Whistleblower suspects 9/11 inside job

Another article on Elsberg, use it...
http://www.sploid.com/news/2006/07/pentagon_papers.php

The Pentagon insider who revealed the cynical lies behind the Vietnam War disaster has concluded that the Bush Administration probably orchestrated or at least allowed the horrific attacks against America on Sept. 11, 2001.

Daniel Ellsberg bravely leaked the "Pentagon Papers" in 1971, which finally turned America against the bloody and amoral war. Now Ellsberg says Washington's despots likely committed the ultimate treason right here at home.

"Very serious questions have been raised, about how much they knew beforehand and how much involvement there may have been," Ellsberg said Tuesday on the GCN radio show. (Click here for mp3.)

"Is the administration capable -- humanly and physiologically -- of engineering such a provocation? Yes, I would say that. I worked for such an administration myself."

That was the Lyndon Johnson administration, Ellsberg said, which committed "manufactured provocation" to escalate the Vietnam War.

Ellsberg called for "a very comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of a kind that we've not seen, with subpoenas, general questioning of people, and raising the release of a lot of documents."

Even worse, Ellsberg expects more fake terrorism either before or immediately after the all-but-certain U.S. invasion of Iran. And those new attacks by criminal elements within the U.S. government will lead to a police state that makes the current abuses of power by the Bush Administration look absolutely tame, he said.
...

While on the subject of false flag terror, check it out:
Court says senior officers involved in Åžemdinli bombing

Lets create a betting pool

Lets create a betting pool to see who have predicted the timing of a false flag attack on US military ships during the evacuation of americans in lebanon correctly. Or maybe not. I dunno. Anythings possible in these days, yknow. But you can bet your ass they will pin the blame on Iran, the country neocons desperately want to invade. It says so in the project for new american century's document from the year 2000, one year before 9/11.

Sorry which was written one

Sorry

which was written one year before 9/11. I need coffee.

Hot off the

911 Eyewitness Rick Siegel

911 Eyewitness Rick Siegel presents WMD at the WTC Sept 11 in DC

This is a duplicate post from another thread but I'm hoping someone can comment on this. I'm very curious.

Is this Google video legitimate? Is the information in this trailer accurate? Please check it out and let me know.

http://video.google.com/ videopla...807290597119388

911 Eyewitness Rick Siegel presents WMD at the WTC Sept 11 in DC

Sorry...here is the correct

Sorry...here is the correct link to:

911 Eyewitness Rick Siegel presents WMD at the WTC Sept 11 in DC

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3211807290597119388

Check it out and advise if this is accurate.

Some more Pak ISI

Some more Pak ISI stuff...

India Should Ask For International Monitoring Of ISI: Rajnath

Profile: Pakistan's Military Intelligence Agency

"He is seen as more liberal and moderate than his predecessor General Mahmood Ahmed, said to have been close to the Taleban - although he also enjoyed good connections in Washington and was in the United States on 11 September."

" 911 Eyewitness Rick Siegel

"
911 Eyewitness Rick Siegel presents WMD at the WTC Sept 11 in DC

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3211807290597119388
"

Hadn't seen that yet. Very interesting info I had not seen or heard before:
1. The video of the pay phone call with the massive explosion in the background.
2. The 1/30 second EMP from 2 different camera angles.

Has anyone else heard or seen this information?

Steven Jones recently said that he tested for Tritium on his steel samples, and there were only trace amount. He doesn't currently believe Thermonuclear devices were used.

I think this video trailer should have its' own section for commenting...

"These are the times that

"These are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as freedom should not be highly rated." Thomas Paine "The American Crisis"

I just received word that

I just received word that the new movie, Protocols Of Zion, tries to paint the entire 9/11 Truth Movement as anti-semitic neo nazis.

Supposedly there is footage of people at Ground Zero with their "Stop The 9/11 Cover-Up" signs, and a voice over descibing the movement as anti-semitic, etc...

http://www.protocolsofzionmov

Rick Siegel should consult

Rick Siegel should consult with S. Jones on thermite. Using speculative information such as this as so called "proof" hurts the movement, even if it is his pet theory. And using the WMD title just leads people straight to that issue and they will poke holes in his theory. In other words, using WMD just sets him up for target practice by those who would discredit the truth movement, just as talking about gold in the WTC towers has been ridiculed in hit pieces.

