2 articles regarding Loose Change in german media (in german)

http://www.welt.de/data/2006/07/29/978203.html

http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/gesellschaft/0,1518,429227,00.html

The first one a hit piece, the second one, published in FAZ (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung) and Spiegel Online was fair and balanced.

Wonder what's about this new attention- maybe inspired by Vanity Fair.

please go thank BradBlog.com for covering 9/11. i got an e-mail from one of the moderators there, and she said she asked Brad about putting this 9/11/C-Span story on the front page, and Brad had no second thoughts about it. show them some love.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3149
Chris | Homepage | 07.30.06 - 9:16 am | #

Great e-mail to send to the left gatekeepers,

***

Webster Tarpley said it best:

"The main barrier [to 9/11 Truth] are the Left Gatekeepers: Noam Chomsky, Amy Goodman, Air America (most of them), The Nation magazine, the left / liberal intelligentsia — the biggest barrier — they have obsessively parroted the racist warmongering official version, they have slandered people like us who try to fight against it. These people have got to be discredited…"

Amen Brother Tarpley!!!

***

I just sent this to every Air America Radio Show (except Mike Malloy and Randi Rhodes).

The 19 minutes withhled from stewardess Betty Ong's staged call to a reservations desk would prove 9/11 was an inside job!!!

Thomas (baldfaced liar) Kean allowed only 4 minutes of Ong's 23-minute phone call! Ong began to say that she tried to call for medics (on a moving plane) when Kean shut the tape off. Why did he conceal the other 19 minutes???

"vaporized
Anonymous | 07.30.06 - 10:15 am | #"

Stop saying vaporized; it's a falsity.

"Ong began to say that she tried to call for medics (on a moving plane) when Kean shut the tape off. Why did he conceal the other 19 minutes???
Anonymous | 07.30.06 - 10:41 am | # "

What day was that during the Coverup Commission?

I'll grab a video clip of it.

Date and time, please.

Ok, obliterated--including the DNA!

How about, "Where flying over New York City"????

We're flying over NYC

Those staged phone calls could've been written by idiots or people whose 2nd language was English (e.g., the Mossad).

I would like the date that Kean did that at the Coverup Commission.

IMO, people should picket Amy Goodman's studios in Chinatown, NY, only less than 1 mile from the WTC!

I would like the date that Kean did that at the Coverup Commission.

Do you doubt this??? A link is here: http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/911-ong-tape.htm

Betty Ong transcript: http://americanradioworks.publicradio.org/features/911/ong.html

Okay, I'm watching it at [ http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing7/2004012707_high.asx ]

NYDIA GONZALEZ: Have you guys called anyone else?

BETTY ONG: No. Somebody's calling medical and we can't get a doc -

With that, the portion of the tape played at the commission hearing ended. Then, the commission heard a recording of a second phone call, the call Nydia Gonzales placed to American Airlines' emergency line. Gonzales was still on the phone with Betty Ong as well. She relayed what Ong was telling her to the emergency operator.

How are you going to call medical & get a doctor onto a flying, hijacked plane???

I'm listening.

Maybe what she meant was they're trying to get ahold of a doctor of some sort that can instruct them on how to help whoever the person is that they were trying to help?

- Ø®£Z -, is there something you or anyone else care to challenge me on?

and obviously not trying to get a doctor onto a flying plane.

So why cut off the tape, genius?

Don't bother trying to start a fight.

Right, because the script was shit.

I'm not trying to start a fight, I'm just calling your bullshit.

I don't know. And in case you didn't read what I already wrote, I am listening to/watching the video. After I watch that part of the video, then I'll weigh in about it.

I can't wait.

OT: Anyone watching the news reports of the Lebanese masacre this morning?

This is insane! The entire world is becoming more and more furious yet the West continues to support this carnage.

"The attack prompted an impassioned television address by Lebanese Prime Minister Fouad Siniora.

"Out of respect for the souls of our innocent martyrs and the remains of our children buried under the rubble of Qana, we scream out to our fellow Lebanese and to other Arab brothers and to the whole world to stand united in the face of the Israeli war criminals," Siniora said.

