The Serious Side To The 9/11 Truth Movement

The Serious Side To The 9/11 Truth Movement -

When most people read or hear about the 9/11 Truth Movement from their usual source of information, be it a magazine, newspaper, or television, they hear that it is comprised of "nuts, conspiracy theorists, kool-aid drinking tin foil hat wearers." Of course, there have been some exceptions to that rule, albeit VERY miniscule exceptions in the scheme of things.

Recently, a national Zogby poll was released that stated 45% of America wants a new investigation into 9/11. 42% believe that this new investigation should include investigating whether or not members of our Government were complicit in the attacks.

Now honestly, do you believe that 42% of our country is filled with "nuts, conspiracy theorists, kool-aid drinking tin foil hat wearers?" Or, is it just possible that some of these people might be on to something?

If you are one of the many who think so, chances are, you may have come across some of the more "fringe" elements of the 9/11 Truth Movement. You may have seen people talking about the "Illuminati", or the "Reptillian Leaders of the Planet", or the idea that no planes hit the World Trade Center on 9/11, or that it was the "Jews, oh no!!! Not the Jews!!!" that attacked us on 9/11.

As is to be expected, I'm sure several of the people who came across the folks who push that information, probably got scared away. They probably thought the 9/11 Truth Movement is everything the media says we are.

Let it be known that that is simply NOT the case.

The title of this article would indicate that there is a serious side to the 9/11 Truth Movement.

As it turns out, there is.

The majority of us in this movement have dedicated our lives to ending the nightmare brought on by the events of September the 11th.

Most of us started out just like everybody else. "The terrorists are attacking... Let's go carpet bomb the Middle East!!!" We waved our flags, and said "U.S.A... U.S.A..." and we cried. MAN did we cry. The images of all of those people holding up the pictures of their loved ones, hoping against hope that someone may have seen them. Or the rescue workers who worked day and night looking for survivors. Or the memorial services that were shown all over the networks for the fallen.

We cried, and we hurt, and to this day, we still do.

However, something changed us as individuals. We saw something that some of you didn't.

A lot of the people within the 9/11 Truth Movement do what we do for six reasons:

  • We figured out we were being lied to by members of this Government regarding the attacks of 9/11, and that didn't sit well with us.
  • We saw that this Government was using that tragic day to further agendas that have no place in this country, or on this planet.
  • We believe the family members who lost loved ones that day deserve closure, as does the rest of this country.
  • We know that either allowing or orchestrating the attacks against us IS WRONG. PERIOD.
  • We know those responsible MUST be held accountable, and safeguards need to be put in place to stop it from ever happening again.
  • We want the best possible futures for our families, our friends, our planet, and ourselves.

Now, do they sound like reasons "nuts, conspiracy theorists, kool-aid drinking tin foil hat wearers" would come up with, or do they sound like reasons that came from sane minded, caring people?


The next time you see someone with a 9/11 Flyer, or a hand full of DVDs, take a minute to say hello. Try to put aside what you've heard or read about us. Most of us in the movement don't bite, and even better, most of us want nothing more than to tell you what it is that we know.

In any event, it certainly makes for an interesting conversation.

Good one, Jon!

Good one, Jon!

Fantastic article dude!

Fantastic article dude!

You know... I registered

You know... I registered to your site, just to compliment you on that piece. I think my confirmation is in, but I'll thank you here first anyway

nice job.

nice job.

That was one of the most

That was one of the most heartfelt posts I've read yet. It's beautifull really, sad too.

Thank you for writing it.

... or posting it anyway....

... or posting it anyway....

Excellent article Jon. Now

Excellent article Jon. Now if we could just get more people to at least "look" at all of the unanswered questions re: 9/11. They would see that the 9/11 Truth Movement is mainly made up of concerned citizens who care about their country, it's citizens, the 'truth' and just want an honest, thorough and open investigation into the 9/11 attacks.

P.S. Yes. I am from Cincinnati.

Thanks all.

Thanks all.

Great job as usual Jon.

Great job as usual Jon. People like you make me proud to be a truther. We are going to win this thing Jon, trust me on that.

There are more people in

There are more people in America that question the events of 9/11 than there are people that support the current Administration. That says quite a bit.

You can thank Rawstory for

You can thank Rawstory for the inspiration. ;)

Just watching CSPAN Foreign

Just watching CSPAN Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (from Wednesday 7/26)- Sen. Leahhy just said "The reality is that the Bush Administration had all the information necessary to stop the attach on September 11 and failed to act upon it."

Although it's following a "let it happen" train of thought, it's still nice to hear.
July 29, 2006
Setup via "Thermite" Jones already works??
By ewing2001

...the setup works, the flagwavers already winning the argument.
Jones looks silly -he is a 'plant':
A. Griffin is wrong about steel.

Griffin's theory depends on the work of Steven E. Jones, a physics professor at Brigham Young whose paper on the subject was published in Research in Political Economy, a journal that describes itself as "founded on analyzing society in a manner consistent with classical Marxism."