Rick Siegel should stick to what is proveable and factual. As it is said frequently, it is not our job to solve this mystery, but to simply say this IS a mystery that NEEDS to be solved!

Lastly, most of what he mentions in the points, can best be solved by Controlled Demolition!

Thanks, SJ, for the comments

Thanks, SJ, for the comments on

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3211807290597119388

I hope others here will watch this. I believe Stephen Jones as the best info yet. But this trailer is compelling.

The Wisconsin Lawmakers

The Wisconsin Lawmakers info: That's great news. More publicity for 9/11 and perhaps more air time for Barrett.

I agree. I think what

I agree. I think what concerned me the most is that Siegel's video will be shown at 9/11 events in Washington. I was wondering if he had conferred with Stephen Jones.

Other Anon, that's a very

Other Anon, that's a very loud explosion at about 1 min, 4 sec into the video^!

Can someone tell me how to

Can someone tell me how to include (capture) a portion of someone else's posting in my own post? I want to to make sure the quoted post stands out as separate from what I'm posting.

Thanks Jon - I just left a

Thanks Jon - I just left a comment, as well.

On another note, I must share this artwork, by Mark Bryan. It's one of the best illustrations of what's going on in this administration (and country) that I've seen:
http://artofmarkbryan.com/

"Rick Siegel should stick to

"Rick Siegel should stick to what is proveable and factual." I agree, Anon, (though I wish you and other Anons would use an actual name).

I have maintained that putting out unproven information to the general public only blurs the 911 issues. Speculations within the movement are fine and necessary, but presenting these meanderings in front of newbies and doubters is harmful.

I agree, Alex. I'm one of

I agree, Alex. I'm one of the Anons this time around. Sorry for the confusion.

I'm also the one wanting to know how to include (capture) a portion of someone else's posting in my own post. I want to to make sure the quoted post stands out as separate from what I'm posting.

Monday, July 17, 2006:

Monday, July 17, 2006: Kiryat shmona
Israeli girls write messages on a shell at a heavy artillery position firing into civilians inside Lebanon
(AP Photo/Sebastian Scheiner)
http://fromisraeltolebanon.info/files/childAbuseAndHate2.jpg

Monday, July 17, 2006:
South Lebanon: A Lebanese Child Receiving the message from the Israeli girls!
http://fromisraeltolebanon.info/files/Childsouth.jpg

ISRAEL, STOP THIS INSANITY!!!
http://fromisraeltolebanon.info/

That last link from

That last link from Anonymous is horrific. Really gets you.

The picture with the baby with its head blown off needs to be see by every single person who supports this violence.

Now excuse me,I am feeling very sick.

dz, I recently noticed that

dz, I recently noticed that Bushflash http://www.ericblumrich.com/ (not Buzzflash) put a link to a "V" for Vendetta parady on their site, with a caption saying that they don't usually cover 9/11 stuff.

So I sent an e-mail to them asking why they don't usually cover 9/11 stuff, & Eric Blumrich (the site owner I presume) wrote back saying,

"Because there are a million sites that cover 9/11 exclusively- I leave such reportage to them."

A very weak response, IMO; but maybe his site would be good for a 9/11 Blogger advertisement? I don't know his rates. Here is Blumrich's e-mail address: painter1984@hotmail.com if anyone wishes to contact him. It is a great site, except for the lack of 9/11 info.

"Because there are a million

"Because there are a million sites that cover 9/11 exclusively- I leave such reportage to them."

Anonymous | 07.21.06 - 11:15 am | #
that is THE weakest fucking excuse ever. i hear that from C&L and the like all the time. you would think they would understand activism. preaching to the converted on this site is fun but we aint changing any minds here.

These past few days it has

These past few days it has become crystal clear to me that Israel was a major player in the 9/11 attacks.

I know, Chris. I thought he

I know, Chris. I thought he would at least "make-up" a better excuse than that. What the hell is wrong with these people.

of course maddog, the MOSSAD

of course maddog, the MOSSAD was shadowing most of the hijackers, including Atta long before 9/11.

