Dear Democracy Now!

Dear Democracy Now!,

On Wednesday, May 26th, 2004, you featured a "debate" between Chip Berlet and author David Ray Griffin - "The New Pearl Harbor: A Debate On A New Book That Alleges The Bush Administration Was Behind The 9/11 Attacks" - (Link.)

Many people who have been following skepticism of the "official story" of 9/11 were deeply disappointed by this lopsided "debate", which more or less concluded with this challenge by Amy Goodman;

AMY GOODMAN: Name just one. Name just one structural engineering expert who said it is not feasible that the planes caused the towers to go down.

You will be pleased to note that we can name one now, his name is Charles N. Pegelow, you can read his resume here.

Since naming one "just one" Structural Engineer "who said it is not feasible that the planes caused the towers to go down" seems to be some sort of litmus test for Democracy Now!, surely it's time for a rematch. Or at the very least, a serious critical examination of the mountain of evidence that suggests that the "official" story of 9/11 (as recorded by the 9/11 Commission in their Report) should be undertaken, (finally), by Democracy Now!?

Or, are the rumors that foundation funding will stop if Democracy Now! undertakes a serious examination of alternative 9/11 theories, (Referred to by many as "9/11 Truth") true?

Is a lop-sided hit-piece debate seriously the best we can expect from D-Now!?

Are you aware that a Professor of Economics (Paul Zarembka) has studied publicly available data regarding the "put" option rumors that arose after 9/11 and found that "indeed, there is evidence of insider trading before 9-11 on American Airlines and United Airlines."

Are you aware that one of the most astute researchers of British and American covert operations writing today (Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed) has spent 5 years researching al-Qaeda & 9/11 and concluded that, "It (al-Qaeda) has no existence as an independent concrete entity. It designates a highly developed category of Western covert operations designed to secure destabilization through the creation, multiplication, mobilization, and manipulation of disparate mujahideen groups. The evidence suggests that this was certainly the case on 9-11."

Are you aware of the large data dump of First-Responder oral histories made public last year by the New York Times? Here are some samples;

"we heard . . . what sounded like a loud explosion and looked up and I saw tower two start coming down" - Sudnick.

"I heard three explosions, and then . . . tower two started to come down" - Darnowski.

"it almost sounded like bombs going off, like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight" - Turilli.

"heard explosions coming from . . . the south tower. . . . There were about ten explosions. . . . We then realized the building started to come down" - Carlsen.

"it looked like the building was blowing out on all four sides. We actually heard the pops" - Meola.

"It was a frigging noise. At first I thought it was---do you ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'? . . . I thought it was that." - Rivera.

"the building popped, lower than the fire. . . . I was going oh, my god, there is a secondary device because the way the building popped. I thought it was an explosion" - Burke.

"It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit. . . . [W]e originally had thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives, because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down" - Cachia.

Democracy Now! broadcasts from a former N.Y.F.D. Firehouse, shouldn't this testimony be considered merely out of respect for the many NY fire personnel who died on duty on 9/11?

How can you just ignore it? Downplay it? Ridicule it? Belittle it?

I hope that others will join me in asking Democracy Now! to wake up, clear the fog, abandon the propaganda, and start asking some serious questions about what happened to this country on 9/11/2001.


A skeptic.

Contact Democracy Now!

i love it. we gotta hold her

i love it. we gotta hold her feet to the fire and call her bluff on this.

Yes! And what about the building that wasn't struck by a plane!

Great letter reprehensor. And what about the the building that collapsed that day-- the one Goodman herself can be seen watching live, in person!

Provocateurs For Truth? I'm getting tired of this B.S.

If Amy is really a brilliant 'provocateur for truth', by ignoring or beating up the truth camp until we focus or better hone our arguments.... she's running out of time fast, and employing a tactic which has almost completely run its course.

Get with it, Amy.... or step out of the way.


Very nice work. Let's all send this to Ms. Goodman & Co.

thats not even the half of

thats not even the half of it.. check this out.. this is a submission from carol:

Here is an event we might want to protest ! ! ! ! !

The head Left Gatekeeper herself, Amy Goodman has a new book coming out and she's having a book party/reception on the early evening of 9/11 at Cooper Union and she's charging people for the coming.

