Chance toTruth Bomb C-Span
Short notice on this, if anyone can, call in:
Update, watch online (C-Span 1)here.
http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=14678&highlight=
Alberto Gonzalez, the U.S. Attourney General, will be on C-Span Washington journal at 9 am (EST).
We can nail this guy and get to see his facial expression and reaction. I intend to call in and ask him, the head of the U.S. dept. of Justice, why the FBI is claiming that the reason why OBL is not named for the 9/11 attacks on their website is because the dept. of justice has determined there is no hard evidence connecting OBL to the 9/11 attacks and therefore they cannot even assemble a grand jury to look at evidence and present charges.
I am wondering what the threshold for truth and justice is, when we don't even have enough evidence to bring about an indictment, but we do have enough "evidence" to go to war in Afghanistan.
I will then ask him if they honestly thought they could get away with an operation like 9/11 and not get caught by the American people.
I will let him know that millions of Americans are awake to the facts and it is only a matter of time before members of our government are facing charges for 9/11.
Their goose is cooked. I urge everyone ele to call in too.
(202) 628 - 0205
- Login to post comments
The guy is on now.... Only
The guy is on now....
Only got the first question in about bin-Laden not being on the FBI's most wanted list. He didn't have the chance to ask the question about 9/11.... bummer.
Somebigguy.... Good luck in
Somebigguy....
Good luck in getting through. I will be watching C-SPAN this a.m. I hope you get on.
Your two questions you plan to as are good ones.
K.
Hey Kurt, those aren't my
Hey Kurt, those aren't my questions, a fellow at Lets Roll posted that, but its a great idea.
Someone just called in, said
Someone just called in, said 9/11 was an Inside Job and told everyone to go to infowars.com. Good stuff.
SBG... I just heard that.
SBG...
I just heard that. Referenced McKinney, DynaCorp and what really happened on 9/11 with the plug for infowars.com. Nice!
Yeah, it seems like you
Yeah, it seems like you gotta get it all out without taking a breath or they interrupt you and move on.
CSPAN just advertised having
CSPAN just advertised having Alex Jones on American Perspectives this Saturday. Did not catch the time it will be on.
Alberto Gonzalez is another
Alberto Gonzalez is another Bush/Cheney evil elf who promotes torture!
Whoever got the call in
Whoever got the call in about OBL not being on the FBI Most Wanted list for 911 did a terrific job. The question must have hit a nerve because Gonzalez could only resort to the usual "national security" BS. I'm just happy that the question got through at all and that there was some truth put forth.
I don't know what to make of
I don't know what to make of this.
New indicting evidence of the 9/11 cover-up.
http://www.rense.com/general72/newdi.htm
Did anyone record this? Did
Did anyone record this? Did SBG get on?
"Uh hi ay... this is SBG
"Uh hi ay... this is SBG from Canada ay. 9/11 was an inside job ay." :)
Anon: you posted: "don't
Anon: you posted: "don't know what to make of this.
New indicting evidence of the 9/11 cover-up.
http://www.rense.com/general72/newdi.htm "
To me, this information looks VERY important, and I will be keeping track of what Scolars for Truth make of it.
Thank you for posting that.
Everyone, please check out the above link, and post what you think.
What time is it at? and on
What time is it at? and on what C-Span channel?
I don't see anything about Gonzales in the C-Span Listings.
I would have recorded it.
I would have recorded it. But it appears that I missed it.
I was making breakfast lol
What a pleasant suprise to
What a pleasant suprise to wake up to!
Did anyone record this? I gotta see it!
Everybody please call in
Everybody please call in C-SPAN and or email them to request the LA 9/11 Symposium be broadcast as many times as possible as quickly as possible.
Main Number: (202) 737-3220
events@c-span.org
Alex, in my opinion, this is
Alex, in my opinion, this is very important information. By underwriting the timing of events is precisely accurate and coupling it with testimonies, you got a solid piece of evidence. But I do remember seing that in a 9/11 movie, I just don't remember which one...
The posting on rense.com
The posting on rense.com would serve to corroborate what William Rodriquez said.... that explosions occurred in the basement JUST prior to the plane hitting the north tower.
suggesting a discrepancy of
suggesting a discrepancy of a couple seconds as major news is a bad idea to me.. its not like every clock in the world is the same to the very second..
hell, none of the clocks in my own house are even on the same minute.
If this is the case, it
If this is the case, it would appear that they wanted the towers to fall simultaneous to the the plane impact for maximum psycological effects, only they didn't, and the mystery "type" of explosives used to bring them down were there as a secondary 'back up'.
sounds all logical to me.
