No. Donna Marsh O'Connor is not in the film.

Again, you're making assumptions. What happens when you make assumptions?

all i can remember is one of the Jersey Girls on Hardball with Chris Matthews saying how she wished the Bush administration would impliment some of the Commissions recommendations. national tv, prime time, and this is what we hear from the most critical of the families.(i guess Donna Marsh wasnt available) you dont need to re-hash the statements they made as of late, about how the Commission is less than adeqaute, i know of those comments, but it would have been nice if that was said on national tv. is Donna Marsh in this film? is her inside job sign taken to heart?

So then don't say you know what's "NOT" in the film.

Tell me what's not in the film Chris.

"when i criticize it in any way"

You know... the Apple G5 is a piece of shit computer. I don't own one. I've never used one. However, I can say beyond the shadow of doubt that the Apple G5 is a piece of shit computer.

Even though the one person I know who does own one, told me that it runs great.

no, you only push that movie so goddamn hard, that it causes you to personally attack me when i criticize it in any way. i think people have a right to know who funds these various 9/11 documentaries, why wouldnt they? you should be proud of that, regardless of some guys criticism on a website.you take it way too personally.

"how did i know you would get so defensive?"

Maybe because I had something to do with this movie, and I'm very proud of it, and when people who haven't even seen it criticize it, it pisses me off.

Especially when all CJ had to say about it was GOOD.

Instead of reading the GOOD he had to say about it, you focused on the one thing you were looking for, and pounced on it.

Even though he later retracted the statement.

Since you knew I would become so "defensive" about it, you obviously were instigating a fight. Since you made the insinuation that I'm promoting it for the money, you obviously were instigating a fight.

I think it is you Chris that needs to do some growing up.

no, i simply asked for full disclosure, as one person above asked why you were promoting it so hard, or something along those lines.im not saying you dont believe in the film, clearly you do, but full disclosure is always a good thing.

Sorry, but didn't you imply I'm promoting it for the money?

I'm done now.

no problem sbg, but i had to defend myself against baseless attacks. i criticize a movie and the guy attacks me personally and irrationally. i cant let that slide. im done now.

Take it easy guys, there was a time when everyone complained about how hard it was to get anything done here because of the Trolls.

Now the Trolls are gone, and the regulars are the problem. If you can discuss things rationally, without the vulgarity, do it. If you can't, please take it elsewhere.

It's obvious to me that you love to instigate arguments. You have since you joined 911blogger.com.
Jon Gold | Homepage | 08.13.06 - 10:58 am | #
again Jon, your an asshole and a liar, your about the ONLY person on here i EVER have had arguments with. the only other people i have arguments with are no-planers and Chomsky lovers. thats about it. just because your irrational ass has a problem with me doesnt mean everyone else here does.

On top of that, you have the audacity to pounce on a movie by the family members?

That's fucking sick.
Jon Gold | Homepage | 08.13.06 - 10:58 am | #
this comment is typical. so fucking typical. im not attacking the families and your ann asshole for implying it. how old are you? you act like a fucking angry child.

oh, and fuck you Jon, for questioning why i havent been to any of your meetings. maybe its because of assholes like yourself being there? maybe its because i work long hours at night when the meetings typically occur? maybe its other personal reasons you have no right knowing? fuck you asshole. grow up. you sit here and fucking RAVE about this movie without pointing out the fact you stand to make money off of it. i dont expect you NOT to promote the mopie if you have a stake in it, but its EXTREMELY immature of you to attack me personally for criticizing it. grow the fuck up.

Reading through the comments I see that there is lots of Canucks here, good to see. This truly is a global movement...

how did i know you would get so defensive? calm down Jon, it just doesnt sound hard hitting enough for me. you dont have to take it so personally and get all emotional over it.

Come on guys, we have dozens of films that focus on controlled demolition, we can have a film here or there that doesn't. If you don't like Press for Truth, you don't have to promote it, you can continue to use whatever film you want in your Activism.

Arguing about it will achieve nothing, I guarantee you that.

Unfuckingbelievable.

Nah, why should people expect to make their money back when it cost THOUSANDS to make.

That's crazy.

Hey Chris... let me ask you a question... do you even read what people say?

"And yes, I see what you mean about ISI involvement as evidence MIHOP, so there are many ways to look at it."

"This whole discussion - and the film - reminds me that there really isn't much distinction between MIHOP and LIHOP"

And as to your question about getting paid, I haven't received one thin dime from 9/11: Press For Truth.

I was told that it needed money to be completed. I gave them the money they needed to complete the film.

In other words, I took a chance in something I BELIEVED in.

If it makes money, I hope to at least get my initial investment back.

It wasn't about making money Chris. It was about getting a film out there that I think can make the difference.

It's obvious to me that you love to instigate arguments. You have since you joined 911blogger.com.

Truth be told Chris, if this movie makes millions upon millions of dollars, and some of that money comes to me, the FACT of the matter is, that money will go BACK into the movement.

Two PA 9/11 Visibility meetings have already taken place, and you haven't shown up at either.

I have spent the last 4 years being one of the MOST active members of this movement.

