Commission Admits: Too Soft on Giuliani

Here's my take.

9/11 Commission Co-Chairs Kean and Hamilton now admit they were too soft on Giuliani.

Republican Thomas Kean and Democrat Lee Hamilton also say in "Without Precedent" that their panel was too soft in questioning former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani — and that the 20-month investigation may have suffered for it.

***

The book states that commission staff, "exceedingly frustrated" by what they thought could be deception, proposed a full review into why the FAA and the Pentagon's NORAD had presented inaccurate information. That ultimately could have led to sanctions.

Due to a lack of time, the panel ultimately referred the matter to the inspectors general at the Pentagon and Transportation Department. Both are preparing reports, spokesmen said this week.

"Fog of war could explain why some people were confused on the day of 9/11, but it could not explain why all of the after-action reports, accident investigations and public testimony by FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue," the book states.

The questioning of Giuliani was considered by Kean and Hamilton "a low point" in the commission's examination of witnesses during public hearings. "We did not ask tough questions, nor did we get all of the information we needed to put on the public record," they wrote.

Commission members backed off, Kean and Hamilton said, after drawing criticism in newspaper editorials for sharp questioning of New York fire and police officials at earlier hearings. The editorials said the commission was insensitive to the officials' bravery on the day of the attacks.

"It proved difficult, if not impossible, to raise hard questions about 9/11 in New York without it being perceived as criticism of the individual police and firefighters or of Mayor Giuliani," Kean and Hamilton said.

***

In their book, which goes on sale Aug. 15, Kean and Hamilton recap obstacles they say the panel faced in putting out a credible report in a presidential election year, including fights for access to government documents and an effort to reach unanimity.

***

If Cleland had not resigned, the commission probably would not have reached unanimity, according to the book."

We know it's Cheney, that's

We know it's Cheney, that's old news.

Tarpley camp, following

Tarpley camp, following orders from Cheney...

Now, oncw again:

Wow, between the Lieberman primary meltdown and the 9/11 commissioners backpeadling...

http://www.myleftnutmeg.com/show...do? diaryId=2472

PS, look here, that's a disk of 9/11 related music in her hand, and I'm the guy in the tie dye.

The Lieberman people wouldn't come out of the event until I left (must have been my "Inside Job" button). Or my sign that said "the war is a lie and you know it" and I handed out disks to the media including the BBC.

The time is right, the rest of you, get out there and do something!

The first rats to leave the

The first rats to leave the Titanic. Unfortunately, the sea is freezing.

Seeing as how Richard Clarke

Seeing as how Richard Clarke was involved in Vigilant Guardian, it makes sense that Cheney may have been the "Maestro"...

Good job Lakezorian.

Good job Lakezorian.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/1

Anyone think Rudy was

Anyone think Rudy was involved at all?

I haven't heard much about his involvenment. This article is really interesting though.
Thanks George as always!

Ronnied
www.487ptown.com

This is what I see

This is what I see happening.

Since the cries for a new independent 9/11 commission are growing stronger by the minute -- and 9/11 is quickly approaching being exposed as an inside job in the mainstream -- the Bush administration and their main cover-up co-conspirators are going to try to re-install the old commission to "tie up the loose ends", shift the blame and attempt to keep themselves from being exposed as the true perpetrators -- and main cover-up criminals -- of 9/11.

The fight isn't won yet. But as the quote that somebigguy posted in another comment thread earlier goes

first the ignore you
then they laugh at you
then they fight you
then WE win

I added the "we" lol

Victory is closer than ever so push hard!

These Commissioners kept

These Commissioners kept their mouths shut as long as they could. They covered up lies. KNOWINGLY. Only NOW when the truth finally starts to come out, do they try and cover their asses... They should be brought before a judge for their crimes. They should be arrested immediately.

You want them to talk? You

You want them to talk? You arrest them immediately.

INCLUDING the staffers.

^ agreed

^ agreed

Book: Sept. 11 panel

Book: Sept. 11 panel considered Pentagon probe
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14191255/from/RS.1/

And... PHILIP ZELIKOW AND

And... PHILIP ZELIKOW AND DIETRICH SCHNELL.

Sorry Commissioner's. 9/11

Sorry Commissioner's. 9/11 has been used for EVERYTHING.

