Richard Andrew Grove: Blowing The Whistle - Preview

I didn't even know about this movie, highlighting Grove's experiences that day, coming out September 11, 2006. Check out the trailer:

High Res version
Medium Res Version

Voice Of Arizona Radio Show

Just as a general train of

Just as a general train of thought, a lot of people are gearing up for the anniversary date in September.

If I had a magic wand and a huge bank account tolend to the matter, I'd think about expediting...

I don't think we can afford 7 weeks.

Condoleezza Rice Continues

http://www.matthewbooks.com/m

9/11 families want more

9/11 families want more thorough search.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060716/ap_on_re_us/attacks_remains
Be nice to check for thermite(ate) in there, too huh?

Michael Wolsey Interviews

Emery.

Emery.

Four 9/11 films I CANNOT

Four 9/11 films I CANNOT WAIT for soon:

Loose Change Final Cut
9/11 Press For Truth
Blowing The Whistle
9/11 History Hijacked by Sander Hicks

Four 9/11 Films I CANNOT

Four 9/11 Films I CANNOT WAIT for:

How The Bush Administration Planned 9/11 - The History Channel

The Bush Administration's Reichstag - ABCNews

The 9/11 Trials Of The Bush Administration - CNN

Why Was Fox News Put Out Of Business? - MSNBC

That was wishful thinking.

That was wishful thinking.

Pocky, though not

Pocky, though not specifically 9/11 related, I would add to your list From Freedom to Facism (Aaron Russo). I loved the preview and the interview Russo gave.

Ya... I can't wait to see

Ya... I can't wait to see that.

Don't forget those who've

Don't forget those who've recently passed on:

In memory of 911 whistleblower Scott Durr: This updated WEBSITE has a list of some of his posts.
.
Listen to Scott Durr on a recent radio broadcast mp3 from Mon., April 3, 2006 on the Greg Szymanski show.
.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
-Schopenhauer

On the war front, fat Newt

On the war front, fat Newt says we are in WWIII.
http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/davidpostman/archives/2006/07/ging...

Meanwhile, Hugo is not pulling punches. Chavez: US causing ME 'Holocaust'
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1150886003716&pagename=JPost%...

Interesting show on TWA

Interesting show on TWA Flight 800 now on CNN. I used to think that flight was shot down because they always figure out what went wrong and couldn't here. However, that plane is chilling in a hangar, and I'm sure forensic evidence would show a missile. Anyway, it's worth a look.

BREAKING NEWS: Myspace.com

BREAKING NEWS: Myspace.com hijack is currently spreading like wildfire

Somebody has managed to hack Myspace with a flash redirect that exploits what is apparently a gaping wide hole in their code. If you are signed into Myspace, and you go to a compromised page, you will be redirected to a blog post containing a diatribe about how the U.S. government is behind 9/11 & your page will now be hijacked! Solution at link.

http://digg.com/security/Myspace.com_hijack_is_currently_spreading_like_...

Anyone ever read biography

Anyone ever read biography of W. Bush written by James howard Hatfield called, "Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and The Making of an American President"?? Wondering how much of this biography is valid and factual. By the way Hatfield died of drug overdose on July 18, 2001.

O'Reilly is completely out

O'Reilly is completely out of control on the middle east issue right now. If you want your head to explode, tune in while you can.

geggy: I have that book. I

geggy: I have that book. I wondered the same thing.

That is a great trailer. I

That is a great trailer. I am interviewing Richard August second on 90.1 pacifica in Houston. We will hopefully discuss how he got to where he is (for the newbs) and what he has in store. It's the 12-1 open journal, so if you get it tune in and call with questions.

I tried to ask about this at

I tried to ask about this at Gold's board, but he revealed he is a mac dork. I need a DVD burning 101 course so I can burn EGLS, What's The Truth, etc. I have a pretty good Compaq laptop, nothing fancy. My questions are this:

(1) Can I just burn from the google versions or 911blogger podcasts?

(2) What, if any, software do I need to buy or download to do this?

(3) Once I have burned a DVD, what is the best way to copy them in mass? I don't have two DVD drives in my laptop. I think I read on here that you can get a pretty good DVD burning machine for not a lot of money. I have a little extra cash to do this. What should I buy and/or how should I do this?