Jones's "smoking gun" is a bit steel someone gave him from ground zero, supposed to have been collected some weeks after the collapse, that according to him shows signs of being combined with sulfur. This is, as they say in the legal profession, "consistent with" its having been cut by a thermate charge. But it's also "consistent with" its having burned (yes, iron and steel will burn — doesn't anyone read Faraday any more?) in the presence of sulfur. Yup, sulfur. Of the sort that's a major component of gypsum (calcium sulfate). That would be drywall. They use it in buildings. In very large buildings, they use lots of it...

Nico (or Nico imposter) go

Nico (or Nico imposter) go pull WTC-7 or something.

NIco and Holmgren would get

NIco and Holmgren would get a lot further with people if they didnt act like children all the time, constantly insulting people.i just read a few of Nicos links and Holmgrens writings about Jones.pure anger and jealousy, regardless of where you stand on the no planes bullshit.Holmgren comes off as an angry little boy.

Sorry guys I keep posting

Sorry guys I keep posting this,but in order to get to the smoking gun,We must find the ammo.If the media is complicit in 9/11,then do We go after Rupert Murdoch of Fox and try to find evidence that corroborates Fox's unfair and tilted attitude in aiding the suppression of truth?That would go a long way in finding out what their motive is or any other corporate media that,in their silence,is invoking the same similar complicity,that,at best,would be circumstantial in a court of law.
What is needed in order to get an independent investigation started into the events of 9/11 is to find out what the motive is for these attacks.Who would be so callous and cold with the knowledge that many people will die in the WTC attacks,and that many more will die in the future wars at great expense to the US? In order to keep the flow of heroin unabated from Afghanistan? which it has...why is there little news that this has continued? In Iraq,We have surveilled them since '91...,24/7,seen everything they did,but still attacked them to build permanent bases there....and now Sabre rattling continues against Iran.
What gets ignored is the 9/11 movement,but yet in order to get an investigation,requires a lawsuit to move through the courts,or hearing by Congress.
While the media plays up the significance of the government show trial of the seemingly deranged "20th hijacker" Zacharias Moussaoui, not one 9-11 victim's lawsuit has been allowed to be heard in a trial by jury. Why have the 9-11 victims' families not been given the same right to have their cases heard in an open trial by a jury of their peers?
Ellen Mariani, who lost her husband Neil on United Air Lines (UAL) Flight 175, filed the first 9-11 wrongful death lawsuit against UAL on December 20, 2001. Interviewed on national television in May 2002 by Bill O'Reilly of FOX News, O'Reilly repeatedly questioned Mariani about why she had chosen to pursue litigation instead of accepting the government fund.
"I want justice," Mariani said. "I want accountability. Who is responsible? I want the truth."
Today, Mariani, like the other 9-11 plaintiffs, is under a legal gag order which prevents her from speaking about her on-going lawsuit. Likewise, thousands of employees of federal agencies, such as the Federal Aviation Administration, have received secret gag orders in the mail preventing them from speaking about what they know about the events of 9-11.
Why have the many victims' cases like Mariani's, brought by relatives of loved ones lost on 9-11, not been heard in open trials with juries – a basic American right?
And why has the Israeli-owned airline security company involved in the shocking security lapses, which apparently enabled the attacks of 9-11, been granted complete immunity by the U.S. Congress?
All of the relatives' wrongful death lawsuits, i.e. criminal cases, against the airlines and their security companies were consolidated by the presiding judge into a negligence lawsuit, which, as a civil case, is much less likely to be argued or investigated in an open trial with a jury.
All the 9-11 wrongful death and personal injury cases against either American Air Lines (AA) or United Air Lines or any of the foreign-owned airport security companies, namely Argenbright Security (British), Globe Aviation Services Corp. (Swedish), and Huntleigh USA Corp. (Israeli) have been handled by United States District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein of the Southern District of New York.
In the case of at least one of these security defendants, Huntleigh USA, there would seem to be a serious conflict of interest for the judge because the airline security company who is responsible for the shocking security lapses at both the Boston and Newark airports on 9-11 is a wholly-owned subsidiary of an Israeli company (ICTS) headed by Israelis with clear ties to Israel's military intelligence agency, the Mossad.
Judge Hellerstein, on the other hand, has deep and long-standing Zionist connections and close family ties to the state of Israel. A Zionist is a supporter of the Jewish state of Israel.This is not an Anti-Jewish commentary I'm making here,in fact many of the Jewish community HATE these radical Zionists.
Judge Hellerstein's wife, for example, is a former senior vice president and current treasurer of a New York-based Zionist organization called AMIT. AMIT promotes Jewish immigration to Israel and stands for Americans for Israel and Torah. AMIT's motto is "Building Israel – One Child at a Time."
Judge Hellerstein, 73, is also a long-time member of The Jewish Center of New York and a former president of the Board of Jewish Education of Greater New York.
This raises the obvious question about why, in the 9-11 terror case in which an Israeli security company is a key defendant and in which individuals from Israeli military intelligence are suspected of being involved, was Hellerstein chosen to preside over all 9-11 victim lawsuits – and who chose him? This is a key question and it would go a long way for us to find out who did choose this judge.
Huntleigh USA is a wholly owned subsidiary of an Israeli company called International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS) International N.V., a Netherlands-based aviation and transportation security firm headed by "former [Israeli] military commanding officers and veterans of government intelligence and security agencies."
Menachem Atzmon, convicted in Israel in 1996 for campaign finance fraud, and his business partner Ezra Harel, took over management of security at the Boston and Newark airports when their company, ICTS, bought Huntleigh USA in 1999.
UAL Flight 175 and AA 11, which allegedly struck the twin towers, both originated in Boston, while UAL 93, which supposedly crashed in Pennsylvania, departed from the Newark airport.
ICTS also operates the German port of Rostock on the Baltic Sea. An Israeli company linked to the Mossad runs the port operations of a major German harbor. (Why would the Mossad want to run a German port? Imagine the possibilities.)
Some victims' families brought lawsuits against Huntleigh claiming the Israeli-owned airport security firm had been grossly negligent on 9-11. While these relatives have a right to discovery and to know what Huntleigh did or did not do to protect their loved ones on 9-11, Huntleigh was granted complete congressional protection in 2002 and will not be called to account for its actions on 9-11 in any U.S. court.
On July 26, 2002, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Homeland Security Bill and slipped in a last-minute provision which provided complete corporate immunity for the three foreign-owned security companies. Likewise, the Senate voted to shield the three security companies from corporate responsibility on November 19, 2002. These congressional votes effectively prevent any legal investigation or discovery into the security failures of these foreign companies on 9-11.
Hellerstein, however, is not the only player overseeing the 9-11 litigation process who has close ties to Israel. In fact, all of the key players and law firms involved are either active Zionists or do a great deal of business representing Israeli companies and/or the state of Israel.
Kenneth R. Feinberg, for example, the special master of the federally-funded Victims' Compensation Fund, is also a deeply dedicated Zionist. Feinberg single-handedly administered the $7 billion fund that paid out U.S . taxpayer money to some 97 percent of the families who could have otherwise used the courts to sue to recover tort damages for monetary loss and pain and suffering.
Those who accepted the Feinberg administrated federal fund signed away their right to litigate against the government, the airlines or the security companies. This federally funded pay-off to the families effectively prevented the possibility for nearly every relative to obtain justice or truth through the legal process, which would have brought legal discovery of facts and events of 9-11.
The Kenneth Feinberg Group is listed as one of the top ten supporters of the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies for 2004-2005. The Jerusalem Institute is an Israel-based Zionist organization that supports the building of the illegal separation wall across Palestine, for example.
The Feinberg Group also lists as its clients major insurance and re-insurance companies such as Lloyd's of London. These are the companies who stood to lose billions of dollars if 9-11 victims' lawsuits had gone forward.
Feinberg was appointed special master by then Attorney General John Ashcroft. Ashcroft, a dedicated Christian Zionist and supporter of such groups as Stand for Israel, is today working as a lobbyist for Israel Aircraft Industries (IAI), Israel's major military aerospace company, which hired the former U.S. Attorney General to help secure the U.S. government's approval to sell an Israeli weapons system to the South Korean Air Force.
The Israelis hired Ashcroft to improve their chances against an American-made system built by Chicago-based Boeing Co.
Ashcroft, who was born in Chicago, is the former head of the Dept. of Justice, where his Israeli-American assistant, Michael Chertoff, directed the FBI non-investigation of the events of 9-11. Ashcroft is now being paid (off) by the state of Israel to work against the interests of an American company - and the United States.
This is some of what We have to contend with in getting our day in court.Exposure of the big money guys is crucial in order to get the investigation going,and then the details of evrything else will soon follow.