What the FUCK have you done?

On top of that, you have the audacity to pounce on a movie by the family members?

That's fucking sick.

theres a movie that wont play it "safe" and tread lightly with all this cryptic shit.

does Press for Truth get into the wargames? Pentagon? do i even have to ask about that one?

does Final Cut have a firm release date yet?

Wow, 9/11: Press for Truth is one amazing documentary! This one is going to make big waves - even if it doesn't get into MIHOP evidence, which it doesn't.
CJ | 08.13.06 - 12:14 am | #
cant say im surprised. what a dissapointment. as if taking 5 or 10 minutes out of the film to show the evidence of CD would be a huge drawback or something.....

"Jon, why do you keep plugging that movie?"

Because I believe it is an absolute good.
Jon Gold | Homepage | 08.12.06 - 9:22 pm | #
you also get a paycheck from it correct? full disclosure man.......

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and Mike Papantonio will have an interview with Alex Jones today at some point during their "Ring of Fire" radio program; 5-7pm Eastern.

This sounds urgent! Alex is the best at fighting against the growing police state.

So you're saying that every movie that comes out has to be identical to Loose Change?
Jon Gold | Homepage | 08.12.06 - 1:16 pm | #
NOPE. but it should NOT ignore the evidence of CD simply because its "controversial". thats bullshit. present ALL evidence. Loose Change tries to do that.Press for Truth likely wont,for fear of advocating a theory or looking like "conspiracy theorists".there are plenty of 9/11 movies out there that cover the Pentagon and CD,and they are not identical to Loose Change.

according to this report, it wasn't David Slesinger, but David Simmons who was arrested and it was days ago.

Why is 911blogger always believe in rumours and half infos??

http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=446021&ve...
"...We are being lied to. I don't know why, but we know the official story does not make scientific sense," protester David Simmons said.

Wow, this could be big news...

"present ALL evidence"

If you wanted to "present ALL evidence", you would go back to 1913, and the creation of the Federal Reserve. If you wanted to "present ALL evidence", you would go back to the United States and Britain in Iran during the time of Mohammad Mossedegh. If you wanted to "present ALL evidence", you would show the writings of Leo Strauss. If you wanted to "present ALL evidence", you would show the obvious collaborative effort between the United States, Great Britain, and Israel to control the Middle East.

The point is, there is SO MUCH information out there that it would be IMPOSSIBLE for any ONE movie, unless it was 50 hours long, to "present ALL evidence".

I happen to like the way 9/11: Press For Truth, in 2 hours, presents its' information.

I happen to think A LOT of other people will as well.

There have been SEVERAL movies that talk about Controlled Demolition, and the Pentagon. I don't know HOW MANY movies there are out there it's THAT HARD to keep up.

How many movies focus on Paul Thompson's timeline? How many movies have family members telling the American people that we were lied to?

"according to this report, it wasn't David Slesinger, but David Simmons who was arrested and it was days ago.

Why is 911blogger always believe in rumours and half infos??"

Um, correction, Mia Hamel was the one arrested in that report. I believe Dave Simmons was someone there with her. Dave Slesigner was arrested last night.

Why is 911blogger always believe in rumours and half infos??

911blogger is a discussion board for 9/11 Truth Activism. 911blogger is not a "thing" that believes in "rumours and half infos".

Isn't it spelled "rumors"? Jon???

I agree with Jon, every movie doesn't have to focus on demolition, there are quite a few. There are other topics worthy of discussion...

"Isn't it spelled "rumors"? Jon???"

Correct. The troops were on the border to... You're lucky.

Maybe his is what is happening:

It is likely that much of the information regarding the true events of 9//11 are classified as State Secrets as is explicit in the silencing of Sibil Edmonds.

THINKPROGRESS says

“In a momentous expansion of the government’s authority to regulate public disclosure of national security information,” a federal court has ruled that “even private citizens who do not hold security clearances can be prosecuted for unauthorized receipt and disclosure of classified information.” Under this interpretation, for example, the reporters who leaked the classified report on prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib “could apparently be prosecuted under the Espionage Act.”

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/08/10/in-a-momentous-expansion-of-the-gove...

Under this type of control it may be possible that explicit dissemination of information regarding the true facts of 9/11 through the MSM Has already been thwarted. When knowledge of the facts reaches a specific critical mass(like around now) people will be silenced or arrested. As has happened in England
under the Official Secrets Act everybody can know the truth about something but it is illegal to report on in the press or to talk about it in public.

The meetings between such media outlets such as NYT an WP and The U.S. administration over issues like reporting on illegal NSA spying may indicate that control is already occurring. This may explain the bizarre MSM handling of the broader 9/11 story.

it's funny that jon describes hangout stuff as "evidence"

BMAC... wow.

Slesinger was not arrested

http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/news/display.htm?storyid=51318
Movie prompts protester at Rockville theater
911Courage.org member believes government complicit in 2001 terrorist attacks depicted in 'World Trade Center'
Published on August 10, 2006

http://www.fredericknewspost.com/photos/06/08/10/51318.jpg

..."As soon as I'm arrested, I will stop leafleting," Mr. Slesinger said. "It is not a physical challenge; it is a moral challenge."