Too Funny See... that's how

Too Funny

See... that's how I let off steam. I have a lot of steam.

I am sorry to yet again be a

I am sorry to yet again be a spoiler on this issue- but before anyone gets too excited about this film, can someone tell me anything of substance related to 9/11 that Mr. Grove has blown the whistle on?

There are parties who have contributed meaningfully- and in some cases critical - to heightening the awareness and deepening the understanding of the 9/11 event. People like Steven Jones and David Ray Griffin have done this - at great risk to themselves, and seemingly with little interest in seeking the glory. (Dr. Jones' latest conversation with Tarpley is itself the very model of modesty- and he is actually involved in the most ground-breaking 9/11 research of its kind!).

Mr. Grove seems to be their polar opposite. He does not appear to have revealed anything particularly unique or useful about the events of the day (and in fact seems to muddle much of what we know to be true and relevant)- yet his arrival on the 9/11 Truth scene has been trumpeted (by Meria, others and even himself) as singularly newsworthy. That a film about him and narrated by him is now slated for release within weeks- despite how depressingly little he has contibuted to our understanding of 9/11 - only further illustrates the point.

If I have misjudged him, or if I am unfairly marginalizing him- can an enlightened someone please correct me in reply? Start by explaining something irrefutably true and important he has revealed that wasn't already known- and elaborate by showing how this information has heightened our understanding of the overall 9/11 conspiracy. (Bonus points will be awarded if you can further explain why we should not hold his demonstrably spurious bits of 9/11 fancy against him...)

I'm being serious.

Why does Richard Andrew

Why does Richard Andrew Grove promote/recommend the very spooky, Muslim-blaming government propaganda video WKJO?

==================================================================

IMHO, the best single measure of a 911 presentation's value is how
impossible the presenter makes it for people to keep clinging to the
belief that they can blame Muslim hijackers for 9/11. Further, if the
presentation tries to advance that unfounded belief (especially
subliminally), then it is acting as govt propaganda.

_________________________________________

is there a film that

is there a film that discusses israel, israeli prior knowledge of 9-11 and israeli advanced warnings of the london bombings?

Bonus points will be awarded

Bonus points will be awarded if you can further explain why we should not hold his demonstrably spurious bits of 9/11 fancy against him...)
Disinfo Agent

I have similar questions, disinfo agent....... can you outline what you believe are Grove's 'demonstrably spurious bits of 911 fancy". ?

You really are just another

You really are just another muther-fucking, 9/11 conspiracy breathing Bigfoot John Gold!

In the meantime, could 911Blogger give some serious policy consideration re Andrew Grove.

I have posted on him before, especially about the lack of any coherent straightforward 9/11 material from him. It's all very well to provide dark hints about sinister govt-business connections, but the material has to be (a)verifiable, in some sense, and (b)coherently presented.

If anyone has any personal contact with Andrew Grove they could do the 9/11 movement a big favour by asking him nicely to get behind 9/11 awareness issues rather than his own. Alternatively, he should run his material by an experienced journalist and a lawyer and see if his material can't be made more convincing and better presented.

I don't think people should be blindly supporting anything just because it has the phrase '9/11' attached to it.

Does this guy Grove seam

Does this guy Grove seam somewhat unbelievable? He came up out of nowhere, and now he's got his own movie?

Disinfo, having spoken to

Disinfo, having spoken to andrew personally and knowing what he is about, I'd say your pretty much wrong in what you say.

Here's the thing: 9/11 goes so deep I can't even fathom who all was/is involved. In other words, think of all the companies, individuals, corporations etc. who profited from 9/11. With this knowledge, realize that R.A.G. is just trying to piece this stuff together.

Go to www.8thestate.com (his site). Look at all the info that is there (audio/video/text) and see how much shit he has to go through to make this stuff make any bit of sense.

What does he talk about that is pertanent to the topic? How about what he was fired for: Finding out that his company was overbilling a client by $2,000,000 and when he told them, tried to bribe him, and when he refused fired him.