This seems pretty unbelieveable ! The event is taking place on 9/11 and doesn't even mention it ! ! !
It seems pretty oblivious to the date and what its really the anniversary of----not her show !

We should send a contingent of people to protest ! ! !

Its bad enough that she never talks about 9/11 on her show, which is so popular and on a zillion radio stations and tv stations but she's having a book launch party that night with food and music. The event description, (copied and pasted below from the link from the Democracy Now website) does not mention 9/11 at all, though it is taking place on the evening of 9/11. It treats that date like just another day.

No matter what version of the 9/11 story you believe, whether you are a 9/11 truther or still cling to the official version, it seems pretty oblivious, unfeeling and in bad taste to have a book launch party that night. Its a solemn anniversary----a time to reflect, commemorate the nearly 3000 people who died. Can't you just see the tv/radio story the next day the next day making fun of her.

Award-winning journalist Amy Goodman, host of the daily, grassroots, global, radio/TV news hour Democracy Now!, is on a national speaking tour to mark DN!'s 10th anniversary and launch her second book with journalist David Goodman, Static: Government Liars, Media Cheerleaders, and the People Who Fight Back.
WHERE: Cooper Union Great Hall, Astor Pl - 7th St at 3rd Ave
WHEN: 9/11/06 - Event @ 7:30 PM, Reception @ 5:30 PM
Join AMY GOODMAN, JUAN GONZALEZ, DAVID GOODMAN and BERNARD WHITE on the 10th anniversary of Democracy Now!. The evening features a special performance by renowned jazz bassist and composer, CHARLIE HADEN, with the Liberation Music Orchestra. The event is a DN!/WBAI benefit, and launches the new book by Amy and David Goodman, "STATIC: Government Liars, Media Cheerleaders, and the People Who Fight Back." The event will be preceeded by a reception with Amy, Juan, David, Bernard, Charlie Haden and other special guests. Reception tickets include event admission, one personally signed copy of book, hors d'oeuvres and wine.
Get tickets online or call 212-431-9090 x822
$20 event tickets [ click here ]
$100 reception tickets (includes event) [ click here ]
Call 212-431-9090

thats right, she is having a book signing which requires payment to attend on 9/11..

Here is an event we might

Here is an event we might want to protest ! ! ! ! !

The head Left Gatekeeper herself, Amy Goodman has a new book coming out and she's having a book party/reception on the early evening of 9/11 at Cooper Union and she's charging people for the coming.

That is just totally outrageous & infuriating!!!

Protest Book Signing!!

I'll join that contingency of protesters...hell I'll spend the 100 bucks to infiltrate it!!!!! When the protesters arrive outside, some of us on the'inside'can start raising our voices in protest ....I'm picturing a mini-version of the 68 Chicago, Democratic convention.....(hopefully, minus the baton beatings and arrests)

"I rise in support and solidarity with the truth seekers shouting for justice outside these privileged walls of silence and demand the Left Gates be opened to the Truth of 911!!!"

Damn straight!

Anyone who knowingly stands in the way of the truth shall be punished. If they want to play tough, than so shall we. The time for pussyfooting around has past. It's time to get tough!

Got My Tickets For the 911 Amy Goodman "Event": Anyone Else?

Just got my tickets for the whole Democracy Now event. Including the wine and jazz hob-nobbing reception.Would any one else like to join me or offer suggestions on how best to utilize this situation for 911 Truth and open the left wing gates? Don't get me wrong....I am a progressive who use to love chompsky,Goodman, Barsamian...ect...until 911 started to filter the wheat from the chafe , so to speak. We need to force them to openly deal with 911.

My dream would be to have William Rodriguez openly confront Juan Gonzales and Barrie Zwicker to openly confront Miss Goodman. I think there is a lot of potential here....and I also think some wine, jazz, and appetizers would be nice after a long hard day of 911 Truth outreach.

Dz,Jon,SMG,Justin,Dylan,Reprehensor Corey ??????? Any takers?

(At the very least we should have as many people as possible show up for the official book signing event (20$) with our 911 Truth shirts awkwardely filling the audience.) Radical Pragmatist


I would join you in a second if I was gonna be in NYC.

Goodman pulled a shill-quote on DRG

AMY GOODMAN: "Name just one. Name just one structural engineering expert who said it is not feasible that the planes caused the towers to go down."

