"Engineering 9/11 would not be ...beyond the scope of the current administration"

Of course, with superior software programs like Promis or B@ware, the computer can facilitate crimes. (as R A Grove has indicated.)

So, technically; the machines could be directing the show.

Someone calling me a nutjob for thinking 9/11 was an inside job pointed me to the famous Al Jazeera interview with KSM and the 9/11 planners taking credit:
http://www.petermaass.com/core.cfm?p=1&mag=94&magtype=1

But read that report. Even the interviewer askes allowed if al Qaeda were mainly the hitmen for Brezinski like intellectuals. I truly think that a good portion of the hijackers thought they were acting for Allah, while ISI acted as the go between the US and al Qaeda. I think Osama and KSM are ego maniacs who would take credit for the Aruba case if they could, and either dont realize or dont care they themsleves were merely pawns. Because, 9/11 benefited only the top al Qaeda leaders ego wise, and the neocons and corporate globalists.

just updated the link, it should take you to the correct download page now.

Has anyone read the article on Commondreams about 911 conspiracy? It's very frustrating. We can't even get many progressives to pull the wool from their eyes. He says the controlled demolition theory is outlandish without explaining why and goes off at the end and basically says that if Gore had been elected, there still would have been a sizable conspiracy theory movement. That is total BS. Hand them this link to the coincidence theorists' guide to 911 http://100777.com/node/963. Of course there would be people touting conspiracy theory regardless of the evidence, but the majority of us have such strong beliefs because of the damning evidence out there. I wrote them a letter telling them why they have one less reader. If you think that was a good idea, please do the same.

The link for above is not the whole interview, but includes a ten minute replay of the section of the interview that relates to 911. (Its about 1/4 of the way through).

Just a heads up to anyone that is confused after the long down load. I don't know if the whole interview is available, but it should be linked if possible.

Oregon Truther, I just saw that hit piece that CommonDreams chose to publish too -- I'm so disgusted with the alternative media.

I thought about writing CommonDreams (yet again) and complaining. I rarely go there now, because of their selective discrimination about 9/11 truth.

Of course, there's the original source article from Rocky Mountain News, as well as an e-mail link to the author at the bottom of the article.

Also, check out this interview with Yosri Fouda, the guy who interviewd KSM.
http://www.tbsjournal.com/Archives/Fall02/Fouda.html

He says that its 100% fact, confirmed by the FBI that the 5 Israelis were in fact Mossad and were prepositioned before the first plane hit. He also said he too wonders if al Qaeda coulda pulled off 9/11 without help, that he suspects Osama is dead(he says KSM slipped up a few times and referred to Osama as dead) and that the "confession" Jalalabad tape is not fake, but is being coaxed by a CIA or Saudi operative posing as a sheikh. Very interesting interview.

This link does not work.

Ellsberg is right, and you can bet they will round up everyone who comes to this site and sites like it wwhen the shit hits the fan. we are clearly "dissenters" and i dont know about you, but my I.P. is filled with mostly porn and "subversive" material like this site and others.hate to tell you guys, but we will all be considered "enemy combatants" if the stack of cards doesnt fall soon.

WTF, if this is really real, then there should be a bunch of sites talking about this

Very worrisome indeed, Chris.

The Nixon Resignation-Watergate was a CIA coup:
http://www.nixonera.com/etexts/silentcoup/contents.asp

Was Ellsberg part of another CIA plan against Nixon?
"Ellsberg is aware of the rumor that Conein and Scotton asked him to leak the Pentagon Papers as part of the CIA's disinformation campaign. But he shrugs off the insidious rumor as yet another instance of ­ CIA disinformation designed to cast doubt on his motives for leaking The Pentagon Papers.

While it is definitely politically incorrect within what passes nowadays for the New Left to even make the suggestion, is it unthinkable that Ellsberg might have suffered such a whisper campaign in order to prevent his CIA friends from being indicted for drug smuggling and mass murder? "

http://www.counterpunch.org/valentine03082003.html

The time line is slo close that whatever his current operations-one should presume that once CIA, always CIA, at least in the 1960s time frame-especially when the NY Times is involved-the house paper of the Leslie Gelb, Council on Foreign Relations.

Question-why does the CIA-secret government want Ellsberg out there saying he agrees with the 911 inside job theory

Becuase it lets the real culprits off the hook.

Video alternative theory of 911:

http://www.geo-economics.org/The_Un...ion_Brief_1.wmv

Bad link above-here it is:

http://www.geo-economics.org/The_Unification_Brief_1.wmv

or scroll down and find link on
www.geo-economics.org

Has anyone made an excerpt just of the relveant 10 minute part of the broadcast with Ellsberg? I think more sites would link to it if it was just the important part.

Anyone come looking for me they will be looking down the barrel of a 12 gauge.

Interesting stuff, geo... I've only just begun to explore this video and site.

This Ellsberg thing is huge. If he continues and speaks through other media it will definitely get some new people looking at 911 Truth.

Just speaking on the Alex Jones show won't be enough. But it's certainly a positive development. And he does have a way with words!

So Ellsberg has joined the other liars about 9/11. It's remarkable that you all have no conscience whatsoever and just keep on lying.

I can't wait for the day when you are all apologizing to the American people.

