Support a resolution calling for a 9/11 special prosecutor.
Somebigguy Mon, 07/31/2006 - 3:26am
Check this out, an extremely easy and quick way to send your message to your local paper and politicians. Don't forget to mention the C-Span coverage:
http://www.usalone.net/cgi-bin/oen.cgi?qnum=219
It will submit your personal message on the issue above to your local daily newspaper as a Letter to the Editor as determined by your address, as well as to both of your senators and your house representative if you like all at once. You can even select exactly who you want your message to go to.
Also, Nominate Kevin Barrett for BuzzFlash Wings of Justice Award:
- Login to post comments
Here's a good old fashioned
Here's a good old fashioned American song...
Click Here
Who do they want to
Who do they want to prosecute?
WE NEED a Jim Garrisson for
WE NEED a Jim Garrisson for the modern era to take on 9/11.
EVERYONE, please rent or check out the special Edition of JFK. If that aint enough to fire you up and see the parralels, I don't know what will.
WHO will be the Jim Garrisson of 9/11, and WHO will be the Mr. X Prouty?
I'll do it. Just give me 4
I'll do it. Just give me 4 years to finish law school.
Well, you can make it
Well, you can make it snappy..
Just show the jury 3x movies:
#1 JFK assasination - secret service
#2 JFK Conspiracy
#3 JFK 2 - The Bush connection
all here:
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=jfk
Then you pick up and send into jumpsuit these folks:
- Arlen Specter
- Poppy Bush
- Dan Rather
..
.
add some Rockefellas if you get lucky
Excellent! A caller just
Excellent! A caller just busted through on Air America and gave 'em hell for censoring 9/11 skepticism! Good job!
On the Laura Flanders show...
But dude! You forgot to plug the Tuesday re-broadcast!
But you still got through. Good job.
This idea being pushed by
This idea being pushed by some in the 9/11 Truth movement to have more official hearings or "investigations" into the the 9/11 attacks is a bad idea. It promulgates the notion that peope need authority figures to tell them what to do and what to believe. In other words, that people can't come to the conclusion that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job unless they're told that it's "official."
At best, the most good that could likely come out of such hearings or "investigations" is that the U.S. government perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks get caught in more lies and contradictions. But it's bad because it fosters the notion that people have to be told by people from on high what to think, which isn't conducive to the cause of truth.
Those who genuinely investigate the 9/11 attacks in-depth already know the U.S. government staged the attacks from beginning to end. The amount of publicly available hardcore evidence demonstrating this is truly staggering. People don't need to be told by some panel or commission what the claimed "truth" is. This worship of "authority figures" to tell us what is and isn't okay to believe is one of the main things that the 9/11 Truth movement is fighting against.
Our task is to educate our countrymen, neighbors, friends, and family as to what the truth is. Genuine change isn't going to come about by voting, or "working within the system," as it is a rigged system designed from the start to keep the ruling elite in power.
Genuine change will come about when enough people know the truth and simply fail to support the system anymore. Then voting will be irrelevant because there will be nothing to vote for, or to vote against.
What if the government held a war and no one showed up? That's the stage we need to reach, where the ruling elite simply lose their chain of command and are abandoned because the masses fail to follow them. The stage where their own soldiers and police no longer follow their orders.
The way to reach that stage is to simply speak the truth to people. When others learn the truth, they will be in a position to speak the truth to others. With more people speaking the truth, even more will join in because they see that they're not alone and isolated in holding this position. And so on, until just about everyone and their grandmother is talking about the fact that the U.S. government staged the 9/11 attacks.
As it is now, we're not all that very far from that stage.
For more on this process, see Étienne de La Boétie, Discours sur la servitude volontaire; ou Contr'un, likely written in 1552 or 1553, first published in full in 1576. An English translation by Harry Kurz with an introduction by Murray N. Rothbard, The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude (New York: Free Life Editions, 1975), is available at http://www.mises.org/rothbard/boetie.pdf .
This idea being pushed by
This idea being pushed by some in the 9/11 Truth movement to have more official hearings or "investigations" into the the 9/11 attacks is a bad idea.
Agreed, sir! IMO, the goverment, military, & big business will certainly try to sabotage any subsequent investigation just like they did the first.
dz, what's going on with
dz, what's going on with your boards? I might be a bit hyper from the C-SPAN program, but there is some odd posting going on some of the threads? It's like a COINTELPRO boiler-room down there.
Redford: Yes, yes,
Redford:
Yes, yes, yes!
There is nothing to be gained, and no possible way to win, by asking the existing government to re-open investigations or hold trials. They've already given us their answer.
We'll set up a card table on the mall, and "We, call this court to order".
We still need to harp on the
We still need to harp on the fact that the "official story" was a complete fraud! That, in-and-of itself, is further proof of an inside job & cover-up!
Careful good people....
Careful good people.... there's a Anon on the loose here too.
There's a Myers shill on the
There's a Myers shill on the loose you mean.
We still need to harp on the
We still need to harp on the fact that the "official story" was a complete fraud! That, in-and-of itself, is further proof of an inside job & cover-up!
Anonymous | 07.30.06 - 10:54 pm | #
Myers, you disagree w/that^?
I think Erin S. Myers' ID
I think Erin S. Myers' ID was assumed by someone like S. King or something.