You cover up ONE lie regarding 9/11, KNOWING, you go to jail.

LY

LY

Jon, do you want me to mail

Jon, do you want me to mail you an OS X Tiger [10.4] installation disc?

Sorry... you don't get to

Sorry... you don't get to make money trying to cover your ass. You go to jail.

Whatever that saying is regarding the game Monopoloy... pass something, something something...

"Jon, do you want me to mail

"Jon, do you want me to mail you an OS X Tiger [10.4] installation disc?"

It's positioning. People

It's positioning.

People will eventually be incarcerated/executed. Criminals always try to shift blame to their partners in crime. This is classic.

That's not legal. Unless

That's not legal. Unless it's brand new, in the box, a gift...

:)

Email me.

Wow, between the Lieberman

Wow, between the Lieberman primary meltdown and the 9/11 commissioners backpeadling...

I agree Jon!

PS, look here, that's a disk of 9/11 related music in her hand, and I'm the guy in the tie dye.

The Lieberman people wouldn't come out of the event until I left (must have been my "Inside Job" button). Or my sign that said "the war is a lie and you know it" and I handed out disks to the media including the BBC.

The time is right, the rest of you, get out there and do something!

Here's the

Ruppert

You guys see what that

You guys see what that Republican plant said to McKinney today?

So, the Omissioners say

So, the Omissioners say NORAD lied and they were too soft on Giuliani? Let's throw the Report in the garbage.

On another matter, Dylan jumped the gun yesterday on that WTC black box issue. The pictures at this Albany 9/11 Museum were of a poster that was used at Ground Zero to help people identify the type of boxes to look for. So, the government still claims they were never found.

I don't know your email. I

I don't know your email. I just looked at your site but couldn't find any email.

MSNBC.com's top story right

MSNBC.com's top story right now is the 9/11 Commissions suspicion of the Pentagon's cover-up:

"Lingering Questions"

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14191255/

Gun to your head, guys, do

Gun to your head, guys, do you fall more in the Ruppert camp that Cheney ran war games or do you fall more in the Tarpley camp that everything was run in privatized command centers?

This for FTW subscribers

This for FTW subscribers today, in response to the Vanity Fair piece.

Guliani was most certainly

Guliani was most certainly involved -- at least in the coverup.

He spirited away that wreckage post haste -- never mind the firefighters, never mind the bodies burried in the cement and molten steel, never mind the forensic analysis.

Guliani's your old school p2 lodge fascist, straight outta Godfather III. He's as slimy as they come.

I think the Commissioners

I think the Commissioners are talking shit about everyone else because they hear second-hand stuff that the internet is brimming with info that they are liars and it's just too much for them to keep up with and they don't know exactly what all is out there, so they are just going to start selling out people. They key question is, why didn't they publish their concerns about NORAD or Giuliani two years ago?

"Gun to your head, guys, do

"Gun to your head, guys, do you fall more in the Ruppert camp that Cheney ran war games or do you fall more in the Tarpley camp that everything was run in privatized command centers?"

I think whether Cheney ran them, or organized them, it links to Cheney.

"Gun to your head, guys, do

"Gun to your head, guys, do you fall more in the Ruppert camp that Cheney ran war games or do you fall more in the Tarpley camp that everything was run in privatized command centers?"

Somewhere inbetween, I guess. No doubt the operation was largely "outsourced", with Cheney and co keeping the rear guard.

If have HAD to choose I'd go with the Ruppert camp. Tarpley -- as much as I admire him and respect his intellect -- virtually absolves the neocons of involvment, though it's quite obvious they were essential to the operation, probably the masterminds, from a clean break and PNAC to Strauss and beyond.

People like Tarpley and Alex Jones are forever chasing the shadow, rather than the substance; alternatively, people like Chomsky only focus on the institutional side (which is, however, far more relevant, though less "sexy").

The shadow gov serves mainly as a means of plausible deniability for members of state, but it's not at all clear who is pulling who's strings -- in fact, like the relationship between israel and the US, the line simply isn't there anymore.

Nor does it really MATTER.

What did Mussolini say about fascism?

"Moles" schmoles. The shadow comes from the same substance.