Siniora called for an immediate, unconditional cease-fire and an international probe, and rejected planned talks with Rice.

After the announcement, Rice canceled her planned visit to Beirut.

A U.S. official in Washington called the decision by the Lebanese prime minister "unfortunate."

It's not just the Arab community now that is furious. The entire world is condemning this slaughter.

9/11 was a false-flag, but stay tuned for "real" terror attacks as a result of this brutality.

WW3, here we come.

Anonymous, please shut the fuck up with the attitude.

Keep lying about me and making stupid statements. It honestly does not bother me.

Now go watch the video clip and see for yourself that the Betty Ong stuff isn't there.

Despicable, truth-denying fraud!

For anyone else, here's an interesting comment by one of the airline people testifying.

[ http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=download&ufid=A0C8A90C51E56114 ]

They're talking about the 19 (alleged) hijackers, but listen to what he says.

"But we also recognize that these people were highly skilled military professionals"

That would be a perfect quick clip to to use for a video montage or something, against the official story as to some of the people responsible/involved in the attack "highly skilled military professionals" not amateur arab hijackers.

That was me who posted the above comment.

For anyone else, here's an interesting comment by one of the airline people testifying.

[ http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=download&ufid=A0C8A90C51E56114 ]

They're talking about the 19 (alleged) hijackers, but listen to what he says.

"But we also recognize that these people were highly skilled military professionals"

That would be a perfect quick clip to to use for a video montage or something, against the official story as to some of the people responsible/involved in the attack "highly skilled military professionals" not amateur arab hijackers.

Those flunkies coudn't fly a Cessna!

Despicable, truth-denying fraud!
Anonymous | 07.30.06 - 1:12 pm | #

Go to the link and watch it for yourself, Anonymous.

I actually would like everyone else to go to the link and watch the video, and see also that there's no Betty Ong audio played.

"Shown to be wrong? What sort of jackass would say that about 9/11 truth?"

A jackass, like myself, who hasn't seen the real perpeTrators brought to justice.

In say what I did, I first assert my position that I largely subscribe to a LIHOP (disguised by an Incompetence Theory), coinciding with a MIHOP contingent, augmented by a misguided CIA schema of fomented islamist radicals, blindly supported by Rapture Hungry domestic radicals, converging with Nationalistic Israelis (divorced from historical Judaism content with world wide Synagogues to experience their faith)..... and a Congressional Military Industrial Complex, suffering from some kind of juvenile Persecuted Bully complex.

A convergence of interest wished for, made, allowed a "9/11". So the second part of what I said is "I could be wrong", about all this....

The rabbit hole may go much much deeper yet.... I don't know.

However, do I still need to "wake the fuck up", Anonymous Asshole?

The Ong audio was played- I heard it some time ago.

It's 11:20am PCT and CSPAN has Bolten hearings on right now.

yeat its 225 and no 911 truth over here

Its not on...

It's not on in Ohio at 2:36 pm Eastern Time either.

Not on in Florida. Bummer. Saw it last night though. Great for the movement.

http://8thestate.com/

Starting now on CSPAN!

However, do I still need to "wake the fuck up", Anonymous Asshole?
Erin S. Myers | 07.30.06 - 1:39 pm | #

You bet your ass, you double-talking, lying piece of shit!

That goes for - Ø®£Z - too! Boldfaced liar says that Kean didn't play 4 minutes of 23-minute Betty Ong tape!

God-damned criminal frauds

The Pentagon gets slammed by a "hijacked airliner" an hour after 2 other "hijacked airliners" crashed into the Pentagon, and this two asswipes, Erin S. Myers & - Ø®£Z -, are protecting the guilty criminals in our goverment who murdered people in cold blood!!!

Hey Meyers, I see your in McLean, Virginia! Gee, that's not a hub for gov't shills by any chance, now is it???

However, do I still need to "wake the fuck up", Anonymous Asshole?
Erin S. Myers | 07.30.06 - 1:39 pm | #

BTW, I never said that to you. If you see a HoloScan message saying that, then someone is dicking-around with the message board, COINTELPRO-like.