Mr. Slesinger, of Rockville, was the lone representative of a group skeptical of government in a sea of municipal workers, but a recent poll by Scripps Howard/Ohio University shows public skepticism about the government's role...

...Mr. Slesinger, 55, has engaged in civil disobedience more than 20 times, he said. He served four months in jail in 1982 after an arrest for trespassing as he protested a nuclear power plant in New Hampshire...

...Before the premiere, Mr. Slesinger said he expected to be arrested for trespassing, or some other minor offense. He seemed somewhat disappointed when nobody from the theater's management, or the city police asked him to leave.

At one point, a police officer eating an ice cream cone walked right past him without so much as a glance.

He later changed his tune and said he would use the lack of enforcement as a precedent to return.

"I'm very pleased that they decided not to arrest me," he said...

"it's funny that jon describes hangout stuff as "evidence"

yawn.

Jesus dude...

Montgomery County's finest obliged him with an arrest at about 9:30PM Friday evening after trying a little friendly persuasion to get him to leave voluntarily. Slesinger made it clear that he would stop leafletting only when placed under arrest and with that he was led to the squad car and handcuffed.

You're posting articles from the 10th. His article available here explicitly says, "August 11th, Better Late than Never".

Boy, won't they be surprised? Following is from Kennedy & Papantonio's Ring of Fire website, under "This week's guests":
...
Nationally syndicated radio host Alex Jones explains why he and many conservatives are disgusted with today's Republican party.

Chomsky has an agenda like everyone else. His is to get people to understand the *roots* of American policy. And I think he does an excellent job. I've seen him live and he is an amazing speaker and is passionate about what he does. The truth is that we need all kinds of perspectives to help us understand the reality of the world that we live in. We shouldn't cut someone down simple because they do not want to risk loosing the ability to help people understand the underlining cause for all the we see wrong with our government. Chomsky may not be public about his real understanding about what went down on 911, or maybe he really does believe the blowback theory. Regardless, he is an important asset to our collective paradigm, so I say lay off shaking your middle finger at him.

Likewise, Zinn, I know, thinks 911 was an inside job, he has said as much, but he's not pressing it either. Everyone has their own understanding about the best way to go about things, and critisizing people who do not see things the way we do is what is really holding this movement back. All genuine views are important and should be granted a level of respect.

Nationally syndicated radio host Alex Jones explains why he and many conservatives are disgusted with today's Republican party.
-c | Homepage | 08.12.06 - 1:56 pm | #
HAHA, Alex Jones may be conservative in many of his social stances, but being labeled is gonna piss him off.

Zinn may not be pressing it, but at least he didnt disrespect it like Chomsky has. i respect Zinn so much more than i do Chomsky based on that alone.

How many movies focus on Paul Thompson's timeline? How many movies have family members telling the American people that we were lied to?
Jon Gold | Homepage | 08.12.06 - 1:30 pm | #

Jon, on rare occasions, you actually do state something brilliant! Paul Thompson's Timeline, even a abridged version, would make an extremely convincing 9/11 truth movie!

Chomsky says-"its unimportant and i havent researched it much at all." well fuck you Noam.

Interesting article on airplane terrorism:

http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2006/08/11/decoding-airplane-terrorism/

By now, everyone has heard about the latest airline bombing threat which was “stopped” by the British government. If you’ve never considered the importance of threats to airplanes, you might do well to consider the recent line of questioning from a Cryptogon post:

We always hear about how smart, how cunning, “the terrorists” are. After all, according to legend, “the terrorists” are so smart and so cunning that they hijacked aircraft and flew them into buildings, and all the rest of that bullsh*t…

Yet, for some reason, “the terrorists” don’t seem interested in attacking the undefended support infrastructure of the U.S. National Security Agency?! “The terrorists” are, likewise, uninterested in taking out the undefended data infrastructures that undergird U.S. mega corporations.

If “the terrorists” hate the U.S. so much, why haven’t they attacked the undefended electrical and data infrastructures that animate the Great Satan? Why do “the terrorists” only carry out symbolic pinprick attacks that are MUCH more difficult to execute than strategic, decapitation strikes? Why not deliver a blow to the U.S. that would actually take it down?

Whatever you take away from that, youÂ’ve got to admit that he asks some compelling questions. And the rest of that post is also well worth reading. The key point I take away from that post is that, clearly, attacking airlines (or threatening to do so) is a purely symbolic act. Attacking one airplane is bad and tragic, but itÂ’s not - militarily speaking - as awful as it would be if they managed to take out an entire airport, power plant, factory, bridge, major highway, railroad hub, port area, etc. You know: real military targets, in other words. Things that are of clear strategic importance because they cripple infrastructure and inhibit your opponentÂ’s ability to fight back. Putting a bomb on an airplane does not do this. It does one thing and one thing only.

It makes people afraid to travel.