As for the alleged assassination attempts on Bush and this business about "Angel", it seems more likely -- to me anyway -- that these elements were involved in a COUNTER-coup, threatening Bush and Ço after they figured out they had been snookered. The war games had gone live. Don't forget, a lot of Pentagon folks died that day, many involved in keeping the books.

Schoenman, Chossudovsky, Sander Hicks Ruppert and Ahmed place the 911 attacks in their proper context: a crisis of capitalism. But I also feel Alex and Tarpley etc. offer valuable contributions.

That's my take.

^ poll doesn't really offer

^ poll doesn't really offer the best choices lol

Thank you, Jon, I am honored

Thank you, Jon, I am honored by your comment.

Do you think the Pentagon

Do you think the Pentagon was honest about its response to the Sept. 11 attacks?
Yes, the military reacted as well as it could have and doesn't have anything to hide.
No, the military was unprepared for 9/11 and hasn't been open about its failings that day.

Push poll, limited hangout, no proper choice for MIHOP. (so I voted for the 2nd one, the least wrong choice..)

TRUE...just figured you

TRUE...just figured you would all like to vote.

I'm aware they're not the best choices, but at least it's something!

Ronnied
www.487ptown.com

I said about 4 months ago

I said about 4 months ago that the "9/11 taint" would be used to remove The Rudimeister as a potential GOP candidate.

The globalists want Condi to lose to Hillary.

You can let MSNBC know that

You can let MSNBC know that to get an accurate picture of public opinion they need to include a MIHOP option in their poll instead of just the limited hangout "we were confused" option by emailing them here: letters@msnbc.com

can't wait to take my photo

can't wait to take my photo with my "Investigate 9/11" banner in front of the White House tomorrow afternoon!!!

DHS... you're going to D.C.?

DHS... you're going to D.C.?

Jon: I'm visiting family in

Jon:

I'm visiting family in MD and DC is 45 min away so we're taking a trip.

Anything you'd like while I'm there?

Any suggestions on signs from anyone?

So far I came up with:

"The 9/11 Commission Report is a Lie and YOU KNOW IT!"

and

"$300,000,000,000 of YOUR TAX DOLLARS WASTED!"

" No, the military was

" No, the military was unprepared for 9/11 and hasn't been open about its failings that day."

I guess technically, this could describe the lower 99.9x% of the military, since things were so compartmentalized, with NORAD having the wool pulled over their eyes with the wargames, the fighter pilots chasing false radar inserts etc.. you could prolly count the # of PTB who knew the full extent of what was going, on 2 hands and maybe 2 feet... with Emperor aWol totally out of the loop of course.

Separately, Tarpley's unique angle is his "Angel is next" theory.... I never read his book in full, but he's summarized several times in interviews, including the LA 911 panel, and Malloy last night. I never really followed that thread.. seems like a road to nowhere, as though whether or not his theory about "the secret gummit speaks" is something we're ever going to learn for sure. Seems he likes to harp on it though.

Here again is his book "Synthetic Terror...", 2.3 MB PDF file (nice size to email to your friends as an attachment)

http://rapidshare.de/files/15543831/Tarpley-_911_synthetic_terror_made_i...

(use Acrobat's SEARCH function to find the word "angel" to jump to the relevant action in this very loooong PDF doc)

'We' were too soft on Kean

'We' were too soft on Kean and Hamilton

Q: What do you call criminal

Q: What do you call criminal indictments delivered to each and every member of the 9/11 Commission Report?

A: A good start!

Poopy: http://www.unitedslave

Whether or not the military

Whether or not the military was "unprepared" or not does not excuse the dishonesty to the 9/11 Commission.

Nor do I think they were necessarily "unprepared". On the contrary, an Inside Job top-to-bottom coverup requires great preparation.

Of course keeping it covered up is a bit more tricky.

Honestly, the #1 thing I think they mis-underestimated was THE INTERNET.

My previous post is

My previous post is referring to this MSNBC 9/11 poll:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14191717/

I was going to go down with

I was going to go down with you if you were going by yourself. I wouldn't mind doing 9/11 Truth Door To Door in front of the White House.

I wouldn't mind doing 9/11

I wouldn't mind doing 9/11 Truth Door To Door in front of the White House.
Jon Gold | Homepage | 08.04.06 - 10:44 pm | #
.........................
Now THAT would be a great door to knock on. :)

it'll just be me, my gf and

it'll just be me, my gf and her sister.

