Updated Podcasts

Episode 4 of the 911 Synchronicity podcast by Richard Andrew Grove available here:
http://www.911synchronicity.com/?p=31

A new entry to the Al Uh Looyah podcast is available here:
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=77


Also, new 9/11 Posters for your Activism needs:
http://www.flatplanet.net/truth911/poster.html

While on the subject of Activism, I feel I must bring up the fantastic work the troops have been doing in the Alex Jones: A Call to Activism thread.

There are numerous lists of email addresses broken down by State or Province as well as a sample email template all of us can use to send out our own email blasts. Take a few minutes, select a group of email addresses, and send something out. All the hard work has been done for us, go for it:
Alex Jones: A Call to Activism

Tucker Carlson to compete on

Tucker Carlson to compete on the new season of Dancing with the Stars:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/08/14/dancing.stars.ap/index.html

I think I'm going to puke.

Quick question for you guys:

I don't know that much about Able Danger, but are Able Danger and MIHOP compatible?

check out my short 911

check out my short 911 vids

andy rooney and condi:
http://www.usd.edu/~dstrong/part1.wmv

Morgan Reynolds 2005 truth convergence speech
http://www.usd.edu/~dstrong/part2.wmv

lady getting assaulted by police man (Alex Jones)
http://www.usd.edu/~dstrong/part3.wmv

Come

Come over
to
here:
http://www.radioparadise.com/content.php?name=Forums&file=showtopic&topi...

and participate in 9/11 forum discussions with people who simply cannot be convenced.

Yet they ask good legitimate questions:
right
here:
http://www.radioparadise.com/content.php?name=Forums&file=showtopic&topi...
.

You know Roger, Spam works

You know Roger, Spam works on 0% of all people.

Why don't they come over to

Why don't they come over to 911blogger instead ? I don't like to waste my time with people "who simply cannot be convenced".Quit spamming.

http://911tvfakery.blogspot.c

http://911tvfakery.blogspot.com
Monday, August 14, 2006
Feedback 9/11TV Fakery Event plus Holmgren Speech (08/14)

Full review collection tomorrow. Here are some voices.

Rick Rajter (9/11 Scholar) was one of the surprise guest speakers of the evening:
"...I think we had a very positive impact and got a lot of
things out. Lots of people were still skeptical, but they were very
supportive of us to continue the research..."

Other voices from the evening:
"impressive presentation" (Jack Gordon)
"Many of the NY911 people looked interested in the material..getting people to examine TV Fakery should be your priority..." (Inphoman)
"...I knew all this from the beginning...planes would have broken up outside the building..." (Judy Cunningham, 9/11 Scholar)
"...would like to write about this and hear more..."
Mikael Vehkaola (finnish journalist)
"...I believe it will be regarded as historic .. a milestone..." (Lynn Ertell)

Also, up now
http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/matters.html

WHY IT MATTERS THAT THERE WERE NO PLANE CRASHES ON SEPT 11.
Copyright:Gerard Holmgren. Aug 14 2006.

This is a transcript of a speech which I gave
(by telephone from Sydney)
to the TV Fakery Conference in New York on August 13 2006.

Nico, why are you doing

Nico, why are you doing this?

Nico,are you the guy from

Nico,are you the guy from 911 Unsolved? If so ,will you please say something in German? Thanks.

Anon: Because he, like me,

Anon: Because he, like me, will continue to believe that there were no planes involved until we are shown an actual, serial-numbered, non-vaporizable plane parts from the actual planes.

But they can't show us those parts. The parts either don't exist or they are able to vaporize upon impact with building. You choose which one is real.

And when someone actually explains the unusually large amount of video/photographic anomalies that existed near the inital fireballs properly, maybe then we can 'see' the planes.

-slaqqer

All, Please vist the call to

All,

Please vist the call to action page

http://www.911blogger.com/2006/08/alex-jones-call-to-action.html

and contribute by going into the list of newspapers and going to each individual page and sifting through to get relevant email addresses. We only have about 10 states, and no UK/Israeli papers whatsoever. The WORST states probably take about 3 hours. We need a LOT more help to hit the biggest states in the Electrical College :)

Giver. No more sitting on our collective touches.

Thank you, come again ;)

I am not a 'No-Planer'*. I

I am not a 'No-Planer'*. I am a 'No-Commercial-Planer'**. A commerical aircraft would interact with a building during an impact in a very different way.

-slaqqer

*some people on this site enjoy applying labels to others who post...narrow-minded simps those are...

**Hey, a new label!!!

anon - maybe he, like me,

anon - maybe he, like me, wonders why we saw a 767 on tv yet the hole in the wtc2 was smaller than a 767 but not one piece of the 767 was observed breaking off as it slipped thru the side of the wtc2 like a ghost without even slowing down.

maybe he, like me, wonders where the giant tail fin of ua175 went since it didn't break off on it's way into the tower yet there was no corresponding hole in the wtc2 for it to have gone thru. as it slipped thru the side of the wtc2 like a ghost without even slowing down. not even slightly.
---

On FOX News "Special Report

On FOX News "Special Report with Brit Hume", Brit just covered Alex Jones warning. someone get a copy of this show quick.