The thing is though, thatÂ’s not where it ends. Getting somebody afraid of traveling is itself a much more loaded and interesting trick. Fear of travel decodes into increased provincialism and a reversion to local tribalism. Americans, increasingly so, are world travelers - at least the people who can afford to be. And the people who can afford to be are, by and large, also reasonably well educated. People who have money enough to be mobile and a decent education are thus able to be exposed to multiple viewpoints and perspectives by traveling. In short, they become more cosmopolitan.

An attack on an airplane then, is an attack on the rising cosmopolitanism and freedom of the middle class who can afford to travel by plane. It’s designed, even if you don’t fly, to make you subconsciously think that other nations and other nationalities are inherently dangerous. They are out to get you and it’s best not to “go there” mentally.

more at the link

I've watched Sky news interview two young muslims who know the one of the SUSPECTS in their neighbour. They said that

if the american and brittish intelligence think he was ploting an attack then they are really concerned for their own sake.

Well it's sure hard being a muslim in Britain these days.

HAHAHAHA

Is it truly illegal to hand-out urgent national security leaflets at a mall or a movie theater? If so, why?

If Bobby Jr. gets aboard the 9/11 truth bandwagon it would a Major, I repeat Major victory for 9/11 truth. Especially for the older generation like myself who still remember JFK and RFK and the "Camelot" years. What a difference between then and now. My God, it is a different world completely. Can you imagine either Jack or Bobby condoning torture or pre-emptive war? There is no way the media could ignore Bobby Jr. endorsing 9/11 truth. It would be the end of the line for the neocon madmen. Please Bobby, pull through for us.

Aj can put this in terrorstorm.

Furthermore, I think yesterday's thrashing of Z was unwarented. Maybe he's posting under a different name, I haven't seen him around, but I don't think he was a gov pee-on, and I know how hurt I would feel if people told me I was insane for expressing my views (yes the 'fat bastard' comments were out of line, but still).

I agree with Jon, every movie doesn't have to focus on demolition, there are quite a few. There are other topics worthy of discussion...
somebigguy | Homepage | 08.12.06 - 1:35 pm | #
and that wasnt my point. other topics are worthy, ALL topics. ALL suspicions about the offical story should be put forward.(and it wouldnt have to be 50 hours long like Jon said) why pick and choose? why ignore CD and the Pentagon? too controversial? well guess what? those ommissions from Press the Truth have been responsible for recruiting roughly half of the movement.(Pentagon flash gave one of the biggest shots in the arm to the movement back when it was in its infancy, so did Theirry Meysan, and you know it.) way to ignore half the constituency.

Little anonymous, I think you are V.

Furthermore, I think yesterday's thrashing of Z was unwarented. Maybe he's posting under a different name, I haven't seen him around, but I don't think he was a gov pee-on, and I know how hurt I would feel if people told me I was insane for expressing my views (yes the 'fat bastard' comments were out of line, but still).
anonymous | 08.12.06 - 2:02 pm | #
you were obviously not here the day before. he called dylan from loose change, me and other people gay for no apparent reason, he called Fetzer fat bastard at least 15 times, he attacked half the people on this site at one point or another,he used 4 different names to attack people while not using V.so i suggest you go back and read his comments for the full story of why he got "thrashed".

There is no way the media could ignore Bobby Jr. endorsing 9/11 truth.
maddog | Homepage | 08.12.06 - 2:02 pm | #
i hope your right maddog, but they did a pretty good job of ignoring his stolen election views/evidence.(im too cynical, i know)

Chris, I agree 100% with MIHOP instead of LIHOP, but an opening question to ask hardcore OV believers is if he/she thinks it's possible that some rogue elements or moles in our own gov't knew 9/11 was going to happen & let it. If they reply "no", you can ask, "How can you be sure, there was no investigation of this nor anything else."

I'm not V. I'm from Chicago too, maybe that's why I felt sorry for him. (I'm a girl btw, and the owners of this sight can tell from my ip address that I'm a regular and I'm not V). Anyway, Chris, you also seem angry and are too quick to make others feel defensive. I'd work on that if I were you. Yesterday, V and you kinda reminded me of each other. I wasn't aware of V's attacks, so I will withhold further comments about it.

The V jerk & little anonymous seem like shills trying to gain some sort of foothold here.

i usually start with the media for offical story believers. i ask them how much they trust the media to tell them things that would be dangerous to the establishment/government/big business etc. its depressing how trusting most americans are of talking heads.....

Anyway, Chris, you also seem angry and are too quick to make others feel defensive. I'd work on that if I were you. Yesterday, V and you kinda reminded me of each other. I wasn't aware of V's attacks, so I will withhold further comments about it.
anonymous | 08.12.06 - 2:14 pm | #
im not V. i dont know V. thats why im coming right at you like V did. nice try.

Daniel in Korea -- I'm listening to your podcast right now and it rocks. It has quite a few tidbits in it that are new to me.

"Girl or woman?"

I believe she identified herself as a "girl" which doesn't happen to be the word I use for people over 18, but whatever.

As for you, big-A Anonymous, what's the problem with picking a name?

It would be justice for Bobby Jr. to pay back Bush senior for JFK's murder by exposing 9/11.

I agree, if I was a Kennedy, I'd dedicate my life to bringing these pricks down...