If Kean and Hamilton were so

If Kean and Hamilton were so concerned they weren't getting the facts, why did they issue a 'final' report?

"Honestly, the #1 thing I

"Honestly, the #1 thing I think they mis-underestimated was THE INTERNET."

No doubt.

Coming from a complete techno-novice,

would there be any way of getting the net back up and running if "they" shut it down?

Without the net, I'd be forced to watch the "news"!

I'd be in the dark, like Plato's Cave.

I ask this question seriously.

I don't think "they" will

I don't think "they" will ever COMPLETELY shut down the net; too much dead prez to be sucked out a al Amazon.

But they may try and make it go the way of radio, and television...come it think of it, they most certainly will.

We need some net-nerds (heroes) to come up with a solution to this problem before it's too late!

"If Kean and Hamilton were

"If Kean and Hamilton were so concerned they weren't getting the facts, why did they issue a 'final' report?
bb | 08.04.06 - 10:53 pm | # "

Because the "mandate" was never taken seriously.

http://antiwar.com/sperry/?articleid=2209

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20051128144916707

http://gnn.tv/B12001

But that was rhetorical, wasn't it?

Oh my God - of course he was

Oh my God - of course he was involved! He removed evidence from the crime scene!

How many light years are people away from the truth? Please get the facts. The man knew the law he violated - he had the steel removed from the trade center, shipped it to China before the investigation got a chance to begin. He violated Federal laws he was clearly aware of as a former Prosecutor, not to remove evidence from a crime scene.

Cheryl, I was just asking

Cheryl, I was just asking because I do not hear much buzz about Rudy, and I do know a number of "facts".

I'm quite aware of the laws, crime scene evidence, etc.

Ronnied
www.487ptown.com

They won't "shut down" the

They won't "shut down" the Internet. They'll create a two-tiered Internet, and thereby segregate information.

As I intimated, 'they' will

As I intimated, 'they' will keep the internet open ---- for business.

My question is -- what about the rest of us?

Is there the possibility that "they" can shut down -- or extremely limit -- THAT tier of the internet/

It's not exactly a radical hypothesis.

They did it with radio and Television.

Like I said, I don't know the first thing about the technical aspects of the net, which is why I asked the question.

I assume 80% of the people on this site are the same.

If I wanted a smartass remark I could have gone to FoxNews.

THE TERRORISM AWARDS! ----

it's almost election '08 - i

it's almost election '08 - i hope everybody is stocking up on things that might be hard to find in the near future - imagine if something as basic as TP or aspirin or even water were suddenly hard to find.
_____--

Gun to your head, guys, do

Gun to your head, guys, do you fall more in the Ruppert camp that Cheney ran war games or do you fall more in the Tarpley camp that everything was run in privatized command centers?

More than likely, Tarpley is on point. I can totally picture some black shady corp. like DynCorp or Bechtel running this from some secret underground control room fully tied into black-op/shadow government technology.

Cheney was obviously a low level operative blundering NORAD and causing problems for the military intercepts. Like Tarpley said, would this op be put in the hands of some rolly polly with four pacemakers who could drop dead at any moment?

These subtle details are the most interesting but yet the ones we'll probably never know. So annoying....

The problem I see with this scenario is that it would be difficult to prosecute these "hidden hands" and it possibly takes the main blame off the Admin (who I want in prison ASAP), and makes them more like accessories to the act than the sole planners/perps. The PNAC slugs had to be tied into the black op though, after all it's their gameplan unfolding. Thoe whole thing could go REAL DEEP though, into Rothschild types, etc.

Thinking like this, it's hard not to get confused.

Anyone think Rudy was

Anyone think Rudy was involved at all?
I haven't heard much about his involvenment. This article is really interesting though.
Thanks George as always!
Ronnied
www.487ptown.com
Ronnied | Homepage | 08.04.06 - 8:53 pm | #

I doubt Kean & Co. would risk pointing the finger @ Ghouliani if he isn't one of them. Their new smokescreen is blame each other & the military on "incompetence."