Perhaps Bush & Co. are

Perhaps Bush & Co. are giving Israel Carte Blanche to destroy Lebanon in return for Israeli help w/911.

http://dirk-gerhardt.homepage

http://dirk-gerhardt.homepage.t-online.de/Bilder/WTC-controlleddemolitio...

Finally I translated my latest compilation. As always, please look for grammar, typos, spelling to improve my text.

Another update regarding

"These past few days it has

"These past few days it has become crystal clear to me that Israel was a major player in the 9/11 attacks".

"I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing -- although that was part of it -- by a sovereign foreign government... It will become public at some point when it's turned over to the archives, but that's 20 or 30 years from now."

-- Senator Graham as quoted in Senator: At Least One Foreign Country Assisted the 9/11 Terrorists

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

-- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring and its connections to 9-11.

truthsearching2006, I

truthsearching2006, I usually just copy the text into my comment and then put italics html tags around the original post to set it apart from my text. For example, if your text was "How do I do X?", I could put:

911 was an inside job!! (just remove the spaces from what I typed here)

to get this:

911 was an inside job!!

"These past few days it has

"These past few days it has become crystal clear to me that Israel was a major player in the 9/11 attacks".

"I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing -- although that was part of it -- by a sovereign foreign government... It will become public at some point when it's turned over to the archives, but that's 20 or 30 years from now."

-- Senator Graham as quoted in Senator: At Least One Foreign Country Assisted the 9/11 Terrorists

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

-- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring and its connections to 9-11.

Graham was talking about Saudi Arabia's involvement, and the Bush Administration's cover-up of it.

http://www.boston.com/ae/books/articles/2004/09/05/911_hijackers_tied_to...

"The discovery of the financial backing of the two hijackers "would draw a direct line between the terrorists and the government of Saudi Arabia, and trigger an attempted coverup by the Bush administration," the Florida Democrat wrote."

http://www.sploid.com/news/20

that Carl Cameron stuff was

that Carl Cameron stuff was amazing. he almost killed his own career by doing that stuff on the Israeli spy ring/9-11.anybody got a link to those reports?

truthsearching2006: "I

truthsearching2006: "I agree, Alex. I'm one of the Anons this time around. Sorry for the confusion.
I'm also the one wanting to know how to include (capture) a portion of someone else's posting in my own post. I want to to make sure the quoted post stands out as separate from what I'm posting."

No problem, truthsearching2006 - I've accidently posted anonymously a couple of times. Re: quoting another post: I simply cut and paste it, then put quotation marks around it. Perhaps there's an easier way.

On another note, I must

On another note, I must share this artwork, by Mark Bryan. It's one of the best illustrations of what's going on in this administration (and country) that I've seen:
http://artofmarkbryan.com/

Wow, very compelling artwork. This guy has some serious talent.

Chris, Try

thanks man, but check this

thanks man, but check this out:

ALL LINKS TO CARL CAMERON'S FOX NEWS STORY ON THE ISRAELI SPY RING HAVE BEEN REMOVED AT THE EXPRESS REQUEST OF FOX NEWS.

Israel Is Spying In And On

Israel Is Spying In And On The U.S.? Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiAC6FEN15o&search=carl%20cameron%20Israel

i love youtube.

ALL LINKS TO CARL CAMERON'S

ALL LINKS TO CARL CAMERON'S FOX NEWS STORY ON THE ISRAELI SPY RING HAVE BEEN REMOVED AT THE EXPRESS REQUEST OF FOX NEWS.

Fortunately Informationclearinghouse.info still has the Cameron/Fox videos avaialable. Here's the link.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7545.htm

sweet, thank you.

sweet, thank you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?

Hey Anonymous, targetting a

Hey Anonymous, targetting a non-9/11 related site for advertising is probably a good idea. No sense preaching to the choir. Lets see what DZ says...

The thing about the foreign

The thing about the foreign countries involved in 9/11, be it Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, or Israel... ultimately, I think their purpose was to 1) Help with the financing, and 2) Supply the patsies that actually took part.

