Case Growing Against Controversial University of Wisconsin Lecturer

Straight from the Catapulting the Propaganda department, here's a transcript of the O'Reilly attack on Kevin Barrett from last night:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,205676,00.html

O'REILLY: Of course, that's nuts. But university Provost Patrick Farrell says Barrett can continue teaching, and he's going to teach a class on "Introduction to Islam."

New

Did everyone notice how the

Did everyone notice how the slimeball O'Reilley edited his own statement about Barrett last night on TV, and cut out the portion of him being "lying face down" when floating in the Charles River?

O'Reilly is a total sleeze liar, and he loves it because that sleeze makes him rich.

I love how O'Reilly offers

I love how O'Reilly offers no evidence or examples to support his point that Prof Barrett is "nuts."

In my comments yesterday I proposed taking bets on how many times he would use the word "nuts." Of course that is his only defense.

As if we should just take his word for it, and a million different people hadn't already proved him a cowardly liar at this point ...

I asked earlier about this

I asked earlier about this picture
http://artofmarkbryan.com/

Someone redone it and included some 9-11 stuff. Anyone remember this, anybody have a copy?

http://artofmarkbryan.com/Dic

'UK Govt Sources Confirm War

'UK Govt Sources Confirm War With Iran Is On'

http://mathaba.net/0_index.shtml?x=540834

Does anyone have a snail

Does anyone have a snail mail address for Rep. Nass? At one time, I thought I saw both work and home addresses posted here, but I can't find them. Anyone have them handy?

just got off the phone with

just got off the phone with Rep. Nass' office.

I asked him how Rep. Nass came to believe the facts he believes...that 19 hijackers blah blah blah. He said, "well, like everyone else on 9/11, we got it mostly from the tv news reports"

i didn't buy that, so i tried to pin him down that it was 9/11 Commision Report that is his source for the "FACTS". But interestingly enough...the staff guy i was talking to wouldn't say that that's where Ness gets his facts.

I pressed, "so you just take the word of government officials?". He rambled on some more...saying basically saying yes, "i usually take the word of the government when we are attacked".

I couldn't believe how long he talked with me though. I got to give him that. But really, they have no leg to stand on. The news reports are on our side. They either have to take the government's word for 9/11, or they have to embrace the facts.

hey jon...i'm trying to find

hey jon...i'm trying to find quotes from Sibel Edmonds. the good ones. I know you made a post with them on your site, but i can't find it right now. Thanks!

Can someone please debunk

Can someone please debunk this one piece of information for me.

The President and the Vice President of the United States REFUSED to testify under oath, in public, and not without each other, and there were to be NO recordings of their testimony.

Why would that possibly be?

A Lesson In 9/11 Research

thanks jon.

thanks jon.

I emailed Nass and Mark

I emailed Nass and Mark Green last night, and I got a boiler-plate response (I know someone else who got the same exact response). Here is the response:

Thank you for contacting me with your request that I debate Kevin Barrett regarding his 9/11 conspiracy theory. A debate is a process of discussing facts and attempting to interpret those facts. It would be silly to debate Mr. Barrett on his fiction relating to the events of 9/11.

I offer the following quotes for you to reflect upon:

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." (John Adams, December 4, 1770)

"Man, once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the spot of every wind. With such persons, gullability, which they call faith, takes the helm from the hand of reason and the mind becomes a wreck." (Thomas Jefferson, December 8, 1822)

The facts surrounding 9/11 are truly a stubborn thing for Mr. Barrett. Mr. Barrett's personal views exceed the hand of reason and his hatred of the U.S. government while clearly a part of his faith doesn't constitute evidence.

I just got the same response

I just got the same response from my email. Cowards. Funny too, that the John Adams quote is completely applicable to our side more than his. This tool doesn't even understand history...

Why does this headline say

Why does this headline say the case is GROWING AGAINST Barrett?