Bobby jr endorsing 911 truth? Too good to be true.Not likely.If I'm wrong feel free to castigate and roundly abuse me.

It would be justice for Bobby Jr. to pay back Bush senior for JFK's murder by exposing 9/11.
Anonymous | 08.12.06 - 2:58 pm | #
not to mention his fathers murder.if i was RFK jr. i dont know how i would contain myself. hes a lot more rational than i am i guess.

agree, if I was a Kennedy, I'd dedicate my life to bringing these pricks down...
somebigguy | Homepage | 08.12.06 - 3:02 pm | #

Damn right! If I were Bobby Jr., I'd be on that mission until my last breath! (I'm on it that way myself, and I'm no Bobby Jr., for Christ's sake. People like him are going to have to step up to the plate.)

not to mention his fathers murder.if i was RFK jr. i dont know how i would contain myself. hes a lot more rational than i am i guess.
Chris | Homepage | 08.12.06 - 3:12 pm | #

I'm with ya. I'd a gone berserk on them a long time ago!

I know. The if you're a Kennedy no less, there are some things you should never forgive-and-forget.

Only in my 911 fantasy world would a Kennedy avenge the murder by exposing 911.

Here's your beloved Ollie Stone shortly after 911:

"This attack was pure chaos, and chaos is energy," he said. "All great changes have come from people or events that were initially misunderstood, and seemed frightening, like madmen. Einstein, Nikola Tesla, [Bill] Gates."

Next time he spouts off about believing the official story how bout someone ask him about that little diddy?

what about it? He doesn't seem to be saying anything.

I hope this Kennedy has enough sense to protect himself. My God the perps axed three of his relatives.

Bobby Kennedy do everything you can to protect yourself. You are mortal just like everyone else. Please don't have any illusions. Have 20 bodyguards, have a bullet proof vest, change your traveling logistics constantly, don't fly in a prop plane like JFK Jr. Take every precaution. etc...

JFK Jr. was assassinated 6 years ago.
I am sure that these assassins were from the same groups that assassinated his father.
Maybe the 911 perps were from the same groups that assassinated JFK ?

What poetic justice it would be to have Bob Kennedy Jr. bring all of these bastards to justice.

ananymous, surely you've seen the documentary about the killing of JFK jr. right? i just got mine last month, along with JFK2, both very good.

anonymous*

“Islamic fascist”—or “Islamofascist” as it’s popularly spelled on the Internet—is the latest explosive in the right’s semantic arsenal. It’s explosive because it instantly brings to mind the 20th century’s greatest horror, the Holocaust, because it offends the sensibilities of millions of people like Ahmed who hold Islam sacred, and because it infuriates people who believe that the Middle East conflict can be resolved at least partially through talking. It has been in wide use for about a year, mostly by hawkish conservatives who feel that five years of “war on terror” rhetoric has not gone far enough to identify who the enemy is—that is, terrorists who are Muslim
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14319984/
Newsweek usually sucks, but its good to see a mainstream publication shining a light on that bullshit reactionary term "islamofascism".

Republican Senator Rick Santorum, who will be fighting for his seat in November, uses the phrase repeatedly. “Islamic fascism,” he told the National Press Club in July “is the great test of this generation.”

or in other words, its the great fake money making red scare of this generation.

Christo Facist more like it.

Check out Alex Jones preview featuring David Gergen as lying sack of excrement

"Yes, but the same thing can be said about Mr. Gold too."

9/11 Truth Door To Door - Opening Weekend "World Trade Center" - Video Inside

i hope somebodys taping this, cause it aint working for me. the stream is working, but no sound is coming out.

Im having the same problem Chris, good thing I have it on the radio.

no sound.

i'm getting same no sound problem

no sound

I found a stream through our local station 92.1 the mic, google it. Its Madisons local station.

thanks Doug.

No sound here too. Dammit!

take Dougs advice, it works, Alex Jones isnt on yet.

Chris, I am so glad you brought up the brazen hypocrisy regarding the neo-con mouthpieces relentlessly repeating their latest talking point: "Islamic Fascism".

Fascism is the marriage of the military and corporations. It is the military-industrial complex running the country and committing that country's citizens to wars that enrich the elite, which is what we have now in America. There is no religious component to "Fascism", although religion may be "used" to further fascism's aims.

They say history doesn't actually repeat itself, but "it does rhyme"...the historical parallel to what the neo-cons have done to America is Nazi Germany in the 30's. 9/11 was the Reichstag Fire. The Patriot Act mirrors Hitler's program following that false-flag attack. Bush's wars based on complete lies have precidents in Hitler's lies prior to attacking Poland.

Wake up America, you're being played...

Okay, the 92.1 The Mix stream works great. Thanks Doug!

Guys, if anyoneÂ’s got the time to spare from other activism and could you set people like this guy straight;

cpnjack (14 minutes ago)
Oh boy. So if he 'predicted 9/11' - how come he doesn't think maybe he gave osama the idea!? What a loon.

In the Alex Jones's Warning on youtube;

http://youtube.com/watch?v=zAHqSfDNjaI

Cheers dudes!!