The Madhi will return!! The
The Madhi will return!!
The final victory against the forces of evil is inevitable.
seriously now...
READ THIS and weep:
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=107&ItemID=10663
BE CAREFUL with the MISES
BE CAREFUL with the MISES institute!!!
BE CAREFUL with the MISES institute!!!
BE CAREFUL with the MISES institute!!!
BE CAREFUL with the MISES institute!!!
It pure economics ideology!!
u2r2h: Mises? as in Ludwig
u2r2h:
Mises? as in Ludwig von?
If the same one, econ ideology maybe, but I thought it was based on an honest 2+2=4....
harmless then, no?
u2r2h, below are a number of
u2r2h, below are a number of great articles and books published online for free by the Ludwig von Mises Institute. I recomend that everyone take a little time out to at least read the articles.
Below are some excellent articles concerning the nature of government, of liberty, and the free-market production of defense:
"The Anatomy of the State," Prof. Murray N. Rothbard, Rampart Journal of Individualist Thought, Vol. 1, No. 2 (Summer 1965), pp. 1-24. Reprinted in a collection of some of Rothbard's articles, Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays (Washington, D.C.: Libertarian Review Press, 1974):
http://www.mises.org/easaran/chap3.asp
From the above article, Prof. Rothbard wrote the following concerning so-called "conspiracy theories":
""
It is also important for the State to inculcate in its subjects an aversion to any "conspiracy theory of history"; for a search for "conspiracies" means a search for motives and an attribution of responsibility for historical misdeeds. If, however, any tyranny imposed by the State, or venality, or aggressive war, was caused not by the State rulers but by mysterious and arcane "social forces," or by the imperfect state of the world or, if in some way, everyone was responsible ("We Are All Murderers," proclaims one slogan), then there is no point to the people becoming indignant or rising up against such misdeeds. Furthermore, an attack on "conspiracy theories" means that the subjects will become more gullible in believing the "general welfare" reasons that are always put forth by the State for engaging in any of its despotic actions. A "conspiracy theory" can unsettle the system by causing the public to doubt the State's ideological propaganda.
""
"Defense Services on the Free Market," Prof. Murray N. Rothbard, Chapter 1 from Power and Market: Government and the Economy (Kansas City, Kansas: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Inc., 1977; originally published 1970):
http://www.geocities.com/vonchloride/marketdefense.html
http://www.mises.org/rothbard/power&market.pdf
"The Private Production of Defense," Prof. Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1 (Winter 1998-1999), pp. 27-52:
http://www.mises.net/journals/jls/14_1/14_1_2.pdf
http://www.mises.org/journals/scholar/Hoppe.pdf
"Fallacies of the Public Goods Theory and the Production of Security," Prof. Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Journal of Libertarian Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1 (Winter 1989), pp. 27-46:
http://www.mises.net/journals/jls/9_1/9_1_2.pdf
"Police, Courts, and Laws--On the Market," Chapter 29 from The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism, Prof. David D. Friedman (La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Co., 1989; originally published 1971):
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Libertarian/Machinery_of_Freedom/MofF_Chap...
Concerning the ethics of human rights, the below book is the best book on the subject:
The Ethics of Liberty, Prof. Murray N. Rothbard (New York, New York: New York University Press, 1998; originally published 1982):
http://www.mises.org/rothbard/ethics/ethics.asp
If one desires a solid grounding in economics then one can do no better than with the below texts:
Economic Science and the Austrian Method, Prof. Hans-Hermann Hoppe (Auburn, Alabama: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1995):
http://www.mises.org/esandtam.asp
"Toward a Reconstruction of Utility and Welfare Economics," Prof. Murray N. Rothbard, On Freedom and Free Enterprise: The Economics of Free Enterprise, Mary Sennholz, editor (Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand, 1956), pp. 224-262. Reprinted in The Logic of Action One: Method, Money, and the Austrian School, Murray N. Rothbard (London, England: Edward Elgar, 1997), pp. 211-255:
http://www.mises.org/rothbard/toward.pdf
Man, Economy, and State, Prof. Murray N. Rothbard (Auburn, Alabama: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, second edition, 2004; originally published 1962):
http://www.mises.org/rothbard/mes.asp
Power and Market: Government and the Economy, Prof. Murray N. Rothbard (Kansas City, Kansas: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Inc., 1977; originally published 1970):
http://www.mises.org/rothbard/power&market.pdf
These texts ought to be read in the order listed above. I would also add to the above list the below book:
America's Great Depression, Prof. Murray N. Rothbard (Auburn, Alabama: The Ludwig von Mises Institute, fifth edition, 2000; originally published 1963):
http://www.mises.org/rothbard/agd.pdf
The above book concerns how the governments create depressions (i.e., nowadays called recessions) through credit expansion.
The small book Economic Science and the Austrian Method by Prof. Hans-Hermann Hoppe doesn't get into political theory, but only concerns the methodological basis of economics (i.e., the epistemology of economics). I would recommend that everyone read this short book *first* if they're at all interested in economics. There exists much confusion as to what economics is and what it is not. This book is truly great in elucidating the nature of what economics is and what it is not. If one were to read no other texts on economics, then this ought to be the one economic text that one reads. Plus it doesn't take all that long to read it.