If you watch wkjo, it ties together most if not all of the companies who benefited/had something to do with 9/11. As well, Richard was the first (that i'm aware of) to even mention these companies; Kroll, Marsh and McClennan, Kroll, Securacom, etc.

Therefore, one thing Richard is trying to do is to get people to do research. Take what he has said and find out for yourself. He is not spoon feeding this stuff to us, he is simply saying what he knows so we can take it from there. He is not the end all 9/11 whistleblower. From watching the trailer to his movie, it looks like it will be a great postmark from what he has already done.

disinfo agent I'm with you.

disinfo agent

I'm with you. I thought his initial "monologue" was pretty heavy on noise, without a lot of signal. He also put a strange amount of emphasis on his form, or his "process" -- the means by which he was trying to "get his message out." Which I just thought was weird -- the form detracted from the content, or rather the emphasis on form did.

The thing that makes me open to reading or viewing more material that he produces is centered on the little tidbit that he slipped in -- about being at the base of the towers and see a lot of "stuff" going on. I'd like to know what -- I doubt he's going to say.

In that area, I found something rather interesting in the NY York Times' oral history archive of interviews with the first responders. (There's an unimaginable ton of material there -- although so far I haven't run into any "bomb in the building -- clear out" statements.) What I did find was in the interview with the Battalion Commander Pfeifer, who was in the Naudet Brothers' film. He said:

"But right before the south tower collapsed I noticed a lot of people just left the lobby, and I heard we had a crew of all different people, high-level people in government, everybody was gone, almost like they had information that we didn't have. Some of them were moved across the street to the command post."

Sort of along the lines of Guiliani saying "they told us the tower was going to collapse..."

ChrisB, "If you watch WKJO",

ChrisB,

"If you watch WKJO", you are watching spooky, DISINFORMATIVE, MUSLIM-BLAMING, U.S. GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA, which is continually promoted by Richard something Grove.

==================================================================

IMHO, the best single measure of a 911 presentation's value is how
impossible the presenter makes it for people to keep clinging to the
belief that they can blame "Muslim hijackers" for 9/11. Further, if the
presentation tries to advance that unfounded belief (especially
subliminally), then it is acting as govt propaganda.

_________________________________________

Myspace hack exploit leads

Myspace hack exploit leads people to 9/11 Truth blog? Well...it's an unusual method, but given the media just aint doing it's job, I have to say thumbs up:) Hopefully this will inspire a massive wave of "creative" ways of getting the truth out.

Al C. - I'd be happy to

Al C. -

I'd be happy to give you some help and answer some of your questions, and get you going in the right direction. However, in respect to helping, this kind of thing is effectively done in a quick and short real-time conversation, not in time consuming back-and-forth posts on a message board. Communicating in real time would be the best way for you to get all your answers, since the person helping you would also have a chance to have more info about your exact situation and software, hardware, connection, etc, and other topics.

Either way, I'd be happy to answer questions, point you to sites or software, and help you out. Do you have AIM/MSN instant messaging programs, or anything similar? Yahoo, IRC, ICQ, the list goes on. Even some P2P programs like Soulseek are perfect for it as well. Post back and leave me some kind of contact information (ie: a username) for any type of software like that, or an email address if that's all you have right now, and I'll get in contact with you.

Radical Pragmatist I can't

Radical Pragmatist

I can't remember who it was who posted before the rebuttal to Grove recently, but one point among many was that Grove seems to suggest that one of the many motivations for 9/11 was to steal gold from WTC vaults.

In suggesting this, Grove greatly exaggerates the amount of gold in storage. While Grove claims "As we all continue to learn more about this topic, we start to comprehend the grandiosity of the thefts and fraudulent transactions that took place under the umbrella of 9-11- specifically hundreds of billions of dollars worth of gold bricks which were surreptitiously liberated from their safety deposit vaults under the World Trade Center."

So- the summary from Grove's free ebook (linked above) suggestion "a trillion in gold", and his own monologue suggests "hundreds of billions". Yet the public record suggests that less than a billion was stored in WTC vaults- and even though this is only 1 percent of Grove's claimed amount - it took an entire week to remove it by the recovery crews during cleanup.