On FOX News "Special Report

On FOX News "Special Report with Brit Hume", Jim Angle just covered Alex Jones warning

From Fox News website:

A radio host who says he predicted a "staged attack" on the World Trade Center involving Usama bin Laden as a "fall guy" in 2001 now says last week's red terror alert is just a trial run for a massive staged terror attack initiated by the U.S. government.

Alex Jones says the attack will occur before the end of October and could provide the "neo-fascist bloodsuckers" in the administration with fraudulent justification to invade Iran or Syria before November's midterm elections.

james ha: You seem to be of

james ha:

You seem to be of the same mindset as I am. Every time out of the thousands of times that I have seen the 'second airplane impact' I have that "Holy Fuck! That is not allowed per all natural laws!" moment.

-slaqqer

I don't know that much about

I don't know that much about Able Danger, but are Able Danger and MIHOP compatible?

ABSOLUTELY. Even Curt Weldon called the program sinister and manipulative.
Able Danger was mostly likedly used to control and manipulate Atta and the 4 others trained at US bases ahead of the "15 brainwahsed musclemen"

Oh and Alex Jones TOTALLY clowned on the no planers and the "OMG Zionists!111" people last week...Alex Jones freaking rocks.

Without getting into "what

Without getting into "what really happened," what percentage of a) people who saw "something" in person, and b) people who saw "something" on tv are completely convinced they SAW PLANES CRASH into the buildings? How many times have you heard ANY aspect of 9/11 skepticism debunked with "For God's sake we all saw it on tv!"? Do you think addressing this conviction head-on is likely to be persuasive on people who don't already discount the official story?

There's seeking truth, which is a valid pursuit, but an academic one. Then there is the attempt to shift public consciousness, which is a different bird. Right now, any academic pursuit which cannot be shown to conducive to PERSUASION as a PRACTICAL matter should be put on hold or conducted in private. IMO.

*addressing this conviction*

*addressing this conviction* might be better phrased as "CONTRADICTING this conviction"

Alex Jones mentioning on his

Alex Jones mentioning on his radio show the
activism done by 911blogger - August 14, 2006:

http://www.filefactory.com/file/edb02c/

Casseia, I'm not sure if

Casseia, I'm not sure if we're saying the same thing, but one could attack that issue of persusaiveness from both sides of the coin.

What argument (or technique of argument) will functionally persuade someone that the "official version" is chock full of holes, indicative of the complicity of ______, etc?

What "argument" (or technique) has been used to persuade people of the validity of the "official version"?

Both issues seem worthy of our attention.

casseia: For God's sake we

casseia:
For God's sake we all saw it on tv!"? Do you think addressing this conviction head-on is likely to be persuasive on people who don't already discount the official story?

what does your movement hurt?

hey it doesn't matter what any eyewitlesses actually saw or were told that they saw. what WE saw on TV of UA175 hitting the wtc2 was phony.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/
ghostgunUA175
click my homepage as well.

as far as persuading others i'll just leave the movement in the cabable hands of yourself and the loosechange gang.
---

heres the full version of my

heres the full version of my video on you tube. sorry about the music, its not for everyone i know, but maybe some people will like it. the words go along with the content.

part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyQ986-LhSU

part2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgU9RS1k8NU

part3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AE_q3j9Rk9M

part4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk2_GsKWnQg

part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bH---6YTJxQ

part 6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v77CKwJ3lJ0

Alex Jones' false-flag

Alex Jones' false-flag terrorism alert mentioned on FOX News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GCWPbhUB9s

SPREAD THIS FAR AND WIDE!

When you send people the

When you send people the link to that Fox News clip, you should tack on the link to this article.

ACTIVISTS NEEDED: Please go

ACTIVISTS NEEDED: Please go to Digg.com, register and then "digg up" this story... Let's bring it up to the front page! (Digg is now one of the most popular sites on the Net, huge amounts of visitors, and the comments section is great to discuss stuff and wake even more people up!)

http://digg.com/politics/Criminal_elements_of_the_U_S_gov_t_to_be_stagin...

Anonymous, I got you covered

Anonymous, I got you covered on digg

Here's the Fox article on

Here's the Fox article on Alex Jone's statements:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,208364,00.html

casseia | 08.15.06 - 1:05 am

casseia | 08.15.06 - 1:05 am | #

for the people that think pushing the idea that no planes were used in the attacks, you need to take note of this persons post.im not saying you shouldnt be doing the research, but to lead with it like you "no planers" always do is a tactical mistake. why, with all the other various evidence of inside job, would you feel the need to lead with no planes? most of you dont even talk about anything else at this point, its all no planes all the time.

Cynthia's

Cynthia's Condemnation

Georgia Democratic Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney is condemning what she calls "some unfortunate remarks," including anti-Semitic slurs made by supporters after her loss to challenger Hank Johnson last week, but claims the men who made them were not formally associated with the campaign.

McKinney calls the men "errant individuals at and near my campaign office," but neglects to mention that the men were part of a security detail that escorted McKinney in and out of the office that night.

Congresswoman McKinney denounced the racist remarks and proceeded to name Jews she admires, including members of the Israeli military who refuse to take part in what she calls the "occupation of Palestine."

—FOX News Channel's Aaron Bruns contributed to this report.
they never get sick of smearing her. shes has NO POWER now, and the scumbags still cant help themselves.