Wow, Amy; that's a serious shill quotation from you! You never heard of fear, itimidation, ridicule, gag orders, threats, national security b.s., loss of job, blacklisting, peer pressure, controlled msm promoting the OV...

Goodman's been running this scam too long

Let's break down her little gatekeeping operation.

Off topic

WTF do you make of this??


Or this

where the hell did you find

where the hell did you find that? that cant be serious.......

This is one of the SICKEST

This is one of the SICKEST things I have ever seen!!!! WTF!!

Couldn't help myself ...

... had to send them an email, asking if it it joke ... not really expecting an answer ...

yeah, ive read a tiny bit

yeah, ive read a tiny bit about that kind of stuff. apparently the next pope, after the one we have now dies, is going to be the anti-christ and will bring about the end times. according to religious doomsayers anyway.

this is only the 5678th time

this is only the 5678th time someone has predicted the end-of-times, what are the odds they're right this rime?
Religion is all only opinion.

Conspoperacies are pure disinfo.

Not that the RC church is great, but this particular brand of Illuminati, Jesuit, Knights Templar, etc. nonsense is supposed to dovetail neatly with the crap put into people's heads by the Davinci Code--that marvel of overhyped crap.

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

She could care less, and we

She could care less, and we should certainly not be begging her to see reason--she's made her bed, period. She is no better than Bill O'Reilly, just has a different target audience to mislead. Just because she is haggard-looking and claims to speak for the downtrodden doesn't mean she's not corrupt. What has she accomplished other than to lead idealistic youth around in circles of pointless so-called dissent? She is no fool, confused about the issues, just as Noam Chomsky knows exactly what is going on. Give me liberty, or give her hell!


"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

Proving herself worthless, or proving whom she carries water for

Amy and her should-know-better smarts, "leading idealistic youth around in circles of pointless so-called dissent."



"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.

"What has she accomplished

"What has she accomplished other than to lead idealistic youth around in circles of pointless so-called dissent"

Still, she was one of the two journalists who were present in the Vera Cruz massacre, in East Timor, in the early 90's, and brought it into world knowledge (though most of american media ignored it, until a videotape showed up). Also, in the late 90's, one of her coleagues found out, through secret cables back and forth the US and Indonesia, that the Indonesian were behind the attacks by milicias in East Timor at that time (after the referendum), and were being supported (not tactically) by the US.

Measure The "Out-Come":

You are further begging the question by pointing out this very back-round of Amy; Most people exposed to such extremes of injustice, are incapable of maintaining a pretended "face" when looking at a case like 9/11.

If you're defending her, which is clearly understandable, you still beg for an answer to an ever tougher question.

For me, I am reduced to only two possibilities for explaining Amy's mind set:

1) She does not know that a dangerous parity is growing fast between Official Believers vs. non-believers.


2) She knows, but for some reason she actively chooses to discuss other things.

Can you offer a third, unconsidered?

If that reason is because she's not in command of herself.... what the hell can any of us do about that? "She's made her bed." as was said earlier.

If she's trying to brilliantly flush the story while pretending 'there is no story'..... the hour is late, Amy Sweetheart.

Turning up the calls and demands to her that she look closer at this subject, revels a person not responding in any recognizable way as someone committed to FIXING and dispelling with confusion. She delegitimizes herself and looks more like a passenger/follower, rather than any kind of leader for truth. In my opinion.


"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.

A book party?

A fucking book party? I am appalled.

Don't worry, they'll serve fair-trade coffee.

Hasta la Victoria's Secret!! Oh yeah, Counterpunch--more fake left BS...

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

"Ignore That Elephant In The Room, Maybe It Will Just Go Away."

Counterpunch has largely ignored pleas to get down and dirty for years. Maybe that's why PCR has become more distant from them?


"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.

Payne Stewart Interception

I would like to get some facts straight about Payne Stewart interception. Please help me. According to the above document:

09:33 EDT – The first time something was noted wrong: controller instructed Payne to change radio frequencies and contact another controller, but there was no response. About 1010 EDT, the accident airplane crossed from the EDT zone to the CDT zone in the vicinity of Eufaula, Alabama. About 0952 CDT (1052 EDT) a USAF F-16 test pilot from the 40th Flight Test Squadron at Eglin Air Force Base (AFB), Florida, was vectored to within 8 nm of N47BA.8 About 0954 CDT (1054 EDT), at a range of 2,000 feet from the accident airplane and an altitude of about 46,400 feet,9 the test pilot made two radio calls to N47BA but did not receive a response. About 1000 CDT (1100 EDT), the test pilot began a visual inspection of N47BA.

