Fire Safety Engineering Professor Studies WTC Collapses
Glasgow tower block to shed light on 9/11 fire
A PROFESSOR of engineering is to destroy a Glasgow tower block in an effort to understand why the Twin Towers collapsed in the 9/11 attacks.
Jose Torero, Professor of Fire Safety Engineering at Edinburgh University, will set the disused building in the east end of Glasgow alight and study the effects...
...The Peruvian-born academic is one of a number of experts across the world who believes that the Twin Towers should have stayed up after they were hit by hijacked airliners on September 11 2001...
...He said: "Those buildings should have withstood burnout. From my perspective, those buildings were designed to last structurally for between three to four hours, enough time to get everyone out who had survived. At least that's what you expect..."
- Login to post comments
"The Peruvian-born academic
"The Peruvian-born academic is one of a number of experts across the world who believes that the Twin Towers should have stayed up after they were hit by hijacked airliners on September 11 2001."
Anyone know how tall this
Anyone know how tall this building is? Is it steel framed?
What are the odds that this
What are the odds that this is actually a trick for PR purposes? I would not be surprised to see this thing drop like a rock in less than an hour- courtesy of a little help from the Pentagon. Then the video will be repeated on Fox and other channels to prove, "Wow- light a building on fire and they all just fall apart instantly! Now we know!"
Anybody live in Scotland?
Anybody live in Scotland? If so, please let me know (post something on GeorgeWashington.blogspot.com, and I'll get it).
disinfo agent : > surprised
disinfo agent :
> surprised to see this thing drop like a rock in less than an hour
Unlikely, in my opinion...
If anyone can do that my friend, and no one else can detect explosives in the staged event, then I'd be impressed.
...From my perspective,
...From my perspective, those buildings were designed to last structurally for between three to four hours, enough time to get everyone out who had survived. At least that's what you expect...
I don't like the sound of this at all! He's already saying that they SHOULD HAVE fallen in 3 to 4 hours. So now all he has to do is manufacture "reasons" why they fell in 1 to 2 hours--this has bullshit written all over it to me.
I wouldn't have expected those towers to fall at all after having totally absorbed the impacts as if birds had flown into them!
I wonder if this guy is going to "pull-them" like Silverstein pulled WTC-7???
What are the odds that this
What are the odds that this is actually a trick for PR purposes? I would not be surprised to see this thing drop like a rock in less than an hour- courtesy of a little help from the Pentagon. Then the video will be repeated on Fox and other channels to prove, "Wow- light a building on fire and they all just fall apart instantly! Now we know!"
disinfo agent | 07.24.06 - 5:34 pm | #
exactly what i fear will happen.
George Washington , sorry ot
George Washington , sorry ot , but I have video clip I made that I would like to make available for veiwing in this or another , thread . How do I go about that?
This won't resolve anything.
This won't resolve anything. If it doesn't drop, people who believe the Kean Commission will say that's because it wasn't also hit by a plane. If it does drop in a few hours, that doesn't change the fact that there is substantial precedent for towers burning 10-20 hours without collapsing. It also wouldn't change the multiple proofs of controlled demolition on 9/11 (visible squibs, voluminous dust, pyroclastic flurry, etc.).
Colin, hit the 'submit news'
Colin,
hit the 'submit news' or 'submit comments' on the left panel and tell us what you are sending, we will reply with some ways to get the files to us.
or just use putfile.com, youtube.com, or something similar and let us know.
GW, i saw your post on
GW, i saw your post on DKOS...
Man those people won't listen to anything.
Check out the top story at
Check out the top story at the Netscape homepage...
http://netscape.com
And vote for it.
Actually I think you have to
Actually I think you have to vote for the story posted further down...
" 911 Truth Advocates Launch Nationwide Congressional Candidate Poll"
http://netscape.com
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pa
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article...
Why I believe David Kelly's death may have been murder, by MP
Kevin Barrett Gets A Massive
Kevin Barrett Gets A Massive Story In The Capital Times - Pictures Inside
Many activist groups are
Many activist groups are aware of the infiltration of our movements however those who aim to destroy us have upped their game in recent months.
Under the guise of ‘activism’ a new breed of control has emerged within the British Isles bent on fighting, alienating and discrediting those who are trying to make positive changed in the world around them. Here I will show the techniques being used by this group.
Founded by Freemasons with the intention of creating a political party, the “British 9/11 Truth Movement” actively aims to collect all forms of ‘truth seeker’ together under the control of one governing body. Using vicious attacks on those who refuse to agree or work with the group they are exposing their true nature to those of us with our eyes open.
Examples:
Harassment of July Seven London Bombing survivor Rachel North which involved heckling her public speeches, constant calls to her work place and her family members. They have now taken to publicly labelling Rachel North as a “shill”, “MI5 agent” or government operative. The fact Rachel North is the most prominent campaigner for an independent inquiry into last years attacks have conveniently slipped the collective mind of the British 9-11 Truth Movement.
David Shayler is connected and supports the efforts of the group, an ex MI5 agent who is rumoured to be currently working for British intelligence. No labels or attacks have been nor will be tolerated against Shayler.
Jon Ronson has recently been bastardised for simply asking questions on the message board. When a mainstream reporter considers the alternative story of 9-11 to be worth investigating, he too is immediately labelled a “shill” and suspected of ‘working for the other team’ merely because of his race. The aim here is to create the impression that all activists are small minded racists who would prefer to remain under the radar than get our message to a wider audience.
Again let me clarify, Ronson only asked questions and did not make any assumptions.
The Indymedia Summer of Truth has been ignored by the British 9-11 Truth Movement. Why?
Surely we are on the same team? No. The British 9-11 Movement demand action and events follow their guidelines, and profit margins or no support is offered.
I actually like Jon
I actually like Jon Ronson..sure his aim is to make his career off sideshowing "conspiracy theorists", but I find him amusing.
That is horrible that the British 9/11 truth movement is attacking others and the 7/7 truth movement. They should be one in the same. Sounds like possible cointelpro and should be exposed.
Windsor Bldg., Spain. Now,
Windsor Bldg., Spain. Now, that's a fire. Guess what, building stood!
http://www.911sharethetruth.com/images/postcards/CA1-huge.jpg
I live about 50 miles from
I live about 50 miles from Glasgow. I will try and get a date for this experiment and take a trip up to see how it goes.:-)
Glasgow's Evening Times also
Glasgow's Evening Times also has the story including a picture of the building to be set alight.
http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/hi/news/5055094.html
No date mentioned here either.