The "meat & potatoes" of 9/11 was done by the United States.

posting an ad on Raw Story

posting an ad on Raw Story was a good idea, i thought. seems like everyone over there sees the truth in regards to 9/11 now.

I don't like to pin the

I don't like to pin the blame on anyone until I am sure. Israel is run by Zionists. America is run by Neocons. They are one in the same. There is no difference the way I see it. Yesterday I blew my stack when I read that the House voted almost unanimously to back Israel in their war of aggression. I immediately e-mailed my senator Barbara Boxer and stated my concern in no uncertain terms. My representative, Pete Starks was one of the few Democrats who voted nay. I e-mailed him and thanked him. It seems Israel owns our congress. I also read where the people of Israel took to the streets in protest of the war. I consider that a good sign although you won't see the demonstrations on CNN. These Zionists/Neocon bastards control our media as all 9/11 truthers know. Fuck the media. We will be our own media. Also most people I know are finally seeing what is really happening and are extremely angry about it. If we attack Iran or Syria I expect to see a revolution in this country. I expect to see neocon blood in the streets. Sorry to be so negative but I am still extremely pissed-off and will remain so until this insanity ends.

15 of the 19 hijackers

15 of the 19 hijackers supposedly came from Saudi Arabia through the Visa Express program started in June 2001. Saudi Arabia was the only country participating in the Visa Express program at the time. Supposedly the alleged "hijackers" received their visas through the CIA Consolate in Jeddah. The same place Michael Springman said he was told to issue visas for people who shouldn't have had them back in the 80's.

We know Pakistan was financing Mohammad Atta.

We know Israel was tracking the alleged hijackers. Maybe "protecting" them in some way.

I don't know. So many questions that we will never be able to answer. Not with our limited access.

bushflash.com's blogad rates

bushflash.com's blogad rates are only $10 a week, we can throw one up there no problem.. someone just remind me ;)

However, we KNOW that Saudi

However, we KNOW that Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Israel are CLOSE allies to the Neocon/Zionists within the Bush Administration.

"bushflash.com's blogad

"bushflash.com's blogad rates are only $10 a week, we can throw one up there no problem.. someone just remind me"

Eric is a nice guy.

CSPAN Wednesday

CSPAN Wednesday 8pm?

Roundtable from LA symposium?

Here is a link to the

Here is a link to the demonstrations in Israel I mentioned in the previous post.
http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?t=2171

Also a master link to the web site that posted it. http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?p=13363

Here is another link I just

Here is another link I just spotted conferming the demonstrations and more to come...
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO0607/S00370.htm

If you're quick to forget,

If you're quick to forget, here's a refresher:

http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/

http://www.thewatcherfiles.com/vatican-ny.html

;)

bushflash.com's blogad rates

bushflash.com's blogad rates are only $10 a week, we can throw one up there no problem.. someone just remind me

Yes, dz please do! & Jon, if you know Eric Blumrich, maybe you could persuade him to do some 9/11 truth of his own. The guy is very talented.

"Yes, dz please do! & Jon,

"Yes, dz please do! & Jon, if you know Eric Blumrich, maybe you could persuade him to do some 9/11 truth of his own. The guy is very talented."

I don't "know" him, but I corresponded with him a long time ago, and remember he was a nice guy.

I believe Blumrich lives in

I believe Blumrich lives in NJ, about 10 miles from WTC. I'd think he would cover 9/11 more.

A comment on Siegel's WMD

A comment on Siegel's WMD video discussed above:

This, in my opinion, is a risky hypothesis (mini-nukes) to put forward. Old nukes would leave a lot of tell-tale radioactive stuff that would be very obvious, and I find it hard to believe that any new technology could be so much cleaner. I'd say that Prof Jones should have the final say with the tests he is making.

An interesting claim in the video is that an electromagnetic pulse from the bomb trigger glitched videos. This could also have occurred with conventional bomb triggers.

IMHO, Prof Jones' idea of thermate + conventional explosives remains the best hypothesis.

CSPAN Wednesday

CSPAN Wednesday 8pm?