Grove asks us to believe that the organizers of the 9/11 attacks managed to spirit 100x the amount of available gold out of the WTC complex- and presumably did so in less than one hour (since the buildings collapsed, presumably by controlled demolitions directed by the perpetrators upon completion of their heist). This is such a defiance of both basic science and of common sense that it may as well have come from the 9/11 Commission Report.

This is one example of a spurious claim from Grove. He may be a sincere guy- and on this point he may be simply parroting an incorrect fact from Loose Change 2 (which he endorses enthusiastically). I am not asserting as others have that Grove is a disinformation source. Given his self-described role as "Whistleblower", however, I would expect him to be revealing previously hidden, critical evidence, based on insider knowledge of a criminal act- not regurgitated bogus claims that are ludicrous and ultimately distracting.

ChrisB

If I have misjudged Mr. Grove, I apologize. I do believe he invites at least some amount of incredulity- not only because of certain handily dismissible claims (as noted above)- but also because of his personal style, which might be generously described as preening and self-congratulatory. He may not be smug- but he comes across that way- and really undermines his credibility and trustworthiness (at least for me).

Many of us are desperately longing for a true whistleblower, someone who can, by virtue of his direct insider knowledge, expose the real crimes and criminals of 9/11. In Richard Andrew Grove, it seems we have less of a whistleblower and more of a horntooter. The trailer for his film to me drives this point home to a degree that would be funny were it not for the unbearably high stakes, and were it not for the fact that innocent blood is crying out from our own soil and the sands of Iraq, begging God for justice to be done.

re: gold in the basement,

re: gold in the basement, and a little loose with the facts in loose change, see

http://www.911myths.com/loose_change_2nd_ed._a_critical_review_of_the_go...

Al C: download/install

Al C:

download/install bittornado at bittornado.com then go to isohunt.com and get NERO 7 Platinum, use the crack for a serial, and boom you are done.

Then you can just download mp4's or avi's or wmv's of whatever you want, throw them in NeroVision and burn. If you add too much content it will just decrease the video quality for you.

I currently am burning "EGLS" & "What's the Truth?" onto DVDs

I currently am burning

I currently am burning "EGLS" & "What's the Truth?" onto DVDs
DHS | Homepage | 07.17.06 - 1:31 am | #

onto the same DVD, i think they make a nice tag team.

In judging by the shills

In judging by the shills over-reaction to Grove coming onto the 9/11 scene, Grove may be a very impressive truther indeed!!!

Let's hear what he has to say!

Radical Pragmatist I can't

Radical Pragmatist

I can't remember who it was who posted before the rebuttal to Grove recently, but one point among many was that Grove seems to suggest that one of the many motivations for 9/11 was to steal gold from WTC vaults....

Yes, perhaps Grove & others overstated the amount of gold under the WTC.

I would think any gold theft should be a side issue indicating how some people with foreknowledge got greedy, like the insider-trading evidence demonstrates.

Myspace hack exploit leads

Myspace hack exploit leads people to 9/11 Truth blog...

Great gorilla truth-spreading tactic!

We must begin to act like the French Resistance did back in WW-II, because Hitler & the Nazis have returned in the guise of Bush & the NeoCons!

(sorry, guerilla not

(sorry, guerilla not gorilla)^

Guys, I am not a shill. But

Guys, I am not a shill. But Andrew Groves has allegedly worked at management level overseeing big projects. If he is on the up and up about supporting 9/11 awareness then he would know that what's NOT needed are bulky distractions, overblown claims or plain wrong statements of fact. All of these features can and will be pointed to by people seeking to discredit 9/11 truth speakers.

I repeat, if anyone is on good terms with Andrew Grove please approach him and encourage him to get a good journalist or editor to assist him to clear up his ideas and eliminate the baggage.

I am assuming Andrew is producing his material for a viewing/reading public. There is a very real obligation to that public to present his views in the clearest possible way.

He should stay away from 9/11 issues he has just heard about from 2nd or 3rd hand sources.

If he is a key whistleblower then he should stick to his own turf. Sibel Edmonds doesn't go around talking about cell phones or building demolitions because it would distract from her main message. Andrew Groves should do the same.

