Guns and Butter Interviews Dr. Steven Jones

Thermite: A Case for 9/11 Controlled Demolition - Guns and Butter
(911podcasts archive)

Guns & Butter interviewed Dr. Steven Jones today regarding his latest research. I am told this new interview is quite informative, so be sure to check it out.

While you are there check out their recent coverage of William Rodriguez and Webster Tarpley here.

Big thanks to SJ for the heads up!

It seems to me we get into

It seems to me we get into too many details when discussing 9/11 CT.

All you need to do is look at the way the WTCs fall down. Those are what implosions look like, and that's your null hypothesis. You need to prove those were random collapses and not implosions.

Second, show me any other skyscraper that has completely collapsed due to a fire: that doesn't happen on any other day.

The burden of proof should be on the other side. I can't believe we have to analyze fuzzy photos and thermite traces.

"Anyone at all?" How could

"Anyone at all?" How could you have missed my many rants here about Steven Jones' total intellectual dishonesty? (How many Anonymouses are there here, anyway?)

Jones doesn't do 911 physics, he denies 911 physics -- as if we need a trace of sulfur to conclusively prove that the towers did not passively fail but were actively failed, something only a physics-ignorant person could believe!

So Jones acts like a physics-ignorant, physicsless physics professor.

Beyond that, Steven Jones failed to keep his word to me (and others) that he would examine the WTC dust sample(s) in his possession for evidence of molecular dissociation (fragmented molecules). (...last time I heard from him was April 21, when, after months had already gone by, he said "next week"...)

If I thought that Jones was being honest, I'd tell you what an idiot Jones is. But Jones is dishonest, and also not a man of his word.

Since then he's gone on Webster Tarpley's audio show, and the two of them lied regarding the possibility that some kind of fusion device could have been involved. Jones said that since he'd only found small traces of evidence consistent with a fusion event having occurred, that we could rule out that possibility! This was after he'd falsely stated that a fission device is required to trigger a fusion event (as if it was still 1956, when that stmt was true), and there was no evidence of a fission event having occurred. Then Webster chimed in, in closing, signing off, telling the world that, see, there's no way a fusion device could have been involved. (check out the last few minutes of http://mp3.rbnlive.com/Tarpley/0607/20060715_Sat_Tarpley2.mp3 )

That is classic false-logic gatekeeper behavior on the part of both of them (I suppose Tarpley could claim stupid ignorance on his part, instead, though if you listen to the audio you'll hear that that is far-fetched after Tarpley tried to sound like he knew about this stuff, and then told us that we can assume that thermonuclear devices are excluded). Tarpley has thus either outed himself as disinfo or merely irreparably sullied his own reputation.

Jones is a liar, a scoundrel, a treacherous limited-hangout disinfo agent with ties to the U.S. Department Of Energy. There is absolutely no way that "thermite" can account for the barely-controlled disintegration (NOT "controlled demolition") of the WTC buildings, or any of the other highly UNconventional Ground Zero evidence. (Thermite could have been involved, but that misses the point -- by design. "Thermite" perfectly fits the definition of a limited-hangout dead-end red-herring; it gains us nothing, but throws us off the trail.)

http://911blimp.net/research/imgs/DrJones,RainbowHunter.gif
http://911blimp.net/research/imgs/DrJones,RainbowHunter.gif
http://911blimp.net/research/imgs/DrJones,RainbowHunter.gif

It seems to be Dr. Jones' secret mission to get people to believe that 1)he's "on our side" so we can trust him to tell us that 2)a conventional chemical compound created so much highly unconventional evidence, and 3)we can just take the government's word for what struck the twin towers.

Steven Jones is a complete sham and an evidence-denying 911 'truth' fraud. (People who have difficulty accepting that remind me of people who have difficulty believing that 9/11 was, or even could have been, an inside job.)

The belief that "thermite caused all that" is no less absurd than the belief that "19 guys with boxcutters" or "jet (sic) fuel" did all that!!!!!!!!!!!!

=================================================

IMHO, the best single measure of a 9/11 presentation's value is how
impossible the presenter makes it for people to keep clinging to the
belief that they can blame "Muslim hijackers" for 9/11. Further, if
the presentation tries to advance that unfounded belief (especially
subliminally), then it is acting as government propaganda.

_________________________________________

Professor Jones is

Professor Jones is definitely the man.

BTW, while at the Guns and Butter site, I saw this interesting description of a talk:

"How the Failure to Identify, Prosecute and Convict President Kennedy's Assassins Has Led to Today's Crisis of Democracy" http://www.kpfa.org/archives/index.php?arch=13099

That's part of what I keep trying to convey: if we don't prosecute the perpetrators of 9/11, things are going to get a WHOLE lot worse.

btw, i was the first to post

btw, i was the first to post news of our show, being the co-producer and all ;)

randi rhodes' show today uploaded to 911blogger's ftp and available from yousendit here:

http://tinyurl.com/rpv3n

16mb 32kbps edited - i missed a few sentences, but that's most of it.