C-Span also airs a debate of
C-Span also airs a debate of Cynthia McKinney versus her neocon-in-disguise opponent on Monday. There'll be some 9/11 talk as well.
hell, none of the clocks in
hell, none of the clocks in my own house are even on the same minute.
anonymous | Homepage | 07.26.06 - 11:11 am | #
___________________________________-
Yeah, but I think that clock at Earth Observatory at Columbia University which record seismic activity should be very accurate. You know, now they have kind of atomic clock which are precise to the zillionth of a second. I that perspective, 15 seconds is a lifetime.
Re: New indicting
Re: New indicting Evidence
Impact time, AA Flt 11: 8:46:40 a.m.
Impact time, UA Flt 175: 9:03:11 a.m.
One really canÂ’t put much stock in these times as representing accurate times of actual events if one considers the obsession with occult numerology throughout the official storybook.
Consider, for example, that UA Flt 175 (13) allegedly impacted WTC2 at 9:03:11 a.m. (93)(11), killing the 9 crew members and 56 passengers (9/11) - exactly one hour to the very second before UA Flt 93 allegedly impacted the field in Shanksville at 10:03:11, (13)(11), killing the 33 passengers and 11 others (crew and hijackers).
Similarly, AA Flt 77 (11)(7x11) allegedly impacted the Pentagram at 9:46:37 a.m. – (9:1:1).
Given the astronomical odds of UA Flt 175’s 9:03:11 a.m. alleged impact precisely preceding UA Flt 93’s 10:03:11 a.m. alleged impact – coupled with the numerical time of both events representing known occult numbers, the likelihood is that these times do not represent actual events.
ItÂ’s probably not too much of a stretch to assume that this could be true of AA Flt 11Â’s 8:46:40 a.m. impact:
AA=11
Flt (11)
8:46:40 =(22)
Little anonymous, the idea
Little anonymous, the idea is to simplify matters, not overly complicate them like you are trying to do.
You can watch this on
You can watch this on CSPAN's site:
http://www.c-span.org/homepage.asp?Cat=Series&Code=WJE&ShowVidNum=9&Rot_...
Click on "Watch" button.
You need Real Player.
Can anyone rip this?
Alberto Gonzalez is on starting at about 2 hours 17 minutes into the clip. I haven't got to the part with the call ins yet...
There wasn't a whole lot
There wasn't a whole lot unfortunately. They do it in such a way that you ask a question, they reply with their typical canned answer, and they move on to the next caller.
No way to follow up with another question and call them on their bullshit. I guess we are supposed to believe that it is for "National Security" reasons that OBL is not on the most wanted list.
Anybody ask Gonzalez if he
Anybody ask Gonzalez if he was still a facilitator of torture? Anybody ask him if he still thought the Nazi defense at Nueremberg is solid legal precedent.
Gonzalez is a sociopathic fascist.
Re: I have that habit. But
Re:
I have that habit. But the devil truly is in the details here.
The point is that these times are only "stated" and are not locked to a reference time(such as the seismic evidence presumably being referenced to an atomic clock). I was just giving the factual perspective on how these stated times were most likely established (i.e. fabricated).
While I don't question William Rodriguez' testimony, I don't see how these times can be used in research to prove other than another "Whoops, we made a mistake in the timeline."
Is there any known reference to confirm these times (perhaps, for example, live satellite footage of 175 with a accurate network clock shown?)
i know i'm sick but i
i know i'm sick but i watched "washington journal" this morning and they announced the "911 Conspiracy Panel" led by Alex Jones will be on CSPAN this Saturday.
guess your phone calls worked
somebigguy: Right. In many
somebigguy: Right. In many cases, the questions/opinions posed on CSpan are essentially worthless, sometimes due to the content, others because of the lack of opportunity for follow-up.
But if a question can be framed in such a way that it also includes information (such as the OBL/FBI question did) then I think it's a worthwhile effort.
Alex Jones on C-Span. i
Alex Jones on C-Span. i think the sky is falling,haha.who the hell would have thought that would ever happen?
Gonzalez is a sociopathic
Gonzalez is a sociopathic fascist.
douglas lain | 07.26.06 - 1:25 pm | #
yeah,him and his buddy Jon Yoo.that guy could rationalize the holocaust.legally speaking.friggin scum.
I wish people were
I wish people were smarter.
If they were, all they'd have to do is look at a good picture capturing the collapse of of WTC 1 or 2 and realize that these were not collapses at all - but rather pulverizations!
I am no physics expert by any means, but I do know that floors pancaking would never, ever cause all the concrete to be pulverized and smoking debris to be launched hundreds of yards.
a few wise words from
a few wise words from Orwell....
http://www.orwell.ru/library/articles/nose/english/e_nose
George Orwell
In Front of Your Nose
There is no use in multiplying examples. The point is that we are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.