Obviously, that is FOX's headline. And anyone with a shred of decency and intelligence knows that FOX is a group of deranged individuals shoveling out crap upon the masses.

Is it possible Mike Malloy could have Kevin Barrett on his program? Could Air America grow some balls and have Barrett on some of their other programs?

Kevin Barrett is a brave man whose words deserve our ears and responsive action.

I got the same email

I got the same email response from Rep Nass as well. If they had to mass-produce their BS they must have had a lot of folks to send it to :)

>NO recordings of their

>NO recordings of their testimony.
>Why would that possibly be?

..because of "national security concerns" of course....

This is an argument i've run into when trying to awaken people to 9/11 truth. They really buy this and accept their role to be sheeple guarded by Bushco. from some unknown, secret threat.
The message about this whole secrecy has to be "it's government by the people, and we are the people, not 'the government'"

Oh, and by the way, about

Oh, and by the way, about the response from Rep. Nass, just a wee bit of bigotry to say "...his hatred of the U.S. government while clearly a part of his faith doesn't constitute evidence." I've forwarded to some of my Muslim friends. I'm sure they'll just love it.

OVERDRAMATIC

OVERDRAMATIC BULLSHIT!!

_______________---
all we gotta do is wait---

these oreilly,hannity people are totally fucked

Gold meets Flocco. Nice

Gold meets Flocco. Nice couple.
Maybe Gold also met Barbara Olsen.

"..There are things you can do when coming across an article like this... the first thing I always do is contact the author of the article which in this case, happens to be Tom Flocco. His email address is readily available on the site...

Just so you know, I have already spoken to Tom, and also have a relationship with the topic of another story he broke named Mary Schneider, but that's a story for a different time.

He apparently is a very busy individual, but he did take the time to answer some of my questions, and was very cordial. The sign of a nice individual..."

My response to

My response to Nass:

Representative Nass,

Thank you for your boiler-plate response. I realize you are probably getting a lot of emails on this topic, so you donÂ’t want to spend taxpayer dollars by responding to each one individually. I can respect that.

Yes, a debate is a discussion of facts. All Kevin would like to talk about are the 9/11 Commission Report facts. So, please agree to the debate, and discuss those facts. Simple.

Thank you for those wonderful quotes from our forefathers; really inspiring stuff. Wow, you (or your staff) must be really enlightened. Let me also offer the following quotes to you to now reflect upon:

“Truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.” --Flannery O'Connor
“When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.” --Sherlock Holmes

Admit it, Mr. Nass, the only one being stubborn here is you. 42% of America believes what Kevin believes. That number is growing every day. Accept it.

Sincerely,
XXXXXXXX

Criminals are in positions

Criminals are in positions of "official" power throughout this country. From the evil Bush/Cheney Administration down through many state legislatures, a huge number of diabolic individuals are in lock-step groupthink. How dare anyone question 9/11, the government, or the evil, covert operations continually in play around the globe.

And it is the duty of the MSM to ignore these realities.

DONT GIVE THAT NASS BITCH

DONT GIVE THAT NASS BITCH ANY 'RESPECT'

letter to the editor.

letter to the editor. Contains some good points.. and some really bad ones

'William D. Feeny: Uproar will ensure Barrett's course full'

http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/letters/index.php?ntid=92393&ntpid=4

Those email exchanges with

Those email exchanges with rep. nass and his further response should be put together in a document for further reference. Let's have him debate that he don't want to debate facts. 8)

'Colin Swinney: Let Barrett,

'Colin Swinney: Let Barrett, Nass debate Sept. 11'

http://www.madison.com/tct/opinion/letters/index.php?ntid=92391&ntpid=5

BRILLIANT---TNF

BRILLIANT---TNF

My "respect" comment to Nass

My "respect" comment to Nass was tongue-in-cheek...not sure if that was evident, but whatever.

...Not that Nass or his

...Not that Nass or his staff is actually reading the contents any of our emails anyway.