This means that according to this document, as I understand it, it took almost 90 minutes between first notice of something wrong, and a visual inspection by a jet fighter.

I know that some have claimed this was 30 minutes, but it appears that according to this document, because of the change in time zones, the actual time to visual inspection was 90 minutes.

Could somebody please let me know if this document is inaccurate or my understanding of the time to interception is inaccurate.

if it is 6am edt that means

if it is 6am edt that means its 5am cdt.
other words you loose an hour from east to west per time zone

it seems to me that they messesd up the whole timeline in this report unless you go edt all the way

Payne Stewart interception

I was living in Sarasota at the time and the Stewart plane event received a lot of coverage. The plane had reached cruising altitude when contact was lost. Interception took place in less than 20 minutes, while the plane was still in Florida airspace, and fighters accompanied it all the way across country until it ran out of gas and crashed in the upper Mid-West. From take-off to intercept may have been about 30 minutes. It was not on the order of 90 minutes but much quicker. This personal recollection should be easy to verify on the basis of many contemporary news accounts in Floria newspapers.

Great letter,

Great letter, reprehensor!

Speaking of left gatekeepers, TruthOut actually posted the Mary Maxwell story ("GOP Candidate Says 9/11 Attacks Were a Hoax") on its front page in the "on the issues" column at the top:

Now if they'd only go further and really publish opinion pieces like the recent ones of Paul Craig Roberts or Manuel Valenzuela. I don't visit TruthOut very often anymore because of their silence on 9/11.

I don't send them money anymore because of it.

I can't believe they re-published that piece.

We could really mess with them

By having everyone send like $5 to any of the left gatekeeper places like Truthout every time they print a good piece on 9/11... If enough of us did this reliably enough, it would put the more cash-strapped among them in a quandary... :)

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

Read This And Get Smart

Two Roads, Leading To The Same Inn

Well yes, you could go down that road. It could be a bit more esoteric and heard to swallow at points.

A person could also see the machine in action by investigating the material discussed by Russo. Forgive me for bringing him up so often but his project is five years late, with the U.S. domestic 'situation' and all the more worse.


"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.

For-Profit Information

It seems too easy to out-spend truth-ers who've earned their money the hard way. Mad-Money couldn't give a hoot about dropping 50K to outspend ten thousand informed people (who are rare-ish in organized groups). Tipping the apple cart of for-profit information, is one avenue we can't forget.


"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.

great idea!

I've contemplated giving them some $$ because i do enjoy the 5 emails a day, but they've never touched 9-11, so this seems like a good way to finally "reward" them.

when i give money to news services it is usually because they got it all

ummmm. Building Seven? WTC

ummmm. Building Seven? WTC 1 and 2 weren't the only buildings that collapsed Mrs. Goodman.

yeah of course she couldnt

yeah of course she couldnt say anything about wtc 7---she is scum and it will soon be apparant to everyone

If reputations and livelyhood can be damaged... withholding the truth, than sooner or later these clowns will need to switch sides. As truthers have been ridiculed for speaking out, these "gatekeepers" need to be ridiculed for concealing the truth. They must be punished!

That is bizarre

Truthout finnally inches into 911 truth, and they use that article...strange....strange.

Radical Pragmatist


The fraudulent pH reporting may be one of the most egregious EPA-associated falsifications and misrepresentations after 9/11. There is a long history of incidents already made public where the federal EPA and the NYC Departments of Environmental Protection and Health falsified and misrepresented toxic exposures from the World Trade Center collapse. There are others yet to be revealed.

Goodman and Gonzalez regularly report on air quality at GZ

Not to forgive DN for refusing to cover the crimiality behind 9/11, she does report on GZ toxic air quality and EPA coverup. Juan Gonzalez has been covering GZ air quality issues from the beginning as author of articles that appear in the NY Daily News. Today's DN had a piece on GZ air quaility.

speech of Patrick Henry: "Give me liberty or give me death"

Isn't it amazing how Bush & Friends call precisely those people "unamerican" that 'pre-9/11' history recorded as the greatest patriots? The Neocon decision is to "give up all liberties in order to avoid death (at the hands of terrorists)"...

among other excerpts from it:
"...We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts..."