Re; The Ong call, the URL is simply wrong for the video, the correct URL is
http://www.9-11commission.gov/archive/hearing7/2004012708_high.asx

The playback of the Ong call is toward the end, and does indeed contain this exchange:

"NYDIA GONZALEZ: Have you guys called anyone else?

BETTY ONG: No. Somebody's calling medical and we can't get a doc - "

"somebody's calling medical"... anybody ever explain what this meant?

Can't tell one anon fron another.... that's why I use my own name.

And yes, McLean is a bastion of Government shills.... I came here to lay my own cock out on the road in front of them, to dare them (YOU?) to have the sand to face me.

FUCK YOU, ANONYMOUS!

Meyers, I would wipe my ass with someone like you, & then flush you down the toilet where you belong. You are subtle disinfo, paid like a whore to run cover for the gov't murderers of 9/11.

You are a criminal, and soon you and you cohorts will turn on each other, & point the finger at you. I can't wait to see you on trial! YOU WILL PAY!

"somebody's calling medical"... anybody ever explain what this meant?
CJ | 07.30.06 - 5:15 pm | #

Exactly, how/why do you call for medical on a hijacked airliner when you don't even know where you're flying to?

If a guy is bleeding from a box-cut to the neck, you apply pressure to the wound? What are you going do, operate on the dude over the phone with a doctor?

And why did baldfaced liar Kean not play the other 19 minutes of the tape?

I never thought I would say this but the movement is over. This was our moment and we blew it. 90 minutes on CSPAN was the MOST we could have ever asked for. And we blew it.

The single crucial mistake the ASS conference made was preaching to the choir. That is, they spoke to the crowd as if everyone was already convinced (which they probably were but CSPAN as a whole is not). Obvously, any clear-thinking person can discern that the official story has huge gaps in it. But our most precious 90 minutes was clouded by true "conspiracy". Although things may fall into place all across the board, we need to approach this like a prosecutor would apporoach a criminal case -- narrow and focused. There is so much credible and specific evidence available -- why would the panelists speak in such broad terms?

The conference should have been as such, in whichever order you like:

Alex Jones: Overview of the historical context of state-sponsored "terrorism". Specifically Northwoods & Tonkin; that's it. No bloviating. Explain what you can prove.

David Ray Griffin: Overview of the strongest points in his two books; The New Pearl Harbor & 9/11 Ommisison Report. Essentially the lecture he gave on BookTV.

Paul Thompson: Get into the nitty gritty of the flaws in the official story vis a vis a detailed timeline. Again, narrow and focused. Perhaps focus on the specifics of Bush's actions that day or the buried news reports that cast legitimate doubt on the official story (General Ahmad's meeting, military wargames prior to and on 9/11, etc.)

Jeff King: The same exact powerpoint presentation that we have all seen. Detailed overview of the physics of the collapses. Again, focus on "squibs", physical evidence, rapidity of WTC7 collapse, etc.

Michael Ruppert: Discussion on "peak oil" and other feasible motives. Focus on big business profits and geopolitical implications of 9/11 and American hegemony.

Kristen Breitwesier: Smart and savvy 9/11 widow that can speak of her trouble in geting the 9/11 whitewash commission formed.

That's it. Twenty minutes each. Boom.

By "preaching to the choir", the panel failed to present any credible evidence that would get the average CSPAN viewer (who is most certainly at least somewhat open-minded) thinking about it. We have to understand that for most people this is UNthinkable -- that our government would perpetrate such a crime. You convince them by presenting specific and provocative evidence -- i.e. war games, WTC7, thermal hot spots, Mineta testimony, Sibel Edmonds, Phoenix Memo, and specifically Osama bin Laden & the FBI. When you trigger that slight sense of doubt, the dam begins to crack. You need to intrigue people enough to take it upon themselves to look into it. By spouting true "conspiracy", by which I mean speaking in broad terms (the "government" and
"they"), the ASS most likely turned off more people than it turned on.

Anon (with no sand):

If you're convinced that I'm a paid whore to subtlety divert attention away from the perpetrators of 911...... You're lost in the woods. I hope you find a way out.