I'm a 9/11 Truth newbie.

I'm a 9/11 Truth newbie. I've been watching this board for a couple months, just finished reading Griffin's A New Pearl Harbor book.

Griffin has a very interesting point in the book- as a cumulative argument, if one piece of the pie doesn't hold up, it doesn't negate the others. There's plenty of evidence that the administration conspired to make 9/11 happen.

I've witnessed a growing momentum, and I'm convinced that in spite of our differences on particular findings, the truth will prevail.

We need a full investigation.

We need a full

We need a full investigation.
Mark Etheredge | 07.29.06 - 6:15 pm | #

You are correct, Sir.

Likewise, thousands of

Likewise, thousands of employees of federal agencies, such as the Federal Aviation Administration, have received secret gag orders in the mail preventing them from speaking about what they know about the events of 9-11.

You need to have a WHISTLEBLOWER INSTRUCTIONS link on

You need to have a

You need to have a WHISTLEBLOWER INSTRUCTIONS link on

Absolutely right on u2r2h! It would be an irresistable force if these people came out en'masse.
It would an avalanche of info that would corroborate any thing We know and suspect.

Building Seven. Good job

Building Seven. Good job Jon.

Jon is the greatest -

Jon is the greatest - investing heart, soul and funds into the most important movement in our lifetime.

Jon is one of MANY greats.

Jon is one of MANY greats. How's that?

Who wants...

To talk about Space Beams?

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."

My sentiments exactly, Jon Gold


I wish...

"Keep It Simple" was the "motto" of the 9/11 Truth Movement, but unfortunately, it's not.

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."


When's the last time you flyered your neighborhood?

"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this."