Roundtable from LA symposium?
DHS | Homepage | 07.21.06 - 12:47 pm | #
huh?

i dont see it on the

i dont see it on the schedule, where di you hear that?

Daniel Ellsberg asked that I

Daniel Ellsberg asked that I distribute this CORRECTION on the "misleading" Kevin Smith/Alex Jones article.
+ Kev Hall +
===================================
= + =
From: EllsbergD@cs.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:34:44 EDT
Subject: Ellsberg correction
To: Kevin@infonews.com

To Alex Jones and Kevin Smith:

The main headline in the story by Kevin Smith and Alex
Jones,
Infowars.com, July 19, 2006, “Ellsberg Says
Government May Have
Carried Out
9/11,” is a highly misleading paraphrase of my
comments and beliefs.
The
subheadline, “Predicts Bush Regime Will Stage
Terrorist Attack to
Provide Pretext
for Iran, Syria invasion, and Justify Internment Camps
for American
People,” is
a flat misquotation, which actually reverses what I
said. Likewise,
the
corresponding statement in the second paragraph that
“within days
after a U.S.
military strike on Iran…Bush’s handlers would
probably stage some
type of terror
attack in the West to legitimize the new war.”

Both of these alleged quotations are contradicted by
the accurate
quotation
running in a boldface insert alongside them: “If
there’s another
9/11 or a
major war in the Middle-East involving a U.S. attack
on Iran, I have no
doubt
that there will be, the day after or within days an
equivalent of a
Reichstag
fire DECREE that will involve massive detentions in
this country.”
[emphasis
added: not a Reichstag-fire-like US-staged
“terrorist ATTACK, either
before or
after a US air attack (not an “invasion”) against
Iran].

On the possibility that 9-11 was “carried out” by
the government,
my views
have not changed over the last two years, when I have
repeatedly
endorsed calls
for a thorough investigation of a sort that has not
yet occurred,
exploring
valid questions that have been raised by outside
investigators and not
directly
addressed by the official hearings. Those hearings
have at the very
least
have aimed at obscuring or covering up massive
incompetence,
inattention,
horribly misdirected priorities, and culpable
negligence, especially in
neglect of
warnings (all comparable to the response to Katrina).
That there
“may” have
been more sinister motives at work, I cannot rule out
as impossible,
after my
own insider’s experience of the Tonkin Gulf
incidents in Vietnam, but
the
evidence so far does not make that a major probability
in my view.

Since your story has already given rise to paraphrased
assertions on
the web
that I now “suspect” or regard as “probable”
or “likely”
or “conclude”
that the government staged 9-11, I’m forced to try
to describe my
state of
uncertainty less ambiguously than words like “may”
convey. I did
say that I
believed the psychological (not “physiological”)
CAPABILITY for
staging or
provoking an attack did exist in elements in this
administration, as in
the past, but
at this moment I would personally put the odds in
favor of this
actually
having happened at about one in a hundred, or 1%.

Dick Cheney, according to Ron Suskind’s “The 1%
Doctrine,” might
regard that
as sufficient grounds for torture, indefinite
detention, or even
preventive
war, but I would say it falls far short of legal
requirements for
indictment,
let alone conviction. Further investigation, yes,
considering the
stakes. By
comparison, for example, I would regard the evidence
that manipulation
of the
electoral process, unethical or illegal, enough to
shift the results in
the
2000 and 2004 elections to be very much stronger,
though still short of
near-certainty. And the evidence that a secret
Administration RESPONSE
to 9-11 was to
accelerate a president-led conspiracy to lie the
country into an
invasion of
Iraq, and to violate laws and Constitutional rights,
seems
overwhelming, more
than enough to warrant impeachment of the president,
the
vice-president, the
secretary of defense, and other top aides.

I know other disagree about 9-11, which I respect, but
I would point
out that
much of the evidence on which they base their
conclusions has not been
subject to cross examination or directly opposing
testimony, precisely
because the
“investigations” so far have refused to use fully
the subpoena
powers at their
disposal or even to address directly many of the
probing questions that
have
been raised by outside analysts.

I trust you will wish to correct these misimpressions
on your website,
and
arrange for the publication of this correction.

Yours, Daniel Ellsberg
= + =