9/11 Truth Movie Night in Austin

The Austin Citizens for 9/11 Truth group is sponsoring a free event on Wednesday, August 2nd.

This event features a lecture by Davidson Loehr, author of the acclaimed book "America, Fascism + God", and a showing of the 2006 documentary "What's the Truth?" at the First Unitarian Universalist Church at 7pm, discussion to follow. 4700 Grover. 452-6168.

The focus of this evening is both to explore the events of 9/11 and to put the resulting drastic changes in American life since that day in context.

We would like to extend an invitation to everyone (and their guests) to attend this event.

Thanks to Wasom for sending this in.

IÂ’ve been coming here to

IÂ’ve been coming here to 9/11 Blogger for about 9 months now.

ItÂ’s has become apparent to me that Jon Gold is a limited-hangout artist.

Gold continually disparages the physics-related evidence we have, while he meekly advocates some behavioral evidence for the sake of (his own) appearance.

Gold proclaims that AA77 did strike the Pentagon, says controlled demolition is exaggerated, believes the actual airliners with passengers hit the 3 targets on 9/11, has no problem with the cell-phone calls, thinks “pull-it” Silverstein & WTC-7 is not important, etc. Gold particularly states or implies these things especially when dz & other administrators aren’t around.

I canÂ’t trust a guy who deliberately disparages our physical evidence! Behavioral evidence can always be explained/excused away. For example, Cheney could always say (if he ever had to answer to anyone), that he let AA77 hit the Pentagon because he didn't wan't to shoot down innocent passengers or some similar b.s.

There is always the--I made a “bad judgment” or “a mistake” or “I overlooked something” option for all of our behavioral evidence--but not for the physics evidence! How the hell could Cheney, or anyone else, explain away the fact that AA77 DID NOT STRIKE THE PENTAGON??? THEY CANNOT!!!

People like Gold won't admit this. He is a fraud.

Even in all that EGLS

Even in all that EGLS type-stuff, like where a supposed "hijacker" was said to be renting an apartment from a CIA big-wig or whatever.

The CIA will just claim they didn't know he was a terrorist hijacker, or that the hijacker was our informant but he was really a double-agent, or he turned against us due to blowback--or a million other such bullshit excuses they can make up to refute all the behavioral evidence!

This is becoming a habit-the

This is becoming a habit-the second time I know where Rockefeller's world religion, pagan-UN, faith , is promoting 911 truth.

Maybe its only one form of truth.
Maybe its a sover for a deeper truth?

Welcome to the Unitarian Universalist United Nations Office (UU-UNO) website. The UU-UNO promotes peace, justice and liberty for all as reflected in the UN Charter.
http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:LXYAvTNsZqwJ:www.uu-uno.org/+unitari...

The Covenant of Unitarian Universalist Pagans (CUUPS) exists in part to promote the practice and understanding of Pagan and Earth-centered Spirituality

http://www.cuups.org/content/chapters/chapter.html

see>

Support for the 911 COINTELPRO hypothesis of Angie

http://www.geo-economics.org/Support%20for%20the%20911%20COINTELPRO%20hy...

Anon, chill the f out on

Anon, chill the f out on Gold and leave it in one thread per day. The good thing about the Gold/Albanese type route is you can take a movie like EGLS, throw it right up there and say you can prove 9/11 is an inside job without even ever getting into the physical evidence. You have no goddamn physical evidence left to even make a case, so enjoy fighting in the snakepit against hundreds of government-paid shills who can run circles around most truthers on science issues. S. Jones is a god, but most of his theories can be explained away, like his latest that he found sulfur, which was likely used to lower temps at which steel could melt. Think about all of the goddamn stuff in those buildings - surely it could be from something else in there. The only near-lock we have on phys evidence is WTC 7 video, and even that is a matter of intuition, i.e., my eyes can't be lying to me, but it is certainly no proven fact it was blown up.

All this talk of disinfo and

All this talk of disinfo and infiltrators - what makes you think they would advertise themselves by their limited hangout views? They probably appear solidly MIHOP.
I use my intuition about people. Jon is OK. In fact he's worth his weight in ...er...gold.

Anon, chill the f out on

Anon, chill the f out on Gold and leave it in one thread per day.

Gold is a limited-hangout artist who disparages our physical evidence whenever he can. (I used to think he was great when I first came onto 9/11 blogger.)