It seems that you're fired up about the crime of "9/11". Good, so am I. We don't have any disagreement there.

You also seem to think that our own government was involved, and that you don't want them to get away with it. Good, I'm still with you there. No disagreement from me.

Though a "criminal" I might be (as classified under the PATRIOT Act or some other extra-constitutional horse shit), the only cohorts that might turn on me are people who get it in their head that I somehow work for this Government.

This Government might surely point a finger at me, but only because I'm not going along with the Kill All The Brown People and Take The Oil plan.

Why should I pay more than I already have? I really don't think you have any idea how much I've paid thus far.

Myers, if you're really an honest & just man, stick to the program in exposing 9/11 as the inside job that it clearly was!

Any other differences we may have are NOTHING by comparison, and could easily be debated like gentlemen after 9/11 is finally resolved.

"Myers, if you're really an honest & just man, stick to the program in exposing 9/11 as the inside job that it clearly was!"

After you just called me a "shill" for government murderers, you think we're gone'a to be cool if I do as you say, "stick to the program"?

Have a nice day, shit for brains.

Really.... I think I'll step away from this blog for a while (maybe just what you wanted all along?), and see ya around.

Best wishes to ya.

e

hate to tell you kevin, but realistically speaking, if Randi Rhodes turned her show into JAck Blood,Tarpley or Alex Jones or whatever, she would lose her job extremely fast. she gets more 9/11 talk in than most radio talking heads. that may be sad, but its true.she could learn a thing or 2 from Malloy though.

Anonymous, I didn't write one single word in defense of Kean or any of the othe lying criminals involved in the 9/11 Coverup Commission.

Quit fucking lying.

You posted a quote from the Memory Hole, which attributed the quote as having originated in clip 6 from the 9/11 Coverup Commission hearings of that day. I watched the entire clip and there was no audio played whatsoever. You obviously didn't take the time to watch the video clip because then you would have already knew that.

CJ posted a link -- purportedly to the correct video clip -- which I'll watch later.

So the website that you took the quote from made the error of putting the wrong video.

I didn't ever write that Kean didn't ever stop an audio tape of Betty Ong; I wrote that it wasn't in the video that the website that you took the quote from reported it being from.

Furthermore, I hate Kean, Hamilton and the rest of them. And haven't ever defended them.

Try putting some ice on top of your head, cooling down a bit and focusing on what you read before wildly throwing around insults and untrue accusations and the like.

I am on the 9/11 was an inside job side.

And I have nothing against people who want to remain anonymous posters. But people who are anonymous posters -- such as yourself -- are the ones who look the most suspect when it comes to being any kind of paid internet agent of any stripe. Be that, disinfo, disruption, distraction, argumentative etc.

So yammering on about someone being a shill or a fraud, without any actual evidence to substantiate the assertion is pointless. And that makes you seem suspect because it makes you look like someone who fits the description of a paid internet agent of the distraction and argumentive stripe.

I'm not saying that you're any kin of paid internet agent. But you make yourself suspect with your wild accusation throwing attitude.

"Myers, if you're really an honest & just man, stick to the program in exposing 9/11 as the inside job that it clearly was!"

After you just called me a "shill" for government murderers, you think we're gone'a to be cool if I do as you say, "stick to the program"?

Have a nice day, shit for brains.

Really.... I think I'll step away from this blog for a while (maybe just what you wanted all along?), and see ya around.

Best wishes to ya.

e
Erin S. Myers | 07.30.06 - 7:57 pm | #

Myers, you or whoever is posting under your name is a fucking fraud. You and I are going to have a very major problem if you keep talking to me out of your ass like that!

- Ø®£Z -, Stop your double-talking bullshit. You don't need to play semantics with me regarding the phony Ong phone call. I think you & Meyers should go pull Larry Silverstein's cock if you want to play games. You're both looking very much like COINTELPRO to me.

I don't know who Erin is. So I don't speak for her/him.

But if you honestly think that I, myself, looks like COINTELPRO, I would strongly suggest going and visiting an optometrist, Anonymous.