Republican Senator Rick Santorum, who will be fighting for his seat in November, uses the phrase repeatedly. “Islamic fascism,” he told the National Press Club in July “is the great test of this generation.”

Googled "Santorum", lately?

hahahahaha, Dan Savage is the man.......

yeah, i knew it was just a matter of time before Bush and the rest of them started adopting that bullshit term. "IslamoFascism" is the single most annoying term those rightwing talking heads have ever come up with. sadly its very effective in riling up the sheep.......

It's a little creepy listening to RFK. He sounds just like his bro...

I'm only really asking dudes cus for some reason it's not letting me post comments in youtube right now.

Anybody gonna call in?

"brain dead peckerwoods", HAHAHAHAHA, Alex Jones is the friggin man........

he kept his credibility but didn't say anything eye-opening or anything to do with the heavy subjects like false flag terrorism and stuff.

Can someone post a download of this interview I missed it.

We need to get Alex Jones on mainstream T.V. Im sure most everyone will agree withthat.

Unfortunately, they didn't get to talk about 9/11 issues, or the New World Order, or anything like that...

Did anyone hear that "break" in Alex's voice? Something that seemed spliced? Or was I imagining that? When they asked him about what needs to change...

Make no mistake, Canadians are talking about 9/11. The younger, internet savvy crowd is working hard to get ideas out. Sadly, people up here think they can trust their media... they think since we're Canadian there is no corruption and corporate servitude. How wrong they are...

Don't bother listening. Nothing about 9/11. All he did was talk about how corrupt the Republicans are. Everyone knows that. So are the Democrats to a lesser degree. I am very disappointed. Not one mention of 9/11 truth. I don't get it. AJ had a golden opportunity and blew it. Shame on him and shame on Bobby.

No mention of 9/11? Alex Jones is my hero and it disappoints me to hear that he wouldnt bring up 9/11. We are out trying everyday to reach someone new and he was on the radio to thousands of non- 9/11 truthers and didnt bring up? Wow.

"Don't bother listening. Nothing about 9/11. All he did was talk about how corrupt the Republicans are. Everyone knows that. So are the Democrats to a lesser degree. I am very disappointed. Not one mention of 9/11 truth. I don't get it. AJ had a golden opportunity and blew it. Shame on him and shame on Bobby."

I'd have to hear it again, but it sounded like it was spliced. If it was, and he says that he did speak of 9/11, then that's bad on Air America's part. If Alex got on Air America and didn't say anything about 9/11, that's bad on Alex's part.

For those in Chicago right now, turn on WCPT-AM 850AM and listen to Lionel then Ring of Fire tomorrow 2-4 and stay around for the Best of Malloy 4-7.

-slaqqer

he couldnt. the host was obviously guiding the discussion. it would have been extremely awkward for Alex to just blurt out "9/11 was an inside job". he maybe could have worked it in if he tried hard enough, but i dont blame him for not doing it based on what i heard and how the interview was structered. Bobby jr. wasnt even there.

Yeah, I kind of figured it would go down like that (Alex would hold back)...I think both AA and Alex Jones have major points of agreement and want to expand their respective audiences, so they are reaching out...but Alex is further out on the edge....millions of Americans can't psychologically bring themselves to believe their government would kill it's own citizens to further the elite's power and profits. Even in the face of that belief being obviously false. We have been brainwashed too successfully.

Still, this new alliance can only lead to good things.

Alex Jones is a place "Conservatives" can go (and still hold on to their self-image of being a conservative) when the cognitive dissonance involved in supporting Bush gets to be too much.

Not what we wanted from AJ, but another small step toward mass public awareness of 9/11 Truth.

Make no mistake, Canadians are talking about 9/11. The younger, internet savvy crowd is working hard to get ideas out. Sadly, people up here think they can trust their media... they think since we're Canadian there is no corruption and corporate servitude. How wrong they are...

Oh, no doubt, they're talking about it. The entire world is talking about it. I get emails every day from people talking about it and contact me because of my site.

I have found a lot of resistance though. I spent a considerable about of time chatting on a Green Party Member yahoo group and I almost got banned from it for the discussion. They set up a members vote and everything to see who wanted to discuss it and who didn't. More didn't but, in the end, I used politics against them and have kept chatting about it anyway. I think at some point I'll help convince them that the 9/11 issue, if resolved, can fix all the issues the Greens want fixed.

But, yeah, they're talking. More and more every day and I freakin' love it. I'm having my very first truth movement meeting/screening/info session at a local university this coming saturday. There's finally enough of us, even here in little ol' St. John's to get the ball rollin'.

Granted I didnt hear the interview, but he tells us to call into radion shows and blurt out 9/11 was an inside job, and infowars.com. Whatever the reason, it's too late now. And I believe he mentioned 9/11 on Mike Malloy's show.

"they think since we're Canadian there is no corruption and corporate servitude. How wrong they are..."

In that way, I think it can be difficult reaching Canadians on many issues. Sure, of course the U.S. media is corrupt but this is Canada...

it very well may have been spliced. both interviews, Alexs and the woman before him sounded like they may have been chopped and screwed, so to speak.