Other Anonymous, why not use both the physical & behavioral/circumstantial evidence together, the 2 are NOT mutually exclusive. Get that through your thick skull.

"Gold proclaims that AA77

"Gold proclaims that AA77 did strike the Pentagon, says controlled demolition is exaggerated, believes the actual airliners with passengers hit the 3 targets on 9/11, has no problem with the cell-phone calls, thinks “pull-it” Silverstein & WTC-7 is not important, etc. Gold particularly states or implies these things especially when dz & other administrators aren’t around."

Anonymous | 07.17.06 - 6:03 pm | #
___________________________________--
Sorry, from what planet are you coming from yet?!?

Lastly, I have no choice but

Lastly, I have no choice but to be somewhat suspect of the site-owner & administrators of this blog, as they do nothing to discourage Gold from bashing our physics evidence and promoting the offical story.

Please go away then...

Please go away then...

TNF, ask Gold yourself. He

TNF, ask Gold yourself. He avoids all physical evidence like the plague. He supports the official story in many aspects.

Fuck you, TNF! You go away,

Fuck you, TNF! You go away, asshole.

:) Does your mother aware of

:) Does your mother aware of your language? tutt, tutt, tutt

Hey TNF, as an

Hey TNF, as an administrator, we do not want to be accused of limiting free speach.

You may or may not have noticed my many attempts at promoting activism, suggesting that instead of endless debate, time might be better spent delivering flyers, DVDs, having movie nights, emailing congress, emailing the press, hanging posters up in public places, etc. I can think of a million things to do.

If honest Truthers spend a little more time on Activism and a little less time arguing with each other, the Trolls would spend most of their time arguing with themselves in empty chat rooms.

If you don't like what Jon has to say, turn off your computer and go deliver some flyers. I have just had the same conversation via AIM with Jon.

9/11 Truth Activists should be too damn busy trying to get to the Truth to spend hours debating people they don't agree with. If we're all doing our part, the Troll will expose themselves, as they will be the only ones left arguing.

Sorry, looks like my last

Sorry, looks like my last response should have been to Anonymous, not TNF.

But everyone should keep this in mind, would you like us administrators hanging around here policing everybody, or would you prefer we were out doing some sort of activism?

All right SGB, thanks. Jon

All right SGB, thanks. Jon just gets to me sometimes the way he belittles our physical evidence. He is extremely frustrating in that regard.

Truthers should not support the government's version of 9/11, period.

I've printed out 50 of these

I've printed out 50 of these at work today,2 sheets per page

http://www.tyrannyalert.com/9-11%20fairy%20tale.pdf

I also have 50 DVDs at home containing EGLS and What's the Truth both on 1 DVD

Good stuff, DHS! Damn good!

Good stuff, DHS! Damn good!

Hey SBG, glad you correct

Hey SBG, glad you correct who you aim your last response to. I totally agree with you and Jon. I rarelly engage in arguments and has never start one, but sometimes, I'm so pissed off with the trolls. Activism most take must of our time and I understand too the great work of Jon to compile all that information. He' kind of our encyclopedia. :) Here, in my hometown, I spread flyer like they were rice at a wedding. I also translate a lot of stock for the benefit of my fellow unilangual french canadian.

Have a nice day, man. And thanks for what you're doing.

I don't agree with anyone

I don't agree with anyone who will not mention the great physical evidence we have to go on. In fact, I do not trust them.

Hey guys, Jon gets to me

Hey guys, Jon gets to me regarding some of his opinions as well, and we've had a couple of "discussions" regarding it, but we agree to disagree and move on.

I have asked Jon to tone it down a bit a few times already, most recently about an hour ago. I don't want you guys to think he is getting a free ride.

He is a good guy, and he can pull facts with supporting hyperlinks out of his ass faster than anyone I've ever seen, so take advantage of that, and ignore the stuff you don't agree with. He's an excellent resource.

Thank you DHS, TNF, anonymous, and everyone else regarding the activism you do. Spread the word!!!

Anon, I think you don't

Anon, I think you don't agree with anyone who don't think exactly like you. As I state in another tread, I'm totally in CD an the obvious lack of evidence (which is evidence in itself) at Shankville. The pentagone is a little more complex IMO. The Fairy Tale From Hell from tyrannyalert.com is my main tool when approching friends and family members. I promote 911 revisited and film like Confronting the Evidence with a lot of good speakers. I think you're a little edgy on "anyone who will not mention the great physical evidence we have..." And your laguage is way over the edge when addressing other genuine truther.