ALL RESPECT TO YOU --SJ

ALL RESPECT TO YOU --SJ

Everybody, keep pummeling

Everybody, keep pummeling Nass and Green and the Madison papers with NASS: DEBATE BARRETT!

If we hit them hard enough, for long enough, something just might give.

(all addresses are at Mujca, or scroll down this page for the link)

just sent this

just sent this email:

_____----

Steve Nass, Mark Green:

You seem to be in complete denial to what 9/11 was really about. You attack Mr Barrett with cheap, childish ad hominem remarks. You don't address the fact that MANY former government insiders are questioning the 'official conspiracy theory', including Paul Craig Roberts, Ray McGovern, and Daniel Ellsberg, to name just a few.

A physics professor from BYU has found scientific evidence of thermate on WTC steel samples. He is currently working to prove 'arson by thermite'. When he does, it will CONCLUSIVE PROOF of controlled demolitions at the WTC on 9/11. The BYU professor has many other scientists, including a Mechanical Engineering professor from Clemson.

A Zogby poll from May 2006 reveals that 45% of America wants a new investigation of 9/11.

Yet, you are still completely out of touch with all this.

Here's a few questions that might possibly wake you up:

Do you know that the Pentagon's Groundbreaking Ceremony was held on 9/11/41?

Do you know that the emergency telephone number 911 went national on 9/11/87?

Do you know that the NYC lottery picked the number 911 on 9/11/02?

Do you know that the S&P Futures closed at 911.00 on 9/11/02?

Do you know that there are exactly 911 days between 9/11 and the Madrid train bombings?

I suppose bin Laden conspired all that from his cave in Afghanistan as well, huh?

I pray that the two of you will wake up already. You are starting to look really silly.

Thank you.

CC: The Capital Times, Wisconsin State Journal, Patrick Farrell

no they are definitely

no they are definitely reading them!!

this is the most dramatic thing that has ever happened to that faggot

he is gonna remember this as being the begining of the biggest shame in his life

he is gonna cry ---he is going to be broken

THIS IS GOING TO BE THE MOST EXCESSIVE PAIN THAT HE WILL EVER EXPERIENCE IN HIS LIFE

all because he cares more about 'the system' than about standing up to babykillers

HE WILL BE REMEMBERED IN HISTORY WITH DISDAIN THAT WILL BORDER ON NAUSEA

Randkiller: your use of the

Randkiller: your use of the word "faggot" is really obnoxious. I can guarantee there are gay guys reading this board and gay guys who are truthers, so STFU, pretty please.

Here, here, casseia.

Here, here, casseia.

CB, there are so much more

CB, there are so much more important questions than this crappy numerologic stuff. You certainly don't make a hard case with those questions.

Yeah! What he said.

Yeah! What he said.

Do you know that the

Do you know that the Pentagon's Groundbreaking Ceremony was held on 9/11/41?
Do you know that the emergency telephone number 911 went national on 9/11/87?
Do you know that the NYC lottery picked the number 911 on 9/11/02?
Do you know that the S&P Futures closed at 911.00 on 9/11/02?
Do you know that there are exactly 911 days between 9/11 and the Madrid train bombings?

Really not the questions I might ask someone that I want to take me seriously...

it;s nice to know that there

it;s nice to know that there are some women in here with class

salute!

thanks casseia, and agreed

thanks casseia, and agreed -- I'm one of those gay guys

Really not the questions I

Really not the questions I might ask someone that I want to take me seriously...

You're wrong. This technique tends to wake the most-brainwashed people up.

CB, there are so much more

CB, there are so much more important questions than this crappy numerologic stuff. You certainly don't make a hard case with those questions.

Nothing crappy about it. The more brainwashed people are, the better this technique tends to work

"Really not the questions I

"Really not the questions I might ask someone that I want to take me seriously..."

Agreed... Numerology should take a back seat to ANYTHING else.

I use it as a last resort.

I use it as a last resort. Green/Nass certainly don't care to discuss the usual evidence. So I gave them something else to think about!

