite pieces similar to the composite wings on a global hawk.

This engine matches the description of the single engine of a globalhawk. The globalhawk is a UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) but could not have caused the damage if it wasn't containing a bunker-busting missle deployed on impact. The plane observed overhead might have been the plane controlling the remotely-controlled mission.

If a 757 had crashed into the pentagon, then there would have been aluminum all over the grass and two 9-foot diameter engines.

http://www.total911.info/2006/07/pentagon-eyewitness-ids-global-hawk.html

"Audio report from Republic Broadcasting Network.
Summaries via LibertyForum July 7, 2006:
"Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press, reports:

Samuel Danner (electrical engineer for AmTrak), was involved in the clean-up at the Pentagon crash site and inspected the debris at the site. He said, "It was not a Boeing 757 that hit the Pentagon. The plane looked like a hump-back whale." He thinks a Global Hawk hit the Pentagon. (There were only seven made as of 9/11/01 and two were missing at the time.)

Danner is a former pilot. He said the aircraft that hit the Pentagon was very quiet with one engine near the back. He also saw a second plane overhead and wonders if it was controlling the plane that hit the Pentagon. He walked the lawn and picked up small pieces of debris with others. He did not see any bodies from the aircraft.

Danner is very ill now with lymphoma, which may be the result of DU exposure at the Pentagon on 9/11. He wants to talk now (after seeing "Loose Change") because "it's been bugging me."

The Global Hawk fired a DU missile that penetrated the thick concrete wall of the Pentagon. DU was detected at the time and workers on the scene later in the day wore protective equipment.

____________________---

Yep, this 53-yr old Sam Danner, a pilot since the age of 16, was a first-hand observer of the crash. He pulled his car over to the south of the pentagon on the right side of 395 when he saw the approach of the plane that hit the pentagon.

He also observed a bunch of guys outside the pentagon standing there looking through binoculars.

He got a good view of the plane's approach, for a duration of at least three seconds. He says that the plane was not a 757, no way. "It was like a humpback whale" he says. . . . one engine on the backside with a "V" tail and no windows he could see. And it was very quiet. Going about 400mph. Overhead, at an estimated 15,000 feet he saw another plane.

As an EMT, he ran over to help at the pentagon, but found no bodies, no wreckage from a boeing aircraft on the scene. He smelled cordite and he saw a 3-foot single engine on the ground there. He picked up graphite pieces similar to the composite wings on a global hawk.

This engine matches the description of the single engine of a globalhawk. The globalhawk is a UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) but could not have caused the damage if it wasn't containing a bunker-busting missle deployed on impact. The plane observed overhead might have been the plane controlling the remotely-controlled mission.

If a 757 had crashed into the pentagon, then there would have been aluminum all over the grass and two 9-foot diameter engines.

http://www.total911.info/2006/07/pentagon-eyewitness-ids-global-hawk.html

Come on now, Jr.! Passing out LC2E DVDs has to be about the best way to spread 9/11 truth!!!
Anonymous | 07.14.06 - 5:46 pm | #
_________________________----
Oh hell yeah! Me, I've passed out Confronting the evidence. I've probably put in 50 request for the free one. Just used a different name, same addy. I love Jimmy Walter, because he keeps sending them to me! Since I dont have a dvd burner, I need him to hook me up.

But if you go back, I was just making fun of inside for saying Golds website dosn't mean shit.

Loose Change being played on Italian satellite Tv AND BAGHDADIYA Sat tv...not sure if someone is using it to stir up more of a Jihad....

I e-mailed 170 Tv Sat companies in Spain, Russia and Germany to make them aware of the 911 movement and websites.....