Alex was great and I'm quite happy that he held his composure. It's not a horrible thing that 9/11 wasn't mentioned specifically. After all, the conversation was still about corruption and when if the public is aware of the obvious corruption, 9/11 is far easier to believe.

yes, despite 9/11 not being mentioned, it was still a great conversation for liberals that listen to Air America to hear. its always good when someone points out how corrupt BOTH parties are to partisan audiences. calm down people, this wasnt a total loss, in fact, i would say its a net gain.now im off to watch V for Vendetta and smoke some green, later!

You Canadians are right about Harper. He is nothing but a Bush-NWO clone-puppet. We have a fight on our hands my friends to the north. It breaks my heart to see your fine country go the way of the States. Perhaps if all of us "useless eaters" unite we will defeat these madmen. I don't see where we have any choice. It seems to me the entire planet needs to wake-up and put down these scumbags once and for all.

In that way, I think it can be difficult reaching Canadians on many issues. Sure, of course the U.S. media is corrupt but this is Canada...

I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean.

Canada is relitivly less corrupt that the US though and that is only because we are far younger a country. Having said that, the US controls us in a way that hasn't really needed us to be corrupt. Afterall, if the States were to say "OK Canada, we dont' want any more of anything you make", we'd be fucked.

Having said that Harper, from Alberta, originally settled from travellers from parts of the US, the richest province in Canada, is in Power and everything is rapidly changing.

The media... I haven't quite figured out yet. CBC is rather good but, it is government funded so it's hard to trust.

You Canadians are right about Harper. He is nothing but a Bush-NWO clone-puppet. We have a fight on our hands my friends to the north. It breaks my heart to see your fine country go the way of the States. Perhaps if all of us "useless eaters" unite we will defeat these madmen. I don't see where we have any choice. It seems to me the entire planet needs to wake-up and put down these scumbags once and for all.

It breaks your heart? My heart has left the building and it's eating me alive.

And you're right, this is a global movement we're fighting here, not just Bush and Co. It just so happens that crumbling the 9/11 lie will crumble the entire thing... hopefully.

"I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean."

It means that many Canadians think our media is pure and objective. No question, the CBC is far better than anything in the U.S. but the private networks aren't much better at all.

Canada is a split country. We have about 30 million people thinly spread along the entire US/Canada border. From West to East you have the Oil rich Alberta conservatives, who don't like Ontario, which is typically a liberal stronghold. Then you have Quebec, which is essentially France, stuck in the middle of the country! It would be terribly difficult for us to unite in the face of tyranny I should think.

However, we haven't had any "terrorist" attacks yet. We only have a few major urban centres with symbolic signifigance... I guess many people don't pay much attention to the terror hype.

It means that many Canadians think our media is pure and objective. No question, the CBC is far better than anything in the U.S. but the private networks aren't much better at all.

Oh definitely and that's because most of the news is still focused on US stuff. I have faith though because people are pissed about the war in Afganistan and recognize that Harper is following George Bush's handbook on ruling a country. When people start truly recognizing what the handbook is about, there'll be outrage impossible for the media to ignore.

IF anyone is from Quebec, I'm just being funny... you're cool. lol

"he couldnt. the host was obviously guiding the discussion. it would have been extremely awkward for Alex to just blurt out "9/11 was an inside job". he maybe could have worked it in if he tried hard enough, but i dont blame him for not doing it based on what i heard and how the interview was structered. Bobby jr. wasnt even there."....... I make no excuses for anyone, not even AJ when it comes to 9/11 truth. The fate of the human race depends on exposing 9/11. All other issues are irrelevant.

Also I just realized that if Alex did bring up 9/11 he would need a large amount of time to talk about it and prove our case.

Here's the interview...
http://revolution.netfast.org/Alex%20Jones%20on%20Ring%20of%20Fire%20wit...

This whole pile of shit rests on the 9/11 lie...how can people refuse to look at it? It boggles my mind. Yes, I know about fear and denial but the greatest fear should be letting them get away with it.

However, we haven't had any "terrorist" attacks yet. We only have a few major urban centres with symbolic signifigance... I guess many people don't pay much attention to the terror hype.

That's because we all believe that it will never happen here. We're naive in that way but, I can understand it. Canada has a great reputation around the world... check, HAD. We're loosing popularity by the day with Harper in control. I mean, he shocked the world by backing out of the Kyoto thing. Nobody ever expected Canada to do such a thing. Now the fucker has extended war commitments and is spending more money on the military.

Hmm... lost a post or two there in the blackout. Oh well.

"And you're right, this is a global movement we're fighting here, not just Bush and Co. It just so happens that crumbling the 9/11 lie will crumble the entire thing... hopefully."....Right-on my Canadian friend. Exposing 9/11 will cause their entire structure to crumble. They created a Frankenstein when they pulled-off 9/11. It will be their downfall.

Why is Alex Jones getting a free pass?If it was Fetzer he would have been slaughtered here.Why the double standard?

That link for the show today isn't woking for me.

I also tried listening to it and got zero for sound from my computer.

I would really like to listen to it, if it was worth it.

