911Blogger Down Due to Power Outages

The host of 911Blogger.com informed DZ that the downtime was due to a series of large power outages in the section of Utah where the host company is located.

The host claims that it will make the system more secure, so this will hopefully happen less frequently.

Sorry for the inconvenience . . . .

Speaking of 7/7, check out

Speaking of 7/7, check out this site for more info:

7/7 Bombing investigation

And here's a thread about the link above for anyone who would like to contribute more info about 7/7:

My 7/7 bombing research

^Btw, this is Jack Blood's official message board. You'll need to register for an account to post on that thread.

i double posted, here is

i double posted, here is further info:

Our site went down for a couple of hours tonight for the second time in the last week. These outages are being caused by major power outages in the Orem, Utah area. We have had nothing but good service from our current host, who use diesel generators which can only run for so long, and these issues are not within their control. I do not plan on switching hosts as I am hopeful that these issues will not persist.

If this issue continues I will look into alternatives, but in the meantime if the site goes out swing on over to yourbbsucks.com and post a discussion thread, or get out and do something useful ;)

I like when blogger goes

I like when blogger goes down. My site gets a bunch of visitors. :)

You should have named this

You should have named this thread, "Game On". Like those kids who play hockey in the street, and a car is in the street... "Game Off"... vrooom... "Game On".

phew.. *i need my fix* ;p

phew.. *i need my fix* ;p

Found this recent Global

Found this recent Global Research article from DU.

"Second 9/11":
Cheney's "Contingency Plan"

http://www.globalresearch.ca/ ind...text=viewArti...

"Second 9/11": Cheney's "Contingency Plan"

While the "threat" of Iran's alleged WMD is slated for debate at the UN Security Council, Vice President Dick Cheney is reported to have instructed USSTRATCOM to draw up a contingency plan "to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States". This "contingency plan" to attack Iran uses the pretext of a "Second 9/11" which has not yet happened, to prepare for a major military operation against Iran.

The contingency plan, which is characterized by a military build up in anticipation of possible aerial strikes against Iran, is in a "state of readiness".

What is diabolical is that the justification to wage war on Iran rests on Iran's involvement in a terrorist attack on America, which has not yet occurred:

The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons, hence the nuclear option. As in the case of Iraq, the response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States. Several senior Air Force officers involved in the planning are reportedly appalled at the implications of what they are doing—that Iran is being set up for an unprovoked nuclear attack—but no one is prepared to damage his career by posing any objections. (Philip Giraldi, Attack on Iran: Pre-emptive Nuclear War , The American Conservative, 2 August 2005)

Are we to understand that US military planners are waiting in limbo for a Second 9/11, to launch a military operation directed against Iran, which is currently in a "state of readiness"?

Cheney's proposed "contingency plan" does not focus on preventing a Second 9/11. The Cheney plan is predicated on the presumption that Iran would be behind a Second 9/11 and that punitive bombings would immediately be activated, prior to the conduct of an investigation, much in the same way as the attacks on Afghanistan in October 2001, allegedly in retribution for the role of the Taliban government in support of the 9/11 terrorists. It is worth noting that the bombing and invasion of Afghanistan had been planned well in advance of 9/11. As Michael Keefer points out in an incisive review article:

"At a deeper level, it implies that “9/11-type terrorist attacks” are recognized in Cheney’s office and the Pentagon as appropriate means of legitimizing wars of aggression against any country selected for that treatment by the regime and its corporate propaganda-amplification system.... (Keefer, February 2006 )


Ya guys gotta hear an

Ya guys gotta hear an archive of the Alex Jones show today, Daniel Ellsberg was on it, the major whistleblower behind the pentagon papers. He said that engineering 9/11 would not be beyond the scope of this regime, that while he finds some of the theoris a bit out there, a good half he finds very plausible, and says there needs to be a major new investigation. He also said 9/11 was America's Reichstag, and said that the next Reichstag incicent in America will wipe out the bill of rights, usher in a police state and leave a lot of dissenters and Arabs in America in detainment camps.

Pockybot: nw0.info has the

Pockybot: nw0.info has the show here:

Hey all: would some of you give me a hand putting in a good word for keeping an article about Kevin Barrett up on wikipedia? Lately I've been the only positive voice there on this:

Two Excellent documentaries

Two Excellent documentaries about Russia pulling off their own false flag 9/11 back in Sept 1999(committed by Russian FSB intelligence)



Assassination of Russia:

these are two award winning documentaries that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the 9/99 attacks blamed on Chechyns were in fact pulled off by Russian intelligence

The Kevin Barrett page is no

The Kevin Barrett page is no longer marked for deletion.

"This article was nominated for deletion on July 17 2006. The result of the discussion was keep."

The page now also states:

"This biographical article needs more biographical information on the subject.
Statistical information such as date and place of birth, information on historical significance, and information on accomplishments is desired. Please remove this message when done."

new documentary on 7/7 that

new documentary on 7/7 that goes even farther than TerrorStorm on the London bombings:

SJ: said: "The Kevin Barrett

SJ: said:
"The Kevin Barrett page is no longer marked for deletion."


Thanks to anyone here who left a "Keep" comment at Wikipedia.

Why "delete" any

Why "delete" any information? It's just like burning books. No books should be burned.