I agree SJ. While those are

I agree SJ.

While those are odd coincidences, I don't think that PROVES anything.

I think not mentioning WTC 7 in the 911 cOmmission Report means they don't really want to discuss that topic.

I think buildings falling down in 10 seconds is suspicious.

But that's just me ...

You're wrong. This technique

You're wrong. This technique tends to wake the most-brainwashed people up.

Seriously? If I totally disagreed with someone and thought their ideas were "nuts", and then someone of the same belief pointed out to me some strange numerological coincidences, like the NYC lottery # and the S&P closing #, that would probably only make me think you were more crazy than I had already thought.

Hey, I'm open to any technique to opening people's eyes, because not enough people know wabout this topic, but using these questions doesn't seem to make any sense to me...

I use it as a last resort.

I use it as a last resort. Green/Nass certainly don't care to discuss the usual evidence. So I gave them something else to think about!
CB | Homepage | 07.26.06 - 5:27 pm | #

Point taken, but as we have learned through the Bush-media Doctrine, repeating something over and over again is a useful strategy. Repeating the truth is even more effective.

ummm... they are certainly

ummm... they are certainly not "odd coincidences"

Look here...

http://forums.bluelemur.com/viewtopic.php?t=3938

thanks casseia, and agreed

thanks casseia, and agreed -- I'm one of those gay guys
CK | Homepage | 07.26.06 - 5:21 pm |

Major kudos for being out on 911blogger! The discourse here occasionally veers into the adolescent-boy-style variety of homophobia, and I'm just not going to sit idly by and watch it anymore without saying something.

And Rand -- no hard feelings, dude.

No, dude, those are odd

No, dude, those are odd coincidences. In any given combination, there will be numerical line-ups such as those.

For example, the S&P futures. How many futures did NOT end at 911.00 that day?

I am reminded of the trick you can do by folding a 20 dollar bill. While I too find this interesting, it doesn't PROVE any given theory about 911. You'd have to somehow say the person who released the new 20 design in 1998 knew already what was going to happen 3 1/2 years later. Seems improbable, at best.

Convincing people it was an inside job can be acheived easily by concentrating on what works best: controlled demolition, WTC 7, cover up of the investigation, forensic evidence, Pentagon damage, etc.

Not a diss, dude. Just think that's a much better route to go.

Sorry, but there's no way in

Sorry, but there's no way in hell those are coincidences. Do some research on Bohemian Grove and the Cremation of Care. You might change your mind :)

I don't believe that $20

I don't believe that $20 bill stuff though.... I just can't see it

really? i come to this board

really? i come to this board constantly and never see any homophobia.immaturity? sure, but not really homophobia per se.

casseia, thanks for the

casseia, thanks for the virtual pat on my anonymous back... see the thing is that TRUTH is a big part of my life, so maybe getting to 9/11 truth was somewhat easier since I'm out as a gay man... I'd already been thru the disillusionment with "reality" if you know what I mean

I should probably write an essay about the psychological aspects of "coming out" since there are clear parallels with the psychology of 9/11 truth realizations

i think there is something

i think there is something to it for sure.... i wouldnt bring it up with anyone that doesnt already know about 911 though...

I'm sorry but I can't help

I'm sorry but I can't help laughing at your comments. You don't buy the 20 bill trick, which clearly shows the towers on fire, but want me to research your stuff.

Either way, neither of those theories has any academic merit. If you could provide some physical evidence or documentation about how people conspired to make those numbers somehow not random, then maybe there would be some sort of connection. You'd have to show manipulation of a given mathematic process, it would be incredibly complicated.

It's easier to point to the easily obtainable video of WTC 7, and say, "Why did that happen?"