Amy Goodman gets her money

Amy Goodman gets her money from the Ford Foundation,
which is a clear CIA front.
This letter is another waste of time.

Amy Goodman gets her money

Amy Goodman gets her money from the Ford Foundation? That says it all. Move on guys.


That's a whole 'nother can of shillery... Goodman needs to be exposed and held accountable, then we can move on.

uh oh, all the recent

uh oh, all the recent comments,recent blogs, and shout box stuff is gone. what gives?

I'm so glad that this is

I'm so glad that this is FINALLY taking place. Amy Goodman has gotten away with her censorship for far too long (and not just 9/11 truth, but other critical issues as well). It's time to find out what her true colors are. During her interviews she always brags about how she and her program serve as a counter-balance to the corporate media, yet over the past year she's done almost nothing but parrot the stories spewed out by the same corporate media she claims to detest. As a former fan of the show, I find it bothersome how incredibly boring DN! has gotten, just in terms of how repetitive the issues covered have become.

Goodman, Chomsky et al. are

Goodman, Chomsky et al. are part of the "Cultural War on Terrorism" a la F. Stonor Saunder's examples from the Cold Ward and the Non Communist Left. They will never change their tune, as they are CIA and what have you.

Change will not come from the Left any more than the Right, as long as these are Establishment fronts. Change is coming from the disaffected.

It's going to come down to

It's going to come down to directly protesting outside DemocracyNow's headquarters. We need to consider Amy Goodman a willing accomplice in the cover-up of 9/11/01. In other words we need to assume that she was "in on" the attack until she proves otherwise. May seem extreme, but the hour is getting late. Alex Jones predicted ANOTHER attack soon, and guess what! Ms. Goodman didn't mention that either. She needs to be consistently heckled when she makes public appearances.

Goodman show

As a former fan of the show, I find it bothersome how incredibly boring DN! has gotten, just in terms of how repetitive the issues covered have become.

Same here! Not only is Goodman gatekeeping 9/11, her shows have become totally lame! She barely ever has a critical word about Bush or Iraq any more. It's as if she's just reading the AP newswire like a zombie or something. At the very least, I would think she would be stirring-up some anti war protests or some impeachment talk??? She's bogus!

logging in and out of

Once one logs into this site, is there a button to press to logout?

there is a 'log out' button

there is a 'log out' button in your panel on the left.. the panel's heading is your username.. it should be the 3rd panel down - after 'site information' and before 'ad fund raising'..

user name and commenting...

When I log in with my screen name (that is registered) and try to post a comment, I receive a message saying THAT screen name is a registered user's name. I am that registered user and I am already logged in. What's going on?

chances are you just weren't

chances are you just weren't logged in when you tried to comment.. if you were logged in you shouldn't see any fields asking for your name..

do this: log out, log back in, go to comment, check to make sure you don't still see the login panel on the left - you should isntead see a panel with your name as the heading, then try to post a comment again..

chances are you just werent loged in as noone else has posted any similar problems yet..

try it, and let me know your username if you still have issues.

still having login trouble...

truthsearching2006.....when I log in, my name does not show up.....the site continues to show the login and password field.....yet, I don't receive any kind of error message.

Sorry Rep, but all this just gets me ranting.

Amy is a magnet of the highest Gaussian order for every bleeding heart issue that can be played in endless re-order and repetition.

My heart bleeds too, Amy.

But if she NEVER takes a swing at the roots, than she's just a feed-back loop of toothless nothingness. Makes no difference if only by limp liberal kindness, or gatekeeper design.

She does not speak to me, nor for me. Anymore.

Planet loving liberals (God bless you) need to get wise or die. This planet needs you to bread a little back-bone into your efforts. Gun-toting liberals like myself, will get steam-rolled by the very governments you flower-children can't bring yourself to end. Stop ASKING FOR IT!

What an f'n mess.... most all we seem to have populating government, are the worst of both worlds between selfish and selfish. Ya, that's right. I said it twice. Stop ASKING FOR IT!

