911 Courage.org - The White Rose 9/11 Litmus Test Debuts

9/11 Litmus Test Debuts

The goal is to require every candidate running for the US House or Senate in 2006 to publicly declare whether he/she will support a truly independent re-investigation of the events surrounding 9/11.
Here are the steps:

1. Develop a Roster of all Senate and Congressional candidates from all parties;

2. Poll Each and Every Candidate regarding their awareness of/interest in 9/11 issues, and their support for a new and truly independent See poll questionnaire at www.911truth.org

3. Publish All Candidate Responses on the website

4. Encourage Widespread Bird-Dogging at all public electoral events with thought-provoking 9/11 questions, until every campaign spokesperson will find it necessary to prepare a position paper on 9/11 truth.

5. Contribute Personalized 9/11 Teaching Materials to communities where truth candidates are contending with official story defenders

My local candidate polling campaign here in Central Florida was launched Saturday August 19, when I yielded to the invitations in my inbox and attended two political events.

My goal? Get the candidates or their representatives to fill out the Candidate's 9/11 Truth Poll. So I decided to photograph them as they received the questionnaire from me. This way, they can never say that they did not receive it.

- Hakeem Aquil

Poll: Most think bin Laden planning another U.S. attack

Anyone catch the frontpage of cnn.com this morning? It shows OBL's picture taking up 1/4 of the page. The caption?

"Poll: Most think bin Laden planning another U.S. attack"

Burning Into Your Soul:

'Bin is Gonna Getcha', stearring at you full page A7, Washington Post, Aug 23.

pathetic tactic... sadly effective.

Osama poll attacks 9/11 conspiracy poll

I think the new "poll" is a direct attack on the recent poll of 1/3rd doubting the o.v. of 9/11, that caused that much media attention.
And it could be the first step of fearmongering towards a new false flag attack, just like Alex Jones warned of in the coming months, especially around 9/11/2006


i agree, as is all of the

i agree, as is all of the wall to wall Bin Laden coverage thats been on lately. that tool Peter Bergen is all over the place lately, hes been working overtime to reinforce the Osama myth.

Osama most likely dead...


Usama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported, citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader. "The Coalition troops are engaged in a mad search operation but they would never be able to fulfill their cherished goal of getting Usama alive or dead," the source said. [FOX News]

Mini H-bombs

Observations Suggesting the Use of Small Hydrogen Bombs at WTC


1) The concrete pulverized into fine dust, 70…300 micron particles (just this could take more energy than the total gravitational energy available). See Gehue plates 6 and 7

2) Very energetic – hot – dust after the explosions. (Demolition charges would produce white clouds of dust, which would not move much, and a gravity-driven collapse would produce much less and more coarse dust.)

3) Brown shades of color seen in the air – these are produced by nuclear reactions of a thermonuclear device. The reactions use (gamma radiation caused by free neutrons, N2, O2, H2O > nitrid acid, NO2, NO3). These clouds soon get their usual white color after some minutes as the heat and fast movement of the clouds cease becoming ordinary clouds with some water.

Note: many of the pictures taken regarding the WTC Towers and the clouds seem to have been developed too blue, killing shades of brown. (This may have been an attempt to suppress the evidence.) Also there was supposed to be 200 000+ gallons of water on the roof of each tower – this water was spilled into stairwells etc, but was later all converted into water vapour reducing the brown color.

4) Superheated steel objects, disintegrating into steel vapour. Molten ponds of steel were found in the elevator shafts. There were lots of burned cars in the parking areas of the towers. The fire department did not announce until 12/19/2001 that the fires under the WTC rubble have been distinguished (more than 3 months after the incident).

5) Elevated values of tritium in this area, but not elsewhere in New York. The University of California found elevated values on 9/13/2001 and 9/21/2001 within bounds of the WTC. They found them harmless for health. In pure hydrogen bomb isotopes of hydrogen are fused (D + T > n + a + 17.6 MeV).

6) An EMP-type phenomenon blacked out cellular phones at the moment when the first (southern) tower started to 'fall down', at the exact moment when a small thermonuclear bomb was detonated. Even in electronic cameras and videos a strange afterglow was seen in the late phase of the 'collapse' of both of the towers. See Gehue plate 5

7) A wave of pressure was witnessed in the root of the tower at the moment when the so-called collapse was progressing just about two hundred meters and nothing had fallen down to earth. The blast wave turned over for example a photographer and a fireman close to the entrance, who was taking photos of the dust cloud. The burst of the dust cloud on the root of the tower was photographed as well. In the image at the left below is what probably was the explosion of WTC 6. The Customs building was deliberately exploded for some reason - it was not damaged because of the falling girders as they had not yet reached the roof of WTC 7 when the photo was taken. A couple of seconds later the clouds of the explosion were already partly above the roof of WTC 7, which was too energetical to be caused by usual blasting agents. This suggests it was the second hydrogen bomb in the WTC block. The first hydrogen bomb is discharging upwards (pulverized concrete) exactly in the picture, and the steel structures vaporized by the bomb are already falling down 100 meters (approx. 328 ft.) farther down. The mass of cloud, caused by vaporized steel, is seen in the center of the picture and even more clearly in the picture at the right.

8) In the cellar, out of all the 47 ultra strong steel pillars, the steel was melted completely at the length of more than 20 meters (approx. 65 ft). Even cars were melted and burned in the cellar. The pillars were far too thick for thermite, which some have suggested. An explosion of a thermonuclear bomb explains the phenomenon well.