Guns and Butter rocks.

Guns and Butter rocks.

check out the archives; lots of great stuff.

I also recommend takingaim.info;

Is there anyone here who

Is there anyone here who sees through Jones? Anyone at all?

I thought Jones was the real

I thought Jones was the real deal until I read your post anonymous. Thanks for opening my eyes.

"Thanks for opening my

"Thanks for opening my eyes."

If it was that easy, you haven't been paying attention at all.

waiting for the 911hoax

waiting for the 911hoax revelation..

DONT FORGET FETZER---ONE OF THE CHIEF SHILL ARCHITECTS!!

HA HA HA NOT
fetzer--- for not bringing up building 7 during his fake msm skirmishes
AN UNCONSCIOUS SHILL THAT IS A SLAVE TO HIS OWN FEARS

AYE---he couldve bitch slapped all those fake msm with one sentence
--"BUILDING 7 PROVES BUSH DID 911"

but he didnt---because he's never thought of himself as a hero---just some bitch ass

he'll never forgive me cause i made fun of him for being a stroke victim

this is not good "people skills"

truly he is a more noble man than i
____________________---

after the 911hoax revelation---when everyone is getting together at huge 911truth reunioun parties---
fetzer is gonna be pissed at me---he'll probably try to take a swing at me ---i couldve had a friend

Is there any scenario under

Is there any scenario under which we can imagine that 9.11 was not an inside job?

If the answer is no, then why are these people still in power?

Excellent 9/11 Truth

Excellent 9/11 Truth Outreach Materials Available for Free On The Internet. This is the best computer CD IÂ’ve seen by far.

Download a great flyer 8.5x11 for free.
Also download and burn a great CD which you can make copies of and give or sell to others, all for free.

Download Instructions:
Go to URL
Type the 3 digit number shown in the window at the bottom
Press “Submit” button
Wait 30 seconds as there is a brief pause and a countdown before the “Download” button appears.
After the pause, “Download” button appears. Now press the download button.

1. DOWNLOAD ONE PAGE 8.5 X 11 INCH FLYER (Total download time a minute)
Download for free at:
http://www.sharebigfile.com/file/13735/101n-Flyer---15-Remarkable-Facts-...

2. DOWNLOAD FILES FOR YOU TO BURN YOUR OWN COMPUTER CD:

Folder A – 1st
http://www.sharebigfile.com/file/13181/Building-7---A-Folder.zip.html

Folder B – 2nd
http://www.sharebigfile.com/file/13206/Building-7---B-Folder.zip.html

Folder C – 3rd
http://www.sharebigfile.com/file/13261/Building-7---C-Folder---Full.zip....

The three folder files are in zip format. Unzip each file, and it will become a folder. Use a free file like Winzip to unzip the files.
(If you donÂ’t have a zip extracting file, Winzip can be downloaded for free at http://www.download.com/WinZip/3000-2250_4-10454671.html?tag=lst-0-2 )

You can use the information on Folders A through C either on your own computer for your own educational purposes, and/or you can also use the folders to easily create a distributable information CD useful for outreach, if you have a CD burner.
To make the CD, use your CD burning software (e.g. Nero) to add all three unzipped folders onto a blank CD and burn the CD. All 3 folders will fit together on one CD. Label the CD “Building 7” or “Bldg 7”.
Each of the three folders takes about 20 minutes to download with broadband.

The positive features of this CD once you burn it is:

1. The CD is very-user friendly, and does not overwhelm the user when they first look at Folder A, which has only a few files in it.
2. The title of the CD itself is low key and non-threatening to the newbie: “Building 7.”
3. The CD begins with the most interesting and obvious issues first, and progressively tells the story of 9/11 truth in a logical, progressive, methodical order.
4. The CD is packed with hundreds of hours of audio and video for those who are really interested in this topic, yet it is so compact that it fits onto a CD. (Some of the multimedia is via web links).
5. Because it fits onto a CD, almost anybody with a computer has the ability to make copies of your CD to distribute to others.
6. The contents of the CD have been specifically created and edited to eliminate red herrings, conjecture, disproved theories, and disinformation to the greatest extent possible.

9/11 OUTREACH IDEAS:

If you have time, review the CD to get a feel for what is on it. You might learn some information you have not seen before.
Give CDÂ’s to your friends, family, and/or acquaintances. You can also give them out or sell them to strangers.
You can either give them away for free, or, if you consider this as an incentive to go out and do the work, you can charge up to $2 max. “donation” to reimburse you for your materials and labor.
Think about it, if you want you can earn some money while you are spreading the word about 9/11. You have the choice of giving the CDÂ’s away for free or selling them, whatever works for you.

Print the flyers. Use the flyers to get strangers interested in 9/11, and then try to give away and/or sell the CD. Give out the flyers free. Then offer to give or sell for a variable “donation” a CD or DVD.