And damn sure, stop PAYING FOR IT! You've got as much blood on your hands, as the very government you keep sending money to that just spends it on guns anyway.


"The truth shall make you free." Why not make the truth free? We live on a priceless blue pearl, awash in a universe of fire and ice. Cut the crap.

Amy Goodman not all good, not all bad

and not a goodMAN at all! (sorry, silly pun)

She is definitely a left gatekeeper, but I think her show is very good on other counts.

Even so, I hope that it's eventually bypassed, just as I hope main stream media is bypassed. I don't hold out a lot of hope for reforming our present media, including most of the "alternative" media.

There is some good things in the works wrt paying journalists who work outside the mainstream. See and

Also, my own proposal:

I have posted a proposal on the Randi Rhodes show forum for replacing our current media with a new, sustainable media that facilitates the selection of "filtering agents". You can think of these as honest gatekeepers that YOU trust - and that keep out trivial information, rather than very important information that groups with economic and other hidden agendas prefer to hide from you.

Broadband access is now up to 42% in the US, so it is quite possible to target TELEVISION, which is how about 48% of Americans get 30+ minutes of news per day (as opposed to only about 9% over the internet). See

The thread is entitled: "Putting the NY Times Out of Business"
The thread is subtitled: "Proposal to replace ALL corrupt media"



Its What Goodman doesn't Cover or Covers up; that bothers me!

She has become the " Ruler" of the popular left intelligentsia, so we would be abdicating our duties if we did not now become the real " exception to the Rulers. and force them to acknowledge the over whelming evidence that 911 was an inside Job, perpetrated in order to freely kill and subjugate the poor and dark skinned ""others, which they proclaim to defend. Radical Pragmatist

Trap & Expose The Rabbit!

Maybe its time to pull a rabbit out of the hole they hide in & catch it, decapitate it, drain its blood, skin it, gut it & use its flesh as food to feed the people, could you just image how good the people will feel when they see food on the table & its this rabbit we trapped together & put in a stew pot on a TV Cook Show staring the Rabbit! this goes for all the rabbits & the Rats we need to trap! Set them up!

It is so easy to tarp a rabbit, how you say? they get so careless & its too easy With a wire snare trap i.e. hidden video cam, cell phones, wire taps etc, WHY not? they do it to us & was it not Monica L. that got Prez Clinton with his pants down?
So get to work & you put it around the rabbits hiding hole (OR THE RAT BAIT), the rabbit will do the rest, the more the rabbit struggles to move the more it strangles then chokes to death, Hope you understand this & getting what I’m say here?

So how do we trap this rabbit or rat?
Find its weakness, look at all avenues of escape that it will use & set the traps!
Some of you know how to skin this rabbit but you have to catch it first to cook it!, so look at more inventive ways & don’t just beat pots & pans in protests, dig for the rabbit crap droppings near & around its home & haunts, rabbits leave crap everywhere & do the rats- so follow the crap trail & you will find the mother load in the rabbits best hiding spot in & around is main hole, Happy Hunting & I think we will have that rabbit pie soon!as for the rats? well I'll leave that to your imaginations? lol!

No Elmer Fudd, blasting like Buck-Shot Dick.

Anna D, with a buck knife and snare line.... hiding in the bushes.

You're hot.

One of the good things that

One of the good things that have been the result of the 911 movement is that the left/liberal gatekeepers has been exposed.

Their anti-war, anti-Bush position is bogus, their soft opposition is the best support Bushco can get.

i disagree, it hasnt been

i disagree, it hasnt been worthless or bogus, being anti-war is a worthy cause and i respect them for it. at least they protest SOME of this governments bullshit. the right has yet to make even a peep. the left is not the enemy.

What do you mean? The

What do you mean? The anti-war bunch has been a total failiure. The Bush adm has been able to do what ever they want.

All they have to do is to join the 911 truth movement, that would take away all the justification for war on the Arabs.

It is that easy, because the 911 is a hoax, it is that easy.

Actually Pagan is correct.

Actually Pagan is correct. The "anti-war left" has been dismally ineffective at stopping or slowing down ANYTHING the Bush regime has done since the Afghanistan war began. In fact it seems as if they're about ready to throw in the towel. Thank God for the 9/11 truth movement. We're the only real opposition left.

just imagine what they could

just imagine what they could do if the anti war left wasnt there as at least a weak opposition. you give the left zero credit. if they were not there, and it was nothing but rightwing flag wavers, we would have those KBR prison camps up and running by now.......