I personally think Grove is

I personally think Grove is a plant intended to distract and discredit the movement. Glad to see we're not buying it.

To the 9/11 Truth bashers

To the 9/11 Truth bashers who call us all nuts, they need to read up on Sibel Edmonds and her FBI translator partner Behfooz. You will NEVER see "911myths.com" cover FBI whistleblowers, Sibel Edmonds, the Pakistani ISI, Able Danger, etc.

Re: Gold in the basement, I

Re: Gold in the basement, I believe Jon Gold still lives in his mother's basement.

If you want to talk to

If you want to talk to Richard, go to www.8thestate.com and post on his forum. He will answer you.

I personally think Grove is

I personally think Grove is a plant intended to distract and discredit the movement. Glad to see we're not buying it.
outsider | 07.17.06 - 5:31 am | #

Let's here what the Grove has to say first!

somebigguy: hilarious!

somebigguy: hilarious!

Hey disinfo, making fun of

Hey disinfo, making fun of Jon is fun!!!

AWESOME, I hadn't heard

AWESOME, I hadn't heard about this either

Why are you making fun of

Why are you making fun of Jon Gold? I now think you are just a couple of haters trying to attack people without an inkling of credibility yourselves.

You guys are hysterical...

You guys are hysterical... Dave (911 Blimp)

In NO WAY do i believe that Muslim Highjackers were involved...

To the rest of you who think i'm a "disinfo" agent- do your homework- and use your real name... otherwise, who's going to believe you?

Re: the gold, it's just a point- don't get wrapped up and start citing "myth" sites... think for yourself...

Either you realize that the Govt is Lying about 9-11, or you don't.

Tune in and listen: 9/11 SYNCHRONICITY Podcsast, this July 22, any of you guys want to be on the show and debate the facts, let me know (and use your real name).

www.911SYNCHRONICITY.com

Hello Richard Grove. Please

Hello Richard Grove. Please read my comments further up the page.

Here's the problem. If we tell people 9/11 was an inside job then they are going to want to know WHO WHAT WHEN WHERE HOW WHY.

And they're going to want you to explain all that in about 5 minutes.

Now that's all completely unreasonable as you and I know. But every marketing guy will tell you exactly that.

Sure, you can have your videos, your longer radio interviews and your book, but you need a bite sized account that gives the main features of who you are and exactly what evidence you possess that points to 9/11 as an inside job.

NOw, I know corporate stuff is complex and messy. But it does not change the fact that people will not wade accept large amounts of tenuously connected stuff.

Put it another way. Imagine you were going to argue your case in a court of law. The court would insist on a VERY clear statement of WHO WHAT WHEN WHERE HOW WHY. And you need to get your material into such a format. Otherwise you're just a great river that fans out into a host of tribulets and you never know which ones make it to the sea.

Want an example. Gold thefts from the WTC on 9/11. If you believe that occurred then MAKE THE CASE. Of course, you're not expected to know all the details. But you should be able to give a credible account of how particular volumes could have been moved on 9/11. Because, at the moment, your account of this idea is not sustainable. You have to present not just "9/11 possibilities" but passably credible accounts of how parts of 9/11 might have gone down.

If all this is too much, then forget it. Whether you like it or not you are writing for the public and you have an educational role. If that's not your field, get a lawyer or editor to work with you to trim down all your stuff so the public can verify it for themselves. - Not all of it, but at least so they will know it's coherent and worth investigating further.

Also, for you to have credibility you should STICK WITH WHAT YOU KNOW. That allows people to assess what you have to say on its merits. If you want to point to other 911 websites or note that there are many issues, that's fine. But if you were in a court of law you would be tested on what you know, not what you heard 2nd or 3rd hand. There are plenty of good 9/11 websites doing that. Do what Sibel Edmonds has done. Stick with what you personally know.

Finally, leave out the crap. I see you've got a story on your site about possible Jesuit involvement in the assasination of Abraham Lincoln. You may as well wear a small propellor on your head and talk about AREA 51. And make no mistake about it. The inclusion of this nonsense at your web site is like a large banner sign that reads 'I'M A LOONEY TUNES. IGNORE ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING I SAY."