TNF, you & Gold were busting

TNF, you & Gold were busting my balls all morning on "The Bold Outlines Of a Plot" thread below, regarding the physics-type evidence at the Pentagon, the Towers, WTC-7, etc. You jerks were basically saying the physics should be ignored because it's so easy to rebut or whatever. That is how gov't shills argue for the "official version" of 9/11.

You need not agree with all the physical evidence of that day, but why go out of your way to bash it & support the "official story"?

^^^ I repeat the question:

^^^
I repeat the question: From what planet are you coming from?!?

"support the official story" ?!?!? You talk non-sense.

Towers (WTC1&2) don't erupt

Towers (WTC1&2) don't erupt & explode like valcanos from being struck by airliners.

Massive buildings (WTC7) do not implode due to 4 or 5 windows out of the 4,000 windows having flames in them.

A hijacked airliner does not strike the most secure building in the world (Pentagon) an hour after 2 other hijacked airliners struck the WTC.

Do you get it?

*Towers (WTC1&2) don't erupt

*Towers (WTC1&2) don't erupt & explode like valcanos from being struck by airliners.

I'm referring to their freefall "collapse" with debris flying upwards, sidways, & tons of dust everywhere.

OK. I've always been totally

OK. I've always been totally IN for CD at WTC1-2&7.

Hani Hanbour was certainly not in command of AA77 hiting the pentagone (OV). Something happened at the Pentagone but I don't know what because the video were conficated. All the evidence I looked at are weird. BTW the "punch out" at the Pentagone is what bring me on the bandwagon of 911 truth.

This, I get it.

What I didn't get is your attack on Gold and me. Do YOU get it?

TNF, earlier today, you &

TNF, earlier today, you & Gold weren't saying anything like what you just said above^. Just the opposite.

Furthermore, a 200 year-old

Furthermore, a 200 year-old farmhouse engulfed in an inferno would offer more resistance to collapse than WTC-7 did. The old farmhouse would squeak & crack here & there, part of the roof would cave in, then a wall or two would bow out, etc.

However, WTC-7, a massive, modern steal-framed building came down like a house-of-cards in free fall because some desks & chairs were burning in a few rooms???

Gold has his own approch,

Gold has his own approch, and I respect him. I can't stand you calling him a shill or that he support the official version. That's non-sense. I, for myself, never said the opposite of what I just said above. I think you're very prompt at infighting and starting controversy, and that, I question it. You have to learn of agreeing to disagree...and watch you're mouth. :) We are civilize people, not bully.

Controlled demolition of

Controlled demolition of WTC-7 may be the only thing everyone here agree with. I dunno why you come up with that? Even Gold probably agree, even if he focus on other circumstance around the 9/11 crime.

Okay TNF, I looked back

Okay TNF, I looked back through the "The Bold Outlines Of a Plot" and I see it was mainly Jon Gold playing a rather mean-spirited game of devil's advocate against me regarding the Pentagon.

I'm basically willing to bet my life that AA77 did not hit the Pentagon, and for some reason Gold always seems to agressively take the official version on that.

Here's one of Gold's typical remarks that I do NOT find to be humorous:

How did the Boeing 757 disappear, including all 240 seats & luggage, but they ID'ed 63 of 64 "passengers"???"

Don't you know? The planes were swapped for Global Hawks, and the passengers were taken to a remote location, and murdered in cold blood.
Jon Gold | Homepage | 07.17.06 - 12:23 pm | #

Very serious question, very

Very serious question, very arrogant response by Gold.

Here's another gem by

Here's another gem by Gold:

Again, thank you ALL for your wonderful theories presented as fact time and time again.
You've only fucking destroyed this movement.
THANKS A BUNCH!
Jon Gold | Homepage | 07.17.06 - 12:31 pm

"Answer: Drones and/or

"Answer: Drones and/or missiles or bombs don't have 240 seats nor luggage."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Keep it up! You're doing great!
Jon Gold | Homepage | 07.17.06 - 12:28 pm | #

I'm not taking that b.s.

I'm not taking that b.s. from anyone^!

"Don't bash our overwhelming

"Don't bash our overwhelming physical evidence, and you won't get into trouble, Jon."

Oh don't you worry fucktard. I'm done.
Jon Gold | Homepage | 07.17.06 - 12:35 pm | #