New 9/11 feature film probes government's version of the Pentagon attack.

http://www.prleap.com/pr/41357/

What really happened at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. on September 11, 2001? Did an American Airlines 757 dive into the five-sided building at the control of foreign terrorists as the government has relentlessly insisted, or did something else strike the building on that fateful day in America? This is what the new feature film, Severe Visibility, explores.

The film, written and directed by Paul Cross, examines the events of that day through the eyes of an Army Major, an employee at the Pentagon who was injured when the incident occurred but is confused by the official report which contradicts his eye witness recollection.
...
Kruter's self-questioning sanity is opposed by his sense of patriotism ultimately setting him on a collision course with his inescapable destiny.
...

Thanks to Cathy for sending this in

Also, still on the subject of the Pentagon, here are a couple of stories by Christopher Bollyn:

9/11 Pentagon Eyewitness Describes Having Seen Global Hawk

9/11 Eyewitness - FBI Destroyed Evidence at Pentagon

Also, Samuel D. Danner interview on Alex Jones:
http://nw0.info

If you guys haven't seen

If you guys haven't seen this yet, here are my thoughts about why they DIDN'T use a 757 to hit the Pentagon...

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=5571

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/

http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/060719/19dewinead.htm

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

That made me laugh.

Later, Danner participated

Later, Danner participated in the retrieval of small pieces of the aircraft from the lawn with Pentagon personnel. He said he found small pieces of shredded aluminum and bits of carbon fiber and polymer resins. The Global Hawk has an aluminum fuselage and carbon fiber wings. "We were told to pick up every piece of debris," Danner said, which they put into trash bags.
Danner said the scene felt more like a crime scene than a crash scene and he was mystified by the way the evidence was being removed rather than flagged and documented.

Sounds way more like me & my buddies cleaning up the backyard after beers & barbeque than a scene of mass-murder!

Dave and Joyce from the

Dave and Joyce from the Power Hour Blow the O'Reilly Death Threat Story Wide Open! - Audio Inside

On his July 11th Fox program, Bill O'Reilly said that at the University of Wisconsin, where Kevin Barrett will be allowed to teach in fall, "there are no standards. . . . I'm stunned." He approvingly stated that at his own alma mater, Boston University, "The Chancellor there, John Silber, would have--would have--this guy'd be in the Charles River floating down, you know, toward the harbor."

Did an American Airlines 757

Did an American Airlines 757 dive into the five-sided building at the control of foreign terrorists as the government has relentlessly insisted, or did something else strike the building on that fateful day in America?

Or were explosive planted in/around the renovated section--the easiest way to pull it off.

Moreover, very easy to have

Moreover, very easy to have planted explosives to bring down the lamp-poles as well.

>"Kruter's self-questioning

>"Kruter's self-questioning sanity is opposed by his sense of patriotism ultimately setting him on a collision course with his inescapable destiny."

There you have it. Those who DO speak out will find themselves unemployed and will loose 1/2 of their earned retirement credits. WE ARE WINNING! -At some point, this must come down to either a real, or a faux 'Take-Over' of the US Military Command.

I will presuppose that we shall see something akin to a 'faux,' although aparently complete; "STAND-DOWN!" -Order from that high-command.

To achieve even that, public outcry must continually address the issue of "Impeachment" for Both Bush and Cheney.

Kevin Barrett Writes More

Interesting Killtown. I

Interesting Killtown. I think they may have used other types of drones at the WTC also.

Operation Northwoods, some 44 years ago, called for utilizing disguised drones, agent-imposter passengers, phony funerals, etc.

I would think it would be

I would think it would be impossible to slam the Pentagon with anything after 2 hijacked airliners slammed the WTC an hour before. Wouldn't the entire area be on the hightest f*cking alert there is???

1. Hani Hanjour could not

1. Hani Hanjour could not have flown back 250 miles from the Kentucky/Ohio border to D.C.

2. Hanjour could have not made that incredible maneuver in a B-757 to hit the renovated section of the Pentagon.

3. A B-757 would NOT make a hole the size of a missile in the Pentagon.

4. 80 videos of whatever hit the Pentagon are being withheld for no damn good reason except to cover-up. The only video released looks like an A3 Skywarrior!

5. Last but not least,
There is NO WAY they could ID a planeload of people that exploded & smashed through the Pentagon @ 530 mph! The fictitious DNA results were made to bolster the official story.

Question... I remember

Question... I remember seeing a video, possibly a news report from that day, of a second plane at the Pentagon - some big white plane. Does anyone else remember seeing this video/news report, and if so, do you know where I might be able to find it?

Hey DP, that video can be

Hey DP, that video can be seen in Loose Change 2.

Thanks for putting this link

Thanks for putting this link up, sbg.

Thanks bigguy!

Thanks bigguy!

nice.

nice.