Chris, I haven't noticed any

Chris, I haven't noticed any overt homophobia here either.... we were just reacting to rand's use of the word "faggot" above

in fact, today might be the

in fact, today might be the day that Bush, et al, go to Bohemian Grove for their annual occult ritual, including worship of a giant stone owl and mock human sacrifice. Happens every year, the latter part of July. Check infowars.com

It's interesting to think

It's interesting to think about how it would serve Bush psychologically to go to a mock human sacrifice. It probably activates the same parts of the brain as any religious ceremony, something that reinforces one's perceived moral values.

If indeed Bush was intimately aware of the 911 plot, it's not crazy to envision this type of ceremony as a simple redemption of their commitment to ensuring their neo-con/pro-violence values.

"Gold meets Flocco. Nice

"Gold meets Flocco. Nice couple.
Maybe Gold also met Barbara Olsen.

"..There are things you can do when coming across an article like this... the first thing I always do is contact the author of the article which in this case, happens to be Tom Flocco. His email address is readily available on the site...

Just so you know, I have already spoken to Tom, and also have a relationship with the topic of another story he broke named Mary Schneider, but that's a story for a different time.

He apparently is a very busy individual, but he did take the time to answer some of my questions, and was very cordial. The sign of a nice individual..."

You left out the important parts...

Alice: "Mr. Gold, how do we know that Tom Flocco is "trustworthy"?

That's a good question Alice. For you students here who have never heard of Tom Flocco, the answer to that question is you probably won't find him "trustworthy".

There are things you can do when coming across an article like this... the first thing I always do is contact the author of the article which in this case, happens to be Tom Flocco. His email address is readily available on the site...

Just so you know, I have already spoken to Tom, and also have a relationship with the topic of another story he broke named Mary Schneider, but that's a story for a different time.

He apparently is a very busy individual, but he did take the time to answer some of my questions, and was very cordial. The sign of a nice individual.

Another thing you can look for is to see if Sibel Edmonds asks for a retraction to this article anywhere. I have already looked for it, and it doesn't exist.

Oh, and let's not forget the most important part...

Recently, I took it upon myself to verifiy these quotes from Sibel herself... here is what she had to say...

Dear Mr. Gold:

Thank you for your support; kind words.

I usually don't respond to inquiries via e-mail; I don't grant interviews in writing either.

However,

Quote #1- Accurate: "once this issue gets to be...investigated, you will be seeing certain [American] people that we know from this country standing trial; and they will be prosecuted criminally"

Quote#2- Accurate: "There is direct evidence involving no more than ten American names that I recognized"

Have a nice holiday.

Best,
Sibel

That's a good indication that I don't trust what Tom Flocco has to say anymore.

Are only black people

Are only black people offended by the word n****r?

i'll admit, ive been guilty

i'll admit, ive been guilty of using the word faggot before, but i surely never meant it to be a slam on gay people.this may sound ignorant or whatever, but RAND probably didnt mean it in that way either, as many people who use the word faggot only substitute it for asshole,bastard or whatever.that doesnt make it right, but im just saying, im guessing he didnt mean it in that way.

i think there is something

i think there is something to it for sure.... i wouldnt bring it up with anyone that doesnt already know about 911 though...
inside | 07.26.06 - 5:46 pm | #

I agree. The truth is the vast majority of this country (and the world even) doesn't know what the hell's going on. People are brainwashed to consider the Illuminati, or false flag ops, as conspiracy theories. Even when there's a ton of evidence supporting it! 9/11 is pure proof of this.

Another one... if the term New World Order is only used by conspiracy theorists, then why did Bush Sr use it in a nationally televised speech on September 11, 1990?

And why did Dan Quayle recommend *using* 9/11 to support a NWO?

THERE IS A NEW SUNRISE IN

THERE IS A NEW SUNRISE IN THE WORLD---
ALL PEOPLE ARE GODS CHILDREN

THERE IS NO REASON FOR HATRED OR WAR

_________________________--
right now---troops are gathering in syria----theyve got chemical weapons

rothschild created an idea of israel based off of hurting people and war THIS IS OUTDATED

WE ARE AT THE GATEWAY----
UNIVERSAL LOVE IS THE ONLY ANSWER

____________________----
please forgive me ck

obviously I find this stuff

obviously I find this stuff interesting !!