I agree with pagan. There is

I agree with pagan.

There is ALWAYS opposition to war, and governments always expect it. An opposition that is just people writing columns and jawing on radio is GREAT for the war mongerers. They could care less.

And with 9/11, you have an issue that would stop the war criminals and profiteers cold. And with all the facts on our side, all it would take is for the left gate-keepers to stop and bring 9/11 truth out into the forefront. It would be over.

How to reach Amy Goodman's radio audience

Last week I called in to WPFW (202 588-0893)in Washington DC. They have open phones for 30 minutes immediately after Goodman's show. I addressed our concerns about Goodman's continuing lack of coverage of 9/11.
See what stations carry her show in your area. Call them as soon as her show is over to voice your concerns. Then you will reach some of her audience before they switch off/ change channel. If the local stations get more calls perhaps her handlers will allow her to do a story.

Amy Goodman and DN! 9-11 Truth Blocking

Good Job Reprehensor!

I am a sponsor of DN! in Reno, NV. I am considering pulling the show off the air because of DN!'s 9-11 Truth black hole. I have repeatedly inquired to DN! about their lack of 9/11 investigation or coverage of 9/11 Truth Movement, and about foundation funding keeping them silent. I have gotten no legitimate response, and I am one of their local programmers. I am truly disappointed in DN! and hope they will see the light before we have another 9/11 marshal law imposing - Iran invading - civil liberty erasing event. Wake up Amy!

Most Sincerely,

instead of a total pull of DN!, why not try this?

Instead of completely axing DN!, why not chop off the last 10 minutes of the show (or the last interview or "big story" segment; there's usually 3-4 per show) and substitute 911 news? You could do this once per week, twice per week, ... 5x times per week.

Since the DN! shows are archived, listeners can go online and get that last segment.

Following my suggestion would allow you to:

1) leverage the DN! popularity (don't assume that whateveryou replace DN! with will have nearly as many listeners)

2) show up DN! and Amy Goodman as the left gatekeepers that they are

3) help to spread 911 Truth without overdoing it; I do NOT assume that everybody wants to hear 911 topics 5 hours per week.



Not only did she ambush Griffin w/ the NAME JUST ONE Structural Engineer demand, she let Chip Berlet conjure a whole nameless publicly available forensic engineering study. I expected as much from Berlet, as he has made a whole career out of smearing people. What else would he do? When all you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

AMY GOODMAN: Name just one. Name just one structural engineering expert who said it is not feasible that the planes caused the towers to go down.
DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: I'm sorry, I don't have that information at my fingertips right at this moment.
AMY GOODMAN: Chip Berlet.
CHIP BERLET: Well, there was an extensive engineering study of the twin towers and what cautioned their collapse which is publicly available and conducted by one of the largest forensic engineering companies in America.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, let me end with Chip Berlet. I want to -- you give your final comment, but start with what did that structural engineering forensic study show?
CHIP BERLET: It showed that two planes hitting those buildings could in fact create a catastrophic collapse situation that would bring down the building and turn the cement and concrete into dust which is what happened when you pancake a building that's that tall.

Of course Berlet can't name this study. If you wrote him like I did to find out what study it was, you got a dismissive mass response with a link to a fucking snopes page a few days later. (pardon my language for mentioning snopes)
I'll write Ms. Goodman post haste to demand a re-schedule of this "debate". Maybe Mr. Berlet can find his "publicly available forensic engineering study" now too.
Oh, and maybe they could actually talk about Griffin's actual approach and reasoning (which in no way hinges on the tower collapses) this time too.

It's going to take a

It's going to take a concerted and ongoing effort to get Ms. Goodman to cover this story again. We have to understand that SHE DOES NOT WANT TO.

The reason that Democracy

The reason that Democracy Now hasn't been covering 9/11 the way you want them to is because the reporters at that show know that there is no story there. You people are at best wrong in your claims.

And I do not like the violent tone of some of the comments in this thread. Are you going to beat up Ms. Goodman to make her see the "truth"? Is that the way to convince anyone of anything? It's certainly not acceptable behavior. But I shouldn't be surprised, since that is a typical tactic of the Right.