It is not a crime to seek the truth, it is a patriotic duty. again, 911truth.org is looking for this. they have not posted, rense has not posted, what's up?
we have to be careful before we run off with a story. somebody have any other confirmation besides the tape?

Blubba Truth, look here & learn: http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/

Anon, the Blubba Truth kind don't want to learn, they're to comfy in their lies' manure

Geo, the film is good. A printed transcript would be of benefit. It's good to see that Bukovsky is still among us, and speaking out. His book "To Build A Castle" has been one of my favorites for a quarter of a century.

Here's the title story. I can't find the link...

"911 Truth Movement Mistake: the Sibel Edmonds story - DROP IT LIKE A HOT POTATO"

Suuuuure... yeah, that's exactly the type of info I want on my site.

why is there a large blank space on 911blogger.com just above the daniel ellsburg entry. who's trying to cover that up?

Dear Mssr. Jouet ,

thank you for the encouragement. Im glad you found the video useful-apologies for the compression and other errors.

I think it provides a new direction for research and hope energetic folks follow the links that support the movie, including the power point, and elsewhere, on:

www.geo-economics.org

I know its a challenge to tarpley-griffin et. alia, but lets debate the issue, and the real question of

Cui Bono?

Thanks again,
-Geo

nixon was took down by cia coup---

ford/rockefeller substituted for a couple of years

carter was first tri-lateral commision rothschild puppet president

thats what theyve had ever since
____________________----
rothschild is the evil dark emperor

You know, I've been very gently nudging people away from debate and into activism, but it seems to be falling on deaf ears.

This is not a debate forum, take your name calling and endless arguments elsewhere, this is a site for activism and sharing ideas. The day this becomes nothing but a debate forum, I'm out of here. I'm trying to save MY country here, this isn't a game.

People are gonna be banned soon, without notice. This is your one and only warning.

I'm deleting all meaningless, hateful posts now. The next one will be your last.

"I see nothing about the purpose being activism."

This site IS activism. An activist by the name of Roger Peters founded this site.

SBG was referring to the, "name calling and endless arguments", and how they take time AWAY from activism, and how they DO NOT belong here.

The time for debate, AMONGST OURSELVES is over.

There is NOTHING wrong with discussing or sharing information, or submitting news, or keeping in touch with the friends you've made in the movement, or... DISCUSSING WAYS TO GET THE TRUTH OUT.

However, arguing FOR the "name calling and endless arguments" on your part, is...

Sorry somesmallgirl, this site is all about activism, because anything else is pointless.

Tell me, don't they make remote control parts for airplanes at Raytheon in Reston Virginia?

There were plenty of meaningful points in the post of mine which fell victim to the purge of "all meaningless, hateful posts" by some guy, who mostly seems to mind only when certain people are called names and otherwise verbally abused personally (and maliciously impersonated) here.

"People are gonna be banned soon, without notice." "The next one will be your last." (with zero mention of who "your" refers to. That is a form of cyber terrorism.) "MY country".

Yeah, that's the hallmark of a democracy, alright, and not at all the hallmark of someone throwing a temper tantrum, and throwing his weight around.

Especially since I submitted an "activism" post here just last week, via the submission form here, and it was ignored, it's not easy for me to buy into that "activism" excuse. (I wonder what it's being used as an excuse for, then?) If we can't chuckle at people who still (try to) cling, in the face of so much contradictory evidence, to the government's contention that "suicidal Muslim hijackers" are to blame for 9/11, A)where can we? and B)this 'forum' has gone downhill fast

The content bias(es) here is (are) becoming harder to ignore.

People who promote blatantly obvious Muslim-hijacker-blaming limited-hangout government disinfo campaigns such as "Able Danger" and EGLS don't need my, or anyone else's, help or activism; they're already getting the murderous government they deserve.

=================================================

IMHO, the best single measure of a 9/11 presentation's value is how
impossible the presenter makes it for people to keep clinging to the
belief that they can blame "Muslim hijackers" for 9/11. Further, if
the presentation tries to advance that unfounded belief (especially
subliminally), then it is acting as government propaganda.
_________________________________________

That's cause everything you have to say blimp are useless diatribes meant to cause division within the movement. If you had anything to contribute, be it to the movement, society, or the world, I would be the first to admit it. However, you are nothing more than a drain on anyone or anything associated with you.

with zero mention of who "your" refers to. That is a form of cyber terrorism.

That means the next person who posts a hateful, vulgarity laced, or abusive post will be banned. Not so hard to understand.

Also, not everything that gets submitted gets posted, lots of things don't see the light of day for whatever reason. Don't take it personally.

It's eerie how the bush regime is all quiet about the 911 truth movement... No rebuttal, comment, etc.; they pretend as if this movement didn't exist. It's as if they're waiting for the right time to declare martial law and imprison all of us true patriots. Scary stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/results?search=jack+Blood+Daniel+Ellsberg&search_...

The NWO.info link had the best part edited out last time I checked.

This is important because many Lefties out there look up to Ellsberg. He was being very careful but seems to believe that the Bushies were up to blowing the towers, and killing 3000 in a false flag event. Send this to your favorite left leaning boards. We need the 50 million + that vote for guys like Kerry to wake the hell up!