MORE ON CD DISTRIBUTION:

1. Go to political rallies, parades, or meetings, where people are open to looking at new political ideas. Or go to public parks, or other places were people congregate, and start conversations with strangers. Give the flyers free to start a discussion. Sell the CDÂ’s or DVDÂ’s for a variable donation, or give them for free if the person cannot afford a donation.

2. Another place to go: Best Buy, or other big store that has TVÂ’s and DVD players on display. This is best done in a big store that is not overstaffed, or that has cooperative employees. Act like a customer. Be discreet. Put into a DVD into a DVD player connected to a big TV. It could be a copy of Loose Change or your other favorite 911 DVD. Turn the sound up pretty high, and turn the sound from nearby TVÂ’s down. I always start Loose Change at the beginning the WTC segment. Hang out either by the TV, or circulate in the store and come back to the TV every few minutes. Some customers (and even salesmen) might start watching and get interested. Ask them a few questions. Ask if theyÂ’ve seen this movie before or heard about it. Ask if they know much about 9/11. Ask if they have heard of any of the evidence contradicting the govtÂ’s account. Tell them youÂ’ve got a free copy youÂ’ll give them, and tell them you are asking for a donation of a dollar or two or even 25 cents for your expenses, but if they canÂ’t afford it youÂ’ll give it for free. Give them a flyer too for free. If you are really prepared, you will carry DVDÂ’s and computer CDÂ’s. Some might want or be able to use only one, some might want both.

MORE ON FLYER DISTRIBUTION:
PRE-PAID ENEVLOPES: Also put them into any prepaid postage envelopes you get and mail them for free.
NEWSRACKS: the free weekly rags are good, coz you don't have to pay to open the newsracks. These papers are often distributed on Wed or Thur for the paper dated the following week. But if you're willing to part with 50-100 cents, definately hit those other MSN news racks: NYT, WSJ, YourTownRag etc. Put a flyer in between section 1 and 2 of each rag, that way the people will definitely find them as they open the paper to read. In "tabloid" (magazine) style rags, put them inside the front cover, near the table of contents. For the daily rags, hit the newsracks EARLY, to reach the maximum # of people.It takes several minutes of standing there to insert these flyers into the papers. One idea is, make quick work of opening the rack, take about 3/4 of the stack of papers and return to your nearby car. In the car you can insert the flyers more easily and less conspicuously. If you paid to open the rack, obstruct the spring loaded door from closing while you do your biz in the car. Then return the new and improved papers to the rack for sale.
SHOPPING CARTS: these are often collected in the parking lots of stores. Whether they're separate or inserted into one another like a freight train, you can toss a flyer into them. The ones together like a train make the quickest work- just insert them at the top of each cart, where they'll sit waiting to fall into the cart when the cart behind it is removed. The store grunts who collect the carts won't take the time to de-flyer them... and you can flyer them 10X faster than they can de-flyer them.

A good opening question is, “Do you believe everything the government has told us about 9/11?” Two good follow-up questions are:
1. “Do you know how many skyscrapers taller than 40 floors collapsed to the ground in New York on 9/11?” Most people say of course 2.
2. “Do you know approximately how long after the 2nd tower was hit that Osama bin Laden was both named by the FBI as wanted for 9/11, and at the same time formally indicted for the crimes of 9/11: Closer to 1 minute after the attack, 1 hour, 1 day, 1 month, 1 year, or 2 years after the attack?” Whatever they say, it will be wrong, because it is a trick question. The answer is OBL has NEVER been named as being wanted by the FBI, has never been indicted for 9/11, and furthermore, the FBI recently admitted that there is “no hard evidence” linking OBL to 9/11.
Those two questions are surprising for most newbies, and gets them interested in learning more about 9/11.

You can give the flyers away free to known people or strangers, or leave them in a group of one or more in lobbies, on the floor next to elevators, or other public places where people are likely to take them and read them.

Once you start doing this, spread the word, and teach others to do this.
Everyone can make an impact spreading the word about 9/11, and if you are so inclined, you even have the option of earning a little small change in the process by selling the CD’s for a “donation.”

Another way to disseminate this information to friends or family who are far away is to email them these instructions, and they can download the information themselves from the Internet, and can follow the instructions so they can get the materials, learn about 9/11, and spread the word themselves.

P.S. when distributing CDÂ’s to total strangers in mass in a public, trafficked area, you might want to consider the advantages of asking for a token donation, even if itÂ’s only 25 cents, for the following 2 reasons:
a. Only those who really want to see the CD will pay you something for it. You may be otherwise giving out CDÂ’s to strangers who are not going to watch it, and maybe just throw it away.
b. There is a psychological incentive for people to value something they have paid for more than something they have gotten for free. Once they pay you, they have “invested” their money, so they are psychologically “invested” in getting something out of their purchase. In other words, everything else being equal, they are more likely to value and watch a CD they have paid for versus one they have received for free at no cost.

Please post what you think.