Guys: PLEASE check out this

Guys: PLEASE check out this 35 minute Richard Grove talk:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5188081102820402482&q=webster+ta...

He goes truly indepth on the corporate crime angle of 9/11, and THEN towards the end explains brilliantly the belief system of world leaders. How 9/11 was akin to an occult death ritual just like JFK, and that the money system indeed reveals long drawn out plans...like the back of the dollar bill showing a future of America as being 1776 thru 2010; and the Freedom tower will be 1776 feet completed in 2010. This guys is very very smart, and I was surprised he went into the secret society/numerology belief system. Very fascinating.

This might be a lame post,

This might be a lame post, but...

regarding the $20 bill trick, are most of you aware that this trick works with the $5(towers intact), $10(1st tower hit), $20(2nd tower hit), $50(tower collapse), & $100(smoldering ground zero)? I'm sure a lot of you have already tried this as it is an old trick. Doesn't prove anything but it is sure spooky.

I ripped the CSPAN from this

I ripped the CSPAN from this morning if anyone cares.

I also just completed my Final Cut certification training, so I am ready to put together a nice video package of the "media coverage" of 9/11 (showing the intelligent retorts of our respectable newspeople).

Yes dood... send it to dz.

Yes dood... send it to dz.

I would never discuss Donald

I would never discuss Donald Rumsfeld's or Dick Cheney's birthcharts with someone I'm talking with about 9/11 ( I'm a professional astrologer btw, and *know*, having dissected thousands of natal charts, which patterns predominate in sociopaths. Rumsfeld and Cheney and plenty of the neo-cons certainly fit the bill.)

The only way for the weight of this information to register with anyone is if they already have an understanding of the language and patterns. This is acquired only by many years of study.

The same is true for Numerology. I defy anyone to fully appreciate "A MidSummer Night's Dream" , or "MacBeth" or many of Shakespeare's plays without understanding both astrology and numerology. Patterns of both are densely woven into Shakespeare's writing.

I think that it's important that we speak the language that most people have a chance of understanding: science. Admittedly, this is a tall task given that so many people have little or no background in the sciences, but we must appeal to their common sense.
Newton's Law of Conservation of Momentum is a fancy name for an easily understood truth: a falling object slows down when it hits something.

All that said, I understand where the numerology comments are coming from,and suspect that a great deal of it is intentional on the part of the perpetrators. But in the larger sense, it serves as a distraction in the 9/11 conversation(IMO.)

Jon , DZ ,DHS , anyone ,

Jon , DZ ,DHS , anyone , please help .Do you have , or can you point me in the direction of ,downloadable video footage of Bush arriving with air force one , being received by columns of soldiers , presidential motorcade,imperial shit etc , those kinds of things? It's integral to a new vid I'm making , and I can't seem to find anything . I recall having seen such footage however.

I have no idea where to find

I have no idea where to find stuff like that. Sorry. I would think the "History Channel" might have some of that... I know they ran a show on Bush's response on 9/11. It was total propaganda though.

how about the "mission

how about the "mission accomplished video" anybody know where to get a hold of that ? I've been googling for hours now .

"Did everyone notice how the

"Did everyone notice how the slimeball O'Reilley edited his own statement about Barrett last night on TV, and cut out the portion of him being "lying face down" when floating in the Charles River?"

O'Reilly didn't edit anything. He played the original tape of what he said, proving once again that Barrett is the liar you are so bloddy desperate to deny he is.

how about the "mission

how about the "mission accomplished video" anybody know where to get a hold of that ? I've been googling for hours now .
Anonymous | 07.26.06 - 7:40 pm | #

I uploaded it to http://www.unitedslavsofamerica.org/ussabraham.rm

Real Player file (RM)

oops!