Do you want to be taken seriously?
Do you want to help the 9/11 awareness movement?
Do you want to help people rather than hinder them?

Then realise that you are coming forward as a witness with specialist knowledge, a unique individual who has a powerful, specific contribution to make. Cut everything out of your site that fails to support or advance that particular, unique message.

Get a friendly newspaper editor to edit your stuff.

Best wishes.

Hello, I am the filmmaker

Hello,

I am the filmmaker working with Richard Andrew Grove and I created the trailer for the upcoming documentary "Blowing the Whistle".

I heard about Richard with the internet release of his first voice recording, which Meria Heller helped distribute.

I was extremely interested in what Richard had to say and I felt in my gut that his information was very important. I decided I wanted to make a documentary about him and his story that related closely to the events of 911.

I contacted Richard and told him about my idea, to make a movie of his story and research, he said he would like me to and agreed to help.

ThatÂ’s it in a nutshell. I just a moviemaker that looks for interesting subjects and makes films or videos about them. My website has other examples of my work. This past winter I did a documentary interview on the Air America Radio talk show host, Mike Malloy. You can find that interview at my site.

Proteanmedia.com/dfest/

I hope this will clear up any confusion over the why, who, how of this movie.

Sincerely,

Brian Forrest

I [finally] heard [back]

I [finally] heard [back] from Richard Grove this evening and we had an extended verbal back-and-forth.

I did my best to make it clear to him how hard it is to think of him as being very different/distinct from WKJO (which prima facie qualifies as Muslim-hijacker-blaming govt propaganda) if every time I hear him, he's promoting it. He understands where I'm coming from though I don't think he's changed his mind about WKJO, at least not yet. He's fond of naming the corporations WKJO names, and friendly with its maker...

I'd say that the biggest thing we agreed on is that, at this juncture, our #1 priority should/must be to tear down the government's Big Lie of 9/11, more than trying to advance who-dunnit and how-it-was-done theories of our own.

IOW, at least in the court of public opinion, unless/until we get people to first question and then reject The Big Lie of 9/11, or else come up with iron-clad proof, we're not getting anywhere.

I wish him luck in pursuing the financial/corporate aspects via the judicial system; I told him he should not expect 911 truthers to want to follow every twist and turn if it's not clear how they directly relate to 9/11. If there's 1 honest judge left, I hope that's the one he gets. I mentioned that evidently there is not one non-corrupt major insurance company or financial institution. So for him to finger some corrupt corporation(s) with which he's most familiar and which tie in with 9/11 would be good, but may not be sufficient... With a monster this big and with so many tentacles, it's hard to tell where its heads are.

I can take my truths a la carte. How much good Richard's capable of remains to be seen; in the meantime I still wish he'd stop touting the govt-lie-telling WKJO.

=================================================

IMHO, the best single measure of a 9/11 presentation's value is how
impossible the presenter makes it for people to keep clinging to the
belief that they can blame "Muslim hijackers" for 9/11. Further, if
the presentation tries to advance that unfounded belief (especially
subliminally), then it is acting as government propaganda.

_________________________________________

ChrisB, Jon's a friend of

ChrisB, Jon's a friend of mine, we're just kidding around.

As long as Andrew Grove has

As long as Andrew Grove has a story on his website about how the Jesuits killed Abraham Lincoln (!!) then he is a menance to the 911 sceptics movement. Any credibility he may be seeking for 911 awareness will be instantly trashed by critics who will point to this bullshit story.

Andrew Groves needs to either get serious about presenting his ideas (and ONLY his ideas) or he should be completely shunned. There is no room anymore for the half-baked and the loonies.

Whatever sincere noises Grove may make, he is in fact damaging the 911 movement.

Hi Blimp, you make the

Hi Blimp, you make the following statement:

I'd say that the biggest thing we agreed on is that, at this juncture, our #1 priority should/must be to tear down the government's Big Lie of 9/11, more than trying to advance who-dunnit and how-it-was-done theories of our own.

This seems to be incorrect as you seem to be capable of only promoting your own theories at the expense of any others, and if anyone dares disagree with you, then that person is disinfo and not to be trusted.