Let me know if someone has it.

Thanks,

Ronnied
www.487ptown.com

Right-on my Canadian friend. Exposing 9/11 will cause their entire structure to crumble. They created a Frankenstein when they pulled-off 9/11. It will be their downfall.

You got that right!

Unfortunatly, I think it'll be a pretty dark time for a few years however, while we sweep the darkness from this earth so that we can live in peace for the following 26,000 years.

A new place to spread the truth:

http://digg.com/world_news/Government_releases_detailed_9_11_hijacking_i...

What do you think so far CJ?

"How is it that Alex Jones can be called a conservative? In what ways is he conservative?"

Alex is a libertarian, like myself. True conservatives are not like the lunatics calling themselves Republicans in the White House. Aaron Russo is also libertarian.

Truly amazing, I had to slow a few choice bits down and watch them again, am now at the 1:20 mark

I just rewatched it myself, and cried at the end.

Thanks CJ. I'm very happy that you liked it.

CJ... what do you think would happen to a sheep after watching it?

Wow, 9/11: Press for Truth is one amazing documentary! This one is going to make big waves - even if it doesn't get into MIHOP evidence, which it doesn't.

But there's enough unbelievably incriminating material, relating to prior knowledge, the whole ISI connection, the behaviour of Bush (there's a great September 13/01 clip of him almost smirking when he describes this despicable act of terror, I slowed down the frames and watched his facial expression very carefully), the corrupt 9/11 Commission, etc. etc. - combined with amazingly professional production - that I think this will help win over the remaining skeptics who still believe the basic government line.

And so much new material and info I'd never seen before! I'd never heard, for example, that they installed surface-to-air missiles at the Florida resort where Bush stayed the night of Sept 10.. I think you will all be mightily impressed, so long as you accept a narrower focus than some would like.

It certainly deserves a place among all the other great efforts, like what will be Loose Change's undoubtedly excellent final cut, Jim Hoffman's 9/11 Guilt, 9/11 Revisited, What's the Truth?, Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime, Barrie Zwicker's The Great Conspiracy and all of Alex Jones' work...we now have a pretty rich collection of documentary work - we just have to make sure as many people as possible see it all!

Given 9/11: Press for Truth's astounding production values, it may well be the best thing to show first to skeptical friends, coworkers and family, especially since it deals with uncontestable public evidence, and stays clear of unwarranted speculation. Then you can move on to Loose Change, Zwicker, etc...

Anyway just a few thoughts after watching a pretty mind-blowing documentary.. congrats to all involved in producing it!

Nice.

It's funny though... how you say it doesn't point to MIHOP evidence... I guess it's all in what we focus on...

By MIHOP evidence, I mean stuff that could not have possibly been the work of ISI-funded Arabs, like controlled demolitions, NORAD standdowns, impossible cell phone calls, etc. If you believe the buildings were demolished, or the flights did not take place as we were told, the documentary doesn't offer any leads in that direction, that's all. But no single documentary can spell it all out, we need dozens, covering different aspects, and I thought 9/11: Press For Truth did a superb job at the areas it covered, which are all part of understanding what happened that day, and represent an excellent introduction to people who still believe the official story. Throwing everything at once at them may not be the best idea anyway, so that's why this is probably the best thing to start them off with. I hope I am being clear.

Those were my comments above

"like controlled demolitions, NORAD standdowns"

But that's what I mean... I believe it was Monica Gabrielle who questioned how the towers came down, and Lorie Van Auken spoke of planes flying around for almost 2 hours with no response, etc...

And I see the ISI connection as MIHOP.

They didn't cover it to the extent that other films do... but it wasn't that kind of movie.

I see what you're saying, I think, i.e. to have people like Monica and Lorie give voice to these questions, if only in passing, only gives them more credibility to an uninformed public. And yes, I see what you mean about ISI involvement as evidence MIHOP, so there are many ways to look at it.

I guess I am one of those people who see the controlled demso as such in-your-face, irrefutable evidence of MIHOP that I like seeing it emphasized. But that said, the evidence is incriminating no matter where you look - one of the most compelling aspects of all this - and there's no telling which particular approach in the presentation of evidence will ultimately turn the tide, and I think this film is as good as any in helping to make that happen.

Better than most, in fact

Again, that was me above

Damn. I'm really lookin' forward to seein' Press for Truth...

This whole discussion - and the film - reminds me that there really isn't much distinction between MIHOP and LIHOP, all the scenarios are just different versions of certain people - some of them connected with US military and/or government - trying to get away with murder, and it's just a matter of getting to the bottom of it, in some ways..

It sounds like a good movie, but I have said before, for me, 9/11 truth without demolition is like the Lord Mayor's Parade without the Lord Mayor.
That's a London thing.

Or Thanksgiving without the turkey.

Or The Wizard of Oz without the Wicked Witch of the North.

Anyone bashing 9/11: Press for Truth should at least see it before jumping to conclusions!

Chris, be careful, you might be driving those new to the movement away. If you keep it up, you might be accused of shrillness yourself.

hahahaha, thanks for the tip asshole. who are you?