9) Steel columns and pillars were ejected in the surroundings of the building. In the beginning of the so-called collapse, exists no such energy exists that could throw steel pillars outwards from 60 to 175 meters (approx. from 170 to 574 ft.) from trunk. Not even cutting charges can do that. Instead, the blast wave from a nuclear bomb is capable to do that.



Professor Jones had tested material from WTC and found no trace of neutron activation.


Here are a couple of shots

Here are a couple of shots for the no planers and 'blue screen' advocates - aircraft engine parts and a truck designated to store them. Claiming that no planes hit the WTC towers is damaging to the movement's credibility and it is one of the first things that debunkers like Popular Mechanics seize upon when building straw man hit pieces.


Isn't there a way to get relevant comments?

A request to all:

I expect people click on the comments feature expecting comments about this story, or at least related subjects. Yet none of the comments even mention 911courage.org or the idea of an electoral litmus test. (I expected perhaps a debate about the usefulness of any electoral strategy.)

Just posting your personal concern, irrelevant of the story, is selfish and ultimately counterproductive. There are likely threads relevant to whatever topic concerns you elsewhere. Or you can submit your own article, or you can use an open thread.

Why can't certain people respect a basic level of relevancy to the original post?

dude, calm down ok? i took

dude, calm down ok? i took up like literally 5 inches of space. if people had anything to say about 911courage.org they would say it. this is the most recent thread, so naturally people are going to gravitate towards it regardless of its subject.calm down.

i dont think that was

i dont think that was directed just at you.. everyone here tends to post comments that are totally unrelated.. its been going on for a long time.. dont take it persoanally, i do it too now without even thinking about it.

i have been doing open threads each day for random discussions, ill try to suggest people make use of those a little better..

That's right...

...if someone has anything to say about the article, they'll say it. If not, they'll (including myself) use the most recent thread to post general (OT) discussion. I don't see a problem with this.

I for one agree with you.

I for one agree with you. I'm getting sick of clicking on threads to see it talking about all this other bs. I think a post rating system would be a great addition to this site. I want to help with 9-11 and stay on top of new information but I don't have all the time in the world to read through every post about any old crazy notion just to get a little more information about the subject matter.

There are reasons we haven't broken totally into the main stream yet. I truly believe a large part of it is due to the lack of focus, like we see here on every topic. I've almost gotten to the point of not even reading the comments anymore.

Bad old habit from v1

I think the reason for this behavior is just bad old habit from version 1.

I suggest that people use the recent posts feature to comment in a related post and use the daily open tread for any off topic sujects or create a post of their own. It would be for the best. Think of all the newcomers we have everyday. They will appreciate.

The new version of the site is better organized than the precedent, so let's try to get the best out of it.


nice idea.. i know that

nice idea.. i know that matthew (sendmeabuck.com) has been getting in politicians faces asking their positions..

New Photos of WTC 7

New this morning: Alex Jones has new photos of WTC 7 and surrounding buildings that were given to him by a fireman. They are huge and extremely clear. Be sure to click on each one of them to enlarge them.

Nothing new, same crap

I assume you saw through the deliberate mistatements in the captions.

New to me, thanks. This is

New to me, thanks. This is an example of a useful off topic post.

Litmus test? Where are we going to file them?

Here's a relevant comment I expect to receive more disregard:

The Litmus test sounds great, affidavits seem even better..... how do we expect to advance our vote for such candidates as the electoral college stands in the way... and worse... that electronic voting is widely accepted as valid?

We've got an awful lot of touch screens and tabulator networks to smash, long before we're ever going to see litmus tested and affidavit bonded candidates "moving up in the world". No?

"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.

This is silly

Unless you come up with a cogent reason why there should be another investigation you're just wasting everyone's time.

Silly silly silly......

Here's what's wasting everybody's time.... An insistence that everything is fine in the Land of Oz and War.

Examining 9/11, and an insistence for a new investigation.... is akin to love and peace.

Do you really think that is a waste of time?
Is that a cogent enough reason for you?

"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.

ban trolls?

>Unless you come up with a cogent reason why there should be another investigation you're just wasting everyone's time.

IMHO posts like the one above, that offer no information or argument to back up their point, should be deleted and the posters banned. Such trolls are a waste of space and time and do nothing good for readers.

i agree, the trolls like

i agree, the trolls like S.King and a couple others may be annoying as hell, but at least they make an effort to refute us and stick up for the official story. this guy is just doing drive-by insults and shit and not exactly trying too hard to convince us that we are wrong.

Blessed is The Religion of Peace

so its your blind racism and

so its your blind racism and fear of someone elses religious practices that makes you believe the official story?

the idea that Islam is a

the idea that Islam is a religion of war is no different than the idea that Christianity is a religion of war. You could make arguments to support both assertions, just as you could make arguments to support the idea that both religions are peaceful. Obviously there are warmongers in any religion, just as there are peaceful folks. I think it depends more on social and economic conditions, especially education, as well rejection of fundamentalism and literalism.

i couldnt have said it

i couldnt have said it better myself. i would only add that its more proof that religion should be a more personal thing and shouldnt be pushed on anybody.im agnostic but im tolerant of religion,i just dont like when any one specific religion causes poltical/social change, because it tends to be for the worse almost every time in my opinion. where are the religious groups when it comes to war and civil liberties, and the enviroment etc.? no, they wanna worry about gay marriage,evolution,stem cell research etc. they are wrong on every issue they focus on.