"...On another matter, Dylan

"...On another matter, Dylan jumped the gun yesterday on that WTC black box issue. The pictures at this Albany 9/11 Museum were of a poster that was used at Ground Zero to help people identify the type of boxes to look for. So, the government still claims they were never found."
Anonymous | 08.04.06 - 9:47 pm | #

WTF? Indestructible block boxes couldn’t be found, but viable DNA for 63 of 64 passengers was found??? Use your brains people—the DNA results were fabricated! No AA77, no passengers were ever @ the Pentagon. Another big smoking gun for us!

Also, drones/missiles/bombs

Also, drones/missiles/bombs don't have black boxes^.

Shadow government - it's

Shadow government - it's always been with us.

what if the democrats pull a

what if the democrats pull a false-flag terror action on us in order to make the republicans look bad?
it could happen!
_____-

1. WTC 1, 2 and 7

1. WTC 1, 2 and 7 collapsed.
2. All the evidence now lay in 3 piles. Right ?
3. Well, normally, no one can touch this evidence. Right. Its the scene of a crime. Try to go to some murder scene and remove the evidence. You will be put into jail. And here this was a mass murder site. So, Ghouliani should be put in jail 3000 times. Right.
4. Well, in steps Ghouliana, and IMMEDIATELY gives the OK to REMOVE THE EVIDENCE and start shipping it off to Pluto ie. China etc.
5. Ghouliana committed a heinous HUGE treasonous crime here. All the evidence, if investigated, might have prevented the Iraq war fiasco, the so called Patriot Act. Millions of people affected here. I wonder what the shadow govt has given Ghouliani as a prize.
6. 2+2=4. Ghouliana is a part of the new shadow government.
7. He should be brought to justice for allowing the removing of the evidence of the controlled demolition. He should be put in jail for life!!!!

Their book is another

Their book is another whitewash. A whitewash of how hard it was for them to investigate the biggest CRIME ever in the history of the USA. I am sorry its too late. Kean and Hamilton you screwed up, and I am sure you did it intentionally.

Please Kean and Hamilton move out of the way. You are the Benedict Arnolds of this generation. No question in my mind. Please, after you have died in your old age, 50 years from now, make it known far and wide and whole droves of Americans can come and PISS and DEFECATE on your graves.

And your names will resound thru the echoes of history in the Wikipedias of the ages of your whitewashing the CRIME of the AGES to derail the whole world into WW Three and bring in the new world order that will crush the common man and re-instate the Egyptian type dynasty's of old. No, we will never forget your treasonous behavior. You had the power to expose the CRIME of CRIMES and you chose intentionally, willfully not to dig for the truth.

Kean and Hamilton are bullshitters for the new world order.

Just this one paragraph below shows that Kean and Hamilton NEVER had any intention of investigating for the truth. Have they come out to this day about the WTC 7 demolition on 911.

How could they not mention the "collapse" of WTC 7 anywhere in the entire 911 "Commission" Report ?

Curiously, none of the New York newspapers howled when the Kean Commission overlooked the destruction of a 47-story New York skyscraper. The WTC-7 housed Security and Exchange Commission records, offices of the Secret Service and CIA, and the NYC emergency command post of mayor Giuliani. Curiously, the WSJ remained silent, suspiciously silent and almost complicit, about the destruction of WTC-7.

When a trio of obscure California investigative journalists-Eric Hufschmid, Michael Ruppert and David Ray Griffin-began to raise holy hell about the 911 discrepancies and the WTC attack, the New York media, top city officials and leading politicians, like Hillary Clinton, ignored them. The Kean Commission simply followed suit.

Doesn't this say it all.

yes, reprehensor, that was

yes, reprehensor, that was rhetorical

Great stuff^! Keep posting!

Great stuff^! Keep posting!

Guys keep it real! Imagine,

Guys keep it real! Imagine, that the Democrats win the november election 6:4 and what happens? Well, we might get lucky and eventually get some new probe into the 9/11 but the results will be barely scratching the surface and certainly not going into the Lihop/mihop. Just as in the 70s with the CIA and assassination investigations. They covered the most sensitive part too in the end..

So, the busheviks might go into the history as the "most incompetent government" because of the shamefull response to 9/11 and Catrina but that's it..

The circus will go on with Hitlary or McCain or whoever.

We know now with high probability who killed JFK and RFK and guess what nobody is interested, the media moguls are censoring interviews and documentaries which could appear on the US networks etc..

http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_assassination